how-to block ads
|
 
johnnylakis
join:2002-10-30
Brooklyn, NY
 ·Verizon Online DSL
| Expensive Cable vs. Cheaper DSL/Satellite Lets see cable dsl was 2000-$29.95, 2002-$34.95, 2003-$44.95. These prices take into account the "bundle discount"????
Now Verizon DSL 2000-$49.95, 2002-$39.95, 2003-$34.95, 2004-$29.95. Does anybody else see a pattern here?
Sorry Cable, you just arent going to survive. You cant raise your prices every year and then cap your customers when they use the internet too much. | |
| | davidkar
join:2002-11-03
Rancho Santa Fe, CA | Re: Expensive Cable vs. Cheaper DSL/Satellite Cox have reduced speed service that Cost $25, same as DSL.
This is not a published price, and you need to insist,
See if other cable service have the same. | |
| | | 
What are you talking
@rr.com
| Re: Expensive Cable vs. Cheaper DSL/Satellite DSL is getting cheaper, but look at the pathetic speed and unreliable service youre getting for the money. DSL is down every other week in most areas, especially Verizon. I've had Road Runner for 3 years now without any problems. My speed went from 2.0 mb/s to 3.2 mb/s and it is now at 5.4 mb/s. Verizon runs around 500 kb/s. Can you tell the difference?  | |
| | | | | | | | |
johnnylakis
join:2002-10-30
Brooklyn, NY | Re: Expensive Cable vs. Cheaper DSL/Satellite I really wish anonymous folks wouldn't post. Because he is right, with DSL you do get 500k during peak time, but for the price..... | |
| | | | |
| Forums » comments on review of Optimum Online |
|
Re: Expensive Cable vs. Cheaper DSL/Satellite
Review