Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » comments on review of Cogeco Cable

ISP Review remarks
·About·
RSS forum:
view: topics text 
Post a:
Comments in response to »Review of Cogeco Cable by Shamans by Shamans See Profile

urbanriot

join:2004-10-18
St Catharines, ON

NG support

I don't think the NG support is bad, actually. Most ISP's worldwide have completely dropped NG support and Cogeco is one of the last of the larger ISP's I know of in Canada that still have it. While it's only 3 day, that's not bad at all.
Shamans

join:2007-09-22
·Cogeco Cable

Re: NG support

In my book, a crappy, nearly unusuable service is not much better than no service. Very few people can live with 3-day retention and unreliable completion rates. I have some friends on cogeco who explicitly spent more $ just to get better newsgroup access.

Hosting their own newsgroup server is supposed to save them $ from bandwidth costs.

Jasdeep

@cgocable.net

Cogeco

Cogeco is very unprofessional. Long wait times for support. We did not even reach our bandwith max before we got capped.

Fr0

join:2008-01-16
Chatham, ON
·TekSavvy Solutions..

Nerf Shamans?

Also, my experience with Cogeco has been bad. This was not always so before I moved, I was getting up to 12Mbps at times, and on average I got ~8Mbps, I was very happy! After I moved though, I started getting >1.5Mbps on average, after 4 tech visits they concluded that my address won't get a better signal for ~a year.

I've since moved on.
Forums » comments on review of Cogeco Cable


Friday, 04-Dec 14:21:49 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF