Search:  

 
theme to white backgroundlet page decide theme
HomeFind ServiceReviewsISP NewsFAQsForumsToolsDatabaseAbout 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » comments on review of AT&T U-Verse

ISP Review remarks		·About·
RSS forum:
view: topics text 
Post a:
Comments in response to »Review of AT&T U-Verse by BruceN by BruceN See Profile

StarFish267

join:2005-11-25
Fort Worth, TX

HD over Coax.

I didn't know one could run H.D. thru coax?
The coax input's on most tv's only run S/D.
permalink · 2009-03-01 22:50:14 · Reply to this

djrobx

join:2000-05-31
Valencia, CA

Re: HD over Coax.

Coax inputs on modern HDTVs run ATSC HD. A good number of them will also tune clear QAM from cable systems to get the broadcast networks in HD without a box.
--
AT&T U-Hearse
Your funeral. Delivered.
permalink · 2009-03-02 11:57:42 · Reply to this
TheGhost
Premium
join:2003-01-03
Lake Forest, IL
clubs:
·AT&T U-Verse
·Comcast

Re: HD over Coax.

Depends on the system I guess. Most of them were encrypted here when I tried (Comcast/Chicago area). Comcast was requiring about $14-15/month ($9 for HDTV box and $5-6 for additional outlet).

Cable can be great if you can use a Cable card though, as you don't need the box.
permalink · 2009-04-11 22:47:38 · Reply to this
Forums » comments on review of AT&T U-Verse

Saturday, 05-Dec 21:12:06 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.republican-creole
page compression OFF