Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » comments on review of AT&T U-Verse

ISP Review remarks
·About·
RSS forum:
view: topics text 
Post a:
Comments in response to »Review of AT&T U-Verse by cowboyro by cowboyro See Profile
real_goose

join:2001-04-13
Grosse Pointe, MI
·Evoice
·VoicePulse for Bus..
·AT&T U-Verse
·Comcast
·callwithus

U-verse static address port mapping

Perhaps your device can not map ports to a static address, but it works for me. Several SIP ports are mapped to my Asterisk PBX which is on a static, not DHCP address. The router is a 3800HGV-B Gateway and the computer is 192.168.1.11. I just created the custom mapping and assigned it to the computer - no problems.

cowboyro

join:2000-10-11
Shelton, CT
·AT&T U-Verse
·Comcast
·Optimum Voice

Re: U-verse static address port mapping

said by real_goose See Profile :

Perhaps your device can not map ports to a static address, but it works for me. Several SIP ports are mapped to my Asterisk PBX which is on a static, not DHCP address. The router is a 3800HGV-B Gateway and the computer is 192.168.1.11. I just created the custom mapping and assigned it to the computer - no problems.
I have the same RG, but the issue is that it cannot map ports to a (static) IP that *it cannot see* - if it's not in the list then you can't map - example a server that has 2 IP's in the same subnet (don't ask why, there is a long story behind it), only one of the IP's is visible in the selection list of the firewall. Sure this is fairly uncommon and the design is good for 99.5% of users... and I could probably get around it with some changes in my network.
Forums » comments on review of AT&T U-Verse


Sunday, 29-Nov 10:58:38 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF