<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Sonic.net forum - dslreports.com community</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/sonic</link>
<description>Sonic.net forum current topics</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2007, dslreports.com</copyright>
<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 08:57:01 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 08:57:01 EDT</lastBuildDate>



<item>
<title>Why do I get 2.5/400 when I pay for 5.4/512?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22649768</link>
<description><![CDATA[Yeah, I don't quite understand it. Do the number of people using my network effect this?

I do love Sonic, but wonder why it isn't faster?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22649768</guid>
<pubDate>2009-07-03 13:14:14</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>AT&#x26;amp;T U-Verse VRAD going in--would Sonic&#x27;s service improve?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22643216</link>
<description><![CDATA[I live in a neighborhood where the fastest service Sonic can provide today is 1.5mbps DSL.  I noticed this week though that AT&T is installing one of their U-Verse VRADs at the location where my phone lines come from.  Question is, does the installation of the VRAD help in anyway to improve the situation for Sonic?  I'd like to be able to get faster speeds from Sonic but if the VRAD is just for AT&T's U-Verse services, then it wouldn't help.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22643216</guid>
<pubDate>2009-07-02 02:18:32</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Sonic - Fusion vs. DSL</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22303080</link>
<description><![CDATA[After my last horrible experience with Earthlink support, I'm strongly leaning towards switching DSL providers, most likely to choose between AT&T and Sonic.  Regarding Sonic, I am qualified for Fusion service, but what reason would I want to go that route?  I do currently have a landline and will not be giving it up, so is there any reason I'd want to go Fusion?  I know it has higher potential bandwidth, but at a greater cost.  But what about in terms of reliability, latency, etc?  TIA to all!]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22303080</guid>
<pubDate>2009-04-27 15:09:52</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Fusion ETA for Rockridge (Oakland CO11)</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22617302</link>
<description><![CDATA[Two part question for the Sonic folks:

(1) What is the ETA for Fusion in Rockridge?  I'm on Oakland CO11, a bit on the CO side of the Rockridge BART station.  From previous posts on this forum I might have expected it to be here by now... but today the availability tool sez no dice at this location... which is what's making me Curious.

(2) If I were to establish Sonic DSL service now -- say, Elite or Pro, maybe with the -S option -- then what would the process and cost be to switch over to Fusion as soon as it becomes available here?

Thanks in advance for the info, and thanks much for participating here.

    -- CuriousPerson]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22617302</guid>
<pubDate>2009-06-26 17:58:13</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
