<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>W.O.W. forum - dslreports.com community</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/wow</link>
<description>W.O.W. forum current topics</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2007, dslreports.com</copyright>
<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 22:55:42 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 22:55:42 EDT</lastBuildDate>



<item>
<title>ultra tv</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,26729759</link>
<description><![CDATA[what is ultra tv and when is coming to wow ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,26729759</guid>
<pubDate>2012-01-04 23:00:16</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>No m-card in columbus ohio</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,26848826</link>
<description><![CDATA[I just had an tech come out to my house for an install of a cablecard and internet.  Well, they just left without doing anything because they said they don't carry m-cards in this market area.  What?  I'm in 43147, pickerington, and I was reassured on the phone when I placed my order that they indeed DID have m-cards.  I've been down this road before, so I was sure to tell them I had a ceton infiniTV4, and could only use an M card.  Anyone in this area using one?

Dan, if you are there, could you look into this?  I've seen a couple guys in these forums in the columbus area talk about their mcard install, so this really annoys me.

Thanks.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,26848826</guid>
<pubDate>2012-02-03 09:55:31</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Can I expect more of the same?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,26863788</link>
<description><![CDATA[I just recently switched to WOW (less than 2 months) and have been having a lot of problems.  I was wondering if this was par for the course, or if other people have reliable WOW service, and I'm the odd man out.

Each time one thing gets fixed, another breaks.  It started with a bad cable box (the same day my cable was installed).  Then for the first several weeks I was having periodic problems with Internet connectivity (dropped packets and latency) and had to have the modem replaced.  And since day one I've been having periodic problems with the HD channels cutting out, pausing, and going blocky.  When the tech came out to replace the modem he re-crimped all the cable ends to the cable boxes to help with the Cable problems.  But there were no problems while he was there, so he couldn't do anything further.  Yet the problem persists.  And now one of my cable boxes just shuts off whenever it feels like it, and needs to be unplugged.  Most recently that did not work and the tech support had to reset it remotely, but was not able to send somebody out to replace the piece of junk.  She suggested that I gather up my cable boxes and take them to the WOW office to exchange them for a newer model.

There's nothing like paying $150 a month for cable and then having to watch the Superbowl over the air because your cable keeps cutting out or going blocky.  Aaaarrrrgggghhh.

If I have to gather up my cable boxes and take them back in myself, they can keep them.  I deserve better.  Can it be had from WOW?  At this point I'm just ready to pay more and switch back to Insight.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,26863788</guid>
<pubDate>2012-02-07 10:46:21</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>ARRIS DG950 - bridge / wireless??</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,26474792</link>
<description><![CDATA[Currently my house is without wireless and I'm not hearing the end of it from the nice people who live here  :(

I have a DLink 655 router with the latest firmware(updated today).  I have read reports of other people with the issue I describe below in the Evansville thread with different routers, but thought I would start a new one in hopes someone may see this and be able to help.  Maybe Wow Dan can help... I have the 30/3 speed.

Basically, to get any type of internet connection with the Arris modem/router, wireless needs to be disabled and I need to be plugged in.  If I enable wireless, I get no connection even if plugged in directly.  Am I doing something stupid/wrong? (All i do is check / uncheck the box for enabling wireless in the arris settings page.)

This wouldn't be much of an issue if I could make use of the bridge function and my dlink router, but whenever I set the arris to bridged, it basically doesn't work as the dlink router cannot get the WAN IP address. 

If you have the arris working in bridged mode, can you please post screen shots of your arris router configuration screens or let me know if there is anything I need to change on the dlink?  Is wireless supposed to work on the arris router? I'd rather use my dlink but can live with wireless via the arris.

May need to give tech support a call, but the tech who was here during install couldn't figure it out, and I wasn't sure if they supported 3rd party routers or if the 30/3 package wasn't supposed to have wireless networking or something crazy.

thanks for the help.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,26474792</guid>
<pubDate>2011-10-25 21:02:19</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Windows Media Center and WOW! cable tv questions</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,26861708</link>
<description><![CDATA[I want to use WMC with my Hauppauge  tv tuner. When I go to set up the tv signal, do I select ClearQam? Also, does the guide for WMC work with WOW!'s channel lineup?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,26861708</guid>
<pubDate>2012-02-06 20:03:38</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Flaky service in Columbus Ohio?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,26679199</link>
<description><![CDATA[Internet and TV were out last night around 8 pm, came back up around 1 am but ever since I keep losing connection every 5 minutes...and have to reboot everything.  Anyone else having this problem?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,26679199</guid>
<pubDate>2011-12-20 16:29:06</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Wow Problems</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,26845801</link>
<description><![CDATA[For about 8 months now I have been experiencing periodic phone disconnection while talking on the phone...also sometimes when I dial a number it will go to a dial tone...now my modem just went out and its rebooting...also around 1pm every day my tv gets a red tint and lasts to about 7pm...then clears up on its own...very very annoying...my cable bill went up 5 dollars and the service is turning to crap...anyone else experiencing this problem...

DS]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,26845801</guid>
<pubDate>2012-02-02 15:41:28</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>strange issues after TV upgrade</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,26855810</link>
<description><![CDATA[Thought I'd post here before phoning WOW. 

I upgraded from an old CRT to a Samsung D7000 HDTV (connected via HDMI to a SA8300HDC) on Friday. Everything went smoothly except:

1) After the upgrade, none of the On Demand channels work. The STB seems to stick on the "Accessing VOD Service" page). 

2) In an attempt to fix the problem, I reset (unplugged) the STB - no luck and then re-formatted it - no luck. Now, in addition to the still-present VOD issues, the IPG data is loading very slowly (after about twenty hours since the re-format I have data only through tomorrow). other than those two issues, everything is working just fine :-). 

Have I made the issues clear enough to understand? Does anyone have any thoughts regarding these issues? Thanks so much for your time, everyone. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,26855810</guid>
<pubDate>2012-02-05 07:25:36</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Quick Little Survey</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,26826415</link>
<description><![CDATA[Just a quick survey, please don't elaborate for the sake of this topic, start a new one with specific issues, but the point of this topic is to get feedback to WOW about the arris Docsis 3.0 modem/router combo devices. . 

Just put 
"I am happy with it"
or
"I wish I could just get a plain modem"

I suspect many people don't care for the arris, and maybe seeing enough people post "I wish I could just get a plain modem" will convince WOW! to act in favor of customer service and offer one. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,26826415</guid>
<pubDate>2012-01-28 23:11:31</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Sucks in MI tonight</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,26828800</link>
<description><![CDATA[Or at least in my neighborhood.
I'm getting 5mbit on my 15 service.

Pinging any-fp3-real.wa1.b.yahoo.com [98.139.180.149] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 98.139.180.149: bytes=32 time=1081ms TTL=46
Reply from 98.139.180.149: bytes=32 time=680ms TTL=46
Reply from 98.139.180.149: bytes=32 time=694ms TTL=46
Reply from 98.139.180.149: bytes=32 time=791ms TTL=46
Reply from 98.139.180.149: bytes=32 time=906ms TTL=47
Reply from 98.139.180.149: bytes=32 time=1084ms TTL=46
Reply from 98.139.180.149: bytes=32 time=789ms TTL=46
Reply from 98.139.180.149: bytes=32 time=952ms TTL=46
Reply from 98.139.180.149: bytes=32 time=1274ms TTL=46
Reply from 98.139.180.149: bytes=32 time=1173ms TTL=46
Reply from 98.139.180.149: bytes=32 time=1362ms TTL=47
Reply from 98.139.180.149: bytes=32 time=1401ms TTL=47
Reply from 98.139.180.149: bytes=32 time=1392ms TTL=46
Reply from 98.139.180.149: bytes=32 time=1364ms TTL=47
Reply from 98.139.180.149: bytes=32 time=1011ms TTL=46
Reply from 98.139.180.149: bytes=32 time=1029ms TTL=47

Awesome ping times, huh?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,26828800</guid>
<pubDate>2012-01-29 20:50:34</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>i-Guide</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,26837409</link>
<description><![CDATA[I am wondering why WOW! has not pursued the implementation of an enhanced guide platform for their current set-top distribution. I know that Indiana uses Passport Echo, but that wasn't by WOW!'s choice.

While it hardly can compare to the award-winning Moxi user interface, the i-Guide platform is an effective and user-friendly interface for interacting with the set-top boxes. When I have used it in the past, it was great. It looks nice, and it lays out content effectively. In my opinion, the Moxi UI is better (from what I have seen and read), but i-Guide is deployable on the SciAtl and Cisco platform that WOW! has, and it is a great solution.

I am certain that it would make less customers wary of switching for an inferior DVR. As long as they work out the kinks with the Cisco HD DVRs and the VOD software (which would also be replaced with the i-Guide software, so it would be a problem), it would not be inferior to the general offerings of other companies (except for whole-home, which would still be fulfilled by the Ultra TV platform). The upgrade could be applied to current customer's boxes remotely (I remember that when my relative's Comcast upgraded to i-Guide, it changed overnight to a vastly different UI). Of course, it may work differently on the Cisco platform than on the Motorola. I do recall that Comcast deployed i-Guide on their SciAtl boxes a while ago, so I know that it is possible.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,26837409</guid>
<pubDate>2012-01-31 22:14:44</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>USB on Cable Boxes</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,26814667</link>
<description><![CDATA[I was just wondering...

Why is it that (nearly) every cable box has been manufactured with USB ports on it? I have never once heard of these ports being provisioned for use or even planned to be provisioned. Every manufacturer and provider will basically say these ports are for future use. Generally this would be for a USB keyboard possibly, but I know that the SARA interface does not have any use for QWERTY text input, and i-Guide (the last time I really interacted with it was 2007 at a relative's) had a very limited search function that also was not very useful. (those are the two I have any experience with). Also, I have never seen USB enabled for external HDDs.

Another possible use could be a USB WiFi dongle (I think TiVo uses this) but the other software probably wouldn't really be able to support it (besides, you wouldn't really get good performance with this anyway).

Basically, has anyone seen the USB port provisioned? I feel like it would make a lot more sense not to include them, since they are never used.

Right now, I actually use it to power my USB-powered speakers that I use for the speakers for my computer-monitor-turned-TV, but that is just because the ports are powered, and there is no information shared between it and the box.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,26814667</guid>
<pubDate>2012-01-26 01:16:29</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>WOW &#x26;amp; 2012 IPV6 Day</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,26781522</link>
<description><![CDATA[http://www.worldipv6launch.org/

So, think WOW will participate?  I don't see WOW having procured any IPV6 space in any of their ASs yet though.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,26781522</guid>
<pubDate>2012-01-17 21:08:28</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Packet loss problems (Columbus OH area)</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,26826309</link>
<description><![CDATA[My WoW Cable connection use to run rock solid. Ping tests would always come back with absolute 0 packet loss. However lately I have been noticing a change and it has been becoming more evident when gaming.

I have tried multiple variations (straight to WoW Modem (Arris TM602G), through the router, from a completely separate desktop in my house) and am always having packet loss problems now. Speeds are always good, just seems to be packet problems.

I have checked my modems status page and everything there looks to be in order:
DOWN: 4dBmV   SNR 39dB
UP:     37dBmV

Some WinMtr I have run:

|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                      WinMTR statistics                                   |
|                       Host              -   %  | Sent | Recv | Best | Avrg | Wrst | Last |
|------------------------------------------------|------|------|------|------|------|------|
|                             192.168.1.1 -    0 | 1095 | 1095 |    0 |    0 |    4 |    0 |
|                   No response from host -  100 |  219 |    0 |    0 |    0 |    0 |    0 |
|                             10.35.25.78 -    2 | 1043 | 1030 |    8 |   34 |  997 |   16 |
|                              10.35.24.1 -    3 | 1003 |  980 |    8 |   37 |  994 |   17 |
|                             10.35.11.13 -    3 |  983 |  955 |    8 |   31 |  996 |   17 |
|            216.156.103.29.ptr.us.xo.net -    3 | 1000 |  976 |    9 |   43 |  997 |   61 |
|        ae1d0.mcr2.columbus-oh.us.xo.net -    3 |  995 |  970 |    9 |   34 |  996 |   18 |
|        vb1121.rar3.chicago-il.us.xo.net -    2 | 1031 | 1015 |   19 |   53 | 1014 |   28 |
|             207.88.14.194.ptr.us.xo.net -   30 |  505 |  357 |    0 |   43 | 1001 |   27 |
| xe-0.equinix.chcgil09.us.bb.gin.ntt.net -    3 | 1011 |  990 |   19 |   57 | 1023 |   22 |
|     ae-1.r05.chcgil09.us.bb.gin.ntt.net -    3 | 1007 |  985 |   19 |   50 | 1007 |   29 |
|a23-13-108-137.deploy.akamaitechnologies.com -    2 | 1032 | 1016 |   19 |   49 | 1003 |   25 |
|________________________________________________|______|______|______|______|______|______|

And another:

|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                      WinMTR statistics                                   |
|                       Host              -   %  | Sent | Recv | Best | Avrg | Wrst | Last |
|------------------------------------------------|------|------|------|------|------|------|
|                             192.168.1.1 -    0 |  737 |  737 |    0 |    0 |    0 |    0 |
|                   No response from host -  100 |  148 |    0 |    0 |    0 |    0 |    0 |
|                             10.35.25.78 -    3 |  677 |  662 |    8 |   35 |  697 |   13 |
|                              10.35.24.1 -    3 |  665 |  647 |    8 |   38 |  697 |   11 |
|                             10.35.11.13 -    3 |  681 |  667 |    8 |   38 |  699 |    9 |
|            216.156.103.29.ptr.us.xo.net -    3 |  681 |  667 |    9 |   42 |  697 |   17 |
|        ae1d0.mcr2.columbus-oh.us.xo.net -    4 |  645 |  622 |   68 |   90 |  699 |   75 |
|        vb1121.rar3.chicago-il.us.xo.net -    5 |  633 |  607 |   70 |   89 |  697 |   79 |
|       te-4-1-0.rar3.denver-co.us.xo.net -    5 |  633 |  607 |   70 |   90 |  699 |   78 |
|         te0-13-0-0.rar3.la-ca.us.xo.net -    5 |  629 |  602 |   69 |   89 |  698 |   82 |
|             207.88.14.218.ptr.us.xo.net -   27 |  357 |  262 |    0 |   95 |  699 |   75 |
|             216.156.64.98.ptr.us.xo.net -    6 |  613 |  582 |   79 |   96 |  691 |   86 |
|             te8-5.bbr1.sjc1.bandcon.com -    7 |  585 |  547 |  105 |  123 |  694 |  114 |
|                                 8.5.2.4 -    7 |  593 |  557 |   78 |   93 |  697 |   87 |
|                           69.64.152.189 -    5 |  621 |  592 |   75 |   96 |  698 |   85 |
|                           airliners.net -    6 |  597 |  562 |   75 |   91 |  698 |   84 |
|________________________________________________|______|______|______|______|______|______|

With my limited knowledge, it looks like packet loss starts almost immediately with the 10.35.25.78 ip. Would I be right to assume that this is WoW equipment here in Columbus? If anyone sees something that indicates it is a problem with my computer equipment here in the house please let me know and will pursue it.

WOW_Dan I really appreciate your involvement you seem to take on the board here and was wondering if you would have any insight. If you need additional info from me, do not hesitate to let me know.

Thanks all!]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,26826309</guid>
<pubDate>2012-01-28 22:30:02</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>HBO VOD in HD? When?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,26821984</link>
<description><![CDATA[Hi

I just signed up with WOW this week and so far it's not too bad. I have a Cisco HD DVR and the menu could definitely use some work, but it's a good value for the cost right now.

One thing I noticed is that HBO on Demand isn't in HD? Does anyone know if that's coming anytime soon?

Also, does anyone know how to program a 30 second skip forward into the WOW remote or a Harmony remote? Thanks.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,26821984</guid>
<pubDate>2012-01-27 16:28:56</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Arris Tg862g modem &#x26;amp; Dlink DIR-655 router</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,26826019</link>
<description><![CDATA[I got the 30/3 cable/phone setup in December.  Before that I had 15/1/cable/phone.  I had a Linksys WRT54G router which needed connected to the new Tg862g modem and eventually the tech got both to work together.  He said since it was a g router that my speeds might not be so great.  I use the router for some games that need port forwarding.  I knew I would need an N router.

Today I tried to connect my Dlink DIR-655 router. I called WOW and they told me that I shouldn't be able to use both the modem router and the dlink router.  It's the way the tech set up the old WRT54g router, and with the dlink now not working as it should, I'm glad I can at least use the Arris.   I've read up on what to do on here and other websites.

The Linksys router was working with the RoutedthruNAT on the Arris modem.  I was not able to get the dlink to work with that.  So I changed the Arris to BRIDGE.  Still get No internet available on the dlink.

Should I take off the DHCP on the dlink router?  

We have rebooted the network several times.  Right now the dlink router is disconnected and we're using only the Arris, but that is not going to help me with being able to do what I want with the dlink.

I'll keep experimenting until I get it. But any advise would be appreciated.

Thanks!]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,26826019</guid>
<pubDate>2012-01-28 20:42:55</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Arris DG950A Settings</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,26826638</link>
<description><![CDATA[I am trying to make changes to my cable modem settings to disable the wifi and DHCP server.  I would also like to disable the firewall so I can use my own router to provide security and network services.

I am able to login to the router but any changes I try to make bring up and error screen showing the setting I was trying to input and the old settings. I have pasted the information from the error message below.  The other option I have is to use my own cable modem, but I have heard rumblings that the new DVR needs the ARRIS hardware.  I have also posted my firmware information.

Download Revision:&#9;TS0710131_101911_NA.MODEL_9.DG950.img
Firmware Revision:&#9;7.10.131

{An error has occurred. Your changes may have not been applied. Please refresh this page and verify the changes you expect.}

Name&#9;Value Set&#9;Value Returned&#9;Full Oid
BssActive.12&#9;2&#9;1&#9;1.3.6.1.4.1.4115.1.20.1.1.3.22.1.3.12

Thanks]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,26826638</guid>
<pubDate>2012-01-29 01:17:14</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Question on what is covered?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,26824955</link>
<description><![CDATA[Just received my monthly bill today. In the WOW! News section it has an ad to try and get me to sign up for the $3.00 a month Service Protection Plan.

Well I work in the I.T. industry and one of my jobs is to run cable inside buildings.  So I do all my own jacks and cabling.  That's not the point though.

It lists what the plan covers.  "Repair of replacement of inside wiring, cable and phone outlets, and equipment for the WOW! Network."

Correct me if I'm wrong but since we lease the cable boxes from WOW!, I thought if my cable box does go bad somehow, it's already covered. 

Do I now have to add this $3.00 monthly fee in order to cover something WOW! already owns?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,26824955</guid>
<pubDate>2012-01-28 14:11:54</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Cleveland West Side practically unusable since Jan 17</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,26793640</link>
<description><![CDATA[So, on the 14th, WOW dropped my entire head end and brought us back up in the 50.4 space during change window. Thanks so much for the warning so I could make sure things didn't explode and start paging me at 4AM. (Yes, that is very much sarcasm. So much sarcasm.) And it should go without saying, but will be said anyway, that WOW_Dan is not to blame here. He's just the messenger, this is not his fault, and it's a few morons who shouldn't have enable who have caused this.

So anyway. It is not my modem. It is whatever they screwed up worse on an already dangerously screwed up network. (Hint: if two CCNAs can spot the fail from what I sent them, then the people you hired aren't qualified to configure a Mot SB3100, forget an Arris C5. I can refer you to some competent network architects who know the difference between a VLAN, PAT, and a FlexWAN PA doing MPLS if you want.)

Since the 17th, I have been dropping connection from World of Warcraft, AIM, Yahoo! Messenger, rsync, and ssh seemingly at random as well as losing DNS+DNSSEC - for around 2-5 minutes at a time. Not so mysteriously, HTTP and IMAP are usually unaffected for the duration and work just fine. To reiterate: it's not my modem, period. See, if it was my modem, HTTP would quit working. IMAP would stop. They don't. Backbone issues? Hm, we'll go with how about no, since that would break everything instead of just selected protocols. Certainly, Google Talk wouldn't continue to work, as it has through every outage. And I'd say this is definitely unrelated to the latency issues, since it's a total cessation of passing packets.

Is it specific port filtering or shaping? No, it probably is not, but I can't say for sure since there's a misconfigured PAT in the way that should be exclusive to settop and not DOCSIS segment. What I do know is that all of the affected services suddenly saw a huge latency drop - 60ms to 30ms in Warcraft, for example - which is when the problems started. (And going from 60ms to 30ms is enough of a drop to make me suspicious to begin with. Halving an already low ping overnight is not realistic unless you just started peering with 'em.) MTR's results absolutely do not jive with that, and show jitter has gone absolutely through the roof - 0.2ms or less to a minimum 2ms with spikes NOT reproducible outside of Wide Open West's network. Let me reiterate: results outside of WOW's network involving similar/same hops do NOT show this extent of jitter.

mtr uswest.battle.net&#012;HOST: REMOVED.FOR.SECURITY        Loss%   Snt   Last   Avg  Best  Wrst StDev&#012;  1.|-- THIS is an Arris C-series 100.0    10    0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0&#012;  2.|-- Cisco WS-X6182-2PA         0.0%    10   10.8  11.7   9.7  15.6   1.8&#012;  3.|-- Cisco WS-C3750V2-??TS-E    0.0%    10   14.0  12.2  10.0  14.0   1.0&#012;  4.|-- 216.55.39.53               0.0%    10   21.0  27.6  19.5  62.6  14.8 - "HI WE STILL FAIL AT DNS. -XO Communications."&#012;  5.|-- vb1111.rar3.chicago-il.us  0.0%    10   38.3  34.3  30.9  38.3   2.3&#012;  6.|-- 207.88.14.194.ptr.us.xo.n 20.0%    10   41.4  41.5  40.9  43.8   0.9&#012;  7.|-- 206.111.2.90.ptr.us.xo.ne  0.0%    10   42.4  41.9  40.3  44.4   1.1&#012;  8.|-- cr1.cgcil.ip.att.net       0.0%    10  123.4  93.8  88.4 123.4  10.5&#012;  9.|-- cr1.sffca.ip.att.net       0.0%    10   88.1  89.2  87.2  92.5   1.7&#012; 10.|-- gar4.sc1ca.ip.att.net      0.0%    10   84.7  93.0  84.7 138.4  17.0&#012; 11.|-- 12.122.251.126             0.0%    10  108.0  90.6  85.7 108.0   8.6&#012; 12.|-- mdf2-bi8k-2-eth-2-1.rwc1.  0.0%    10   86.1  87.1  86.1  88.2   0.7&#012; 13.|-- ???                       100.0    10    0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0&#012;
mtr useast.battle.net&#012;HOST: REMOVED.FOR.SECURITY        Loss%   Snt   Last   Avg  Best  Wrst StDev&#012;  1.|-- THIS is an Arris C-series 100.0    10    0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0&#012;  2.|-- Cisco WS-X6182-2PA         0.0%    10   10.8  11.7   9.7  15.6   1.8&#012;  3.|-- Cisco WS-C3750V2-??TS-E    0.0%    10   14.0  12.2  10.0  14.0   1.0&#012;  4.|-- 216.55.39.53               0.0%    10   21.0  27.6  19.5  62.6  14.8&#012;  5.|-- vb1111.rar3.chicago-il.us  0.0%    10   38.3  34.3  30.9  38.3   2.3&#012;  6.|-- 207.88.14.194.ptr.us.xo.n 20.0%    10   41.4  41.5  40.9  43.8   0.9&#012;  7.|-- 206.111.2.90.ptr.us.xo.ne  0.0%    10   42.4  41.9  40.3  44.4   1.1&#012;  8.|-- cr1.cgcil.ip.att.net       0.0%    10  123.4  93.8  88.4 123.4  10.5&#012;  9.|-- cr1.sffca.ip.att.net       0.0%    10   88.1  89.2  87.2  92.5   1.7&#012; 10.|-- gar4.sc1ca.ip.att.net      0.0%    10   84.7  93.0  84.7 138.4  17.0&#012; 11.|-- 12.122.251.126             0.0%    10  108.0  90.6  85.7 108.0   8.6&#012; 12.|-- mdf2-bi8k-2-eth-2-1.rwc1.  0.0%    10   86.1  87.1  86.1  88.2   0.7&#012; 13.|-- ???                       100.0    10    0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0&#012;
mtr 1.ponyfortress2.com (74.91.112.232) - CAUTION: More DNS fail. Use the IP.&#012;HOST: REMOVED.FOR.SECURITY        Loss%   Snt   Last   Avg  Best  Wrst StDev&#012;  1.|-- THIS is an Arris C-series 100.0    10    0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0&#012;  2.|-- Cisco WS-X6182-2PA         0.0%    10   10.8  11.7   9.7  15.6   1.8&#012;  3.|-- Cisco WS-C3750V2-??TS-E    0.0%    10   14.0  12.2  10.0  14.0   1.0&#012;  4.|-- ge-6-20.car1.Cleveland1.L  0.0%    10   13.1  14.6  11.8  35.2   7.2&#012;  5.|-- ae-2-4.bar1.Cleveland1.Le  0.0%    10   14.1  14.6  11.4  28.9   5.2&#012;  6.|-- ae-6-6.ebr1.Washington1.L  0.0%    10   19.1  23.0  19.1  37.2   5.4&#012;  7.|-- ae-81-81.csw3.Washington1  0.0%    10   20.0  22.9  19.4  44.8   7.7&#012;  8.|-- ae-3-80.edge1.Washington4  0.0%    10   20.9  29.3  20.6  82.5  19.5&#012;  9.|-- gblx-level3-40g.Washingto  0.0%    10   21.6  32.3  20.6 112.1  28.5&#012; 10.|-- lag9.csr1.DCA3.gblx.net    0.0%    10   22.1  32.8  19.3 129.4  34.1&#012; 11.|-- po1.ar5.ATL1.gblx.net      0.0%    10   36.7  50.2  34.0 152.1  37.1&#012; 12.|-- Internap-Atlanta.TenGigab  0.0%    10   34.6  44.2  34.6 124.0  28.1&#012; 13.|-- border10.tge4-1-bbnet2.ac  0.0%    10   34.8  43.7  34.8 116.1  25.4&#012; 14.|-- ???                       100.0    10    0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0&#012;Don't know WHAT is up with L3 at InterNap DC, but given testing time, most likely related to a series of ongoing DDoS attacks which has been interfering with the whole peering point. 

These were performed from AS2828 public-facing, and are reasonably similar to results from AS3356. And anyone who doesn't immediately know what these mean has no business with enable on WOW's network.
AS2828 LG traceroute useast.battle.net
   1 65.106.2.113.ptr.us.xo.net (65.106.2.113) 0 msec 4 msec 0 msec&#012;   2 216.156.13.33.ptr.us.xo.net (216.156.13.33) 4 msec 56 msec 0 msec&#012;   3 vb1700.rar3.chicago-il.us.xo.net (216.156.0.161) 8 msec 4 msec 4 msec&#012;   4 207.88.14.194.ptr.us.xo.net (207.88.14.194) 0 msec 4 msec 0 msec&#012;   5 206.111.2.90.ptr.us.xo.net (206.111.2.90) 4 msec 0 msec 76 msec&#012;   6 cr1.cgcil.ip.att.net (12.122.81.94) &#91;MPLS: Label 17051 Exp 0&#93; 28 msec 24 msec 20 msec&#012;   7 cr2.wswdc.ip.att.net (12.122.18.22) &#91;MPLS: Labels 0/18357 Exp 0&#93; 24 msec 28 msec 24 msec&#012;   8 12.122.134.197 20 msec 20 msec 24 msec&#012;   9 12.122.251.78 24 msec 20 msec 20 msec&#012;  10 mdf001c7613r0003-gig-10-1.wdc1.attens.net (63.240.193.10) 20 msec 20 msec&#012;     mdf001c7613r0004-gig-12-1.wdc1.attens.net (63.240.193.14) 36 msec&#012;  11   * * *  &#012;
AS2828 LG traceroute 1.ponyfortress2.com
   1 65.106.2.113.ptr.us.xo.net (65.106.2.113) 0 msec 4 msec 0 msec&#012;   2 ge11-0-4d0.mcr1.chicago-il.us.xo.net (216.156.13.25) 4 msec 4 msec 0 msec&#012;   3 ae1d0.mcr2.chicago-il.us.xo.net (216.156.1.82) &#91;MPLS: Label 426864 Exp 0&#93; 4 msec 0 msec 4 msec&#012;   4 vb1701.rar3.washington-dc.us.xo.net (216.156.0.165) 20 msec 24 msec 24 msec&#012;   5 te4-0-0.cvr1.atlanta6-ga.us.xo.net (207.88.14.114) 32 msec 80 msec 32 msec&#012;   6 207.88.188.18.ptr.us.xo.net (207.88.188.18) 32 msec 32 msec 32 msec&#012;   7 border10.tge3-1-bbnet1.acs.pnap.net (64.94.0.12) 32 msec 32 msec 28 msec&#012;   8   * * *  &#012;
AS3356 LG traceroute useast.battle.net
 1 ae-2-4.bar1.Cleveland1.Level3.net (4.69.132.194) 0 msec 0 msec 0 msec&#012;  2 ae-6-6.ebr1.Washington1.Level3.net (4.69.136.190) 24 msec 8 msec 8 msec&#012;  3 ae-8-8.ebr1.Washington12.Level3.net (4.69.143.218) 8 msec 20 msec 8 msec&#012;  4 ae-103-3503.edge1.Washington12.Level3.net (4.69.158.25) 8 msec 8 msec&#012;    ae-101-3501.edge1.Washington12.Level3.net (4.69.158.17) 8 msec&#012;  5 att-level3-te.washingtondc12.Level3.net (4.68.62.30) 8 msec 48 msec 8 msec&#012;  6 cr2.wswdc.ip.att.net (12.122.84.82) &#91;AS7018 {ATT-INTERNET4}&#93; 16 msec 16 msec&#012;    cr1.wswdc.ip.att.net (12.122.88.174) &#91;AS7018 {ATT-INTERNET4}&#93; 12 msec&#012;  7 12.122.135.9 &#91;AS7018 {ATT-INTERNET4}&#93; 8 msec&#012;    12.122.134.197 &#91;AS7018 {ATT-INTERNET4}&#93; 12 msec 8 msec&#012;  8 12.122.251.82 &#91;AS7018 {ATT-INTERNET4}&#93; 12 msec&#012;    12.122.251.78 &#91;AS7018 {ATT-INTERNET4}&#93; 12 msec 8 msec&#012;  9 mdf001c7613r0004-gig-12-1.wdc1.attens.net (63.240.193.14) &#91;AS17231 {ATT-CERFNET-BLOCK}&#93; 12 msec&#012;    mdf001c7613r0003-gig-10-1.wdc1.attens.net (63.240.193.10) &#91;AS17231 {ATT-CERFNET-BLOCK}&#93; 20 msec 20 msec&#012;
AS3356 LG traceroute 1.ponyfortress2.com (74.91.112.232)
 1 ae-2-4.bar1.Cleveland1.Level3.net (4.69.132.194) 0 msec 0 msec 0 msec&#012;  2 ae-6-6.ebr1.Washington1.Level3.net (4.69.136.190) 8 msec 8 msec 8 msec&#012;  3 ae-61-61.csw1.Washington1.Level3.net (4.69.134.130) 8 msec&#012;    ae-91-91.csw4.Washington1.Level3.net (4.69.134.142) 8 msec&#012;    ae-71-71.csw2.Washington1.Level3.net (4.69.134.134) 8 msec&#012;  4 ae-1-60.edge1.Washington4.Level3.net (4.69.149.15) 8 msec 8 msec&#012;    ae-4-90.edge1.Washington4.Level3.net (4.69.149.207) 8 msec&#012;  5 gblx-level3-40g.WashingtonDC4.Level3.net (4.68.63.170) 12 msec 8 msec 8 msec&#012;  6 lag9.csr2.DCA3.gblx.net (67.16.146.29) &#91;AS3549 {GBLX}&#93; 60 msec 32 msec&#012;    lag9.csr1.DCA3.gblx.net (67.16.146.25) &#91;AS3549 {GBLX}&#93; 212 msec&#012;  7 po1.ar5.ATL1.gblx.net (67.17.105.214) &#91;AS3549 {GBLX}&#93; 1228 msec 204 msec 204 msec&#012;  8 Internap-Atlanta.TenGigabitEthernet3-4.ar5.ATL1.gblx.net (207.218.80.218) &#91;AS3549 {GBLX}&#93; 200 msec 68 msec 216 msec&#012;  9 border10.tge4-1-bbnet2.acs.pnap.net (64.94.0.76) &#91;AS14745 {INTERNAP-BLOCK-4}&#93; 204 msec&#012;    border10.tge3-1-bbnet1.acs.pnap.net (64.94.0.12) &#91;AS14745 {INTERNAP-BLOCK-4}&#93; 216 msec&#012;    border10.tge4-1-bbnet2.acs.pnap.net (64.94.0.76) &#91;AS14745 {INTERNAP-BLOCK-4}&#93; 212 msec&#012; 10  *  *  *&#012;
Discount GBLX hops; ATLGA was under significant DDoS attack at the time of sampling with insufficient mitigation. Go go GBLX. WHY it's going Level3 from WOW's network, I just don't know. XO has a massive peering connection at Internap Atlanta - I can't see any logical reason for going AS3356 to AS3549 to AS14745 when you can quite literally go AS2828->AS14745 direct, but maybe BGP sees something I don't.

But do you know how else I know it's NOT my modem? Because rebooting my modem doesn't fix it. In fact, if I just let it sit, it starts working again. This seems to now happen any time I go over 50-100PPS sustained. Oh, and completely at random. In fact, I can actually look at graphs and see that any time I exceed 100PPS for more than a few minutes, regardless of bandwidth utilization, an upstream hop starts stalling out frequently and will randomly just quit passing packets. I know it's upstream, because the IPv4 gateway is still reachable, still reports up, still reports zero packet loss. Latency spikes and disconnects are confirmed by over 30 other people (including 4 known to be routed with XO and 7 via L3) to be just me. I'm the only one on WOW.

I also know it's not my modem because I'm also seeing random latency spikes regardless of bandwidth and PPS rates. These spikes are not reflected at the IPv4 gateway heartbeat either. Signal levels? Nope. Downstream -7.6dBmV @ 36.7dB, Upstream ranging 38-47.4dBmV based on weather. (Not worth a truck roll - it's weather related. Always has been, always will be.) Speedtest is showing strange behavior - down at 16.06Mb/s (up from 15) and upload has dropped to absolutely not possible.

Here's some ping and smoke tests to one of those two IPs that WOW isn't actively blocking from performing quality tests, shall we?
Ping test which shows packet loss: https://secure.dslreports.com/pingtest/97c8c46289b6/2869210
SmokeTest (ongoing) to 144.1: https://secure.dslreports.com/r3/smokeping.cgi?target=network.454a5fcc6274241535f75a2e9502e68a
SmokeTest (ongoing) to 144.10: https://secure.dslreports.com/r3/smokeping.cgi?target=network.020781e2f554968af7e57610aa37e2a2
By the way, initial results are pretty embarrassing - 50ms+ average from all points, significant packet loss and extreme jitter over the past 24 hours.

I honestly don't care what it is. I don't care about excuses or proclamations of "innocence" or "investigating further." At this point, I apparently know the network better than the people supposedly responsible for it. There is no innocence here - there is deliberate blocking of ICMP traffic and there is clear evidence of a specific issue. There is no investigating further - there is a specific problem, most likely with the WS-C3750V2 or immediate next hop, which requires work be performed to at least the minimum required by an entry level position in IT which includes opening a TAC case. Frankly, I am beyond tired of this at this point. Yes, AT&T ENS blew up their network last night - I am painfully well aware. This is not AT&T ENS. This is not XO. This is not Level3. 

Hell, for all I know, XO and Level3 are conspiring to slap you around for passing your 10net traffic right out the public facing interface and chewing their CPU cycles filtering it. And YES. YOU ARE DOING IT AND IT IS BOTH WRONG AND STUPID. Your 10net is COMPLETELY wrong. Hell, maybe someone should also tell LW463 to not let his underlings assume people are idiots. Especially people who have worked on geographically diverse DOCSIS systems many times WOW's size before MPLS existed. Or maybe just start by getting rid of the guy who thinks it's "D slam" and lists "Frontpage" as a PROGRAMMING LANGUAGE. Here's a hint: it's an abbreviation for Digital Subscriber Line Access Multiplexer and Copper Mountain was only deployed for very small scale G.991 SDSL and IDSL by minor CLECs; I had some going to Copre DSUs passing V.35. Baby Bells primarily ran Redbacks in mixed-mode with Radius auth'd PPPoA for interLATA and resale and PPPoE for local IP term. I think there might have been a few Nortel NMS deploys in GTE territory since they favored DMS, but don't hold me to it. Huh, turns out old rootwyrm might just have a bit of experience in the regulated communications space, huh? (Oh, and I'm pretty sure you got some 24 and a 64 networks I used to manage DNS for.)

Either way, I am beyond tired of this. And I don't mean metaphorically. I mean physically. You see, every time this happens, and I'm asleep? I GET WOKEN UP BY SERVICE ALARMS. I already had to turn off every single live/dead ping alarm because of the ICMP blocking, which is just childish on their part at best, and if being implemented via BOOTP on modem, hysterically incompetent in light of the other much more significant problems present in the config. Blah blah, home internet, yeahNO. I get woken up by alarms because the automated system I had to write to power cycle the modem via AC outlet control gets tripped, sees the heartbeat gateway is just fine, and says it's external. Meantime, the opposite end of rsync waits 120 seconds, tests remote host, finds it completely unreachable, and fires off an alarm because it thinks the host has died. My NAS sync AND backups just flat out break, and I've been forced to totally disable it, because the outages are just that right length that it exceeds retry count and breaks the mirror. Oh, and then there's the time I've spent troubleshooting a problem which is rather explicitly and clearly WOW's network and responsibility to detect and fix. Did I mention it's happening outside of normal change window too? Yeah. That's another indicator that something's rotten in Denmark, by the by.

So yes, at this point, I would say I am justifiably furious. Especially since I've had to be the one to do all the work, the problems I have found are not only beyond amateurish in nature AND quality of work, but also extremely hazardous and just flat out stupid. I mean seriously, how can this be going on and WOW have absolutely NO awareness of things? How is it DOCSIS 3 managed to get rolled out on this, forget DVRs even working HALF the time? (And that's the LEAST of the potential woes.) Did your network engineers negotiate for "no on call ever"? Just completely ignore their pagers and cell phones after 4:30PM? Do they have no concept of end-to-end heartbeat? Do they just make absolutely no effort whatsoever to monitor service quality or even baseline function? Pretend that 15 minute MRTG sampling is adequate monitoring? I cannot find any rational or logical explanation for why this has been going on for several days with WOW apparently blissfully unaware the whole time. I can tell you for fact that when I had root on the equipment in that very same building - and yes, I mean that EXACT SAME HEADEND right down to the dishes - I got paged the very SECOND anything went down for ANY reason. Frankly, I don't think it's in the slightest unreasonable to expect the same level of professionalism and service from WOW's staff that most IT professionals consider standard.

Like I said; I don't care what the exact problem is, and I'm tired of excuses from people who apparently decided padding their resume was a good idea. Again; no offense intended directly or indirectly, Dan. Not saying you're guilty of it - you definitely are not. I know you're just the messenger here, and I really do appreciate the help. Not your fault OR responsibility that they're putting you in this position, and I don't blame you. But I am tired of these morons putting you in this position with their technical incompetence.

All I want to know at this point is 1) WHEN is this all going to be fixed? 2) WHAT procedural steps will WOW be taking to ensure this does not ever happen again?
]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,26793640</guid>
<pubDate>2012-01-20 16:23:36</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>&#x26;amp;quot;Explorer Settop Not Authorized&#x26;amp;quot; message</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,26804784</link>
<description><![CDATA[I rearranged some wiring in my basement to connect an HDHomeRun Prime and in doing so the connection to my SA 8300HD cable box wasn't getting a good enough signal to access any cable channels (too many splits).  I was, however, able to view recordings and was using the Prime for new content.

After about 2 weeks, I'm now getting this unauthorized message.

I reconnected the cable to get a good connection (verified by connecting directly to TV), but the cable box is still giving me the error message.

I'm guessing that I need to call in and have it provisioned again.

Does anyone know if I'll still be able to access the recordings on the cable box, if it has to be re-provisioned?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,26804784</guid>
<pubDate>2012-01-23 18:46:12</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>

