  MarkyD Premium join:2002-08-20 Oklahoma City, OK clubs: | bandwidth I'd be amazed to see AT&T/VZ offer speeds of even 10mbps on their 4g networks. -- MCSE, ACSA, and a lot more | |
|
 |  EPS
join:2008-02-13 Hingham, MA
| Re: bandwidth It depends on the capacity of the networks- if offering 100Mbps speeds means the network quality will degenerate into nothing with relatively small numbers of users per tower, then I'd prefer T/VZW to offer lower speeds for a better overall experience. But if the system can provide it, and there are no technical barriers, why not offer 100Mbps speeds? Of course they won't be cheap... (Then again, cellular carriers up to this point have not really had "speed tiers", the closest thing being whether you wanted 2G or 3G data) | |
|
 |  |  |
 |  |  |  EPS
join:2008-02-13 Hingham, MA
| Re: bandwidth Haha, true enough... but any real 100mbps connection would essentially kill DSL and cable's high end customers- hell, it'd be a threat to FiOS (which doesn't have 100mbps publicly available but likely will in a few years) if the prices are right.
Though, if LTE wireless offered enough speed, could at&t theoretically offer U-Verse IPTV over it, and wipe out their physical plant entirely? | |
|
  DaMaGeINC The Lan Man Premium join:2002-06-08 Greenville, SC clubs: | wow. nice. It amazes me how this country is soo behind. | |
|
 |   HiVolt Premium join:2000-12-28 Toronto, ON clubs:
·TekSavvy Solutions..
·Bell Sympatico
| Re: wow. nice. said by DaMaGeINC :It amazes me how this country is soo behind. Heh, look north of the border if you wanna laugh even more.  -- ,,!,,('-'),,!,, | |
|
 |  |  |
 |  |  |
 |  |  |   Calcium
@com.au | Re: wow. nice.
Australia has that now 14.4mbps capacity towers, handsets are only at 7mbps | |
|
 |  |  |
 |   L337 Premium join:2005-03-10 Chicago, IL | Eh... you have no idea =D We are consider pretty much screw. | |
|
  ninjatutle Premium
join:2006-01-02 San Ramon, CA | Don't make it affordable
Make it unlimited and out of the price range for the average joe. I don't want mofo thieves ruining 4G like they did with 3G. | |
|
 |   MarkyD Premium join:2002-08-20 Oklahoma City, OK clubs:
·Cox HSI
| Re: Don't make it affordable said by ninjatutle :Make it unlimited and out of the price range for the average joe. I don't want mofo thieves ruining 4G like they did with 3G. Are you retarded? You are what is wrong with America today. You want it to be priced out of the average Joe's budget to...deter pirates? Give me a fucking break. | |
|
 |  |   ninjatutle Premium
join:2006-01-02 San Ramon, CA | Re: Don't make it affordable So I take it you don't agree. Well too bad  | |
|
  Hazy Arc
join:2006-04-10 Greenwood, SC | Yeah...Right No way the backhauls from the cell towers can handle 100Mbps per user. | |
|
 |  ydoucare
join:2003-03-12 Rensselaer, IN
·Embarq
·Millenicom
·Sprint Mobile Broa..
| Re: Yeah...Right said by Hazy Arc :No way the backhauls from the cell towers can handle 100Mbps per user. Exactly. They'd have to start piping in some faster backhaul connections if we're ever going to get 10 Mb/s, much less 100. As it stands, most towers are fed only 1 or 2 T1's. | |
|
 |  |  patcat88
join:2002-04-05 Jamaica, NY | Re: Yeah...Right Its time to increase the number of T1s. At $500 a mo each, you need 20 of them for a T3 to become cheaper assuming a T3 is $10K a month. | |
|
  meh37
@verizon.net | I'm all for "pushing the envelope", ... but should I worry/complain about not being able to get 100mbps over wireless any time soon?  | |
|
 |  ydoucare
join:2003-03-12 Rensselaer, IN | Re: I'm all for "pushing the envelope", ... You won't get 100 Mb/s wireless for a LONG time, so there's no point in even giving it a thought at this point in time. | |
|
 Lazlow
join:2006-08-07 Saint Louis, MO | Just shows how far the US is behind. Japan and Korea will have 100Mbps wireless before the US has 100Mbps wired available (at a reasonable price and in most areas). Its just sad how far we have fallen. | |
|
 |  |
 decifal
join:2007-03-10 Bon Aqua, TN
| we just need something that works To heck with 100mbps, we just need 6mbps with low latency at affordable prices.. if we are going to cap it, well do what comcast is doing and go with a usable 250 gig cap... Least you can use your netflix or other streaming services without blowing your monthly wad.. | |
|
  Dogfather Premium join:2007-12-26 Laguna Hills, CA 1 edit | There's no point I had 30Mb and later 50Mb service from Verizon and very rarely found any server that could come remotely close to serving those speeds. In a portable device it's even more pointless. | |
|
 |  EPS
join:2008-02-13 Hingham, MA
| Re: There's no point That's true. Really, the biggest benefit I think there is to a high speed connection is for sharing it- we have up to five people on our 20/5 FiOS connection at times. However, with a wireless connection, usually you're the only one on the specific connection. | |
|
 |   DustySilicon
join:2002-10-06 Oak Grove, MO | "Tests show LTE can produce speeds up to 186 Mbps," said GSMA director Dan Warren. Tests and real are two different worlds. Don't get excited over this marketing gibberish. | |
|
 |  Lazlow
join:2006-08-07 Saint Louis, MO | I think you mean "any one server". Personally I use multiple servers at the same time. Sometimes it is to accomplish one task but usually there are several independent tasks running at once. I do not use p2p. | |
|
 |  |  |
 cchhat01 The Guru
join:2001-05-01 Elmhurst, NY | Wireless Carriers in US are such Jerks! I've said what I wanted to... please, don't let me stop this ranting...
Chirag -- Chirag's Website | |
|
  sibisties
join:2002-10-19 Boisbriand, QC | Yeah, right... And WiMax was also supposed to deliver 70Mbps over a 30 miles radius four years ago...
I'll believe that thing when I'll see it deployed and working in a REAL environment. | |
|
 |  patcat88
join:2002-04-05 Jamaica, NY | Re: Yeah, right... 70Mbps per tower on multiple separate channel blocks. 30 miles at .5 mbps.
There you have it. | |
|
 ITALIAN926
join:2003-08-16 Stratford, CT
| crzy How much speed do all you idiots need LOL
BBR Geek #1 , Yes ! I can download Ice Ice Baby in 3 seconds !
BBR Geek #2 , Ha ! Got ya beat ! Ive done it in 1 second !
You know, most of you wont be happy until your processors cant keep up with the POTENTIAL speeds of your internet connection. Every single day, I install 20/5 service to people and all I can think is how overkill this is to 99% of the customers. | |
|
 |  patcat88
join:2002-04-05 Jamaica, NY | Re: crzy Overkill means there is slack in the system for hogs  | |
|
  Big Bad Dog
@qwest.net
| Bits per hertz 4G is 5 bits per hertz. What you can send in a theoretical burst to one user in a sector of a cell site devoting all available hertz and assuming very small cell sites is not how many megabytes you can offer each of your customers a month given economics driven by Shannon's law.
How many megabytes will the average user get in a month? That's the important question. What you can burst at is not what you can stream at.
That journalists swallow this rubbish is sad. | |
|
 |  patcat88
join:2002-04-05 Jamaica, NY
| Re: Bits per hertz Yeah, 100mbps. Your running out of SNR and frequency.
Time to start removing under 5GHZ satellite users and start killing off duplicate radar bands/decrease allocation, and force all radionavigation to digital and more efficient systems than analog.
Also time to kill all the analog business radios, most if not all of which can be replaced with Nextel or a cellphone. | |
|
  mc1lean
join:2007-11-18 Lincolnton, NC | re:100 mpb wireless ??? Whats a mb? I'd be happy if Sprint could keep mt at 1mb down and get me over 100k up w/o dropping me several times a day (not to mention threatening me with a cap). | |
|
 |
|
 |