 Dampier Phillip M Dampier
join:2003-03-23 Rochester, NY | No Caps or Aggravation! Wow... it's higher than TW pricing, but no caps and no aggravation! | |
|
 |  me1212
join:2008-11-20 Pleasant Hill, MO | Re: No Caps or Aggravation! I may cost more, but look how much more you are getting. If I could I would get it. Just think how many hulu/netflix vids you could do at one time.................  | |
|
 |  |  |
 |   RARPSL
join:1999-12-08 Suffern, NY
| said by Dampier :Wow... it's higher than TW pricing, but no caps and no aggravation! Since TW tiers are much lower speeds than CV but cost the same, CV is a better deal even if you ignore TW's Caps/etc. | |
|
 |  |
 |  |   Eat Me
join:2002-09-25 Sussex, NJ | Re: No Caps or Aggravation! Keep dreaming. 30M for $50? Not in the US, not this year at least. | |
|
  baineschile 2600 Premium join:2008-05-10 Sterling Heights, MI | Nice Good strides for Copper. I wonder how much faster the fiber/coax boys can get? | |
|
 |   hayabusa3303 Over 200 mph Premium join:2005-06-29 clubs: | Re: Nice there is alot of room left in that copper still. | |
|
  hayabusa3303 Over 200 mph Premium join:2005-06-29 clubs: | nice If Tw could watch these guys. They would LEARN something. | |
|
 |  squison
join:2001-07-07 Decatur, GA | Re: nice The difference is CV has strong competition, while TW, in most cases, doesn't. | |
|
 |  |
 |  |   hayabusa3303 Over 200 mph Premium join:2005-06-29 clubs: | Re: nice the problem is now we have to get used to it. | |
|
 margaf77
join:2000-12-22 Bayonne, NJ | Curious about their TOS on upstream I know that Cv can be tough on heavy uploading in the past, I wonder if this will change with 15Mbps up. | |
|
 |  |
 |  |   jadebangle Premium join:2007-05-22 Olathe, KS
·SureWest Internet
·AT&T Yahoo
·Comcast
| Re: Curious about their TOS on upstream said by MxxCon :they stopped being "tough" on heavy uploaders over 2 years ago. since then they stopped capping people. so you can upload full throttle as much as you want and they won't say a thing. True but most ppl don't do that due to their laziness... | |
|
  RDF
@rr.com | I wish This Company is in MA Oh man with the caps coming out and not competition. I wish CV was in MA since TWC really sucks and have a monopoly in all 10031. | |
|
  qx
@comcast.net
| This is exactly what Time Warner should do It makes SO MUCH SENSE from a business point of view to simply make your customers happy. People will PAY MONEY for a quality service. They will not pay if it sucks. So provide a great service like this and then charge them for it... It's that simple! Time Warner cable could learn A LOT from this business model. Easy, Easy, Easy! | |
|
  imtim83 You All Deserve The Economic Meltdown Premium join:2001-06-03 Kenner, LA | Go OOL! I love OOL! | |
|
 |  |
 |  |  |
 |  |  |   Simba7
join:2003-03-24 Billings, MT | Re: Go OOL! I operate a small data center out of my house and this would be freakin' awesome!
I hope Bresnan looks into this. | |
|
 |  |  jjeffeory
join:2002-12-04 USA
| While $1,000 a month is really, really steep. It's not true that a residential would find a use for 1GBPS. Come one, You could watch 3 streams of HD video in three different room, and record 2 HD shows all at the same time! I could think of many more. | |
|
 |  |  |  |
 |  |  |  |  jjeffeory
join:2002-12-04 USA
| Re: Go OOL! Yea, MPEG-2 is really wasteful. I have U-Verse in SoCal. It's basically a 24mbps connection with 6 mbps dedicated to video. I believe that U-Verse uses an mpeg-4 codec for their video. Man are their problems with viewing three HD programs at the same time with their service. It kind of sucks. The picture quality for their HD material is really, really soft and fuzzy too. It would be great to have at least a 100mbps speed connection for all that in addition to the internet, etc... We'll get there eventually... | |
|
 |  |  |  bilbusb
join:2003-04-10 Tucker, GA
·Service Electric B..
| said by jjeffeory :While $1,000 a month is really, really steep. It's not true that a residential would find a use for 1GBPS. Come one, You could watch 3 streams of HD video in three different room, and record 2 HD shows all at the same time! I could think of many more. Since a 1gb buisness internet connection would run you more then 75k a month i would say no. | |
|
 |   Pizz Hi
join:2000-10-27 Astoria, NY
·Verizon Online DSL
·RoadRunner Cable
| said by imtim83 :I love OOL! Out of every single MSO in this country, they get it. Sure the critics will say: 'Their foot-print is minimal, sure they have less subs then majority of the MSO's in this country'. But they allow growth, and they allow what their CUSTOMERS need. Do they raise pricing? SURE, because they expand with GROWTH. They're the leaders of this field, and will continue to be the leaders of this field, because as much as people want to flame Dolan, he allows the engineers to fucking be engineers.
Besides the pricing point, you see currently, it'll adjust. They're seeing what Fios will offer, and I'm god damn happy they're bringing the fight to them. No MSO, or operator, has this type of competition in their areas, as Cablevision. They have to be leaders, not the typical Time Warner Cable, slack-jaw dependents.
: | |
|
 vinnie97
join:2003-12-05 Mesquite, TX | heh @ the contrast utter hilarity at the contrasting of TWC with Cablevision. | |
|
 |   RR User
@rr.com
| Re: heh @ the contrast LOL, I can't believe it myself. Cablevision gives more and more and more, while TW takes away more and more.
Still, I think TW could "buy out" Cablevision, as it always seems to be an ongoing rumor, since TW is bursting at the seams with CASH since they are so greedy. I bet that would be a doomsday scenario for CV customers with the metered usage and all. However, I'd be more willing to bet even if TW offered CV a lot of money for a buyout (assuming for a nanosecond TW isn't cheap), CV would say "eww, no thanks TW". LOL | |
|
 LJGoose
join:2008-08-31 Middle Island, NY
·Optimum Online
| Boost Subscriber I know alot of people who are having issues with Cablevision right now but as for me I have not had a single issue. I have been a boost subscriber for over a year now and end up with speeds of 33-35/5 when I am only supposed to get 30 down. Great company. Tech support is not the greatest but thats what you have BBR for! | |
|
 |   RARPSL
join:1999-12-08 Suffern, NY
| Re: Boost Subscriber said by LJGoose :I know alot of people who are having issues with Cablevision right now but as for me I have not had a single issue. I have been a boost subscriber for over a year now and end up with speeds of 33-35/5 when I am only supposed to get 30 down. Download on Boost has been uncapped for a while. While they only claim the speed as 30Mbs, the tier (and modem) is uncapped so it will deliver as much of the 38Mbs theoretical maximum as the congestion the Channel your Node has assigned to you will allow. Thus your getting that 30-35 at times.
BTW: The upload is capped at 5.5Mbs so you can get 5+Mbs at times. | |
|
 |
  viperpa33s Why Me? Premium join:2002-12-20 Bradenton, FL
·Bright House
1 edit | Surprises me I think it's great that this company is doing this because they seem to have a vision concerning the future of the internet. Not like TWC which has no vision except taking 2 steps backwards.
With TWC testing caps, you have some people coming out and saying that ISP's should have bandwidth caps and that what they offer is more than enough. What surprises me though is I don't hear those same people complaining that Cablevision should have caps or what Cablevision is offering is to much. -- "I predict future happiness for Americans if they can prevent the government from wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of taking care of them" Thomas Jefferson | |
|
 robl27 Premium join:2008-07-16 Mary Esther, FL | sigh... can cablevision please buy out cox? i want speeds! | |
|
  Agent Smith
join:2008-07-07 New York 3 edits | LOls Fiber can go over 1Gbps and up to 100Gbps im guessing.
But with thoes cables speeds i can imagine network slowdowns. | |
|
 |   Eat Me
join:2002-09-25 Sussex, NJ | Re: LOls Verizon's GPON maxes out at 2.4GBps and that's shared among 32 users, sorry. | |
|
 |  |  |
 |  |  ITALIAN926
join:2003-08-16 Stratford, CT | Yea, ummm, right now. | |
|
 |  |
  Bluegrassman
join:2008-05-29 Paducah, KY | Cablevision: please buy our market Wow! Comcast has my market up for sale....I wish Cablevision would buy us.  | |
|
 tmc8080
join:2004-04-24 Floral Park, NY
| Fee upgrade? A free upgrade to 20/5 for the $29.95 ($49.95 unbundled) tier would certainly get Verizon's attention!
I can't see why a 100(1)/15 tier is very low on the upload...esp. at that price. It should be more symmetrical of at least 30mbit upload (There's a reason why docsis 3 is a new spec.. it can upload faster than docis 2.0 speeds)! FIOS does 50/20 so a higher price without a competitive upstream.. won't get many to bite.
Certainly residential & business want higher speeds.. but the pricing will be sky high for the time being while cablevision figures out what is fair compared with Verizon's offerings. There aren't enough docsis 3 customers around to report how well the service holds up during peak load times or severe weather.. or other network congestion & speed tests around the world. | |
|
  Titus Pullo I came, I saw, I slept
join:2004-06-26 | Mine is bigger is all cable companies know. We're faster and you're going to pay. And people do. And so the beat goes on . . . -- | |
|
 paradox7heor
join:2009-04-11 Center Moriches, NY
| OO BOOST I have just received it, well.. i had a prob with TV, and the tech announced it, and i was like sure... sign me up, he said it takes 3 days to activate.. this to me was a bit weierd, any booster's get anything dif? today's the day and yea.. nothing dif really | |
|
 |  The2ndclory
join:2004-07-13 Bridgeport, CT | Re: OO BOOST BOOST shouldn't take more than 4hrs to take effect. The only thing you may have to do is power cycle your modem. -- Haik who?? | |
|
 jimboe
join:2000-08-14 New York | 101
From whence did this value come? | |
|
 |
|
 |