 CheesePremium join:2003-10-26 Naples, FL kudos:1 | Sooooooooooooo If I only have internet and phone, my rental fee for the EMTA is going up 2 bucks? I don't see mention of internet price going up? | |
|
 |  Morac join:2001-08-30 Riverside, NJ kudos:1 Reviews:
·Comcast
| Re: Sooooooooooooo The modem rental fee used to be $5 when Internet service was first introduced. That's why I bought my own modem. A few years later (about 6 or 7 years ago), they raised the Internet rates from $39.99 to $42.99, but lowered the rental fee to $3. So people renting were hit with a $1 hike, while people who bought their modem, like me, were hit with a $3 rate hike.
Now that I'm forced to rent their eMTA, since you can't buy one, they're going to stick it to me again. --
The Comcast Disney Avatar has been retired. | |
|
 |  |  CheesePremium join:2003-10-26 Naples, FL kudos:1 | Re: Sooooooooooooo said by Morac:The modem rental fee used to be $5 when Internet service was first introduced. That's why I bought my own modem. A few years later (about 6 or 7 years ago), they raised the Internet rates from $39.99 to $42.99, but lowered the rental fee to $3. So people renting were hit with a $1 hike, while people who bought their modem, like me, were hit with a $3 rate hike. Now that I'm forced to rent their eMTA, since you can't buy one, they're going to stick it to me again. I have the eMTA and a RCA modem!  | |
|
 |  |  |  CorydonCultivant son jardinPremium join:2008-02-18 Denver, CO | Re: Sooooooooooooo My understanding is that if you have both (and they both come from Comcast) they still just charge you one fee. | |
|
 |  |  |
 |  | | said by Cheese:If I only have internet and phone, my rental fee for the EMTA is going up 2 bucks? I don't see mention of internet price going up? No increase for the internet. Just the eMTA. | |
|
 |  |

approval from: MTBikerChris 
| All Aboard!!! The Comcast bashing train is leaving the station. Hurry up and get on!!! | |
|
 |  |
 |  |  jester121Premium join:2003-08-09 Lake Zurich, IL | Re: All Aboard!!! You've only been around a month, trust me you'll get used to it. Most of us don't even raise our eyebrows any more. | |
|
 |  |  |  |
 |  |  |  |  |
 |  |  |  |  |  |
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |
 |  |  fiberguyMy views are my own.Premium join:2005-05-20 kudos:3 | "why don't you like fun?" | |
|
 |  NOVA_GuyObamaCare Kills AmericansPremium join:2002-03-05 | Re: All Aboard!!! Perhaps some of the bashing is warranted. There are plenty of things that Comcast does wrong, and plenty of people (myself included) who aren't exactly thrilled with them... but who have no other real choice for things like high speed internet. | |
|
 dogo88 join:2001-09-24 Old Bridge, NJ | As expected And the main reason I went to DirecTV. Plus the better quality broadcasts can't hurt either. Cable just plain sucks! | |
|
 |  | | Re: As expected Another reason why I went to nothing. Plain ole HD subchannels work fine for me considering the prices and the quality of programming. | |
|
 |  |  badtripI heart the East BayPremium join:2004-03-20 Albany, CA | Re: As expected said by rid0617:Another reason why I went to nothing. Plain ole HD subchannels work fine for me considering the prices and the quality of programming. No doubt. Plus, I don't get pissed off for having to pay for shoddy programming with my time (commercials) as well as my checkbook (cable bill). I just pay with my time now.
Plus the high definition broadcasts look better OTA than OTC IMO. | |
|
 Reviews:
·Comcast
| let us buy... gawd... this is why we will never be able to buy emta's or cable boxes that arn't tivos... comcast likes to jack up the rates!... I came to the conclusion the only reason we can't buy eMTA's is because it has a battery in it and if the power goes out and you need 911 they dont want to be sued when it doesnt work just because you bought your own and you didnt replace your battery when it died...... | |
|
 NOVA_GuyObamaCare Kills AmericansPremium join:2002-03-05 | Here's an idea or two... Comcast blames the higher costs on the higher costs of programming (specifically sports), but also lays the blame on "new advanced set top boxes and modems" and DOCSIS 3.0 network upgrades.
Simple solution, Comcast (and all other providers): move all sports channels to a sports tier where they belong. Then drop the cost of basic cable without the sports tier down to reflect the savings. Those who are interested in having the sports tier can then purchase it as a premium package, just like movies and pay-per-view. This way those who do not care about receiving channels like ESPN don't have their bills inflated because of it.
These companies could also offer access to the sports tier on a pay-per-view type basis, charging some fee for 48 hour access over weekends or the like, for casual sports viewers. (Weekend access fees, when measured on a per-day basis, would be higher than just buying monthly access to the sports tier of course.)
Or, even better yet, why not just offer ala carte access to all channels-- like many users have been requesting for many years? The technology required to do this is in place, for the most part. The only thing stopping it is broadcasters, who bundle channels together to force viewers into paying for channels they neither want nor care about. -- ObamaCare encourages euthanization of the old, pays for abortions of the almost-new, and rations care for all those in between while raising your taxes to pay for it. Government rationed, government controlled health cartels screw the middle class. | |
|
 |  RobIn Deo speramus, God Bless the USAPremium join:2001-08-25 Kendall, FL kudos:2 | Re: Here's an idea or two... said by NOVA_Guy:Comcast blames the higher costs on the higher costs of programming (specifically sports), but also lays the blame on "new advanced set top boxes and modems" and DOCSIS 3.0 network upgrades.
Simple solution, Comcast (and all other providers): move all sports channels to a sports tier where they belong. Then drop the cost of basic cable without the sports tier down to reflect the savings. Those who are interested in having the sports tier can then purchase it as a premium package, just like movies and pay-per-view. This way those who do not care about receiving channels like ESPN don't have their bills inflated because of it. Comcast did that and the FCC, after complaints from the NFL, forced them to move it back to regular channel lineup. -- CheckSite.us | YourIP.us | Reverseip.us | |
|
 |  |  AVonGaussPremium,MVM join:2007-11-01 Boynton Beach, FL | Re: Here's an idea or two... With the current climate, maybe it is time to do that again? | |
|
 |  |  NOVA_GuyObamaCare Kills AmericansPremium join:2002-03-05 | said by Rob:Comcast did that and the FCC, after complaints from the NFL, forced them to move it back to regular channel lineup. That's too bad. When did that happen-- it should have been more widely publicized. And Comcast should include a sentence like "Complaints from the NFL to the FCC, forcing us to carry sports channels, are part of the reason your bill is increasing this year." in every bill each time the price they charge their consumers increases.
If the NFL can use the government as their tool to force consumers to pay higher prices, then cable/satellite companies should be able to fight back by making inflammatory statements in their literature that is distributed to the public. -- ObamaCare encourages euthanization of the old, pays for abortions of the almost-new, and rations care for all those in between while raising your taxes to pay for it. Government rationed, government controlled health cartels screw the middle class. | |
|
 |  |  |  Morac join:2001-08-30 Riverside, NJ kudos:1 Reviews:
·Comcast
| Re: Here's an idea or two... said by NOVA_Guy:That's too bad. When did that happen-- it should have been more widely publicized. They resolved their difference a few months ago and it was pretty widely publicized. See this page for details.
That's why digital plus subscribers now get NFL Network, MLB, NHL, etc as part of regular package. Comcast is making lemonade out of lemons though by now promoting the sports channels in their commercials and raising rates (NFL costs 45 cents per subscriber) to compensate. --
The Comcast Disney Avatar has been retired. | |
|
 |  |  KearnstdElf WizardPremium join:2002-01-22 Mullica Hill, NJ | that is the sad thing, the NFL went crying like a baby they didnt get to be on the normal digital.
but really did the FCC even have a right to force comcast to take NFL off the sports tier? i know the FCC has must carry channels but i doubt they could must carry an optional channel. -- [65 Arcanist]Filan(High Elf) Zone: Broadband Reports | |
|
 |  |  | | no the fcc did not force comcast to put it in a digital package. comcast and the nfl network worked out a deal . | |
|
 |  |  joakoPremium join:2000-09-07 /dev/null kudos:5 | 1) Wasn't it the NFL Network? 2) Didn't Comcast continue to offer THEIR sports channels in the basic tiers? -- PRescott7-2097 | |
|
 |  openbox9 join:2004-01-26 Alexandria, VA kudos:1 | said by NOVA_Guy:Simple solution, Comcast (and all other providers): move all sports channels to a sports tier where they belong. I don't believe most of the sports content owners/distributors allow that. Do you really think Disney wants ESPN off of the basic tier? | |
|
 |  |  NOVA_GuyObamaCare Kills AmericansPremium join:2002-03-05 | Re: Here's an idea or two... There's a simple solution to that too. How long do you think Disney would last before they caved in if Comcast, Time Warner, Dish, and DirecTV dropped all Disney channels from the lineup? A week? A month? During that time period, the cable/satellite companies could compensate consumers by dropping prices on their service dramatically.
Disney relies on the income from pimping out this entertainment very heavily. I think that they would give in quickly if there were an organized boycott of their programming by the major players in the cable and satellite industry.
It's too bad this will never happen. Sometimes reality sucks. -- ObamaCare encourages euthanization of the old, pays for abortions of the almost-new, and rations care for all those in between while raising your taxes to pay for it. Government rationed, government controlled health cartels screw the middle class. | |
|
 |  |  |  openbox9 join:2004-01-26 Alexandria, VA kudos:1 | Re: Here's an idea or two... I agree and would quickly welcome such a move, but how well do you think Comcast, Time Warner, Dish, and DirecTV would fare in the face of their irate sports- and Mickey-loving customers?
I plan to do my part when my Dish time runs out next year by cancelling service. My family simply doesn't watch TV that much. In fact, I can't remember the last time my wife watched a program and I only rarely watch CNBC. OTA does more than enough for us. | |
|
 |  |  |  |  See 7 replies to this post |
|
 |  |  |  SunnyD join:2009-03-20 Madison, AL | Too bad that can't ever happen. Disney would just take all the cable operators to court and win megabux and an injunction because of the cable operators committing collusion. | |
|
 |  |  |  |  openbox9 join:2004-01-26 Alexandria, VA kudos:1 | Re: Here's an idea or two... It's not collusion if the distributors don't sign/renew contracts with content owners. But, you're right, it still won't happen because the distributors aren't willing to deal with consumer backlash....the price increases are easier to handle. | |
|
 |  Jwobot join:2002-08-14 Sterling Heights, MI 1 edit | said by NOVA_Guy:Comcast blames the higher costs on the higher costs of programming (specifically sports), but also lays the blame on "new advanced set top boxes and modems" and DOCSIS 3.0 network upgrades.
Simple solution, Comcast (and all other providers): move all sports channels to a sports tier where they belong. Then drop the cost of basic cable without the sports tier down to reflect the savings. Those who are interested in having the sports tier can then purchase it as a premium package, just like movies and pay-per-view. This way those who do not care about receiving channels like ESPN don't have their bills inflated because of it. These companies could also offer access to the sports tier on a pay-per-view type basis, charging some fee for 48 hour access over weekends or the like, for casual sports viewers. (Weekend access fees, when measured on a per-day basis, would be higher than just buying monthly access to the sports tier of course.) Or, even better yet, why not just offer ala carte access to all channels-- like many users have been requesting for many years? The technology required to do this is in place, for the most part. The only thing stopping it is broadcasters, who bundle channels together to force viewers into paying for channels they neither want nor care about. A Education Tier, Music Tier, Kids Tier,ect
. That way people who want to watch those types of channels can and those who dont wish to watch, dont have to pay for them. | |
|
 |  |  |
 |  |  | | said by Jwobot:said by NOVA_Guy: A Education Tier, Music Tier, Kids Tier,ect
. That way people who want to watch those types of channels can and those who dont wish to watch, dont have to pay for them. SKY TV uk, small world media uk, foxtel aus, and most cable and sat co in Canada have that. | |
|
 |  | | said by NOVA_Guy:Comcast blames the higher costs on the higher costs of programming (specifically sports), but also lays the blame on "new advanced set top boxes and modems" and DOCSIS 3.0 network upgrades.
Simple solution, Comcast (and all other providers): move all sports channels to a sports tier where they belong. Then drop the cost of basic cable without the sports tier down to reflect the savings. Those who are interested in having the sports tier can then purchase it as a premium package, just like movies and pay-per-view. This way those who do not care about receiving channels like ESPN don't have their bills inflated because of it. These companies could also offer access to the sports tier on a pay-per-view type basis, charging some fee for 48 hour access over weekends or the like, for casual sports viewers. (Weekend access fees, when measured on a per-day basis, would be higher than just buying monthly access to the sports tier of course.) Or, even better yet, why not just offer ala carte access to all channels-- like many users have been requesting for many years? The technology required to do this is in place, for the most part. The only thing stopping it is broadcasters, who bundle channels together to force viewers into paying for channels they neither want nor care about. Even better ideas - * Drop commercials * Allow customers to choose their own channels
This is the exact reason why I don't have cable TV. Not that I am admitting to piracy, but you have to wonder why people would rather pirate a TV show that doesn't have commercials vs pay to watch the TV show and commercials. It's kind of counter-intuitive if you think about it: Free: Commercial free Pay: Commercials If the programming was commercial free, then I would most certainly consider cable TV. | |
|
 |  Reviews:
·Comcast
| said by NOVA_Guy:Comcast blames the higher costs on the higher costs of programming (specifically sports), but also lays the blame on "new advanced set top boxes and modems" and DOCSIS 3.0 network upgrades.
... Or, even better yet, why not just offer ala carte access to all channels-- like many users have been requesting for many years? The technology required to do this is in place, for the most part. The only thing stopping it is broadcasters, who bundle channels together to force viewers into paying for channels they neither want nor care about. Whoohoo! À la carte! | |
|
 |  |  NOVA_GuyObamaCare Kills AmericansPremium join:2002-03-05 | Re: Here's an idea or two... Yeah, that's it! 
Thanks for the correction.  | |
|
 cdbma join:2003-01-19 Bolton, MA | wimps Comcast is large enough to have its way with broadcasters (IMO), so the appearance (excuse?) that the broadcast fees are going up sounds a bit wimpy to me. Push back! Negotiate!
While I really don't want to pay more, I'd rather they say "we need to raise the rates to make more money and meet our corporate revenue objectives." rather than "boo-hoo, the broadcasters stole my ball and I'm going home." | |
|
 | | Couch Change I remember that comment. Just didn't realize the couch they were talking about was mine. | |
|
 |  NOVA_GuyObamaCare Kills AmericansPremium join:2002-03-05 | Re: Couch Change With the rate hikes, pretty soon their goons will be coming to your house to take the couch as well.  | |
|
 | | what a joke direct tv does not rape you with box rent/outlet what a joke direct tv does not rape you with box rent/outlet that high $6/m just for the outlet? and then box rent is on top of that? and Some system also have a hd cable card fee as per card.
direct tv only wants $5 per box for any box box 1 is free.
and there HD dvr pack cost about the same as comcast digital classic and comcast digital classic only comes with a SD box. adding a HD dvr can cost $10-$20/m per box on comcast.
also don't for get the sports pack to get speed in Chicago land while other comcast area have it in starter as well a sci-if.
also why is fox movie in the sports pack? | |
|
 |  Reviews:
·AT&T U-Verse
| Re: what a joke direct tv does not rape you with box rent/outlet With all the fee's Comcast keeps adding that's why I dropped them for AT&T U-Verse: DVR Included (recorded 4 TV programs at once, Record or play back from any TV) STB $5.00 each (STB are both SD and HD and a smaller foot print than Comcast) HD Service $10.00 covers all the STB No big deal its 2SD and 2HD AT&T U-Verse SD is a lot better than Comcast | |
|
 |  |  AVonGaussPremium,MVM join:2007-11-01 Boynton Beach, FL | Re: what a joke direct tv does not rape you with box rent/outlet Not to detract from your statement, but I believe the STB rental fee is now $7. | |
|
 cdruGo ColtsPremium,MVM join:2003-05-14 Fort Wayne, IN kudos:5 Reviews:
·Frontier FiOS
| Digital Outlet Fee quote: Comcast's digital additional outlet fee, used for customers with additional modems or set top boxes, will increase $1 from $5.10 to $6.10.
Does that include the digital box rental? Or what just the fee to have an outlet? If it's the former, still is expensive. If it's the latter, ouch. | |
|
 |  | | Re: Digital Outlet Fee I think that is the basic sd box price + maybe $1-$2 more some systems.
cable card seems to be outlet + $1-$2 card rent + HD cable card fee (some systems) per card.
HD seems to be outlet + $4-$5 box rent (hd fee built in?)
HD dvr seems to be outlet + $10-$15 rent (HD fee and dvr fee built in?). there old full price seem to be any from $10 /m box 1 promo price to $15-$16 full price to $20-$22 full price box 2+
will tru2way be the same outlet + guide data fee + hd fee + drv fee (yes tru2way forces cable co software and control on you) | |
|
 R4M0NBrazilian Soccer Ownz Joo join:2000-10-04 Glen Allen, VA | And here I was... And here I was just needing that one extra nudge to get my butt off the couch and call DSL Extreme to move my cable internet over to Fiber...
I've done all the homework and it would make sense even now to move (faster and cheaper internet - No real need for TV)
Thank you Comcast.  | |
|
 MannusPremium join:2005-10-25 Fort Wayne, IN 1 edit | Cut the cord I cut the cord on PayTV months ago. Between Hulu.com and other streaming sites, torrents, my OTA PC digital tuner card, I can watch almost everything I used to watch on DISH. Plus. I'm saving 50.00 a month. | |
|
 |  | | Re: Cut the cord yep, i fell like i'm wandering around in crazy town with all these people complaining about programming fees, rate hikes, etc...
TV is so important it's worth 50-150 dollars a month? For a bunch of useless channels playing mostly useless content to deliver ads convincing us to by other mostly useless devices/products. Sure there are a couple good things on, but little that cant be rented/streamed from cheaper/free places.
I always get a chuckle at work when someone says. "Did you see that new iphone (or any other gizmo/product/fad) commercial? I need to get one of those!!" I just tell them I never see commercials anymore.  | |
|
 |  | | I also "cut the cord" about a year ago from the glut of mind rot and higher costs of cable. Hulu, youtube, and Netflix provides all I need for TV. I can choose what I want to watch with little or no commercials. Much, much happier. | |
|
 | | Other rates I saw somewhere that CHSI only customers will see a price drop of $2.00
And that Comcast is dropping the 2.00 rental fee for the router you get with their Home Networking Services. | |
|
 IGGYNo Guru Just Here To HelpPremium,MVM join:2001-03-30 Chatham, IL | Having to include a title is stupid fix this stupidity
"new advanced set top boxes and modems"
I would sure like access to at least the 1st one. So would many other Comcast customers. The current Motorola units of course are still giving me and many others problems on a fairly regular basis. These known issues have never been properly addressed by providers or the manufacturer. If you plan on charging me more you had best be offering me a quality service worth paying for in the first place. -- Test PC Security Cable Diagnostics Blog ZoneAlarm Help Windows 7 Comcast BroadVox Direct | |
|
 |  R4M0NBrazilian Soccer Ownz Joo join:2000-10-04 Glen Allen, VA 1 edit | Re: Having to include a title is stupid fix this stupidity LOL... I always think the same thing. So I just put the first few words of my post.  | |
|
 Chaldo join:2008-03-18 West Bloomfield, MI | 57.45.. cool when will that change to 67.45?? I remember when cable was like 45 bucks... This is crazy | |
|
 |  Curlee join:2009-07-17 Issaquah, WA | Re: 57.45.. cool when will that change to 67.45?? said by Chaldo:I remember when cable was like 45 bucks... This is crazy My Mom went to the movies for a dime.
I don't like it either, but don't forget to adjust for inflation ... | |
|
 Titus PulloI came, I saw, I slept join:2004-06-26 kudos:1 | God they bring the "suuuuuuu" to suck - | |
|
 | | Couch change
Maybe, but given the rate hikes over the years in the NW, how many couches they think we have? | |
|
 |
 |  | | Re: Just Great!!! said by QLR:I wonder how much will my rates go up... I would switch to satellite, but my apartment lease forbids the dishes. The FCC has laws that say they can't do that. | |
|
 |  |  | | Re: Just Great!!! said by Joe12345678:said by QLR:I wonder how much will my rates go up... I would switch to satellite, but my apartment lease forbids the dishes. The FCC has laws that say they can't do that. In a some obscure ways, satellite dishes and broadband internet antennas can indeed be prohibited.
The FCC's OTARD rule primarily prohibits the indiscriminate banning of the placement of antennas. If a city ordinances adopt the National Electric Code recommendations, then those recommendations become law and are exempt from OTARD protection.
Can a an apartment complex prohibit you from mounting a dish on your patio railing? Yes, as it compromises the structure.
Can an apartment complex prohibit you from mounting a dish on your patio with its own unattached concrete block mount? No, they can't prohibit you.
Can an apartment complex prohibit you from mounting a dish on your patio with its own unattached concrete block mount that does not follow the NEC grounding recommendations? Yes.
Can an apartment complex prohibit you from mounting a dish on your patio with its own unattached concrete block mount that is properly grounding, but needs an outside wall entrance? Yes, as it compromises the structure.
Can an apartment complex prohibit you from mounting a dish on your patio with its own unattached concrete block mount that is properly grounding, and fed through your window? No. | |
|
 |  |  |  Davy49 join:2007-04-10 Jacksonville, FL | Re: Just Great!!! Hi All, I keep reading in the forums where the nfl network has been moved to a different 'tier', I believe I read the digital classic / preferred tier. I live in the 32218 zip code area, as far as I know, the only way we can receive the nfl network is on the sports and entertainment tier that we are paying extra for. Does this apply to anyone else in here ? David | |
|
 |
|