dslreports logo
site
spacer

spacer
 
   
spc
story category
AT&T Repeatedly Helped FBI Break Communications Law
As the President decides to change privacy laws he doesn't like...
by Karl Bode 04:01PM Friday Jan 22 2010
Buried under the roar of the media's obsession with Apple's looming tablet computer this week was a tiny little story about an agency you might have heard about (the FBI) repeatedly breaking the law by faking terrorism emergencies in order to get phone customer data. According to the Washington Post, the FBI illegally collected more than 2,000 U.S. telephone call records between 2002 and 2006 "by invoking terrorism emergencies that did not exist." The adherence to law eventually became so slack, that requests for private user data devolved to the point where even one request was made by Post It Note.

Interestingly, two additional elements of the story have come to light as the week rolled on. One, Wired News notes that a few weeks ago, the Obama Administration apparently prepared for this by issuing a secret rule "saying it was legal for the FBI to have skirted federal privacy protections." Convenient. Two, Wired Notes that the FBI and AT&T were like peas in a pod as the law was repeatedly broken, and a significant portion of the idea to shortcut the standard legal process actually originated at AT&T:
quote:
The telecom employees were supposed to be responding to National Security Letters, which are essentially FBI-issued subpoenas. But those Patriot Act powers say the target must be part of an open investigation and that a supervisor has to approve it. While they require some paperwork, FBI agents have been issuing about 40,000 such NSLs a year.

But an AT&T employee provided the unit with a way around some of those requirements. The employee introduced them to so-called 'exigent letters.' Those letters, first used immediately following 9/11, asked for information by saying that the request was an emergency and that prosecutors were preparing a grand jury subpoena. The letter falsely promised that the subpoena, which gives the telecoms legal immunity, would be delivered later, the report said.
But it gets more interesting. Not only was AT&T advising the FBI on ways to break the law, they were going several steps further -- developing systems that would not only hand over data on the initial target, but entire "communities of interest" that they associated with (we're talking about American citizens, including reporters). AT&T was so gung-ho about helping the FBI wiggle around and over the law, they actually began to fancy themselves NSA/FBI analysts:
quote:
AT&T took a particular interest in using its "community of interest" technology to become analysts for the agents, the report said. For instance, according to the report, an AT&T analyst looked at one informal FBI request and said the calling patterns on four numbers were "very interesting," and "we strongly suggest" the bureau examines other, associated phone numbers.
As this rabbit hole gets deeper and deeper, AT&T's involvement in breaking telecom law becomes absolutely staggering, and it becomes more and more clear why companies like AT&T and Verizon spent so much time and money lobbying for immunity from any claims of wrongdoing. Prosecution, should the country suddenly become interested in the letter of the law as applied to corporations, could have easily resulted in life-threatening financial injury for both companies. Meanwhile, as Techdirt notes, you've got a President (one in a series of several) who apparently believes he has the magic power to simply declare what's legal and what isn't.


98 comments .. click to read

Recommended comments




Jim Kirk
Premium
join:2005-12-09

1 edit

2 recommendations

reply to dib22

Re: AT&T being good citizen after 9/11 attacks

said by dib22:

I remember when AT&T actually stood up for its customers rights. I remember when AT&T followed the letter of the law instead of rolling over when ever the govt. asked.
Really? When was that?


Steve
I know your IP address
Consultant
join:2001-03-10
Foothill Ranch, CA
kudos:5

5 recommendations

reply to FFH5
said by FFH5:

I just see an organization that was determined to help the US defend itself against terrorists after the 9/11 attacks. And if all the paperwork was sometimes delayed and not all the i's dotted and t's crossed, I am ok with that.
Here, let me fix this for you:
I do not believe in the rule of law

expert007

join:2006-01-10
Buffalo, NY

2 recommendations

It will be mere minutes

until TK Junkmail posts his usual 'as long as you're doing nothing wrong, you have nothing to worry about' mantra.