 SabreDi relung hatiku bernyanyi bidadari join:2005-05-17 | Who needs it? I don't even own an HDTV, let alone have any interest in 3D (and I'd probably drop TV altogether if it wasn't for my wife's love of the NFL network and its gloriousness that is Red-Zone) and I really can't see more than a tiny niche market that would care, at least for a long time.
3D will become feasible and popular in the home when (1) it's not prohibitively more expensive than 2D, and more importantly (2) when it doesn't require wearing something for it to work AND it's able to convince people that they don't need to wear anything on their eyes. The convincing is likely to be harder than the technology itself. -- With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world.
Save American Soccer - Stop the MLS! | |
|
 |  ArchivisYour DaddyPremium join:2001-11-26 Earth kudos:18 | Re: Who needs it? If you dont have an hdtv, then its tough for you understand why this technology has the potential take off. 3d has done wonders for movie theaters and that could eventually lead to a huge hit at home as well. -- 'A government big enough to give you everything you want, is strong enough to take everything you have.' -Thomas Jefferson - | |
|
 |  |  | | Re: Who needs it? said by Archivis:3d has done wonders for movie theaters and that could eventually lead to a huge hit at home as well. This is a "fad" that movie companies drag out about every ten years or so.
I've been to my fair share of "3D", the results have always been sub-par.
I'm not wearing glasses on top of my glasses in my own home or getting prescription "3D" glasses or contacts to watch TV, and I'm not paying any more for movies that are "3D".
Again, "3D" is a "fad". | |
|
 |  |  |  woody7Premium join:2000-10-13 Torrance, CA | Re: Who needs it? Thats what I had to do at Avatar, annoying but was ok, just wouldn't be doing it on a regular basis. If I could wear contacts it would be more enticing, but as others have stated, a fad. Now HD and Bluray are as the kids would or used to say the "bomb". I won't even buy DVD's unless Bluray. I don't watch tv that much, but HD is light years ahead of the regular broadcast. Peace -- BlooMe | |
|
 |  |  |  | | i agree.i will pass on any tech that will make me wear glasses to enjoy it. this is a fad and will be an expensive on at that. | |
|
 |  |  |  kaimanaPremium join:2010-04-01 Suisun City, CA | I went to watch my first movie in 3D this past weekend..."How To Train Your Dragon" ... It was a great experience for me and my daughter. Initially when 3D first reappeared a couple of years ago, I thought it was hype. After experiencing it for the first time this past weekend, I was really impressed. The glasses are something I am willing to get used to... and just as long as I can get 3D prescription glasses in an oakley frame, I'm good!
It'll probably be a while before I can get a 3D television, since I just recently purchase a new LCD TV.
~my .02  | |
|
 |  |  |  kaimanaPremium join:2010-04-01 Suisun City, CA | I went to watch my first movie in 3D this past weekend..."How To Train Your Dragon" ... It was a great experience for me and my daughter. Initially, when 3D first reappeared a couple of years ago, I thought it was hype. After experiencing it for the first time this past weekend, I was really impressed. The glasses are something I am willing to get used to... and just as long as I can get 3D prescription glasses in an oakley frame, I'm good!
It'll probably be a while before I can get a 3D television, since I just recently purchase a new LCD TV.
~my .02  | |
|
 |  |  |  |  | | Re: Who needs it? Hmmm... 2 posts? Are you still seeing double?  | |
|
 |  |  |  |  |  antdudeA Ninja AntPremium,VIP join:2001-03-25 United State kudos:4 Reviews:
·RoadRunner Cable
| Re: Who needs it? said by mod_wastrel:Hmmm... 2 posts? Are you still seeing double? A side effect from 3D.  | |
|
 |  |  SabreDi relung hatiku bernyanyi bidadari join:2005-05-17 | Fair point. I do think though that it will take off. It just won't be for several years yet. We, as consumers, aren't quite ready yet, nor do I think the technology's mature enough yet. | |
|
 |  |  |  ArchivisYour DaddyPremium join:2001-11-26 Earth kudos:18 | Re: Who needs it? said by Sabre:Fair point. I do think though that it will take off. It just won't be for several years yet. We, as consumers, aren't quite ready yet, nor do I think the technology's mature enough yet. No, it'll be like HDTV was. It'll take years for everyone to get TV's and for broadcasts to go out in HD. Even now, HDTV is still growing and expanding. -- 'A government big enough to give you everything you want, is strong enough to take everything you have.' -Thomas Jefferson - | |
|
 |  |  |  |  | | Re: Who needs it? said by Archivis:said by Sabre:Fair point. I do think though that it will take off. It just won't be for several years yet. We, as consumers, aren't quite ready yet, nor do I think the technology's mature enough yet. No, it'll be like HDTV was. It'll take years for everyone to get TV's and for broadcasts to go out in HD. Even now, HDTV is still growing and expanding. Actually HDTV has a huge advantage over 3DTV as anything shot on film is high definition, especially when compared to NTSC. Motion pictures and TV shows shot & edited on film are all ready to be seen in HD. Plus the fact shooting in HD is no different than shooting on NTSC video, except for the wider screen which over the years has proven to be not an issue.
OTOH the amount of 3D content is so small if a video format tried to rely on 3D only it would fail due to lack of content. The only thing that keeps 3D sets from being laughed out of the market is they can be used for 2D like stereos in the 50s could be used for mono listening.
3D & HD, different in many ways. | |
|
 |  |  | | I have HDTV (57") and I don't see this as anything more than a "niche".
Maybe interesting for gaming, but alot of folks I know (20s-40s) had eye-strain or nausea when at the theater for Avatar.
And I would think there will be alot of 3D hyped re-releases that are useless for 3D. Some bloggers wrote that it doesn't impact as it does on a HUGE theater screen too.
If you are a sports fan, this will be interesting. Even a console gamer. But the bandwidth needed for 3D, the "new" TVs and updated "media players" will result in a spike, then settle down to small "I want 3D" niche.
I think some folks would rather have lower HDTV costs than this ...  -- Splat | |
|
 |  |  ssj4androidRedefining Reality join:2002-04-14 Wyoming, MI | I can't see the difference myself due to eye problems, so I hate all this 3D stuff. I have to wear glasses over my glasses just to see the same thing I'd see in 2D (although it's still darker). They have 2D versions of these movies, but I'd likely have to go alone as everyone else will want to see the 3D version. And I don't really want to watch movies by myself. | |
|
 |  |  fiberguyMy views are my own.Premium join:2005-05-20 kudos:3 | I tried one out at Best Buy... like I'd enjoy battery powered bulky glasses on my face in order to watch and "experience" 3D television... I really didn't see anything that "wow'd" me when I tried it.. not to mention, I found it REALLY hard to watch.. they were showing a scene where there was a city in Roam.. the smaller detail of the city became really distorted with all the detail.. it just wasn't a good experience.
Some have told me "it's first generation - it will improve"... in this day and age, I don't buy that.. either improve it and make it work.. make it work with out glasses... or don't release it yet... I find this as a way for them to skate by, let people early adopt and pay through the nose to improve their next generation... how about bringing out 'the next generation' first... IOW: improve before you sell.. that may have been the way of the past, but technology has really improved since the 1980's, for example, so I think they just need to spend more time in the labs and get this right before they try to launch anything. | |
|
 |  |  antdudeA Ninja AntPremium,VIP join:2001-03-25 United State kudos:4 Reviews:
·RoadRunner Cable
| said by Archivis:If you dont have an hdtv, then its tough for you understand why this technology has the potential take off. 3d has done wonders for movie theaters and that could eventually lead to a huge hit at home as well. For me, 3D effects don't work with my eyes. I couldn't see 3D effects in Avatar (Real3D in Arclight Dome), CA Adventure's 3D Muppets show, Super Bowl's three TV ads. and Chuck The Third Dimension episode, stereograms, red and blue glasses, etc. | |
|
 |  LinklistPremium join:2002-03-03 Longport, NJ kudos:5 | said by Sabre:I really can't see more than a tiny niche market that would care, at least for a long time. The 1st regularly scheduled HDTV broadcasts in the US started in 1996. And it wasn't until last year that HDTV has reached the 50% mark of US homes with it.
So 3D starts this year. but it may take 10 years before it starts to become a major player in the marketplace. -- NCAA® March Madness on Demand® | |
|
 |  | | Some people just "need" to play with the latest and "greatest" (and I use the term loosely) tech toy they can get their hands on. Outside of some heavily CG'd movie (and maybe porn), though, exactly how will 3D, presuming it's done well, improve the viewing experience? When I think of 3D, I think of fins on cars in the '50s... "wow, all cars are gonna have fins... wow!" ...yeah, that lasted. Movie studios and theaters and TV manufacturers and electronics stores just want some new gimmick every "model year" to get you to buy more stuff... more stuff you don't need that never really satisfies, so you keep buying yet more stuff. HD is something that customers, en masse, wanted--it totally satisfies; 3D is just something "they" want customers to want. They're just kidding themselves... and few others. | |
|
 |  | | I don't want or need this POS "technology". Don't know why they keep forcing it down consumer's throats. | |
|
 |  |  ArchivisYour DaddyPremium join:2001-11-26 Earth kudos:18 | Re: Who needs it? How exactly are you being forced to watch 3D? | |
|
 |  |  |  | | Re: Who needs it? said by Archivis:How exactly are you being forced to watch 3D? I'm not and I never implied that I was. | |
|
 |  |  |  |  ArchivisYour DaddyPremium join:2001-11-26 Earth kudos:18 | Re: Who needs it? said by BodyBumper:said by Archivis:How exactly are you being forced to watch 3D? I'm not and I never implied that I was. said by BodyBumper: Don't know why they keep forcing it down consumer's throats. ?? -- 'A government big enough to give you everything you want, is strong enough to take everything you have.' -Thomas Jefferson - | |
|
 |  |  |  |  |  | | Re: Who needs it? Maybe he means from a marketing standpoint... which is sort of true: (1) 3D (2) LED (3) Yellow (Quadtron or something--like we've never seen the color yellow on our TVs before) | |
|
 |  |  |  |  |  |  ArchivisYour DaddyPremium join:2001-11-26 Earth kudos:18 | Re: Who needs it? If it weren't successful, they wouldn't advertise. | |
|
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | | Re: Who needs it? Marketing has never been restricted to successful products. If it were successful, they wouldn't need to advertise... as much. Success breeds more success, with less advertising. (One or two hugely successful movies that would have been successful anyway is hardly a sure sign of success. Check back with it a year from now at least, maybe two. The market will decide.) | |
|
 1 edit | Verizon, I just want - - TCM HD. That's not so much to ask, is it?
I saw my first IMAX 3D movie a few weeks ago. Despite the claims of it being "crystal clear", it wasn't. While 3D seems to have come a long way, there was a lot of blurriness and the experience left me feeling disoriented for a couple of hours afterward. Oh, and having to wear the special glasses over top of my own wasn't very comfortable.
Edit: In regards to a comment above mine - we have a 50" and a 63" plasma HD TVs.  | |
|
 | | No one I know wants it I have actually asked most of my friends and co-workers if they plan on ever buying 3D HDTV's for their homes and all I ever get back is a unanimous "No."
Who exactly is either the TV or the 3D TV signals market demographic?
PLEASE, just give me better HD color representation and resolution in the TV's and for the love of all that is good in the world, just a good quality consistent 1080p signal.
Is this really too much to ask for? How did we skip true 1080p signals and jump straight to 3D signals that require more bandwidth?
In the immortal words of George Jetson, "JANE! Stop this crazy thing!" | |
|
 Frankis chillingPremium join:2000-11-03 somewhere | I tried them at a store 3d glasses included w/sega master system. |
It felt as if I was thrown back to the 1980's because their 3d was practically the same thing as the 3d glasses I used when I was a kid w/the sega master system. The only difference is that the glasses were way lighter and the picture was obviously sharper and better (because it was on an led hdtv versus a regular old sdtv w/8-bit graphics). -- At first I thought everyone on the highway was drunk but then I realized I was driving in Florida  | |
|
 | | No thanks I'm all for technology advancing, but I don't like the idea of this taking off either...of course I have the choice to not buy it, but I don't want it to be the only thing I have a choice to buy.
3D has always been gimmicky, but seems to have some momentum this time. Having to wear special glasses (over my own glasses??, no) ...not lose them, not break them, not have the kids or dog mess with them...too much if you ask me. | |
|
 JonPremium join:2001-01-20 Lisle, IL | So how soon before we start seeing the 3D channel tiers. It'll be another add on package that they can charge you for. "Get all your favorite 3D channels in one package for just $19.99 a Month!"
I also wonder how long before someone comes up with glasses that will work on any set. I'm sure the providers would be happy to rent you those too, at $5 a month, per pair. | |
|
 glinc join:2009-04-07 New York, NY | How? I wonder how these people will make it work in live sports. They would have to basically get angles and record it that will make it look like the ball is coming to you through the tv. If it will be all the same and just broadcasting in another format is just lame. | |
|
 |  espaethDigital PlumberPremium,MVM join:2001-04-21 Minneapolis, MN kudos:2 Reviews:
·Vitelity VOIP
| Re: How? said by glinc:I wonder how these people will make it work in live sports. They would have to basically get angles and record it that will make it look like the ball is coming to you through the tv. It's recorded using 2 cameras with a fixed lateral offset.
It's basically a camera feed for each eye, and your brain creates the 3D depth perception the same way it does with your eyes naturally. | |
|
 Reviews:
·Optimum Online
| They gotta get people to start spending somehow The credit machine is alive and well. This 3D fad will get stupid people in the stores. There won't be a 3D TV supply shortage, but you bet there will be some sets leaving the stores.
I've said it before.. Movie server at home with 6 TB of storage + Netflix + computer connected to every TV in the house = me a happy camper | |
|
 |
 Phatty join:2000-05-10 Valley Park, MO | 3D not for me I have no interest in going 3d.. I have no interest in needing to purchase multiple glasses so that I always have enough for guests, I have no interest in being stuck wearing glasses the entire movie... Hell half the time I'm watching TV I'm multi-tasking, reading other things, or moving around.
3D is just the next big marketing thing that manufacturers are trying to get consumers to jump on now that the move to 1080p is complete.
I was just up at Best Buy the other day and thought the Demo's were 'neat', but nothing I see myself ever willing to spend money on specifically to support it. | |
|
 |  espaethDigital PlumberPremium,MVM join:2001-04-21 Minneapolis, MN kudos:2 Reviews:
·Vitelity VOIP
| Re: 3D not for me I'm with you.
When I'm watching TV it's usually hockey during the standard NHL season, and during that time I usually have a computer sitting on my lap to be catching up on work, checking stats, etc.
Throwing on a pair a 3D glasses isn't conducive to the way a majority of folks watch TV. | |
|
 | | 3D Useless to me I don't know if me having a problem with the color green has anything to do with it but I just don't see 3D images. 3D has never looked like anything was coming at me or that anything was sticking out. And yes I wore the stupid plastic glasses.
It's just a plain waste of time for me. I have seen explanations of what 3D video looks like. A picture showing half the content is coming out of the TV. I've never been able to see images that look like that. 3D video, images or books. Just do see the 3D in them. | |
|
 |  milnoc join:2001-03-05 H3B kudos:1 | Re: 3D Useless to me By any chance do you have only one good eye? Proper viewing of 3D material requires two equally good eyes to maximize the effect. -- Watch my future television channel's public test broadcast! »thecanadianpublic.com (click "Watch Live!") | |
|
 |  |  | | Re: 3D Useless to me Agreed, I have severe eye dominance and 3D does not work well on me at all.
A service made for everyone that cannot actually be used effectively by everyone is not a good service IMO.
How much you wanna bet that Comcast makes me buy in to a channel TIER where I pay for those 3D channels that I can't really use? | |
|
 |  |  | | Well my right eye is a little weak. The eye doctor said I didn't really need glasses but he gave me a prescription. He did say my right eye was lazy. Lazy eye. Can't really focus real good. Sometimes I can read stuff with my right eye and sometimes it's just too blurry.
And It does make sense that it could be the reason 3D doesn't work for me. Didn't think about it before you said that but that is probably it. | |
|
 |  |  |  milnoc join:2001-03-05 H3B kudos:1 | Re: 3D Useless to me One of my eyes has no central vision at all. Just peripheral vision. This makes seeing any 3D effect at all extremely difficult, even when using polarizer based filter systems.
On the bright side, I don't need to upgrade any equipment, and I don't have to "enjoy" the splitting headaches many people seem to experience with these gadgets.  -- Watch my future television channel's public test broadcast! »thecanadianpublic.com (click "Watch Live!") | |
|
 | | 3d is a new world The latest movies are in 3D and not the old red and blue 3D. Many people are drawn to the old school 3D concept and it by far is not.
I am game and love it with Nvidias 3D product and I am thrilled to see it coming to TV's. By far not a fad, and again people need to get off the old 3D format, this is such a different concept of 3D.
The gaming side has been cool and enjoyable and I doubted the movie side, until I seen Avatar and wow... 3D has come a long way and again it is not the tradtionial red and blue 3D glasses. | |
|
 | | DONT WANT 3DTV
HEY let get all the stations to have HD first. Im not sitting at my home wearing 3D glasses to watch TV. | |
|
 |  markofmayhemWhy not now?Premium join:2004-04-08 Pittsburgh, PA kudos:5 Reviews:
·Comcast
| Re: DONT WANT 3DTV Exactly! However, Sharp has been pretty advanced on the "no glasses needed" 3D front, though they are still developing the screen size for handheld devices. This crap is a fad, it will fade away. "How to Train Your Dragon" and "Avatar" were produced for 3D. Movies like "Clash of the Titans" were produced, then altered FOR 3D. It is soooo bad, awful... horrendous. THIS is what killed 3D the first 20 times it was tried and THIS is what will kill it again. Bad 3D ruins it all. You could have the best story ever told and if the 3D is bad, no one can put up with it. On the other hand, you could have a horrendous plot, boring, horrible acting move and if the 3D is implemented correctly, the entire technology makes a comeback. It will die off.... again.... because 3D just isn't enjoyable on MOST video. Without the glasses, it becomes tolerable. I'll wait. -- I can haz competition? | |
|
 DesdinovaPremium join:2003-01-26 Gaithersburg, MD | Hmmm... I've had HD3D on my 10' DLP projection home theatre set-up for about five years now and have been gaming on a similar set-up since 2003. 3D is as much a fad as HDTV, stereo, cell phones, faxes and surround sound were when THEY were first introduced to a consumer market and it just won't go away. It'll certainly take a number of years to reach any kind of saturation point, but there are enough folks out there who WILL spend the money on it that it'll lead to better systems (laserdiscs also never got above a niche market but they paved the way for DVDs).
I don't doubt that we're not too far away from a glasses-less system (using a more discreet lenticular overlay) but until then, I'll happily wear glasses to experience 3D at home or in the theatre. I for one can't wait to start enjoying 3D programming. | |
|
 KiwiPremium join:2003-05-26 USA/MidWest kudos:1 Reviews:
·AT&T U-Verse
·Comcast
| 3D Hell, yes! Look at a Mitsubishi DLP. I know somebody that will pick up their 60" today for $700.00; hell I paid that for a 27" crt just a few years ago. At the beginning of last year I bought a 55" Plasma and I still often think "That was great bang for buck" I don't watch regular TV, but will stream Netflix and on a nice day buy Blu ray movies; which is like night and day when comparing against 480 resolution. 1080P.
For the nay sayers, just get out of the way and let those willing enjoy a good thing, nobody twists the the arms of those paying to upgrade and if the idea sounds bad; there will be plenty to take up the slack, move over so you don't get run over.... | |
|
 | | ho hum "Comcast grabbed headlines for demonstrating the Masters golf tournament in 3D"....
ah yes 3D golf 
Fore | |
|
 Reviews:
·Charter
| Massive flop I cant think of a worse idea then 3DTV during the current state of the economy. People are still migrating to HDTV and have bought expensive sets within the last 5-10 years for the most part. I dont see much(any?) demand for this and i doubt anyone wants to upgrade their HDTVs anytime soon for this gimmick in its current state. Perhaps in 10-20 years when technology allows for its easy migration where you can bypass the glasses and forced specific seating position it may come to pass but as of right now its going to flop....hard. | |
|
 |  LinklistPremium join:2002-03-03 Longport, NJ kudos:5 | Re: Massive flop said by GvilleDSL: Perhaps in 10-20 years when technology allows for its easy migration where you can bypass the glasses and forced specific seating position it may come to pass but as of right now its going to flop....hard. They already have technology that can do 3D without glasses: »www.mobile-tech-today.com/story.···l_skip=1
Sharp has developed a no-glasses 3-D touchscreen and plans to install the LCDs in mobile devices like digital cameras and smartphones. Sharp's 3-D technology uses a parallax barrier system with images different for each eye. Sharp declined to comment on whether it will supply the screen for Nintendo's planned 3DS portable game player.
all displays will eventually be 3-D." The technology can also be used in large TVs, he said, but at the moment there are no specific plans for this kind of product.
Sharp said the no-glasses 3-D LCD display is scheduled to begin manufacturing sometime in the first half of its 2010 fiscal year. Hasegawa said the company expects half the displays for its mobile devices will be 3-D-capable within the next fiscal year. -- NCAA® March Madness on Demand® | |
|
 |  |  | | Re: Massive flop Yes but the models without glasses you have to sit in 1 spot directly in front of the TV to have proper 3D viewing. | |
|
 JUG831 join:2009-01-09 Downingtown, PA | NO THANKS Like many here, I say no thanks. I have no interest in buying a niche TV that has no content yet.
Nor do I have any patience in allowing TV manufacturers to condition me like Pavlov's dog every time something new is available.
If anyone from IO, TWC, VZ are reading - tighten up what you have first. If anyone from Sony, et al. is reading - work on lowering energy consumption first. | |
|
 DesdinovaPremium join:2003-01-26 Gaithersburg, MD | Once Again... ...there are LOTS of folks forming opinions on something they really don't know anything about.
For example, this "niche product" has already sold four million 3D-compatible TVs over the past several years. Viewers have the option of turning the 3D on or off, meaning they can watch the 3D channels in regular 2D if they choose. Folks with NO 3D would see the content without issue and wouldn't even know it WAS 3D in the first place. So right now there millions of folks who already have immediate access to 3D. With the new 3DHD Blu-Rays coming out later this year, for these TV owners, it's a small step to join in the fun. When they show THEIR friends how cool it is, it's a pretty safe bet that some of those folks will also go out and pick up 3D gear, especially as the prices come down.
So if an established user-base of millions is a "fad niche" it's a pretty damn solid one.
»news.cnet.com/3d-tv-faq/?tag=con···tentBody | |
|
 | | Big Market wants your money again. | |
|
 |  Jon GebWal-Mart Sucks join:2001-01-09 Howell, MI | Re: Big Market Thats called business. | |
|
 |
|