site Search:


 
   
story category
Clearwire Takes On More Debt To Fund Network Build
As company pushes into major markets and Verizon takes aim
by Karl Bode Thursday 02-Dec-2010 tags: business · wireless
Tipped by Gbcue See Profile
While Clearwire announced the addition of 1.23 million new subscribers last quarter, the company's quick expansion has come at significant financial cost, their debt burden resulting in a 15% workforce reduction and streamlined marketing efforts. The company today outlined plans to sell roughly $1 billion in debt to help continued network expansion, as the company pushes into major networks like New York, Los Angeles, and San Francisco. Some analysts are complaining that this was among the more expensive options, which also included selling spectrum or getting a long-rumored investment from T-Mobile (Sprint's supposed preference). The fiscal particulars:

Clearwire said the new debt would come in the form of an offer of $175 million in first-priority, senior secured notes due 2015, $500.0 million of second-priority secured notes due 2017 as well as the exchangeable notes due 2040. It said it would also grant the initial purchasers of the exchangeable notes an option to purchase up to an additional $100.0 million of exchangeable notes.

Clearwire's head start into the "not really 4G" market has quickly eroded with Verizon's upcoming LTE launch. Some analysts estimate that Clearwire will need an additional 3 billion to complete their network build; more if the company plans to shift to a dual WiMax/LTE deployment. Meanwhile Sprint and Clearwire's relationship continues to be strained, and we're hearing chatter among Sprint employees (which we've been unable to confirm on any official level) that despite statements to the contrary by CEO Dan Hesse, Sprint will begin an LTE network build next year.

view: topics flat text 
Post a:
sonicmerlin

join:2009-05-24
Cleveland, OH
kudos:1

Competition

If Sprint and T-mobile decide to build their own separate networks, along with LightSquared's LTE build that would increase competition quite a bit. Of course the issue though is one of capital, which is why this market is so darned uncompetitive.

The incumbents have all the advantage in the world.

BTW, doesn't Sprint own a majority of Clear? Why would they build their own separate network? Wasn't Clear planning on going dual WiMAX/LTE?

Also WiMAX 2 will be out much earlier than LTE-A, and will speed everything up another 10 fold. So wouldn't that be something for Sprint and Clear to take advantage of?
hottboiinnc
ME

join:2003-10-15
Cleveland, OH

Re: Competition

Yes sprint does own the majority of Clear- and the spectrum that Clear uses for the most part. They were talking about running the dual network for roaming. That's the part where TMO comes in. Sprint/Clear could use it as well for roaming if they created a multi-mode device for that. But when you do that more battery is sucked with all the radios that are powered- UNLESS they do like BB and allow you to shut the different radios off and only use certain ones at a time.

I don't see Sprint building out another network. Especially when $$$$ are limited with them already and it just makes since for them to team up with Clear and TMO.

The ONLY competition that will really be seen is if LightSquared's network takes off for roaming Other than that; I don't see anything really happening that hasn't already. We'll still have TMO, Cellco, T, and Sprint. All the others just are MVNOs for the most part. If Metro can't find a roaming partner- they'll be required to sell their network or take a HUGE back seat as more and more Next Gen networks are built and the old networks are shut down over the next 3-10 years. Cricket hasn't announced anything and does mainly rely on Sprint and CellCo for their roaming; which again; will have to take a back seat if they can't merge in or start building out their next gen network either.

This is the time when we'll see mergers and or closings when more and more incumbents start building out their Next-Gen networks

kpfx

join:2005-10-28
San Antonio, TX

Verizon not a threat.... yet

Can't say the launch of Verizon's LTE network will be much of an initial threat to Clear.

The huge price difference ($30-50 for Clear VS $50-80 for Verizon) and the caps that Verizon has (5-10 GB) mean it's probably going to be limited to users upgrading their existing Verizon 3G cards.

Not to say it doesn't have the potential to disrupt the game, but so far Verizon's biggest disadvantage seems to be... well, Verizon.

L Supreme
Premium
join:2004-06-05
Lowell, MA

Re: Verizon not a threat.... yet

The main thing Verizon has over Clear is brand recognition. IMO if Clear wants to keep its advantage they need to increase their advertisement.

w0g
o.O

join:2001-08-30
Springfield, OR

Re: Verizon not a threat.... yet

ever been in an area where Clear has service? billboards, flyers, TV and radio advertisements, dedicated Clear stores and kiosks in malls - they generally make themselves known.
hottboiinnc
ME

join:2003-10-15
Cleveland, OH

Re: Verizon not a threat.... yet

YEP! in Cleveland alone! they have ads on the electronic/tv style billboards- and normally like 5 different ads on them, one mall as a HUGE kiosk and only 2 little laptops to show off the service but you can see the HUGE green signs a good 500feet from the little booth. The other mall has signs all over it in the sign stands. Clear Channel Radio stations are giving away Clear Internet away for 1-2 years on differnet things they're doing. TWC is running their ads and some of them even have the Clear brand on them.

I've never seen so many ads for one company at once. The only thing i haven't seen yet are TV ads here.
chsteiger
Premium
join:2003-10-03
Pasadena, TX
Clear's coverage is real bad.. so I would like to see is VZ is better.
hottboiinnc
ME

join:2003-10-15
Cleveland, OH

Re: Verizon not a threat.... yet

you'll have that with any network that is brand new and still being built. And actually ALL wireless carriers DO NOT tell you that you can use your device in the "coverage map" coverage is always an estimate.
chgo_man99

join:2010-01-01
Schaumburg, IL
Reviews:
·AT&T U-Verse
·Mediacom
·T-Mobile US

Clear should close its stores and only sell online

There is no advantage for them running store. When you buy something, you pay the same price whether with a contract or not. Online, you sometimes actually get a better deal and you still get good deal on fast shipping. I know from my experience, bc representatives refused to match pricing to clear's website.

Cancellation is a hassle. If you cancel let say, because you really don't need it and sell it on ebay, they lure you into transferring ownership (instead just cancelling and letting other guys register) for $25 dollar gift card. My "great buyer" started to use it right away while I did not have yet a time to suspend service bc they are closed on weekends. Once I suspended the buyer, oh suddenly was not interested in using it anymore. So I had to cancel contract anyway and paying extra days for buyer.
hottboiinnc
ME

join:2003-10-15
Cleveland, OH

Re: Clear should close its stores and only sell online

the stores allow the customers to actually use the product before they buy. The same thing Cell phone companies do with their products. So why close? It also allows you to save on shipping costs when buying. And you can talk to someone as well. Have a problem; return to the store. No problems.

And an FYI- you're review for them doesn't say much and says its for DSL. Clear is NOT DSL.
chgo_man99

join:2010-01-01
Schaumburg, IL
Reviews:
·AT&T U-Verse
·Mediacom
·T-Mobile US

Re: Clear should close its stores and only sell online

You cannot return there! You have to ship back to headquarters if you're not satisfied. Thats the biggest turn off about the stores. You cannot have there technical support either. Thats a dramatically different attitude from how cell phone stores treat their customers.

FYI - I know someone created Clearwire in a wrong category and there is another in the correct one.
hottboiinnc
ME

join:2003-10-15
Cleveland, OH

Re: Clear should close its stores and only sell online

uh not true in all stores. You can return here. your area must be totally differnet- just like with cell carriers. And NOT all cell phone companies let you return to the stores. I can't return my phone to a store. and i bought it from VZW.

DoRight

join:2007-07-20
East Petersburg, PA

Re: Clear should close its stores and only sell online

Maybe it's changed but when I left there in June company policy was not returns at any stores/kiosks. You were to return to local offices or ship back. I don't see how that's changed much

BillRoland
Premium
join:2001-01-21
Ocala, FL
kudos:2
Reviews:
·Cox HSI

Hesse is a clueless suit

Don't put any stock into anything Hesse says, he has a degree in talking out both sides of his mouth.

I am kind of curious what spectrum Sprint is supposed to build this LTE network out on?
--
"Don't steal. The government hates competition."
Beyond AM. Beyond FM. XM

rawgerz
The hell was that?
Premium
join:2004-10-03
Grove City, PA

Re: Hesse is a clueless suit

said by BillRoland:

I am kind of curious what spectrum Sprint is supposed to build this LTE network out on?

Nothing worth taking a second look at. Maybe they will in the next auction..
--

You can't make all the people happy all of the time. But it should be common sense to shoot for the majority.
hottboiinnc
ME

join:2003-10-15
Cleveland, OH
they have spectrum they're not using that Clear has on their site. Sprint still owns that. Clear does NOT. If it wasn't for Sprint, Clear wouldn't have a lot of the spectrum they have now.

redxii
Premium,Mod
join:2001-02-26
Sherwood, MI

Who would want it?

Throttle cap is something like 5MB or several email and weather checks a day.
hottboiinnc
ME

join:2003-10-15
Cleveland, OH

Re: Who would want it?

proof on cap?

They throttle NOT cap. And the throttling is ONLY for congested towers. and is EQUAL among ALL customers on that tower. NOT the entire network.

Stop believing everything you read on here.

redxii
Premium,Mod
join:2001-02-26
Sherwood, MI
Host:
Suddenlink
ISDN
Fiber Optic
Broadband Tweaks
/dev/null

Re: Who would want it?

I didn't have to *read* anything.

They don't equalize anything and if you check too many e-mails in a day you have to wait until midnight PST; if you checked way too many e-mails you have to wait a day or two or seven for the throttle to go away and the throttle won't release at midnight.

I'm pretty sure our tower isn't congested, we're on the edge of town and only a half mile from the tower, and Clear isn't the only broadband.
--
ASUS P5WDE-2 Premium | Pentium D 965 EE @ 4039MHz | 4GB DDR2-1066/OCZ2P10664GK | BFG GeForce GTX 275 OC 896MB | Hauppauge HVR-1600/1199 | Lite-On SHW-160P6S | 2x HD502HJ | Thermaltake Purepower RX CM 500W
hottboiinnc
ME

join:2003-10-15
Cleveland, OH

Re: Who would want it?

yah see- you're basing that off something you have NO clue what's going on. You fail to realize that CLEAR is NOT the ONLY one that is using that network. TWC uses it, Sprint uses it and every other new MNVO that signs up. So yes there could be that many users on it and you'd have NO clue. So why keep saying shit that isn't true about them. You have no proof on anything.

redxii
Premium,Mod
join:2001-02-26
Sherwood, MI

Re: Who would want it?

I use(d) Clear. Why wouldn't I know what's going on ?

Link

join:2001-12-16
Davis, CA

Re: Who would want it?

I used Clear, and found it to be a very, very positive experience.

There were definitely kinks though, most of them came from the IT guys having their heads up their butts iMHO, who routes traffic in the bay area through virginia or washington or whatever?! Come on! Idiots -_-

VZW's policies and pricing suck, and they might very well lose out in aircards, where sprint+clear are doing a great job right now.
--
VGMasters my video game forum

battleop

join:2005-09-28
00000
"I'm pretty sure our tower isn't congested,"

Do you have any real data to back that up or are you just making it up?

thecybernerd
Premium
join:2007-01-05
Great Falls, VA

Sprint will use Clear's network for LTE.

I think Sprint will use the Same Radio Access Network clear is using for WIMAX to deploy their LTE.
hottboiinnc
ME

join:2003-10-15
Cleveland, OH

Re: Sprint will use Clear's network for LTE.

won't build the LTE network for anything but roaming. And that is if TMO is on deck. Sprint can build their network just fine on WiMax. And there is no proof that Sprint will build that network except for "employees' saying.

GNH
tolle causam
Premium
join:1999-12-20
Arlington, TX

HEADLINE 2014

"AT&T Absorbs Clearwire's Dual WiMax/LTE Network For Pennies On The Dollar"

Streaming News at 11
hottboiinnc
ME

join:2003-10-15
Cleveland, OH

Re: HEADLINE 2014

never happen.

GNH
tolle causam
Premium
join:1999-12-20
Arlington, TX

Re: HEADLINE 2014

I'd like a dollar for every time I heard that...
hottboiinnc
ME

join:2003-10-15
Cleveland, OH

Re: HEADLINE 2014

and it won't happen. Sprint won't build the LTE network for their own use. and ATT won't ever take them.
Sammer

join:2005-12-22
Canonsburg, PA
More likely HEADLINE 2012

"Deutsche Telekom to merge T-Mobile USA with Sprint in 4G joint venture"

GNH
tolle causam
Premium
join:1999-12-20
Arlington, TX

Re: HEADLINE 2014

Yep.

Tuesday, 21-May 02:10:32 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 13.5 years online © 1999-2013 dslreports.com.