dslreports logo
 story category
Ex-Cox Supervisor Arrested For Superbowl Porn
FBI Gets Involved, Busts 38-Year-Old
You might recall that a few years ago about 80,000 Comcast customers watching the Superbowl in Tuscon got a heavy dose of pornography instead of play-action passes, something Comcast apologized for by issuing all regional customers $10 credits. A few years later the investigation has resulted in the FBI and local police arresting a then Cox Communications worker on suspicion of fraud and computer tampering. Comcast Tucson receives the KVOA feed through an arrangement with Cox, and the 38-year-old ex-Cox supervisor apparently thought it would be funny to instead deliver Wild Cherries 5 instead of the Arizona Cardinals for thirty eight seconds.
view:
topics flat nest 

Duramax08
To The Moon
Premium Member
join:2008-08-03
San Antonio, TX

Duramax08

Premium Member

Todd spangler wrote the article

Oh look Karl, Its your buddy Todd Spangler!


Bill Neilson
Premium Member
join:2009-07-08
Alexandria, VA

Bill Neilson

Premium Member

To be fair

"and the 38-year-old ex-Cox supervisor apparently thought it would be funny to instead deliver Wild Cherries 5 instead of the Arizona Cardinals for thirty eight seconds."

It was funny

RockCake
Premium Member
join:2005-07-12
Woodbridge, VA

RockCake

Premium Member

Re: To be fair

Cox....porn...there's a joke there somewhere.

james1
join:2001-02-26

james1 to Bill Neilson

Member

to Bill Neilson
Alot of funny things are illegal. Raping a clown for example.

Also, I'm not sure why the FBI is wasting its time on something so trivial and inconsequential. No one was ever in any sort of danger, even if it was an ongoing thing the FBI has enough things to do. Don't they have "terrorists" to catch?

This was at worst an investigation for the FCC to take care of, and at best should have been taken care of via civil lawsuits by offended individuals and an internal investigation to fire the person responsible.

I'm starting to agree that the intelligence services in the US are bloated and overlapping their mandates with other far less expensive branches of the government.
Crookshanks
join:2008-02-04
Binghamton, NY

Crookshanks

Member

Re: To be fair

If computer hacking was involved then laws were broken. If laws were broken it's certainly an issue for law enforcement, not just a civil matter.

Might agree with you that the FBI has better things to be doing but some sort of law enforcement investigation was bound to happen.

Edrick
I aspire to tell the story of a lifetime
Premium Member
join:2004-09-11
Woburn, MA

Edrick

Premium Member

Re: To be fair

The article doesn't state that it was hacking. It says computer tampering, which if at the time he was an employee and had authorized access to the system. Then it wasn't hacking and wasn't a federal case. It's an employer issue if while on the company dime he changed the programming.
theboz1419
join:2003-02-12
Elgin, IL

theboz1419

Member

Re: To be fair

What he did was against federal laws.
hottboiinnc4
ME
join:2003-10-15
Cleveland, OH

hottboiinnc4

Member

Re: To be fair

how do you claim that? he did NOT hack the system. He already had access to the system. That is NOT hacking. no crimes were broken. Not a Federal case. the FBI is waisting $$$ on this and the FCC as well.

SomeJoe7777
join:2010-03-30
Houston, TX
kudos:7

SomeJoe7777

Member

Re: To be fair

I don't think so.

He had access to Cox's systems, but he caused unwanted events on Comcast's systems, to which he was not authorized access. That's computer tampering, same as a virus writer can be charged with damage to other computer systems.

Also, he caused $800,000 of revenue loss for a business, that's where the fraud charge comes in.

This isn't a civil case, it's criminal, for sure. Whether the FBI or local law enforcement should be the investigating party might be up for debate, but once he caused damages that are in the criminal vice civil realm, it is beyond the jurisdiction of agencies like the FCC, and beyond something that can be handled with a civil suit in the courtroom.
expert007
join:2006-01-10
Buffalo, NY

expert007 to james1

Member

to james1
Now THAT was funny. Unless you're a clown.

TechieZero
Tools Are Using Me
Premium Member
join:2002-01-25
Lithia, FL

TechieZero to james1

Premium Member

to james1
"To me, clowns aren't funny. In fact, they're kinda scary. I've wondered where this started, and I think it goes back to the time I went to the circus and a clown killed my dad."
-- Jack Handey

ArrayList
DevOps
Premium Member
join:2005-03-19
Boston, MA
·RCN

ArrayList to james1

Premium Member

to james1
said by james1:

Alot of funny things are illegal. Raping a clown for example.

not in Tennessee it isn't.
chgo_man99
join:2010-01-01
San Jose, CA

chgo_man99 to james1

Member

to james1
Add to that SuperBowl watch underage (under 18) teenagers and it is against federal law to show them porn, even if it was a softcore almost not showing anything.

The only kind of porn I saw on TV like Cinenamx was after midnight and it was not even hardcore.

cdru
Go Colts
MVM
join:2003-05-14
Fort Wayne, IN
kudos:7

cdru

MVM

Re: To be fair

said by chgo_man99:

Add to that SuperBowl watch underage (under 18) teenagers and it is against federal law to show them porn, even if it was a softcore almost not showing anything.

Not if it's not interstate or foreign. Since it all happened within the state of Arizona, the federal statute wouldn't apply. It also specifically mentions "knowingly transfer." I'm not sure "making available" meets that threshold even though in all probability minors would see it.

N3OGH
Yo Soy Col. "Bat" Guano
Premium Member
join:2003-11-11
Philly burbs
kudos:2

N3OGH to Bill Neilson

Premium Member

to Bill Neilson
This guy had to WANT to get fired. Literally had to WANT it.

In the end, they'll probably tag him with $800K worth of restitution, and drop him on some sort of probation.

Metatron2008
Premium Member
join:2008-09-02
united state

Metatron2008

Premium Member

Sounds like the supervisor enjoyed working for Cox.

He won't have any lack of Cox in jail.
peters4n6
Premium Member
join:2002-10-11
Tucson, AZ

peters4n6

Premium Member

Spelling pet peeve

Jeez...Tucson is spelled t-u-C-S-o-n NOT t-u-S-C-o-n. Almost as bad as the flight attendant who I heard recently upon landing stating, " Welcome to TUCK-sawn, "

Sorry for the pet peeve.

GroovyPhoenx
Premium Member
join:2006-05-22
Gloucester, ON

GroovyPhoenx

Premium Member

Cox and porn!

Won't SOMEBODY think of the children!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Sorry I had to do it. LOL

bigfitch
Premium Member
join:2005-06-01
Aurora, IL

bigfitch

Premium Member

Re: Cox and porn!

To bad it wasn't in place of the half time show. The guy might be getting a raise. " No pun intended " Less people would have tuned to a diff channel when B.E.P. Was tone deaf.


AlphaOne
I see
Premium Member
join:2004-02-21
kudos:1

AlphaOne

Premium Member

It took them this long?

The guy left Cox "shortly after the Super Bowl incident".
That's a red flag right there. Cox probably knew or already made aware of what happened. They probably fired the guy, or forced him to leave. If the guy just left to avoid any investigation, well he was wrong ... and shame on Cox for not noticing the red flag.
Or are they just waiting for the investigators to sero in to the facts? I hope there's no cover up has been done.

And kids, I agree that FBI has other things that needs to be done.
But Comcast did their share of investigation, and found out that the feed to them is at fault. They have to let FBI know, as there some sort of tampering involve, nobody knows exactly what really happened at that time.

It's a waste of resources, and Cox should have been proactive on the issue. Investigation shouldn't lasted for several weeks.

Jeffrey
Connoisseur of leisurely things
Premium Member
join:2002-12-24
Long Island
kudos:3

Jeffrey

Premium Member

Important sidenote

Wild Cherries 5 wasn't even that good. Wild Cheries #1 and #2 were far better.

AlphaOne
I see
Premium Member
join:2004-02-21
kudos:1

AlphaOne

Premium Member

Re: Important sidenote

said by Jeffrey:

Wild Cherries 5 wasn't even that good. Wild Cheries #1 and #2 were far better.

Please explain in detail.

Oh, pictures please.

antdude
A Ninja Ant
VIP
join:2001-03-25
United State
kudos:5

antdude

VIP

38?

Seconds and Years? Weird. Why not 69? :P
OmagicQ
Posting in a thread near you
join:2003-10-23
Bakersfield, CA
kudos:2

OmagicQ

Member

Re: 38?

said by antdude:

Seconds and Years? Weird. Why not 69? :P

38 seconds might be the threshold of comprehension time for the average cox subscriber (IE it would take 38 seconds for viewers to figure out what was happening and react)

who knows.


How about ..