 kataanRIP my love.Premium join:2003-04-22 Greenacres, WA | The Empire at its greatest!
Now witness the firepower of this fully ARMED and OPERATIONAL Telecom station! | |
|
 | | Tmobile to Metro? No Thanks... I'm sure all those Tmobile customers forced onto MetroPCS will be thrilled... | |
|
 |  |
 |  |  | | Re: Tmobile to Metro? No Thanks... why not? they can keep the same TMO call centers since those centers are the ones that know how the TMO GSM network operate. Would be pointless to try and merge them now into CDMA- would only make sense to merge the systems later in a new network. | |
|
 |  |  |  |
 |  | | said by lakerfan82:I'm sure all those Tmobile customers forced onto MetroPCS will be thrilled... Despite Sprint imposing caps, I'll be a scruffy-looking nerf herder before I go to MetroPCS. | |
|
 SnakeoilIgnore Button. The coward's feature.Premium join:2000-08-05 Mentor, OH kudos:1 Reviews:
·RoadRunner Cable
·magicjack.com
| How much will AT&T spend to get T-Mo I wonder how much all this wheeling and dealing is costing AT&T on top of the buy out of T-Mo.
I'm surprised the investors haven't started crying about it as of yet. -- Is a person a failure for doing nothing? Or is he a failure for trying, and not succeeding at what he is attempting to do? What did you fail at today?. | |
|
 |  openbox9Premium join:2004-01-26 japan kudos:2 | Re: How much will AT&T spend to get T-Mo Crying about what? Eliminating competition and growing assets all the while potentially raking in several billion $? So far investors are fairly content. | |
|
 |  |  SnakeoilIgnore Button. The coward's feature.Premium join:2000-08-05 Mentor, OH kudos:1 | Re: How much will AT&T spend to get T-Mo All the spin ads they have been rolling out, all the extra lobbying, has to add up to a pretty penny. I for one will not be an AT&T customer. | |
|
 | | Proposed Condition for Merger
AT&T should only be required to meet one condition:
The spectrum must not be sold direct to end users. Meaning that it may only be sold at wholesale to unrelated entities that must actually COMPETE for subscribers. | |
|
 |  | | Re: Proposed Condition for Merger Metro PCS is CDMA. TMO is GSM. Would be the same problem as Sprint acquiring TMO customers. I prefer GSM. | |
|
 |  |  | | Re: Proposed Condition for Merger
First, MetroPCS has nothing to do with my proposal. This article discusses a different proposal which would include divesting assets that would benefit smaller carriers. I'm talking about a requirement for a wholesale ONLY network, totally separate. Meaning that AT&T will not have any end-users as customers.
Second, both T-Mo and AT&T are GSM networks.
Third, if there are problems with 3G compatibility, then the Justice Dept. could negotiate that this requirement would apply only to the next generation and future networks, including the 4G LTE network that just began rolling out. | |
|
 n2jtx join:2001-01-13 Glen Head, NY | My Wish... @ATTFAIL
I want to see this proposed merger go down in flames. The U.S. needs two nationwide GSM carriers. -- I support the right to keep and arm bears. | |
|
 |  RoKmAn join:2000-09-09 East Elmhurst, NY Reviews:
·gogo wireless
| Re: My Wish... Your wish is legitimate considering the mass deployment of VoLTE is eons away despite all major carriers choosing to adopt LTE ( the result of the evolution of GSM) anyway. Also, given the insane amount of differing frequencies used with LTE by the different carriers, roaming and other convergence benefits remain distant. | |
|
 |  | | Ditto here if just for the fact I hate companies that are to big for their own britches!!
I can't believe the DOJ and FCC can be this blind and ignorant! -- The Firefox alternative. »www.mozilla.org/projects/seamonkey/ | |
|
 |  |  | | Re: My Wish... said by cork1958:Ditto here if just for the fact I hate companies that are to big for their own britches!!
I can't believe the DOJ and FCC can be this blind and ignorant! I thought the DOJ was fighting this? | |
|
 RobIn Deo speramus.Premium join:2001-08-25 Kendall, FL kudos:3 | Put T-Mobile in an Escrow.. Set some very strict and tough requirements (i.e. AT&T must build out their 3G network to at least 90% of their network, roll out U-Verse to new markets, etc). Keep T-Mobile in escrow until they have met the requirements. -- CheckSite.us | YourIP.us | Reverseip.us | |
|
 |  cdruGo ColtsPremium,MVM join:2003-05-14 Fort Wayne, IN kudos:7 | Re: Put T-Mobile in an Escrow.. said by Rob:Set some very strict and tough requirements (i.e. AT&T must build out their 3G network to at least 90% of their network, roll out U-Verse to new markets, etc). Keep T-Mobile in escrow until they have met the requirements. Yeah, because putting a company as large as T-Mobile "in escrow" is going to work. AT&T can build out their network to 90% now for a fraction of what they are paying for TMobile. UVerse and wireless are completely different and I don't see conditions for one being put on the other. Verizon Wireless was never in the picture when Frontier had their transaction.
If TMo were to go into escrow it would die. AT&T wins regardless if they hold up their end of the deal or not. At that is what AT&T wants. | |
|
 |  |  RobIn Deo speramus.Premium join:2001-08-25 Kendall, FL kudos:3 | Re: Put T-Mobile in an Escrow.. When I meant escrow, I meant pending sale. | |
|
 |  |  |  cdruGo ColtsPremium,MVM join:2003-05-14 Fort Wayne, IN kudos:7 | Re: Put T-Mobile in an Escrow.. said by Rob:When I meant escrow, I meant pending sale. You don't put $39b transactions in "Pending Sale" while they operate any length of time. Either DT owns them, or AT&T owns them, but not state of limbo. Putting them pending just ends up hurting the consumer as they have no idea what's happening to them. | |
|
 |  |  |  |  RobIn Deo speramus.Premium join:2001-08-25 Kendall, FL kudos:3 | Re: Put T-Mobile in an Escrow.. said by cdru:said by Rob:When I meant escrow, I meant pending sale. You don't put $39b transactions in "Pending Sale" while they operate any length of time. Either DT owns them, or AT&T owns them, but not state of limbo. Putting them pending just ends up hurting the consumer as they have no idea what's happening to them. Uhh they have no idea what's happening to them now. Nothing changes. Time to make demands for corporations to honor before we approve mergers. First they follow through, then we push the deal through. None of this "We promise we'll do x and y". -- CheckSite.us | YourIP.us | Reverseip.us | |
|
 jfmezeiPremium join:2007-01-03 Pointe-Claire, QC kudos:22 | AT&T should butt out In a way, the goverment should tell AT&T "No way José" and let MetrocPCS bid on T-Mobile if it wants it. Since MetroPCS is going LTE, then T-Mobile's network may not be so incompatible after all.
If Sprint had a good track record of mergers, it too would e OK to buy T-Mobile. But I doubt they could succesfully integrate T-Mobile into Sprint. | |
|
 Reviews:
·ooma
·Optimum Online
·Verizon FiOS
| they keep hiding THE clip.. apparently Lucas doesn't want this clip (destroying the deathstar) to stay on youtube for very long... O-well...
»www.youtube.com/watch?v=vmRfj2dF7gM
You don't compromise with Evil.. Don't know why they keep floating these paltry on the cheap ideas to keep the deal alive.. it's progressing to the terminal stage of death (a trial). $4 Billion of spectrum and customers does not equal the entire assets of Cingular AND BellSouth. No deal. | |
|
 morboComplete Your Transaction join:2002-01-22 00000 | Metro PCS vs T-Mobile? Metro PCS vs T-Mobile? Let's just say that I hate calling my friend on Metro PCS because coverage and dropped calls is so bad. It wasn't bad when he was on T-Mobile. | |
|
 |  Reviews:
·ooma
·Optimum Online
·Verizon FiOS
| Re: Metro PCS vs T-Mobile? said by morbo:Metro PCS vs T-Mobile? Let's just say that I hate calling my friend on Metro PCS because coverage and dropped calls is so bad. It wasn't bad when he was on T-Mobile. Metro PCS network mirrors that of sprint in coverage maps (which is to say cherry picked major metro cities), but with about 50% the amount of towers and 25% of 4g network coverage. All carriers are working to expand their networks to make them more seamless, but at varying degress of commitment to that goal (and financial ability to finance said buildouts). If universal voice, text, and data are most important to have everywhere you go.. there is a defacto duonpoly of AT&T and Verizon (and their respective MVNOs). Try to get cheaper service with another provider and you might be shut out when traveling with limited or notexistent service for roaming. | |
|
 |
|