dslreports logo
 story category
171 Groups Urge FCC, Congress to Protect Net Neutrality

A coalition of 171 public interest groups have sent a letter to Federal Communications Commission and Senate leaders, urging them not to kill the agency's 2015 net neutrality rules. In the letter, groups including Consumer Union (owner of Consumer Reports), Public Knowledge, the ACLU, the EFF, Free Press and more argue that the rules have massive public support, and eliminating them would be a major mistake for the Pai-lead FCC, Trump, and the GOP. The letter was sent to to FCC Chairman Ajit Pai, Senate Commerce Committee Chairman John Thune, and Ranking Member Bill Nelson (D-Fla.).

Click for full size
"Protecting net neutrality is crucial to ensuring that the internet remains a central driver of economic growth and opportunity, job creation, education, free expression, and civic organizing for everyone," the letter warned.

The groups were also quick to deflate broadband industry claims (often using ISP-funded think tanks that cherry pick data) that the FCC's rules stifled broadband deployment.

"Since the order went into effect, broadband infrastructure investment is up, ISP revenues are at record highs, and businesses continue developing innovative ideas and offerings," said the letter. "A 2016 report found that the total capital expenditures of ISPs increased by 4 percent and that total revenues increased by 5 percent from 2014 to 2015."

While FCC boss Ajit Pai has stated he wants the rules killed, it's unlikely that the FCC itself will do the killing. Reversing the rules via the existing FCC process would require convincing the courts that things have changed dramatically since the FCC's massive legal win last year. It would also require a new public comment period, something net neutrality opponents would like to avoid for what should be obvious reasons.

All told, it's believed that the GOP will try to kill net neutrality either via a standalone piece of legislation, or via a Communications Act rewrite. Like the Thule proposal that tried to pre-empt the FCC's 2015 rules, the bill will likely profess to "save" net neutrality by encoding it into law, but will be so riddled with loopholes as to make it a sharp step backward from leaving the existing rules in place.


Most recommended from 60 comments



UnloadedOne
join:2015-04-04
Astoria, NY

UnloadedOne

Member

Can't hear you!

Pai: (covering ears) La! La! La! Can't hear you all!! La! La! La!

Anon33637
@digitalocean.com

Anon33637

Anon

Too many billionaires running America

I wish those groups good luck. But with a billionaire so called president and his partially billionaire cabinet the american consumer will lose their rights or have reduced rights. Unless competition exist.

The republicans today are dismantling health insurance for those who want or need it and guess who may benefit the most. I'm thinking big insurance corporations. And everyone get old and may need health insurance.

Anon6723e
@2602:306.x

Anon6723e

Anon

Lol

Lol! These clowns ignored the fact that they got CRUSHED in the popular vote, something that would incline a sensible party to at least tack towards the center, but no, they're doubling down on a platform aimed at 40% of the electorate. I'm sure at this point a LETTER is going to convince them to change course....

By all means, write your letters to Congress and the FCC, at least you'll lower Federal expenditures on toilet paper....

P Ness
You'Ve Forgotten 9-11 Already
Premium Member
join:2001-08-29
way way out

P Ness

Premium Member

Good freaking luck

Good luck after the moves of the FCC and now the release of the Healthcare plan.
this President and our congress are all in favor of corporate america over the consumer.

just handing money hand over fist to corporate america, who knew we voted Hillary into office.
quisp65
join:2003-05-03
San Diego, CA

quisp65

Member

If GOP controls the authority isn't it already gone anyway

If GOP controls the authority isn't it already gone anyway? Would somehow rules get enforced?

I don't remember anything getting enforced to begin with. What am I missing?

radem
join:2001-05-31
Windermere, FL

radem

Member

With zero rating, it is already dead

Most ISPs have just capped their "unlimited" internet plans at below what 10% or more of their users were using and zero rated those "services" that either followed their special rules or paid the ISP to zero rate their data. Net Neutrality died as soon as zero rating was allowed by the FCC. This was allowed because of the amount of money that large ISPs send to politicians and allowed them to claim that they implemented Net Neutrality without really enforcing it.

Net Neutrality means that data over the Internet must be treated as neutral unless the ISP has to do something to properly operate their network. Allowed changes for properly operating a network are throttles when network connections are overloaded, stopping denial of service attacks, etc. ISPs were absolutely not allowed under the true definition of Net Neutrality to charge their customers for some data and not for other data as this is the opposite of treating all data as the same. Yes, they are not blocking certain data (unless you go over their artificially low cap) they are just penalizing you for using data other than the ISP's "preferred" data by charging you by consuming part of your cap.