 1 edit | Hello?? What if the converter boxes wind up costing 100 dollars? Why should people have to PAY so the Govt. can make money? I would consider this a form of taxation! | |
|
 |  HallPremium,MVM join:2000-04-28 Dayton, OH kudos:1 | Re: Hello?? The frequencies that analog TV is currently carried on is going to be sold (rented ?) by the gov't to entities for non-TV usage, hence the part of the story that mentions $10b from auction. In theory, it will cost taxpayers ZERO. | |
|
 |  |  en102Canadian, eh? join:2001-01-26 Valencia, CA | Re: Hello?? Get an HD antenna. | |
|
 |  |  |  dvd536as Mr. Pink as they comePremium join:2001-04-27 Phoenix, AZ kudos:4 | Re: Hello?? $35.00 and they suck |
said by en102:Get an HD antenna. HD antennas dont exist. they're just jazzy looking rabbit ears and DONT WORK any better than a dollar store set of rabbit ears. And with digital TV's its all or nothing got iffy signal? no snowy but watchable picture. forcing digital is bad for those with only indoor antennas. -- You can never be too rich, too thin or have too much Bandwidth | |
|
 |  |  |  |  Fluker join:2005-04-07 West Lafayette, IN | Re: Hello?? have you ever actually seen an hdtv signal OTA?
It just plays like a scratched dvd, or satelite during a light storm.
You'll see artifacts and some jumping, but it's not quite on or off like a light switch.
analog is such a waste of potential bandwidth. A signal that had some snow is FLAWLESS in digital. | |
|
 |  |  |  |  |  jgelow join:2005-05-28 Moreno Valley, CA | Re: Hello?? It depends on how far away you are from the broadcaster. I set my mother-inlaw's tv with a decent ota ant and the picture was dead on. I was jealous since I couldn't get a signal like that unless I pay for it through sat or cable. | |
|
 |  |  |  |  |  RayWPremium join:2001-09-01 Layton, UT kudos:1 | said by Fluker:have you ever actually seen an hdtv signal OTA? It just plays like a scratched dvd, or satelite during a light storm. You'll see artifacts and some jumping, but it's not quite on or off like a light switch. analog is such a waste of potential bandwidth. A signal that had some snow is FLAWLESS in digital. Hmmm...My neighbor is a broadcast engineer and his testing makes him an advocate of Digital OTA vice digital over AT&T cable. But time will tell when we all have to shift.
And yes, digital is more efficient, but conversely is less fringe area friendly. -- I am not lost, I find myself every time. | |
|
 |  |  |  |  |  |  Fluker join:2005-04-07 West Lafayette, IN 1 edit | Re: Hello?? I imagine that a comparison of quality over distance would look like this, with the top line representing digital vs analog on the bottom | |
|
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  RayWPremium join:2001-09-01 Layton, UT kudos:1 | Re: Hello?? said by Fluker:I imagine that a comparison of quality over distance would look like this, with the top line representing digital vs analog on the bottom You are almost right. Analog extends much further to the right past digital and the digital is a much sharper cutoff. Digital seems to be an all or nothing proposition and unlike FM and AM, if you miss any data you lose all of it.
We played around with the digital radios a year or two ago and found that they stay much clearer and seem to have more information carrying capability for a given bandwidth, however if you are working under marginal conditions, they stopped working where a FM radio could still make contact (granted we sometimes had to repeat several times it was so poor, but it at least worked). -- I am not lost, I find myself every time. | |
|
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | | It is more like this with the top line representing digital vs analog on the bottom, which extends further right | |
|
 |  |  |  |  |  Reviews:
·Verizon FiOS
| said by Fluker:have you ever actually seen an hdtv signal OTA? It just plays like a scratched dvd, or satelite during a light storm. You'll see artifacts and some jumping, but it's not quite on or off like a light switch. OTA HDTV is in the uhf band - you just need a good uhf antenna. I got one for about $25, it's small and worked like a champ.
with regard to quality, I never had problems with picture quality except during storms. In fact, OTA HD looks better than satellite or cable because it's not compressed as much. | |
|
 |  |  |  |  |  |  scooper join:2000-07-11 Youngsville, NC kudos:2 Reviews:
·Time Warner Cable
·Embarq Now Centu..
| Re: Hello?? Bad answer - WHEN the analog is shutoff, the Digital TV range will be in the exact same frequencies as the current 2-51. Since 2-13 are VHF - that puts your statement inaccurate in the first place.
Another thing - due to some issues, channels 2-6 will generally be avoided by commercial TV broadcasters when possible. But channel 7-13 are quite desireable - lower power required than the UHF band, yet relatively free of the problems of 2-6. What channels your TV stations will be on after Feb 17, 2009 depends on several things, but there are sources for that out on the net. nasadude - you better do some checking.... | |
|
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | | Re: Hello?? There are stations using vhf for their digital broadcast. WFAA (ABC)in Dallas is one of them. | |
|
 |  |  |  |  |  |
 |  |  |  |  bi0tech join:2003-06-19 Cockeysville, MD Reviews:
·Comcast
·Verizon FiOS
| More misunderstanding.
You are correct that there is no HD antennas. Thats more of a marketing concept.
Rabbit ears are used for VHF reception. Digital stations in most areas of the US are broadcasting on UHF. For lowest cost this would be a 'bowtie' style antenna.
You will generally be able to pick up more analog signals on the edge of usable then digital. But the quality is usually so low I don't particularly agree that its better in anyway. Where as the digital signals that are received by a low cost antenna suited to the location (UHF/VHF/directional/multi-direction) are all good quality. So if really want an extra few channels that sort of resemble a picture with sound, then yes a digital upgrade is probably bad for you. | |
|
 |  |  ricep5Premium join:2000-08-07 Jacksonville, FL | said by Hall:The frequencies that analog TV is currently carried on is going to be sold (rented ?) by the gov't to entities for non-TV usage, hence the part of the story that mentions $10b from auction. In theory, it will cost taxpayers ZERO. I have bad news....govt. spectrum auctions are a form of deferred taxation.
How do you think these companies afford to bid, because they know they can pass it on. Thats right, the very people who actually use it. In most cases that is you and me.
So while the press rags on about how spectrum auctions bring revenue to the govt., in essence, its an indirect tax. Govt. gets the money right away, the citizens pay a little later. | |
|
 |  Reviews:
·Optimum Online
·Verizon FiOS
| said by qworster:What if the converter boxes wind up costing 100 dollars? Why should people have to PAY so the Govt. can make money? I would consider this a form of taxation! Sounds like the government has been bought and paid for. Frickin politicians getting paid by lobbyists for the cable/TV/satellite industry. | |
|
 |  Greg_ZPremium join:2001-08-08 Springfield, IL | Then those people do not need them, nor a TV and can go back to spending time with their families, or reading a good book. Evil concept, but television is the devil. -- I threw out the map a long time ago. Now I follow my own direction! | |
|
 |  | | »www.newegg.com/Product/Product.a···82107049
80$ and you can get an FCC waiver to offset that by 100$. So that poor old man in Texas can get a set top box can make 20$ on the deal.
This device is basically for standard TVs, its not for HDTV sets. | |
|
 |  |  plat2on1 join:2002-08-21 Hopewell Junction, NY | Re: Hello?? said by elister:» www.newegg.com/Product/Product.a···8210704980$ and you can get an FCC waiver to offset that by 100$. So that poor old man in Texas can get a set top box can make 20$ on the deal. This device is basically for standard TVs, its not for HDTV sets. and that is $80 right now...in two years when they are required they will probably cost a 1/4 of that | |
|
 |  |  |  Fluker join:2005-04-07 West Lafayette, IN | Re: Hello?? exactly.
DVD players can be had for $30 right now and they have somewhat complex moving parts.
I doubt it will be long before there's an inline box with a RF remote selling for $25 | |
|
 |  |  |  |
 |  |  |  |  HetermanPremium join:2004-02-28 Fayetteville, AR | Re: Hello?? If they're going to be that stripped, then there will have to be a modulator included. How else is the signal going to be displayed? | |
|
 |  |  |  |  |  Fluker join:2005-04-07 West Lafayette, IN | Re: Hello?? I was thinking that it won't be long before there is a little deal the size of an ipod that just goes behind the TV and has a non line of sight RF remote.
Who even needs to know it's there? | |
|
 |  |  HallPremium,MVM join:2000-04-28 Dayton, OH kudos:1 | said by elister: 80$ and you can get an FCC waiver to offset that by 100$. So that poor old man in Texas can get a set top box can make 20$ on the deal. I'm pretty sure the coupons won't be for $100. I recall $40 or $50 being the planned value. You also won't be able to buy something for less than that and apply the full coupon value, i.e. "make money". If you have a $40 coupon and buy a $30 box, it's called even.
»www.ntia.doc.gov/dtvcoupon/index.html
»www.ntia.doc.gov/dtvcoupon/faq.html | |
|
 |  | | said by qworster:What if the converter boxes wind up costing 100 dollars? Why should people have to PAY so the Govt. can make money? I would consider this a form of taxation! Are you a moron? Why should the government have to give people money to buy a converter box to get TV signal? People should feel lucky they are getting that much. There is not law that states the government has to provide people subsidies to get television service. | |
|
 amungusPremium join:2004-11-26 America Reviews:
·AT&T DSL Service
| sad indeed that truly is a sad sad photo.
The old adage, "if it isn't broken, then don't fix it" comes to mind.
I'm still a huge fan of analog, be it tv, audio, or whatever. I'm not looking forward to this shift, even though I do have cable. They will likely wish to switch too, if nothing else than for HDTV, and that means I'll have to get a box or three, likely a junky old moto unless I wish to pay for more. If/when that day comes, I'd rather bolt a dish on the roof and use cable for internet only. | |
|
 |  | | Re: sad indeed With the garbage on TV I have no intention of buying one. Goodbye TV | |
|
 |  |  | | Re: sad indeed said by rid0617:With the garbage on TV I have no intention of buying one. Goodbye TV here here. | |
|
 |  |  | | said by rid0617:With the garbage on TV I have no intention of buying one. Goodbye TV Pretty much sums up my thinking. -- Saving the world keeps me busy. However, I find Earth very primitive from my home planet of Krypton. -Supergirl | |
|
 |  |  swhx7Premium join:2006-07-23 Elbonia | said by rid0617:With the garbage on TV I have no intention of buying one. Goodbye TV Never mind the rubbish, DVDs will still play perfectly. | |
|
 algPassionately apatheticPremium join:2001-04-10 Houston, TX kudos:3 | Converters quote: "It's going to affect a lot of people, and it's going to leave a lot of people without TV," Perlin said. "I don't want cable because I don't need that many channels."
Then don't buy cable and just get the tuner so you can continue watching OTA. I'm really getting tired of everybody thinking that they will need to get cable or satellite in 2009 just to watch their local channels. -- Stop spamming the forums with Mafia games already. | |
|
 |  See 6 replies to this post |
|
 pnh102Reptiles Are Cuddly And PrettyPremium join:2002-05-02 Mount Airy, MD | Pathetic
What did these people do when DC power was phased out? -- Only SHATNER is Kirk. | |
|
 |  See 6 replies to this post |
|
 PashuneCaps stifle innovationPremium join:2006-04-14 Gautier, MS | Well ..Well, I guess I'm ready, despite I have a DirecTV box that's close to 10 years old now.. | |
|
 DrModemPremium join:2006-10-19 USA kudos:1 1 edit | Healthiness Boost With thier health conditions most probably don't need to be watching TV anyhow.
This switch will be a boost to national health!
------
Plus tv is trash anyway. | |
|
 |
 | | ears quote: "Perlin, 88, will be among nearly 500,000 in greater Houston, according to Nielsen, whose rabbit ears won't cut it anymore.
The rabbit ears are just fine.... | |
|
 |  | | Re: ears Yup, keep the ears, replace the TV and get nice clean uncompressed HD  | |
|
 |  |  |
 |  |  |  gaforcesUnited We Stand, Divided We Fall join:2002-04-07 Santa Cruz, CA 1 edit | Re: ears From what Ive read, a standard uhf/vhf antenna is all thats needed for ota hd signals. So the old mans rabbit ears will still work. -- The will of the people is the best law. -Ulysses S Grant | |
|
 |  |  Reviews:
·Comcast
·AT&T Midwest
1 edit | said by dallasb:Yup, keep the ears, replace the TV and get nice clean uncompressed HD You will NEVER see Un-Compressed HD, unless you sneak into the remote truck!!!
Un-Compressed HD is 1.2 Gigabits/sec for video only. -- Looking for 1939 Indian Motocycle | |
|
 81399672Premium join:2006-05-17 Los Angeles, CA kudos:2 | I refuse to switch I refuse to switch and i hope a lot of people complain about the switch -- i am not a lawyer but I do play one on internet | |
|
 |  See 17 replies to this post |
|
 jjoshuaPremium join:2001-06-01 Scotch Plains, NJ kudos:1 1 edit | All I need... ...Is a video capture card that accepts a cablecard - and that's only if Comcast stops transmitting analog. MythTv FTW. | |
|
 |  | | Re: All I need... Cablecards don't (and probably never will) work in linux. So much for MythTv 
Most people have more that 3 TVs in the house. I have 6, so I am going to have to juggle my 2 convert between the 6 then? WTF
If everything had gone by the original plan, I think the digital switch would have happened several years ago, so there really isn't anything we can do anymore. | |
|
 |  |  jjoshuaPremium join:2001-06-01 Scotch Plains, NJ kudos:1 | Re: All I need... said by tad2020:Cablecards don't (and probably never will) work in linux. So much for MythTv The cablecard will work with a capture card that works with linux. We still have 2 years to sort this out. | |
|
 |  |  |  | | Re: All I need... said by jjoshua:The cablecard will work with a capture card that works with linux. I think your mistaken. Shy of 3rd party drivers, it'll never work.
For what little information there is out there on PCs and cablecars, I found this: »www.pcmag.com/article2/0,1895,1908511,00.asp
retail products may be available, but even those will be limited to systems running the new Microsoft O/S. The reason for this is the requirement by the content providers and cable TV companies for the robust content protection built into Vista. If linux drivers ever do get made, it won't surprise me if it would be a TOS violation with your cable company. | |
|
 |  |  |
 |  |  |  | | Re: All I need... The TiVo linux has a precompied binary supplied to them for that particular platform. Those CableCard drivers will only work for TiVo linux on TiVo hardware. The only chance we have for seeing drivers that will work on other linux platforms is if somebody reverse engineers those binaries and makes new ones. | |
|
 Jodokast96Stupid people really piss me off.Premium join:2005-11-23 Erial, NJ kudos:2 | What you've all missed in the article... ...is that a lot of people don't even know it's coming. You can bitch about old people and stubborn asses all you want, but only a handful of people I know have heard anything about this. And articles like this comprise 90% of what I have read. | |
|
 |  See 25 replies to this post |
|
 Fluker join:2005-04-07 West Lafayette, IN | Some people still rent phones Some people hate change.
I've met people (Indiana has lots of "small world" types) who will get adamant about the superiority of carburetors, audio/video cassettes, typewriters or anything in the days before cell phones.
There will be a lot of pissing and moaning from these people before they even consider any of the possible advantages. | |
|
 yabos join:2003-02-16 London, ON | Oh well... It's called progress, you have to lose something to gain something and in this case the gain is worth it. | |
|
 |  | | Re: Oh well... said by yabos:It's called progress, you have to lose something to gain something and in this case the gain is worth it. To you and, I'd wager, a very small minority of the US population. To the rest of us, it's little to no gain and not worth any loss. And this is coming from an owner of an HDTV and an HDTV capture card. (Not to mention several older, perfectly functional NTSC only TVs, dozens of VCRs, and 4 DVD recorders, 2 with HDD DVR). I've watched HDTV. I'm underwhelmed. It's nice when done right, but not worth giving up my existing equipment or having to spend extra $$$ to keep it usable. Let alone falling victim to the inevitable restrictions that will work their way into digital broadcast TV over the years (think broadcast flag for starters). | |
|
 | | HDTV converters.. If there is HDTV usb conversion accessory for pc's for under $100, there's almost no doubt that converter boxes should get around that cheap come 2009, or shortly there after. | |
|
 PolarBear03The bear formerly known as aaron8301Premium join:2005-01-03 | What nobody realizes Nobody seems to realize that if you are currently watching analog OTA, NOTHING else is required to watch digital OTA, assuming your TV has an ATSC tuner. Digital OTA works just like analog: plug in an antenna and pick up a signal.
Last time I was at Walmart, I don't think they had a single TV for sale that DIDN'T have an ATSC tuner in it. -- A computer lets you make more mistakes faster than any other invention, with the possible exceptions of handguns and Tequilla. -- Mitch Ratcliffe | |
|
 |  KoolMoeAw ManPremium join:2001-02-14 Annapolis, MD | Re: What nobody realizes said by PolarBear03:...assuming your TV has an ATSC tuner. I agree the overall worry is overblown, though doesn't mean a lot of people won't be caught unaware. The biggest thing is as you state above. It kinda sucks forcing everyone who doesn't have a digital-ready (ATSC) TV to have to buy a new one, or buy a tuner.
Next year may be a good time to invest in the stock of low-end TV manufacturers....
Having three TVs in the house, one analog, one analog for console gaming only, and one digital, I'm not all that upset - I know it's coming and the one watched analog set is dying anyway. KM
But -- Don't Lie - Be Kind - Realize your Potential | |
|
 |  |  PolarBear03The bear formerly known as aaron8301Premium join:2005-01-03 | Re: What nobody realizes said by KoolMoe:It kinda sucks forcing everyone who doesn't have a digital-ready (ATSC) TV to have to buy a new one, or buy a tuner. I do agree, but nice HDTVs with ATSC tuners are getting cheaper all the time. And by 2009 when this goes into effect, they will be the same price as Tube TVs were in 2005.
So it does suck, but it won't suck nearly as bad as everyone is making it out to be. -- A computer lets you make more mistakes faster than any other invention, with the possible exceptions of handguns and Tequilla. -- Mitch Ratcliffe | |
|
 scooper join:2000-07-11 Youngsville, NC kudos:2 Reviews:
·Time Warner Cable
·Embarq Now Centu..
| For a bunch of otherwise sophisticated people ... Some of you are real Luddites about the upcoming Digital TV transition.
#1 - you don't have a choice. As of 3 AM local on Feb 17 2009, ALL of your current high power TV stations (analog) will be off the air. If they haven't built their digital facilities - then they have essentially gone out of business.
#2 - this only affects Over The Air broadcasts. DBS (already digital) and cable can do whatever they want over their medium. What I expect to happen - the major channel will probably continue to be available on cable - but it will be a down-converted /remodulated to NTSC (analog) for old style analog TVs.
#3 - the convertor box program - expected price of the DTV convertor boxes is expected to about $60 - $80 each. Eash household will be eligible for up to 2 convertor box coupons worth about $40 each to help defray the costs of conversion. Expect to see convertor boxes shortly after Jan 2008 (along with the coupons).
#4 - Public Service announcements (PSAs) - some stations are already doing these (my local CBS - WRAL in Raleigh NC is doing so, there maybe more). Starting in Febuary 2008, ALL stations will be required to broadcast 2 PSAs DAILY during prime TV watching, so everybody will know about it. Believe me - the stations are not totally happy about this - as this cuts into their ad revenue, as well as the fact that they are currently operating both analog AND digital transmission facilities.
#5 - TV reception of the digital signals - yes - it is basically all or nothing. Those of you with DBS will know what I'm talking about. On the plus side - if you have working OTA reception for both UHF and VHF - you're all set once you get your digital tuners.
#6 - TVs themselves - for the last couple years, manufacturers have been required to start putting in digital tuners in all TVs of a certain size - that has now progressed to ALL TVs.
If you want more info - start browsing at www.avsforum.com | |
|
 |  See 16 replies to this post |
|
 atuarreHere come the drumsPremium join:2004-02-14 College Station, TX | RE I do not know how they expect the average American to even know about it. Everyone I have asked does not have a clue that this "transition" is coming.
They need to work at getting the information out there more so the average American will be ready for the transition, other wise everyone will be hollaring and screaming when they can't get their daytime soaps, or watch American Idol. | |
|
 |  scooper join:2000-07-11 Youngsville, NC kudos:2 | Re: RE Point #4 in my big post | |
|
 |  TransmasterDon't Blame Me I Voted For Bill and Opus join:2001-06-20 Cheyenne, WY | Direct TV and Dish Network......... are going to have a hay day. Sign on with us and you can still use your present TV. I also see great deals on HD systems from both of these outfits.  -- Remember safe sex does not prevent crabs. | |
|
 |  BF69Premium join:2004-07-28 Camden, TN | Re: RE said by atuarre:I do not know how they expect the average American to even know about it. Everyone I have asked does not have a clue that this "transition" is coming. They need to work at getting the information out there more so the average American will be ready for the transition, other wise everyone will be hollaring and screaming when they can't get their daytime soaps, or watch American Idol. I must be a nerd because I've known about this for literally a dozen years. | |
|
 newz71 join:2002-01-01 Taylor, TX | Will splitters still work? So, If I have 2 VCRs hooked up to one coax splitter, does this mean I will have to buy two of these little box things in order for each VCR to get a different station or can the splitter be plugged in to this little box? -- No current signature, check back soon! | |
|
 |  scooper join:2000-07-11 Youngsville, NC kudos:2 | Re: Will splitters still work? if you want to record 2 shows at the same time - 2 converter boxes | |
|
 |  HetermanPremium join:2004-02-28 Fayetteville, AR | It's my understanding the "converters" will be like some of the simpler cable boxes. That is, they will take the digital OTA signal and then re-modulate it to go into your TV as an analog signal (you'll tune your TV to channel 3 or 4). They may possibly have RCA jacks for sound/video and possibly some higher end connections ($).
So, to answer your question, no, I don't think so, unless you are wanting to record the same channel on the 2 vcr's. (ex. you could split the signal OUT of the digital converter, but the converter itself would be tuned to, and converting a single digital channel.) I doubt that is what you want to do, as I cannot think of why you would want to record the same program on 2 vcr's simultaneously. | |
|
 |  |  scooper join:2000-07-11 Youngsville, NC kudos:2 Reviews:
·Time Warner Cable
·Embarq Now Centu..
| Re: Will splitters still work? Again - halfway correct.
"Coupon box" features - ATSC tuner capable of decoding all 18 ATSC formats transmitted in ATSC on air channels 2-51 (some early ones may goto 69 for now) outputs - 1 RF modulated on channel 3 or channel 4 just like a VCR 1 composite video output (yellow) 1 s-video output 1 set RCA analog line level audio outputs.
Notice that means NO HDTV (component / DVI / HDMI )/ digital audio (TOSLINK or digital coax) outputs . It also is saying NOTHING about QAM tuners for digital cable. It is, in short, a simple tuner to convert ATSC programming to NTSC for older NTSC TVs.
You CAN purchase ATSC tuners now, that are not quite so stripped. | |
|
 Reviews:
·Verizon Wireless..
·Comcast
1 edit | What does all this mean? My question is... I have a 35-40 foot high outdoor ant. that has the signal amplified the hell out of and get a beautiful picture right now. Am I going to have to change my amp/equipment in order to keep the OTA signal. I have digital cable too so whats the diff.
Or is it just the NTSC tuners that I'm going to have dump for ATSC? | |
|
 |  scooper join:2000-07-11 Youngsville, NC kudos:2 | Re: What does all this mean? Just the NTSC tuners that will not be usuable. For digital OTA - you will need an ATSC tuner. Your current OTA rig will work fine for ATSC signals. | |
|
 HetermanPremium join:2004-02-28 Fayetteville, AR | Don't completely write off DTV
I think everyone should try the digital channel OTA broadcasting if you have the capability before just writing the technology off. I have a distant (right at 85miles) station that will not come in ( with worth watching quality) on analog. However, digital comes in fine, all 4 of the channels, one being HD. This was contrary to what I had "figured" and read/experienced with analog transmissions vs digital.
I have a 7 element VHF/UHF outdoor antenna about 17' up. I really need a larger one, but I was impressed. | |
|
 |  algPassionately apatheticPremium join:2001-04-10 Houston, TX kudos:3 | Re: Don't completely write off DTV said by Heterman:I think everyone should try the digital channel OTA broadcasting if you have the capability before just writing the technology off. I have wondered that about all the people dragging their feet and steadfastly REFUSING to switch. In my experience once a person has actually seen DTV in practice they are instantly sold on the idea and never want to see an analog broadcast again. -- Stop spamming the forums with Mafia games already. | |
|
 |  |  | | Re: Don't completely write off DTV Well, here's a post to broaden your experience. I've seen DTV and even HDTV in all its "Glory". I'm underwhelmed. Yeah, it's cool, but not at the cost of replacing all the existing, perfectly functional NTSC only gear in use in this country today. Broadcast all the ATSC you want, just leave the NTSC signals on, at least for another decade until most of the majority of the NTSC only gear has worn out and failed. Stopping the manufacture of NTSC sets and adding the warning stickers to the equipment less than 2 years before the scheduled cutoff is insane, especially when most of this equipment has a useful life of more than 10 years if taken care of. I've got a 24 year old 19" Sylvania superset that still works like new - and has a better picture than a lot of sets on the market today, even some of the cheaper flat tube digital sets, SD or HD.
I just hope my cableco keeps providing the same analog feed for a long time to come (they've already removed PPV and a couple of premiums from the analog lineup, but since they require an STB anyway, that's no big deal except that their analog STBs were cheaper than the digital ones. The analogs are still in use where they were already deployed, but they will only deploy digital now.)
The whole thing stinks of corruption. They're taking RF spectrum that was given for public broadcast use away from the people and selling it off for private use, and all without asking the public's opinion on the matter. | |
|
 |  KearnstdElf WizardPremium join:2002-01-22 Mullica Hill, NJ | money is more important then the consumer, heck the money side is what is driving this not progress into a fully digital age. if the FCC wasnt due to make billions off the sales of the RF segment they wouldnt be making an effort in the slightest. -- [65 Arcanist]Filan(High Elf) Zone: Broadband Reports | |
|
 |
|