2,200 Applied For Broadband Stimulus FundsAnonymous reviewers now get to work digging through applications... 12:21PM Thursday Aug 27 2009 by Karl Bodetags: legal · coverage · business · legislation · consumersThe nation's larger broadband companies didn't apply for broadband stimulus funds, largely because they don't want government scrutiny into their business practices, don't like the fact they had to use the funds just on under-served rural areas, and frankly, many don't need the cash. That said, there's plenty of smaller operations who do want to do business in rural America; in fact there's 2,200 of them according to the latest statement from the NTIA and the Department of Agriculture's Rural Utilities Service. According to Uncle Sam, thousands of applicants from different sectors requested proposed $28 billion worth of projects (there's only $7.2 billion to go around): Applications came in from a diverse range of parties including state, local, and tribal governments; nonprofits; industry; anchor institutions, such as libraries, universities, community colleges, and hospitals; public safety organizations; and other entities in rural, suburban, and urban areas. "Applicants requested nearly seven times the amount of funding available, which demonstrates the substantial interest in expanding broadband across the Nation," said Lawrence E. Strickling, Assistant Secretary for Communications and Information and Administrator of NTIA. "We will move quickly but carefully to fund the best projects to bring broadband and jobs to more Americans." Meanwhile, we're privately hearing from a number of reviewers tasked with picking and choosing between the applicants. One tells us they're forced to sign this (pdf) conflict of interest and confidentiality form. From the form: I hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, I do not have a financial conflict of interest and that my particular circumstances are not likely to raise the appearance of a financial conflict of interest, impropriety, or the appearance of impairment of objectivity with respect to any BTOP application I am asked to review or on which I am asked to comment. Reviewers are kept anonymous, but a few insiders have agreed to risk life and limb to share with us the internal workings of how the approval process works over the coming weeks. We assume they're kept anonymous in order to keep lobbyists from plying them with shiny baubles, but time will tell just how well that concept works. Related:- Friday Morning Links
- Wednesday Evening Links
- Monday Evening Links
- Tuesday Morning Links
- Echostar Joins Push For Lower Broadband Definitions
- What Network Neutrality Is REALLY About
- Unions Blame Verizon For Fairpoint Disaster
- FCC Study: Open Access Lowers Prices, Improves Competition
|
 |  |   Leechy
@embarqhsd.net
| Re: Small companies build out then nationals buy up later You didn't read the NOFA. The "special conditions" apply for the life of the funded assets. If a small ISP wins a grant for a fiber network, that network has to be open, neutral, etc for the life of the fiber, even if the ISP goes bankrupt and sells the fiber to Comcast or Verizon. | |
|  |  |   TKJunkMail Enjoy the sun Premium join:2002-03-03 Avalon, NJ
·Sprint Mobile Broa..
·Comcast
1 edit | Re: Small companies build out then nationals buy up later said by Leechy :
You didn't read the NOFA. The "special conditions" apply for the life of the funded assets. If a small ISP wins a grant for a fiber network, that network has to be open, neutral, etc for the life of the fiber, even if the ISP goes bankrupt and sells the fiber to Comcast or Verizon. »broadbandusa.sc.egov.usda.gov/files/nofa.htm
2. Sale or Lease of Project Assets The sale or lease of any portion of the award-funded broadband facilities during their life is prohibited, except as provided herein. The agencies may approve a sale or lease if it is: a. For adequate consideration; b. the purchaser or lessee agrees to fulfill the terms and conditions relating to the project after such sale or lease; and c. either: i. the sale or lease is set forth in the original application and is part of the applicant's proposal for funds; or ii. the agencies waive this provision for any sale or lease occurring after the tenth year from the date of issuance of the grant, loan or loan/grant award. Generally you are correct, but I'll bet the awarding agencies will make exceptions if the alternative is shut down of the assets. And bankruptcy courts have wide powers to override the conditions of any existing contracts. -- My BLOG .. .. Internet News .. .. My Web Page | |
|  |   mrkevin Knowledge comes, but wisdom lingers. Premium join:2007-08-07 Aurora, ME clubs:
·US Cellular
·Dish Network
·magicjack.com
·Rivah.net
| Not all these grants are for broadband infastructure.
To provide access to broadband service to consumers residing in unserved areas of the country;
To provide improved access to broadband service to consumers residing in underserved areas of the country;
To provide broadband access, education, awareness, training, equipment, and support to community anchor institutions (e.g., schools, libraries, medical facilities), or organizations and agencies serving vulnerable populations (e.g., low-income, unemployed, aged), or job-creating strategic facilities located in state- or federally designated economic development areas;
To improve access to, and use of, broadband service by public safety agencies; and
To stimulate the demand for broadband, economic growth, and job creation. I wonder how many of these grants are for computers and training on how to use Internet Explorer. -- An army of sheep led by a lion, will always defeat an army of lions led by a sheep. | |
|  hoyleysox
join:2003-11-07 Long Beach, CA
·Cox HSI
·Time Warner Cable
| Hopefully there is an objective criteria for evaluation There should be some scoring system for comparing the cost & benefits of each proposed project.
It should weigh and compares factors like: How many people served # of businesses that would benefit Cost Can it fit with other existing projects Can future projects build off the current project
Those are the first that came to mind. | |
|   N O Y B St. John 3.16
join:2005-12-15 Forest Grove, OR 1 edit | WiMAX Someone (Clearwire for example) should apply for broadband stimulus and add WiMAX service at:
Zip Code: 97463
There is a cell tower at (Datum NAD27): N43.734 W122.442 | |
|  |   SHABAZZ
join:2008-07-13 Seattle, WA | Re: WiMAX Are you could build your own. | |
|  |  |   N O Y B St. John 3.16
join:2005-12-15 Forest Grove, OR
| Re: WiMAXWhat would I need to do? What equipment would be needed and where to get? How to get tower space, and internet access service? What FCC Regulations, approvals, etc. need to be met?
I would be willing, if the entry barriers and cost is not to steep.
-- Be a Good Netizen - Read, Know & Complain About Overly Restrictive Tyrannical ISP ToS & AUP »comcast.net/terms/ »verizon.net/policies/ Say Thanks with a Tool Points Donation | |
|  |  |  |   rawgerz In Debt we trust Premium join:2004-10-03 Grove City, PA
·Verizon Online DSL
·Sprint Mobile Broa..
1 edit | Re: WiMAX Standard rates for cell towers are $1-2 per foot a month. Private towers are whatever the owner asks. $ to hire professional tower climber. Internet can be backhauled to tower from another location if phone is not at tower site. Single T1 is $550 a month, at best, T3's and you are looking at around 5K a month. Equipment should be less than 5K, at least tower equipment, not counting CPEs. That tower looks to be most likely owned by fish and game. --
You can't make all the people happy all of the time. But it should be common sense to shoot for the majority. | |
|  |  |  |  |   Killa200 Premium join:2005-12-02 Spring City, TN
·AT&T Southeast
| Re: WiMAX Your looking at more than 5k for a viable, self paying wimax tower setup.
Other numbers are about right though, though i'd be skipping anything lower than a few (read three or more) bonded t1's for a wimax setup, unlike the single t1 that can start you up on a proprietary or 802.xx setup. | |
|  | |  |
|
|