802.11g Bumps Into Itself Research raises some compatibility concerns UK writer Guy Kewney seems to be enjoying himself with a bout of " I told you so" in regards to 802.11g interoperability. Kewney has long adhered to the idea that releasing a myriad of 802.11g variations before the standard was finalized wasn't a very swift idea, and now new research seems to indicate that 8011.g variations may not get along with 802.11b products or even other 802.11g products. Kewney obviously wasn't alone, as last year was packed with such worries; the request for patience on the part of vendors not being heeded. Performance is also a concern, as several variations simply aren't up to snuff.
|
 BellBoySteven Paul Jobs 1955-2011Premium join:2001-02-20 Los Angeles, CA | Such is the fate... ...of the early adopter. Apple with their AirPort Extreme, Linksys, etc. are in for a fun ride if what they say is true about .g products wreaking havoc with existing .b networks.
Makes me kinda glad that I don't have the cash to buy into this stuff right at the get go.  -- I'm not an ASI tech, but I play one on TV... | |
|  |  | | Re: Such is the fate... Apple addressed this issue with being able to firmware update their Airport Extreme products in case the Wifi alliance changes the protocols in the future. Just fyi. Personally I feel "G" will be the dominant platform since it's backwards compatible with "B", whereas "A" is more of a proprietary standard in its own way (802.11a is not compatible with 802.11b which is really idiotic in my opinion). For that reason I'm staying away from anything "A" due to compatibility reasons. Even though there might be some problems with initial "G" 802.11 products they will be rectified in the future. -- "All timid men who prefer the calm of despotism to the boisterous sea of liberty" - Thomas Jefferson | |
|
 IamZedPremium join:2001-01-10 Dayton, OH | Not ready for prime time. I have a deep pocket client that requested this. I am very glad I refused to do that job because it will no doubt be all my fault now. Give it a year ore more. -- Unless I'm wrong, in that case, relax | |
|  robofalconOn The Line Between Genius And InsanityPremium join:2002-09-06 Hayward, CA | saw that coming ooo, im so surprised.... Hopefully firmware updates will be able to solve some of these issues. | |
|  |  LuwigiePremium join:2002-06-06 East Lansing, MI | You can only pack so much Into the 2.4 Ghz frequency. Everything from cell phones to cordless phones, from microwaves to WIFI, uses 2.4 Ghz. It was just enevitable (that is spelled wrong right?) -- Satellite "BROADBAND" sucks. luwigie@dslr.net | |
|  |  |  tiger72SexaT duorPPremium join:2001-03-28 Saint Louis, MO kudos:1 Reviews:
·T-Mobile US
·AT&T DSL Service
| Re: You can only pack so much yah, spelled wrong. the issue isnt so much that it's interfering with other communications tools (phones,etc..) but that the systems cant talk or that they are far below the max speed and they have to run at .a or .b speeds (if at all). It was [u]inevitable[/u] that there were going to be screwups with early releases. -- UMKC:15051/20689 kbps RoadRunner:2092/369 kbps | |
|  |  |  | | said by Luwigie: Into the 2.4 Ghz frequency. Everything from cell phones to cordless phones, from microwaves to WIFI, uses 2.4 Ghz. It was just enevitable (that is spelled wrong right?)
Actually, cell phones don't use the 2.4ghz frequency. | |
|
 | | they are taking the microsoft approach
was anyone surprised that this happened, really? microsoft started the trend by putting out technology as fast as possible without fully testing it. seems that everyone now follows that trend especially in the comptuer and electronics industry, i will gladly pay more for something tested and true than something that is just thought up put together as quick as can be and shipped.
WAYYYY off topic tip : in 2000 Win2K had over 68000 bugs. today it is said to be below 28000 bugs. hmmmm good trend to follow. | |
|
 | |
|
|