Consolidation NationGiant ISP's to pose free speech threat? ( old news - 03:09PM Wednesday Jul 16 2003) tags: legal · businessThe FCC's June decision to allow greater media consolidation has been a hot topic, though how it affects the broadband industry remains to be seen. The attention so far has been focused on how the ruling impacts more mainstream media, such as music radio. Some analysts have poked into its impact on broadband, usually surmising that it isn't an immediate threat. Concerns surrounding media consolidation and broadband for the time being seem to be focused primarily on free speech concerns. With rampant consolidation creating bigger and more powerful broadband ISP's, companies and consumer groups alike are concerned that these Goliaths of data will attempt to either control which web sites are viewed, or stifle the use of (or advertising for) certain technologies. To that end, a group of companies like Amazon, Microsoft, and Walt Disney, recently formed the "Coalition of Broadband Users and Innovators", and have been pushing the FCC to "preserve the free flowing nature of the internet", with one hand, but embracing many of the changes with the other. Meanwhile the American Civil Liberties Union has apparently taken on a mission: to prove to the world the threat posed to free speech by the consolidation of the cable industries; a threat, they believe, that is the "most critical free-speech issue of the 21st century." ACLU representatives were on a mini tour last summer, taking time out in San Francisco and Seattle to speak about the issue to anyone willing to listen. The ACLU has released a report on the issue that is worth a read. Forum discussion on the consolidation debate can usually be found in our broadband politics and legislation forum. Related:- Think Tank Tells Missouri to Let VoIP Be
- Comcast Seeks P2P “Bill of Rights and Responsibilities”
- Judge Orders Marshall University to Help RIAA
- Primus Backs CAIP Against Bell Canada
- Republicans Pushing Telecom Immunity Vote
- Escape Your Verizon Wireless Contract Without An ETF
- TorrentSpy Isn't Paying $100 Million Court-Ordered Fine
- Sprint Jumps the Gun with Lawsuit to Protect WiMax Venture
|
  oliphant5 Got Identity? Premium join:2003-05-24 Corona, CA
edited
| IMHO the main concern Would be more underhanded anti-competitive commercial tactics like bandwidth throttling competitors sites. With the internet, unlike television and radio, there are virtually an infinite number of news, and of course various other opinion, sites so I don't see outright censorship. What I see happening would be say an ISP owned by one news or media organization hosing connections to competitors' news or media sites, effectively monopolizing that type of content for their own subscribers.
Also, it looks like some in Congress are looking to reverse the FCC's decision on media ownership rules through new legislation.
»www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/ar···l15.html
-- "Countries...have a right to be free, and we a right to aid them, as a strong man has a right to assist a weak one assailed by a robber or murderer." --Thomas Jefferson, 1816. [text was edited by author 2003-07-16 15:35:37] | |
|  |   TheMadSwede Premium join:2001-01-30 Wheaton, IL
·AT&T Yahoo
| Re: IMHO the main concern I'm not a lawyer, and I don't play one on TV, but I don't know if it is illegal (in the truest sense of the word) for an ISP to restrict content/access.
That said, the only thing the general public has going for it is that any company that tries to control bandwidth (or even access) in the manner oliphant describes could face a PR backlash if their shady measures are proven to be true.
I am not one so silly to think that PR is all that matters to corporations, but most media companies want to appear to their customers as free and open, even if that's not what they are. Just a thought. -- Cable Cable Cable...keep that cable rolling. | |
|  |  |   calvoiper
join:2003-03-31 Belvedere Tiburon, CA
·Comcast Formerly ..
| Here is how it happens.... There are some real dangers here, fortunately not yet materialized.
For now, throttling the competition doesn't seem to be a big problem, but I too worry that it will become one--perhaps by giving favored content "enhanced" access, rather than "restricting" the competition.
Example: Perhaps limited play downloads of HDTV movies become a big Internet item. What happens when your broadband provider agrees to turn off the traffic shaper/meter for "preferred" downloads? Will you still shop "Angie's Movie Outlet" and download at 1.6Meg when your affiliated "ISP Movie Store" can give you the same download at 5Meg? (Advocates will yell, ISPs will claim "we're not hurting Angie, we're just helping ourselves," and point out that it's just another form of "bundling" products.)
Either way, it ends up being an uneven playing field.
Calvoiper -- VoIP--the death knell of remaining voice monopolies! | |
|  |   Unit649 I B U, Who U B? Premium join:2000-01-22 Stockton, CA
·Comcast
| I wouldn't be surprised if this is already happening now but its just not publicised. In a way it is because for example SBC is tied to Yahoo! so I would expect there is a nice fat behind the scenes trunk line between the 2. But who is to say this can't happen already? All you gotta do is filter certian ip blocks out, or have certian IP's blocked on the faster lines and open on the slower ones..... -- U ::::Founder, ForeverChat IRC Network:::: »www.foreverchat.net | |
|   bistro777 Donuts-Is There Anything They Can't Do? Premium,MVM join:2002-02-07 Englewood, CO
| House Panel Votes to Block FCC's New Media Rule "The House Appropriations Committee moved in a bipartisan vote yesterday to block the Federal Communications Commission from easing a rule that limits ownership concentration in commercial television markets."
The details are here in the Washington Post.
I'd introduce myself, but I already know who I am. | |
|   calvoiper
join:2003-03-31 Belvedere Tiburon, CA | The REAL RISK to free speech I think the real risk may be that this thread has gotten only 8 responses. If no one cares, there will be no free speech to care for.
Calvoiper -- VoIP--the death knell of remaining voice monopolies! | |
|  |  Beeper Part Of The Problem
join:2001-09-27 Dayton, OH clubs:
| Re: The REAL RISK to free speech said by calvoiper : I think the real risk may be that this thread has gotten only 8 responses. If no one cares, there will be no free speech to care for.
The public's lack of interest into your interests is not a threat to the nation. -- Guaranteed Fear and Loathing. Abandon all hope. Prepare for the Weirdness. Get familiar with Cannibalism. | |
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  Beeper Part Of The Problem
join:2001-09-27 Dayton, OH clubs:
| Re: The REAL RISK to free speech said by aztecnology : Actually it is, with only about 38% of the voting population casting votes, it presents a problem to the rest of us, and this is a perfect example...
Do you realize that voter turnout in the 1946 election was 38%?
When 105 million people are voting, I'm not worrying. -- Guaranteed Fear and Loathing. Abandon all hope. Prepare for the Weirdness. Get familiar with Cannibalism. | |
|  | |  |
|
|