Search:  

 
 
   News
newer
story category Little Fish, Big Pond
Speakeasy launches service improvements
(old news - 03:53PM Wednesday Sep 17 2003)
tags: dsl · business
DSL Provider Speakeasy this week announced increased upstream bandwidth, a new Wi-Fi incentive package, and a new Personal Technology Assistant (PTA) customer support program. According to the company's press release, the ISP will be instituting a minimum download/upload of 1.5Mbps/256 Kbps for all of their DSL customers (Many basic customers now have a 1.5Mbps/128kbps RADSL connection). The changes don't affect existing SDSL customers, though they can quickly switch to the new tiers if they qualify, according to one rep we spoke to.

While the speed changes have been discussed in our forum for quite some time, the company also today announced a new Wi-Fi initiative. Until October 31, 2003, new customers can select any standard DSL package for $29.95 per month for 3 months, and will receive a Netgear wireless router, PCMCIA card or USB adapter for an additional $49. According to Speakeasy, 40% of their customers already utilize wireless technology, and the company sells itself as one of the more "Wi-Fi friendly" operations around.

More interesting perhaps is the company's introduction of a new 'Personal Technology Assistant' customer support initiative. Users will receive one point of contact for all of their DSL problems, avoiding the common '50 answers from 50 different techs' conundrum often faced by broadband users looking for support. It could also be helpful (if works as advertised) in avoiding the common irritant of having to explain an often complex support issue to half a dozen support reps each time you call your ISP (all of whom usually follow a tedious and time consuming support script).

Speakeasy, which is making every effort to take their business to the "next level", recently brought in Bruce Chatterley to take on the positions of CEO and President. The company, which is poised to take in $50 million in revenue this year, hopes to double that total with Chatterly's assistance. The company, while usually fairing fairly well in our review index, hasn't been without their fair share of growing pains.

Casting a menacing shadow over this fiscal optimism is the FCC's Triennial review, which could prove to be a thorn in the side of many smaller telco competitors. While the ruling will slowly phase out line-sharing over three years, it for the time being left certain loopholes that will allow some providers to continue receiving decent rates from the baby bells (though, as we've mentioned, those holes could soon be narrowing). When we spoke to Speakeasy founder and former CEO Mike Apgar recently, he didn't seem to be terribly flummoxed or discouraged by the ruling, and was optimistic (at least publicly) that his company could weather the coming industry shift.

"Six out of seven of our new customers are switching from another broadband service provider that failed to meet their needs in one form or another," he says. "We have anticipated an FCC ruling in essentially this form for over a year," adding that his company is "well positioned to grow and continue to address this market demand indefinitely." Speakeasy hopes their size will allow them to successfully negotiate rates with the bells if necessary as the competitive landscape shifts.

Related:
  1. When Customers Create Their Own Broadband Contracts
  2. Unions Blame Verizon For Fairpoint Disaster
  3. Unions Ramp Up Opposition To Verizon/Frontier Deal
  4. Windstream Bumps Upstream DSL Speeds
  5. Frontier Fires Up Verizon Acquisition PR Campaign
  6. Frontier Increases Modem Rental Fee
  7. Windstream Quietly Keeps Growing
  8. Fairpoint Hires New Marketing Firms
Forums » Little Fish, Big Pond
view: topics flat text 
Post a:

statemachine
Premium
join:2001-01-21
Si Valley
clubs:

Did they pay you to write this?

Seems awfully cheery and upbeat for a news article.
joebear29

join:2003-07-20
Alabaster, AL

Re: Did they pay you to write this?

Its upbeat so you can get gloomy at the end when you read the evil Bells and their FCC toadies are trying to destroy this patch of broadband sunshine.

koitsu
Premium
join:2002-07-16
Mountain View, CA


Especially with a sticky thread on the SE forums titled Packet Loss/Latency Reports, which is affecting most Seattle, Portland, Bay Area (which I can vouch for), and Chicago customers.

EDIT: And NYC customers. You crazy east-coasterners.
--
Making life hard for others since 1977.

[text was edited by author 2003-09-17 18:35:20]

bhan261

join:2001-02-12
New York, NY

Re: Did they pay you to write this?

...and NYC customers (which I can vouch for).

Chicago_DSL6

join:2003-08-04
Palatine, IL
Don't forget New York too!

paulhaskew
Unoffical Dominos Spokesman

join:2002-01-10
Vancouver, WA
clubs:
PDX is not being affected...
Bondman

join:2001-08-24
Livonia, MI

I am also very disappointed that they have put out this press release when they are not able to properly service existing customers. I am getting packet loss and double ping times which is causing major browsing issues. They do not acknowledge that there are any problems with their service at:
»www.speakeasy.net/main.php?page=systemstatus
and then click on RealTime Network Status.

DenverDialup

join:2003-06-06
Littleton, CO
clubs:

quote:
According to the company's press release, the ISP will be instituting a minimum download/upload of 1.5Mbps/256 Kbps for all of their DSL customers (Many basic customers now have a 1.5Mbps/128kbps RADSL connection).
Wow, holy crap, 256 Kbps upstream bandwidth! That's like half-sh*tty instead of full-sh*tty!

More upstream speed is good, Mr. Bode, but I wouldn't be as ecstatic as you are unless it were something real, like 384-512 Kbps.
--
"Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the Universe trying to produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the Universe is winning." -- Rich Cook
planoken

join:2001-11-12
Allen, TX

*

No problems with SE in Dallas.

bhan261

join:2001-02-12
New York, NY

Re: *

Let's all move to Dallas...and then SE can overload THAT POP, too!

tiger72
SexaT duorP
Premium
join:2001-03-28
Saint Louis, MO
clubs:

Re: *

or lets use comcast or charter instead =\

ROFL.
--
UMKC:15051/20689 kbps RoadRunner:2092/369 kbps

bluerabbit
Premium
join:2000-11-02
New York, NY

This is so NOT to be meant to start a flame...just think that is odd that all of the comments are a bit on the cynical side so far...must ALL of the news be negative to be considered news?... I think if you look at the aggregate of reporting on this site you will see it is pretty well fair and balanced. I for one am glad to see a little common sense move by this ISP...and all the ISPs can have a voice here...I think that once in awhile a little progress by an ISP is nice to see ... not always problem problem problem:)

bhan261

join:2001-02-12
New York, NY

Re: *

What you're seeing here, at least from us Speakeasy customers, is a certain frustration over the lack of responsiveness we've witnessed to the recent, widespread P/L issues that have been well-documented. Good news aside, I think those of us who are wondering why our SE circuit continues to "spike" wish that they would fix that before issuing cheery press releases.

TheMadSwede
Premium
join:2001-01-30
Holland, MI
·Charter Pipeline

Re: *

said by bhan261 See Profile:
What you're seeing here, at least from us Speakeasy customers, is...
<insert game show buzzer sound>

Incorrect. The correct answer is:
"What you're seeing here, at least from SOME of us Speakeasy customers, is..."

I know it's kind of semantics, and I'm not trying to be a jerk, but many SE customers, maybe even most SE customers, are more happy than unhappy with their service.

What makes BBR so great and so annoying at the same time is that every review and opinion presented here is so personalized and customized. If someone didn't like the fact that their installer smelled like onions they can put that in their review, so other onion-haters out there will be aware of it. But does that mean every installer smells like onions?

Judging from the overall perception of SE, they are doing ok. Maybe not great, but ok, and far better than a great number of other providers.
--
Cable Cable Cable...keep that cable rolling.

statemachine
Premium
join:2001-01-21
Si Valley
clubs:

Well, let's see:
1) Karl Bode went to the trouble to enumerate all their new pricing plans thus giving free(?) advertising.
2) Nothing critical is ever said in the article, and the whole source of the article is just one: Speakeasy.
3) Speakeasy pays dslreports/broadbandreports for displaying advertising banners.
4) Speakeasy employees whose job it is to post on this website and whose company pays broadbandreports are given MVM status.

Nope, no cynicism here.

bluerabbit
Premium
join:2000-11-02
New York, NY

Re: *

ok... so your basic point was that it was too cheery... got it...guess I was wondering why you actually have no comment on the actual content of the article...ie like SE has a bad idea...a good idea...SE can never accomplish that...or ... well yes that is good but what about the things SE has not addressed ... the fact the SE does negative thing one, negative thing two, negative thing three...

bhan261

join:2001-02-12
New York, NY

Re: *

I would hope that SE would take an aggressive stance on either fighting the changed regulations and/or look for ways to work with the ILECs. Anything less could leave them out in the proverbial cold. So this doesn't surprise me. I have to assume SE wants to be in this business for the long haul and I certainly hope they succeed. Yes, I currently have some issues with them but all-in-all, competition is a good thing. It wouldn't be good for any of us if our only choices were the ILEC or local cable company.

So I say, good for you Speakeasy and good luck. Now, will you fix the packet loss, please?

Raybro
VIP
join:2000-11-04
Back home

Re: *

said by statemachine See Profile:

4) Speakeasy employees whose job it is to post on this website and whose company pays broadbandreports are given MVM status.


Kat recieved that MVM because she earned it not because Speakeasy advertises with this site. It is also not her job to post here, she does it of her own free will.
--
Statements made by me are not the views or practices of my employer and they cannot be held responsible for any statements I may make.

statemachine
Premium
join:2001-01-21
Si Valley
clubs:

Re: *

said by Raybro See Profile:
said by statemachine See Profile:

4) Speakeasy employees whose job it is to post on this website and whose company pays broadbandreports are given MVM status.


Kat recieved that MVM because she earned it not because Speakeasy advertises with this site. It is also not her job to post here, she does it of her own free will.

I stand by what I said.

drmorley
Premium,MVM
join:2000-12-20
Park Ridge, IL
clubs:


Re: *

said by statemachine See Profile:
said by Raybro See Profile:
said by statemachine See Profile:

4) Speakeasy employees whose job it is to post on this website and whose company pays broadbandreports are given MVM status.


Kat recieved that MVM because she earned it not because Speakeasy advertises with this site. It is also not her job to post here, she does it of her own free will.

I stand by what I said.
Stand by it all you want. It doesn't make it right or even intelligent for that matter.

If her (Kat's) job was to post here at DSLR then she's doing a crappy job as she only averages about one post/day. There are several forums that have official reps that ARE paid to post and assist customers. What's the problem with that?!?

BTW, I'm fairly certain that Speakeasy does pay DSLR. This is a for profit site. Neither the servers that host this site not the upstream provider Justin has partnered with are free.

[text was edited by author 2003-09-17 22:48:07]

statemachine
Premium
join:2001-01-21
Si Valley
clubs:

Re: *

You should read my original post. I never pointed anyone out. I just stated a fact.

Yes, it's a fact of life that people get paid. And it's a fact of life that other people will point out conflicts of interest that arise.

BBR's journalistic integrity is on the line here -- was this article paid for or influenced through Speakeasy's payments to this site for other business? That is the true question.

And before you get even more hot and bothered, may I point out that perhaps you have a conflict of interest in this discussion too?

drmorley
Premium,MVM
join:2000-12-20
Park Ridge, IL
clubs:

Re: *

said by statemachine See Profile:

BBR's journalistic integrity is on the line here -- was this article paid for or influenced through Speakeasy's payments to this site for other business? That is the true question.
Point taken. To add to your argument Justin is the moderator of the Speakeasy forum. They might be one of if not the biggest customers of DSLR.

As such Justin's running a business and what business in their right mind would smear their biggest customer. This is a precarious time for Independents--even the bigger ones like SE.

Like you I believe that article is leaning a certain way. From a business model perspective I can't blame them.

nil
Java Geek
join:2000-11-27

Host:
Webmasters and Dev..
Forum Feature Requ..
Perhaps it's time to cut down on the coffee and the paranoia?

If we have a negative article you scream we're biased.. if it's positive you scream we're paid to do it..

What would please you? Impersonal blurbs copied from news feeds? There you go: »news.google.com/
--
Life is too short to be boring

statemachine
Premium
join:2001-01-21
Si Valley
clubs:


Re: *

Time to retire your "unwitting victim" chant.

What would please YOU?

"Oh, BBR is just SO wonderful! They are the BEST ever! BBR is always looking out for MY best interests. And, my, they'd never, ever, put themselves first!"

Please. If BBR doesn't want criticism, it should stop writing.

Get used to it.

Maybe you should try a happier place.
[text was edited by author 2003-09-18 11:12:36]

nil
Java Geek
join:2000-11-27

Re: *

Theres a difference between criticism (not even asking for constructive) and just constant, baseless complaining.. and insults.

--
Life is too short to be boring

statemachine
Premium
join:2001-01-21
Si Valley
clubs:

Re: *

Oh, now YOU would NEVER do that.

nil
Java Geek
join:2000-11-27

Host:
Webmasters and Dev..
Forum Feature Requ..

Re: *

No, I didn't say that.. we all get heated in discussions.. but I would like to think if I do do that I'd have the sense to recognize it and correct myself. Of course, I could be wrong there.. if you see me insulting someone, just use 'hey mods'!
--
Life is too short to be boring

statemachine
Premium
join:2001-01-21
Si Valley
clubs:
And just to be MORE constructive... just for YOU, here's a place you can go where it's OK to get paid by ISPs for cheery articles about their companies.

nil
Java Geek
join:2000-11-27

Re: *

if you're suggesting we have a rule that only negative articles are news, you'd be wrong.
--
Life is too short to be boring

statemachine
Premium
join:2001-01-21
Si Valley
clubs:

Re: *

No, the only thing I'm suggesting is that BBR is getting paid to promote Speakeasy in a "news article."

Go back and read the thread and quit insulting people when you don't understand the argument. That's the second time you've done so -- and both times you jumped into a thread half-cocked. Perhaps you have a conflict of interest too? Hmm?

nil
Java Geek
join:2000-11-27

Re: *

Read between the lines.. all I'm saying is that just because we post a positive article does not mean we're paid to do it.
--
Life is too short to be boring

statemachine
Premium
join:2001-01-21
Si Valley
clubs:

Re: *

Excellent!

MarkyD
Premium
join:2002-08-20
Oklahoma City, OK
clubs:
·Cox HSI

Speakeasy

is better than most ISPs available for the most part, am I wrong? And if you are dissatisfied with the service you receive from them, what are you doing still with them? Some people (like Oklahomans) would kill to have Speakeasy and their AWESOME support.
--
Marky D for Cox Oklahoma GM!!

splix
Premium
join:2002-02-19
Oakton, VA

Re: Speakeasy

I have NEVER had a problem with Speakeasy that was not my own fault. I can't wait for these speed increases to happen.
--
»/pics/di···g/587751 - my digital photos
frogger40
Premium
join:2001-11-25
Miamisburg, OH

Nice Release!

I've had only good experiences with Speakeasy thus far; I figure the more, the merrier!

Every ISP is going to have issues, that doesn't mean that they put their entire business plan on hold! With the economy the way it is, even people that can afford BB want that little "extra" for their money; Speakeasy is just making sure that they get to them first.
jsuen

join:2002-04-03
Belvedere Tiburon, CA

PTA

Instead of getting "50 different answers from 50 different techs" you get one wrong answer and nothing you can do about it.
rmdir

join:2003-03-13
Chicago, IL

Britsys....

Considering I'm getting 1.5/768 for $45 a month with Britsys, it doesn't sound particularly exciting. $35 more a month for their offering (1.5/758)? No thanks.

»www.speakeasy.net/residential
spell5

join:2000-01-26
Boston, MA

Mega thumbs-up

I've been with speakeasy for 3+ years and continue to have a positive experience.

On the plus side:
1) My service is rock-solid, never, ever, fail, reliable.

2) Honest pricing. When new and/or less expensive services are offered, they contact me! I recently increased my bandwidth and lowered my monthly cost.

3) Knowledgeable customer support. Never had a drone reading a script.

4) Static IP addresses. No port blocking. No restrictions on how you use your service. Run servers, use bandwidth, whatever. They only ask 2 things. 1-Don't hack/port scan and 2-If you want to run a porn site, they're gonna bill you for bandwidth.

5) You don't have to give them a credit card. We're all adults here. They bill me. I pay.

6) Free equipment. Well, essentially. They've rebated the cost every time I've upgraded.

7) They're encouraging me to offer Wi-Fi service to my neighbors. If I choose to sell it; I set the price and they do the billing. (We split the proceeds.)

CON:
1) Monthly charge changes slightly each month. Their cost is the same but they bill the actual tax which changes slightly each month.

2) They gave shell accounts on one of their servers with some of their packages. Unfortunately, you aren't able to ping from that account (handy to troubleshoot network problems).
nomocontrol

join:2000-12-12
Rockville, MD

Re: Mega thumbs-up

Thank you. With all the whining going on in here, it is nice to read a post that wasn't in the "I hate Bill Gates Because He's Rich" mode. I am coming up on the end of my third year with SE and wouldn't consider switching. I also had my speeds upgraded and my monthly fees lowered. I like to think of it as customer appreciation. Ok, maybe my 3 year old modem is showing its age, but so what, the amount of rocket science I engage in online is probably equal to the amount that all the whiners are doing, so it just doesn't matter.

dvd536
as Mr. Pink as they come
Premium
join:2001-04-27
Phoenix, AZ

buying your MVM

I wasnt aware you could buy an MVM tag. i thought those companies that paid the site and people to post got a tag like 'VIP: ispgoeshere support' or the like.
--
You can never be too rich, too thin or have too much Bandwidth
Forums » Little Fish, Big Pond


Monday, 30-Nov 08:18:36 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.