Search:  

 
 
   News
newer
Utah Spyware Bill Now Law
State makes controversial spyware push
(old news - 09:26AM Thursday Mar 25 2004)
tags: legislation · privacy
Though we've yet to see any news outlets pick up on it, sources inform us the anti-Spyware bill being debated in Utah was signed into law late yesterday by Governor Olene Walker. This comes despite heavy protest from companies like AOL, Amazon, Cnet, eBay, Google, Microsoft, and Yahoo - all of whom claimed the bill was "overly broad" and would have a detrimental impact on their business. The bill is highly controversial, as it makes no effort to distinguish between the various flavors of spyware or malware, making it a crime to install any of them on a consumer's computer. A less potent attempt to eliminate spyware is working its way through Congress.

Related:
  1. House Democrats Fight Telecom Wiretap Immunity
  2. FBI: ISPs Should Retain User Data For 2 Years
  3. Republicans Pushing Telecom Immunity Vote
  4. Dodd, Feingold To Fillibuster Telecom Immunity
  5. Vote On Telecom Immunity Delayed
  6. Congress 'Grills' NebuAD CEO
  7. Congress May Require NebuAD Be Opt-In
  8. Embarq: Selling User Browsing Data 'Empowers' Users
Forums » Utah Spyware Bill Now Law
view: topics flat text 
Post a:

technick
Premium
join:2000-12-16
Loganville, GA

Other states should follow

This is great, other states should follow now, and I hope that gets pushed through congress and other parties rather quickly.

I wonder how long it will take before companies start moving over sea's to continue spyware & malware practices.

georgequ
Premium
join:2003-05-10
Painesville, OH
clubs:
·AT&T Midwest


edit:
March 25th, @09:42AM

Re: Other states should follow

said by technick See Profile:
This is great, other states should follow now, and I hope that gets pushed through congress and other parties rather quickly.

I wonder how long it will take before companies start moving over sea's to continue spyware & malware practices.

IMHO That should not take more then, oh say 24 Hours.
Bill won't do much good I am afraid.

EDIT: On the other hand, it might stop company's like Turbo Tax from giving us their free C-Dilla programs
--
Dutch
Click here to participate in something wonderful

Julio
Bachatero y Que?
Premium
join:2003-03-19
Brooklyn, NY
clubs:

great!!!

this is great!!! Spyware is as bad and sometimes even worst then viruses to removed from your system.

SuperJudge
Magus
Premium
join:2002-11-14
Albany, GA
clubs:

Re: great!!!

I mentioned in the forums one time, that there is such a fine fine line between spyware and virii, that a lot of antivirus companies will list spyware, and antispyware programs will list virii.

It's horrible.
--
Updated My Journal
TP&C

en102
Canadian, eh?

join:2001-01-26
Valencia, CA
I agree, most of these spyware apps do not have installers/uninstallers, and end up installing dll's as well as making changes to your browsers searching options.
Tuvok9
Rangcor The Great
Premium
join:2004-03-04
Fairview Heights, IL
clubs:

I hope Illinois follows Utah image

Think it is a good idea and that all of the states and countries should follow Utah's example. If we don't stop spyware that may harm computer system or programs, we might as well download every program with the spyware as if it was to work with the system.

ropeguru
Premium
join:2001-01-25
Hollywood, FL
clubs:

Supreme Court???

I wonder how long it will take for all the big boys, Microsoft, AOL and the like, to get this to the Supreme Court and get it rescended by paying off the judges???
footballdude

join:2002-08-13
Imperial, MO

Re: Supreme Court???

said by ropeguru See Profile:
I wonder how long it will take for all the big boys, Microsoft, AOL and the like, to get this to the Supreme Court and get it rescended by paying off the judges???

Why would someone with a lifetime appointment to a high paying and highly prestigous job risk impeachment by taking a bribe? Any bribe big enough to buy someone in that position couldn't be held secret for very long.

DSL_Steve
Premium
join:2003-11-28
Woodbury, CT

Re: Supreme Court???

[QUOTE= footballdude See ProfileWhy would someone with a lifetime appointment to a high paying and highly prestigous job risk impeachment by taking a bribe? Any bribe big enough to buy someone in that position couldn't be held secret for very long.
[/QUOTE]

Its not a bribe when some lobbyist gives *gifts*.
footballdude

join:2002-08-13
Imperial, MO

Re: Supreme Court???

said by DSL_Steve See Profile:
Its not a bribe when some lobbyist gives *gifts*.

People lobby Congress but I don't think I've ever heard of someone lobbying Supreme Court Justices.

hailinfantry
Bizarro Quinn
Premium
join:2004-01-18
Brooklyn, NY

Re: Supreme Court???

said by footballdude See Profile:
said by DSL_Steve See Profile:
Its not a bribe when some lobbyist gives *gifts*.

People lobby Congress but I don't think I've ever heard of someone lobbying Supreme Court Justices.

You can't lobby a judge. A judge must be impartial. It's a felony offense to even suggest a bribe to even the lowest of judges. I don't feel that a federal anti-spyware bill would overrule a state bill if the state bill had broader limits. The state has the right to build upon existing federal statutes. If there was a federal law specifically stating that spyware was legal, then that would overrule the Utah law. The constitutionality of this law would go to the Utah supreme court first--since it will appear in their annotated laws/codes.

Safron

join:2001-07-25
Gray, GA
clubs:

It won't be the Supreme Court.
Measures are already running through the House and Senate that are not as restrictive as the Utah bill. These will be passed by the Federal government, nullifying Utah's bill.

Just my opinion, same as with the spam bills.
jsouth
Jsouth

join:2000-12-12
Wichita, KS

Re: Supreme Court???

Actually it can go there. If people take the companies to court over the Utah law.

Backspace
Allah Says " Vote For Hussein Osama '08"
Arbitrary Text
join:2001-12-30
Upper U S
clubs:
·Verizon Online DSL
·Comcast
·1and1

said by ropeguru See Profile:
I wonder how long it will take for all the big boys, Microsoft, AOL and the like, to get this to the Supreme Court and get it rescended by paying off the judges???

Paying off the Supreme Court judges? Come now, be real!
--
See the real John Kerry.

justin
Australian
join:1999-05-28
Brooklyn, NY

Host:
IPv6
Business Connectiv..
Home/Office setup ..
Console/Handheld g..
Console Tech

Re: Supreme Court???

true, how about taking them for rides in a private jet, saving them from flying coach, and bringing them on lavish hunting trips with VIPs .. it appears they only need then to write a 21 page rebuttal to any nasty accusations this may sway them in an upcoming judgement, and case closed.

Backspace
Allah Says " Vote For Hussein Osama '08"
Arbitrary Text
join:2001-12-30
Upper U S
clubs:
·Verizon Online DSL
·Comcast
·1and1

Re: Supreme Court???

said by justin See Profile:
true, how about taking them for rides in a private jet, saving them from flying coach, and bringing them on lavish hunting trips with VIPs .. it appears they only need then to write a 21 page rebuttal to any nasty accusations this may sway them in an upcoming judgement, and case closed.

Maybe I'm an idealist but I believe that the judges are above reproach. It doesn't make sense that they would take any type of gift or payment for a decision about spyware when it was the same judges who chose the last President.;)

justin
Australian
join:1999-05-28
Brooklyn, NY

Re: Supreme Court???

I agree. At last when it comes to spyware appeals.
dda
Premium
join:2003-12-29
Bolton, MA

said by Backspace See Profile:
Maybe I'm an idealist but I believe that the judges are above reproach. It doesn't make sense that they would take any type of gift or payment for a decision about spyware when it was the same judges who chose the last President.;)

I think you prove the point right there; They certainly showed they were not above reproach before so why wouldn't they do it again?

I don't think it is required, though, as a Federal law would override the Utah law just as CAM-SPAM overrode other state laws regarding spam.

whizkid3
Premium,MVM
join:2002-02-21
Queens, NY
Justin, Bravo!

b_zen
Premium
join:2002-07-24
Saint Louis, MO
clubs:
·TTNet

how bout we create a legislation here to ban any political affiliation both in the SIG and Avatars etc...

There has been quite a few fights that started because of this. I would know

Please, take notice...

ANYONE BUT BUSH in 2004!
--

Fiber Optic is the future! 3Plink.com |Voice|Video|Data|

Backspace
Allah Says " Vote For Hussein Osama '08"
Arbitrary Text
join:2001-12-30
Upper U S
clubs:
·Verizon Online DSL
·Comcast
·1and1

Re: Supreme Court???

said by b_zen See Profile:
how bout we create a legislation here to ban any political affiliation both in the SIG and Avatars etc...
..........................snip.................................

You'll have to ask the mods or fatness to remove the avs and sigs. I don't think that it will happen during a Presidential election year.:p
--
See the real John Kerry.
kjl1977

join:2003-02-20
Bolingbrook, IL

We'll see....

I think it's a good thing. If these legit companies are going to install anything that is 'critical' - they should have to come right out and say it during the install process (no fine print in the endless user agreement) - it should say it in big bold letters and make you check a box to acknowledge it.

Besides, most spyware is malware put on by crappy websites.

Sr Tech
Premium
join:2003-01-19
New Fairfield, CT

Customers Privacy

I guess all the companies listed do not really care about your privacy when it comes to marketing. The only answer I can come up with is Money and Marketing. I hope this bill goes Nation Wide.

Combat Chuck
Too Many Cannibals
Premium
join:2001-11-29
Verona, PA

Re: Customers Privacy

Or it could be that such companies are worried about being implicated for things that have nothing to do with spyware by a law that does not clearly identify it's purpose. Ie WinXP's product activation, or auto updater.

But then again we all like laws that make us feel better no matter what the actual impact; hence CAN-SPAM.
--
Japan-- Now with 30% more climbable telephone poles!!
RayW
Premium
join:2001-09-01
Layton, UT
clubs:

And AOL has big center in Utah

Wonder how that will affect them having a presence just north of me?
--
I am not lost, I find myself every time.

Varangian

join:2002-12-08
Collinsville, IL

Re: And AOL has big center in Utah

Well, if they attempt to close it, here's some advice for the Utah legislature.
0 Jail the highest ranking AOL suit you can catch.
1 Confiscate the facility. It's an installation devoted to the criminal installation of spyware on Utah computers.
2 Sufficiently Fine AOl and its parent company to keep the employees paid.
3 Use the employees as a spyware help hotline. You'll have these little Mata Haroids all eliminated in no time

Transmaster
Onward Through The Fog

join:2001-06-20
Cheyenne, WY

User definable term

AOL and company, and their idea of spam remind me of Pedo Porn sites. These scumbag sites all proclaim "we only have art photo's". AOL, EBay, Et-AL all proclaim we don't spam, we only advertise.
--
"Remember when hacking a loogy it comes not so much from the lungs but from the soul."

Varangian

join:2002-12-08
Collinsville, IL

Bra-vo!

The fascist antics of Utah's U.S. congressional delegation have me wretching..but this is the good stuff-My hat's off to the Utah legislature.
Every one of this large scale ISPs - SBC, Verizon, Earthlink, ect, shoves spyware in with its installation software.
Up to date computers while privacy penetrated they can usually soldier on infected. Older machines running windows or 98 can look forward to an OS reinstall.
I'm encouraged by the legislation. I'll believe it's for real when i hear the suits that ordered the cr*p installed - not call center wage slaves - going to the big house for it.
cybercrimes

join:2003-12-24
Phoenixville, PA

spyware

i hope PA. will do the same thing im geting tired of my pc geting slow and filld with spyware.

Varangian

join:2002-12-08
Collinsville, IL

You know..

It's usually possible to get the broadband to work without the spyware .
the main thing you DON'T want to do is INSERT THE INSTALLATION DISK.
That's where the spyware is.
Connectivity can inevitably be achieved with a third party application. Research FIRST.
Forewarned is forearmed.

Vvian Kalyss

join:2003-10-14
Stage 5.0
clubs:

Re: You know..

...and forearmed is two arms too many.

How about they tell us exactly why this app is installing. Many times an install just gives me a checkbox yes-no decision to make without actually explaining why a particular component wants to ride along. Even something as plain as "This component will look at your cookies when you visit our site so we can tailor which banner ads to show you." I wouldn't mind (too much) being tracked like that, at least they're being honest about it. I don't want bs mumbo jumbo.

--
" Her eyes were just the end of Hell-- / All pain, / Articulate "

Vvian Kalyss
slipstreamer

join:2004-03-24
Mastic Beach, NY

Capitol punishment for spyware violators

I think Capitol punishment would be fitting for Spyware/adware/virus, creators. Sure, it sounds extreme. But, when you really think about it who will miss them? (anyone who says they will miss them will also be shot as a traitor) Additionally think about all the natural resources we'll be saving. Conserving on the fuel, water, electricity, etc. that they would otherwise be using in their daily lives.
Forums » Utah Spyware Bill Now Law


Thursday, 21-Aug 09:53:55 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 9 years online! © 1999-2008 dslreports.com.