republican-creole
Search:  

 
 
   News
newer
Fine Tuning the Wireless Spectrum
Careless use increases the potential for interference
(old news - 08:25PM Sunday Apr 04 2004)
tags: fcc · Radio · wireless
Wi-Fi and cellular networks are among the highest profile and most popular wireless technologies available to consumers. With newer technologies such as WiMax on the way the potential increases for interference because of careless use of the spectrum. "People are seeing a lot of more interesting things to do with spectrum - We need to be more efficient about what we have, because we can't make more," Intel Senior Fellow Kevin Kahn said in a CNET report.

The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has been re-evaluating the use of the currently occupied wireless spectrum. Its recent efforts have involved freeing up over-the-air television broadcast spectrum. The television spectrum is particularly valuable because it's in the lower radio bands, which means signals with significant amounts of bandwidth per channel can be sent over a long range. Kahn added, "the industry is better off making spectrum more flexible" and "that he sees a day when technologies are developed to enable smoother transitions across networks".

Related:
  1. Tuesday Evening Links
  2. WSJ: AT&T Is Dying
  3. FCC To Probe AT&T, Verizon Wireless
  4. FCC Votes To Investigate Wireless Industry
  5. Apple Lied To FCC About Blocking Google Voice
  6. FCC Lusts After TV Industry Spectrum
  7. FCC Imposes Shot Clock On Wireless Tower Builds
  8. FCC Looking For White Space Database Administrators
Forums » Fine Tuning the Wireless Spectrum
view: topics flat text 
Post a:

Omega
Displaced Ohioan
Premium
join:2002-07-30
Cheyenne, WY
clubs:

Well, I dunno

Might be nice accessing someones Wireless network with your cell phone.
--
Bush 2004
My site

Optimized
Premium,Mod
join:2001-05-03
Pompton Lakes, NJ
clubs:

Host:
RCN
Patriot Media
Cellphones, Provid..
Other Manufacturers

Re: Well, I dunno

said by Omega See Profile:
Might be nice accessing someones Wireless network with your cell phone.

That's not very far off ...
--
Chilly likes it

DR_JAY

join:2002-04-23
Verdun, QC

Re: Well, I dunno

YIKES!

RadioDoc
58ef2c0
Premium,ExMod 2000-03
join:2000-05-11
·AT&T Midwest

CB all over again

Give it another year or so and this will look like Citizens' Band radio. All interference, all the time. I'd bet half of the unlicensed Part 15 devices operating will be doing so with illegal amplifiers and antennas just to make it across the house.
moonpuppy

join:2000-08-21
Glen Burnie, MD
·Verizon Online DSL

Re: CB all over again

But why do we need cell phones? That is old technology. Let's get with the program and have everything work in IP. IP phones, IP internet connections, IP radios, etc. We'll just let the ITU come up with some cool scheme to make sure over the air collisions a thing of the past and make data transfers of 100Mbit possible. (insert sarcasm here)

If you think getting a cell phone site is hard now, wait until this happens.
keyboard5684

join:2001-08-01
Youngsville, PA
·Teliax VOIP
·WestPAnet Inc.
·WestPAnet Inc. CA..

I agree. This is getting out of hand. I have a small 2.4GHZ dish pointing down town to my access point (I am on a hill) and I can pick up (and use) about 50 wireless networks. These are all small residential 802.11 networks connected to different broadband providers. There are probably more if I decided to move the dish around since it has a small radiation pattern.

2.4 ghz phones are everywhere and completely not neccessary. A 2.4ghz phone is no better than a 900 mhz cordless phone. I think people think it is better if it is a higher frequency (Now available, 5.8GHZ phones that can go 30 ft).

We then have people competing with people. Bobby sue puts up a wireless network to use the laptop in the pool. George next door uses a local ISP 2.4 ghz connection. Since Bobby Sue put in the omni on her roof George now needs a 5 watt amp to overcome the interference. Then so does Bobby Sue. It goes on and on like that.

wolfox
Gentle Wolfox

join:2002-11-27
Dunnellon, FL

Re: CB all over again

said by keyboard5684 See Profile:
We then have people competing with people. Bobby sue puts up a wireless network to use the laptop in the pool. George next door uses a local ISP 2.4 ghz connection. Since Bobby Sue put in the omni on her roof George now needs a 5 watt amp to overcome the interference. Then so does Bobby Sue. It goes on and on like that.

Horizontal polarization. Problem solved - no need to escalate the "Wi-Fi" cold war. But then, that would require using a little ingenuity. Nobody wants to be bothered to try that...

Hey, show me your Wi-Fi dish, I will show you my ugly hacked one, we'll compare notes. I get about 30 miles away with mine!
--
Nothwest Arkansas' ONLY all Techno Radio Webcast, powered by SBC DSL!
RadioDoc
58ef2c0
Premium,ExMod 2000-03
join:2000-05-11
·AT&T Midwest

Re: CB all over again

said by wolfox See Profile:
Horizontal polarization. Problem solved
OK, then what do you do when access point #3 (or 4 or 11) appears? That only works in a sparsely populated RF world. We're talking Japanese commuter train density here.

superdog
I Need A Drink
Premium,MVM
join:2001-07-13
Lebanon, PA

said by wolfox See Profile:

Hey, show me your Wi-Fi dish, I will show you my ugly hacked one, we'll compare notes. I get about 30 miles away with mine!

I highly doubt it?. Unless You have found a way to adjust the timing on Your radio, that link will not work.;)
--
»www.wavecrazy.net
Forums » Fine Tuning the Wireless Spectrum


Wednesday, 02-Dec 23:36:12 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.republican-creole