site Search:


 
   
story category
4G Won't Be Widely Available in UK Until 2015
Regulator Puts UK 4 Years Behind U.S. On LTE
by JKukiewicz Friday 16-Dec-2011 tags: coverage · business · wireless · world · consumers · wireless · LTE
When, earlier this year, the UK communications regulator, Ofcom, set back the date of its planned 4G spectrum auction by more than a year, it claimed that the change would leave the actual roll out date for 4G services unchanged. The comment raised some eyebrows: surely, in practice, the faster we have the auction, the faster we can roll out the service? It seemed as though Ofcom were just covering their backs or, at the very least, refusing to acknowledge that arguments between mobile broadband providers have been one of the auction’s largest delaying factors thus far.

Similarly, last week, Ofcom announced that 4G won’t be widely available in the UK until 2015. But denied that it had ever planned anything different. It may be true that Ofcom never specified an earlier date for widespread deployment, however, but they did predict that UK consumers would start to see 4G services by the middle of 2013 just a few months ago.

Under the regulator’s new annual plan for 2012/13 that seems unlikely.

What’s setting back UK 4G?

In their plan’s statement of intention, Ofcom say that they’ll, “continue to pursue a balanced approach that makes appropriate use of the tools at our disposal – both market mechanisms and regulatory intervention - to secure optimal use of the radio spectrum." Those two tools have to solve two problems: increasingly ungentlemanly competition between the potential 4G providers and long drawn-out technical issues.

The competition side looks unlikely to clear without further infighting: 3 claim that Vodafone and O2, who already have access to a large chunk of sub-1GHz spectrum, shouldn’t be allowed even more access to spectrum that carried 4G; Vodafone and O2 claim that any move to do so is anti-competitive and against EU law.

On the technical side is the amount of space in the spectrum currently taken up by Digital Terrestrial Television (DTT) and some other technologies. DTT is used by about half of the UK’s TV users, a far higher proportion than in other countries where satellite and cable dominates, while, for example, aeronautical radio causes interference at the 2.6GHz band level. Ofcom claims it needs time to clear the spectrum of these interferences completely and that’s not expected to happen until late 2013.

Julia edits consumer site Choose, which helps UK users compare deals on broadband and covers mobile broadband.

view: topics flat text 
Post a:
Mr Matt

join:2008-01-29
Eustis, FL
kudos:1

No Fraud, No Fraud!

Is it possible that the wireless carriers in Great Britain are waiting until they deploy real 4G rather than as the ones in the United States, claiming FAKE 4G is real 4G!

Romney2012
Defeat Obama 2012-Chg we can believe in
Premium
join:2002-03-03
USA
kudos:4

1 edit

Re: No Fraud, No Fraud!

said by Mr Matt:

Is it possible that the wireless carriers in Great Britain are waiting until they deploy real 4G rather than as the ones in the United States, claiming FAKE 4G is real 4G!

No chance of that. Ofcom is an example of a slow moving regulator that gives the word sloth a favored definition. Any slowdown is a result of incompetent gov't regulation and not carrier plans.
--
The nine most terrifying words in the English language are, I'm from the government and I'm here to help.
»www.politico.com/rss/2012-election-blog.xml

zorxd

join:2010-02-05
Quebec, QC
Reviews:
·voip.ms
·Acanac

Re: No Fraud, No Fraud!

Regulated UK still have much better wireless plans than "unregulated" US.

Sometimes forcing companies to wait for deployment can help competition, because the same technologies are used by all carriers so a customer can switch to an other carrier easily.

Regulation is one of the reasons why the cell phone market is better in Europe.

ddarko

@cogentco.com
Peddling your fact-free ideology in place of reality. The article describe the two major causes of the 4G delay: (1) a dispute among carriers over who should be allowed to buy more spectrum, with the implied threat of litigation by some carriers if a decision goes against them; and (2) the high level of terrestrial usage among UK residents, a reflection of the fact that the UK has a system of mandatory TV fees, that makes it harder to clear spectrum for 4G use.

But hey, why acknowledge the real world difficulties of policymaking when you can engage in nonsense characterization about regulators (that's completely unsupported by any facts, of course). You've also concluded that any government is bad so ipso facto any delay is caused by government.

ohrly

@virginmedia.com

Re: No Fraud, No Fraud!

said by ddarko :

a reflection of the fact that the UK has a system of mandatory TV fees, that makes it harder to clear spectrum for 4G use.

Strictly speaking it's not a "mandatory TV fee", it is a licence that you need to obtain to use a TV to watch broadcasts. Plenty of exceptions, from using a DVB-T receiver for radio only to using a TV as a monitor for a DVD player/games console/etc.

The UK is undergoing its analogue switchoff (it will finish next year, great swathes of the country have already had it), with the frequency plans for the new digital transmissions having already been meticulously planned for years. You would hope that Ofcom and the broadcasters have already sorted out space for 4G - since they're spending millions completely re-engineering the transmission network for the frequencies they have planned out.

buddahbless

join:2005-03-21
Premium
Reviews:
·Comcast
·T-Mobile US

UK really does not need LTE at the moment

Simply because all of the UK ( or most of it for that matter) Has fiber laid to almost everywhere which is leaps and bounds above to US fiber build out(cough... ATT! ). The UK also has some of the fastest ( and cheapest) wired broadband service in the world, so much so most of there broadband users are content with there wired connections and don't see the real need for anything much faster in the form of wireless at the moment.

It's us here in the US that could actually benefit from the lesson the UK is learning as they watch our horrible incompatible LTE launch( cough again.... Verizon and ATT). LTE wont be the god send of Data technology as long as Verizon ,Sprint and ATT dictate and operate the way they have and will continue to without some standardization. Non compatible/ interchangeable handsets, totally different frequency use, etc. Lets just hope Advanced LTE is standardized, regulated and interchangeable ( similar to the worldwide use of GSM).

ohrly

@virginmedia.com

Re: UK really does not need LTE at the moment

said by buddahbless:

Simply because all of the UK ( or most of it for that matter) Has fiber laid to almost everywhere which is leaps and bounds above to US fiber build out(cough... ATT! ). The UK also has some of the fastest ( and cheapest) wired broadband service in the world, so much so most of there broadband users are content with there wired connections and don't see the real need for anything much faster in the form of wireless at the moment.

Certainly for residential broadband there is next to no fibre to the home, and fibre to the cabinet is only really starting to be ramped up in any great scale.

It's not really the fastest in the world either - even the fibre to the cabinet service only does 40Mbit down, 10Mbit up (artificial limits imposed by the telco, there are plans to double it next year and keep going up).

There is also cable in some areas, with alleged top speeds of 100Mbit/10Mbit, but since it's cable that is subject to congestion and all the other nasties that plague DOCSIS.

The two areas the UK really does well in is competition (the telco is forced to allow third party access to its network, so everyone has the choice of tons of ISPs) and availability (ADSL availability is close to 99% of the population although attainable speed really varies).

Sunday, 03-Jun 19:48:47 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.