 
BIGMIKE
Premium
join:2002-06-07
Westminster, CA | Bush there that four letter word 
--
Type "miserable failure" in Google | |
|
 | 
calvoiper
join:2003-03-31
Belvedere Tiburon, CA | Re: Bush It all depends on whether the Judge's ruling stands on appeal.
All in the meantime is speculation, nothing more.
calvoiper
--
VoIP--the death knell of remaining voice monopolies! | |
|
| | 
John Galt
Forward, March
Premium
join:2004-09-30
Happy Camp
 ·CenturyLink
| Re: Bush said by calvoiper  :All in the meantime is speculation, nothing more. There you have it...
--
A is A | |
|
| | |
| | | 
AthlGrond
Premium,MVM
join:2002-04-25
Aurora, CO
1 edit | Re: Bush Why? Either it's legal or not. Judges are apolitical right? (Meaning that supposedly they aren't ruling to please the crowd.) | |
|
| | | | 
R4M0N
Brazilian Soccer Ownz Joo
join:2000-10-04
Glen Allen, VA
 ·Comcast
| Re: Bush said by AthlGrond :Why? Either it's legal or not. Judges are supposed to be apolitical right? (Meaning that supposedly they aren't ruling to please the crowd.) There... Fixed it for you. | |
|
| |
| | nasadude
join:2001-10-05
Rockville, MD
·Comcast
| Re: Bush said by braynes : ... so they Bribed the telcos. Bruce I think the bribe was for the FCC to role over and play dead when it comes to telecom matters. Although the FCC seemed to want to do that anyway, so I'm not sure there's a quid pro quo. | |
|
| |
pnh102
Reptiles Are Cuddly And Pretty
Premium
join:2002-05-02
Mount Airy, MD
·Comcast
| No Threat At All No large company fears a class action lawsuit anymore. These always become the standard "bribe the lawyers for a few million and hand the victims $5 discount coupons for new service they haven't purchased yet." Some of these evolve into mechanisms for generating new revenue.
Case in point, a class action lawsuit against GM which had resulted in the victims of defective GM trucks receiving coupons worth $1000 towards a discount for another GM vehicle. Well, in order to receive the reward, the victim would have to further enrich GM.
If this ruling is upheld on appeal and the companies involved face criminal charges, then the shareholders and executives should be worried.
--
Only SHATNER is Kirk. | |
|
|
| 
Transmaster
Don't Blame Me I Voted For Bill and Opus
join:2001-06-20
Cheyenne, WY
·Qwest.net
1 edit | Political Hack This bogus decision well be over turned in short order. The ACLU lawyer Jameel Jaf who argued the case before her is himself a fund raiser and apologist for various Islamic terrorist organizations. Is there any wonder why he would want to stop the NSA he is one of the people the NSA would listen to.
Judge Anna Diggs Taylor is a Jimmy Carter appointee who was given her judicial seat as an award for her help in getting Carter elected. She is not well thought of by her fellow judges on the 5th circuit. Read below for more information
»article.nationalreview.com/?q=OW···MjFjNzQ=
--
The older I get the more I prefer the company of my dogs over that of man kind. | |
|
RadioDoc
58ef2c0
Premium,ExMod 2000-03
join:2000-05-11
·AT&T Midwest
| The only people who win in a class action are the class action attorneys.
This is news?
We'll all be lucky to get a $10 gift card good for more useless add-on services we don't want.
Posted at 14:35 PM CDT. Take that, cat.
--
Toolmaster of La Grange. | |
|
| JazzJRabbit
join:2003-09-27
Wheaton, IL
·WOW Internet and C..
| Re: The only people who win in a class action said by RadioDoc :We'll all be lucky to get a $10 gift card good for more useless add-on services we don't want. At this point I'd be happy if they were ordered to stop (for real and no fvsking appeals), barred from doing it again and all responsible went to jail for > 10-20 years. I don't care about rewards, I want it to stop and never happen again. If a class action suit can do that much I don't really care how much lawyers will reap. | |
|
| | 
Fatal Vector
join:2005-11-26
| Re: The only people who win in a class action
I keep telling you: There IS NO JAIL in such cases. Therefore, in the end, it's all meaningless to the corporations.
Especially since they allready have legions of shysters on their payroll so the dont even have to pay extra for shysters.
Class action suits are meaningless. The only ones who make any money are the lawyers for the plaintiffs. The plaintiffs themselves get nothing but crap, the shaft, or both. | |
|
| | | undertow
join:2004-08-21
Plano, TX
| Re: The only people who win in a class action said by Fatal Vector :I keep telling you: There IS NO JAIL in such cases. Therefore, in the end, it's all meaningless to the corporations. Let me explain to you how this works. You see, the corporations finance Team America. And then Team America goes out and the corporations sit there in their, in their corporation buildings and, and, and see that's, they're all corporationy, and they make money. | |
|
| | RadioDoc
58ef2c0
Premium,ExMod 2000-03
join:2000-05-11 | There's no money in that, so it'll never happen.
--
Toolmaster of La Grange. | |
|
| 
Michieru2
zzz zzz zzz
Premium
join:2005-01-28
Miami, FL | Well at least you can buy yourself a couple of snickers  | |
|
big9member
@embarqhsd.net | War on Terror When are you sexually frustrated nerds going to realize what it means to lose the war on terror? | |
|
| 
Hangmn
Don't Fight It...It's Inevitable
Premium
join:2000-04-08
Philadelphia, PA
4 edits | Re: War on Terror said by big9member :
When are you sexually frustrated nerds going to realize what it means to lose the war on terror?
You truly are an idiot if you believe this has anything to do with the war on terror..this is about eroding civil liberties and personal rights in the name of the "war on terror"
If there was truly a war on terror Syria, Iran as well as North Korea would have been invaded by now.
Not to mention seizing the over a trillion of the Saudi Royals dollars currently sitting in US financial institutions,,the war on terror is a war on YOU
Oh and not so sexually frustrated..father of 2, 41yrs old with a 27 yr old wife.
--
»davescustompc.com | |
|
| | |
| lawrence171
Evilly Yours - Evilness
join:2001-12-24
Canada
| said by big9member :
When are you sexually frustrated nerds going to realize what it means to lose the war on terror?
It can mean two things: Genocide or gradual removal of trust and freedom in society.
--
What I used to be I no longer am... God, why can't you freeze time for my sake? | |
|
| 
batterup
I Can Not Tell A Lie.
Premium
join:2003-02-06
Netcong, NJ
clubs: | said by big9member :
When are you sexually frustrated nerds going to realize what it means to lose the war on terror?
TERRORISM, 9/11, PEDOPHILES, OH MY. | |
|
|
Orwell1984
@rr.com
| I would be very happy to know what it means to win the war on terror.If any person here can explain to me how we define victory in this I would like to hear from you. Without a clear definition of victory it will not be possible to win. EVER! Like any sensible, rational person I have no problem with my duly elected government taking extreme measures to defend our nation in time of war. Look at some of the things we did to win WWII. Even after the war allied soldiers killed innocent civilians to get people to turn in resistance fighters in Germany. I personally have no problem with this. BUT until you have the stomach to do things like this don't use the word WAR so lightly. If this was war, Pakistan would be occupied now because it is Al Queida's primary base of operation and training. Half assing a war gets you a Vietnam or Afghanistan (to the Russians). We are not at war. That is a pleasant euphemism to get people riled up. Get over it and use some common sense. Do not grant broad Powers to your Government for a war with no clear end. They cannot be trusted. The Forefathers of this nation knew that and we should never forget it. | |
|
| | undertow
join:2004-08-21
Plano, TX
| Re: War on Terror Why haven't some attorneys filed a class action lawsuit against firefighters yet? I mean everyone knows that firefighters are just pawns of the Bush Administration who purposely set fires so they can stomp all over our civil liberties and break into our homes while they claim they're just putting out the fire. Whatever! We know what's really going on. Fascists! | |
|
| | |
Orwell1984
@rr.com | Re: War on Terror My ignorance raises it's ugly head again. Which side of the argument are you on undertow? Your post is as a reply to me but I can't figure out if you are for or against anything I said. | |
|
| | | |
| | 
woody7
Premium
join:2000-10-13
Torrance, CA
·EarthLink
·DSL EXTREME
| when the use of the euphimism "war on terror" I believe that that is what the present administration is using to "elevate" their so called war "powers". If anyone has read the constitution, there is not any mention of the president having extraordinary powers, that is what concerns me, this present administration is claiming to follow the constitution, and want judges that are strict followers that don't interpret said constitution, and then lambast them when they do. We have three branches of government, but you would think that there is only one and if you disagree with them, you must be weak on terrorism. Both houses of government have become impotent. They are/were elected to serve us ,and they need to be made aware of this fact, or they need a rude awakening.As a Vietnam vet, 2 tours of duty, I am truly disappointed for a couple of reasons. One is that how you could start a war that you can't possibly win (remember the past),and once started how could you be so unprepared for the peace? (remember the past again). I am a conservative Democrat/liberal republican, no that is not an oxy moron.I like the physcal responsibility of true conservatives, but with a touch of the true democratics compassion. I don't want any religion in politics, not even my own. This socalled war is bogus from the getgo, just as Vietnam was.I had the choice to go or not go, and chose the former, and don't regret it. It gives me a better slant on what is going on. JMT
--
BlooMe | |
|
| | |
Orwell1984
@rr.com | Re: War on Terror As it is coming from one who has been there I respect your opinion. Thank you for all you have done. Your efforts will be appreciated by generations to come. | |
|
| | | |
R4M0N
Brazilian Soccer Ownz Joo
join:2000-10-04
Glen Allen, VA
·Comcast
| Re: War on Terror said by Orwell1984 :
As it is coming from one who has been there I respect your opinion. Thank you for all you have done. Your efforts will be appreciated by generations to come.
Only half of the generations, the other half, unfortunately, will still think he was a baby killer. | |
|
|
SheBegsForIt
@embarqhsd.net
| Some of you are going so far in your criticism that it almost seems you would literally like to see us lose. I hasten to add that this isn't because you are disloyal. It's because you just don't recognize what losing means. Nevertheless, your conduct gives the impression to the enemy that we are divided and weakening. It concerns our friends, and it does great damage to our cause.
For those who don't know the enemy...the enemy are the same ones who would throw you off a building, cut off your hands, cut out your tongue and otherwise murder you just for disagreeing with them. | |
|
| |
See 11 replies to this post |
|
|
|
|
Wiretap Ruling A Threat to Telcos?
·