republican-creole
Search:  

 
 
   News
newer
story category 802.11i Security Upgrade
IEEE could ratify standard today
(old news - 10:20AM Thursday Jun 24 2004)
tags: wireless · security
Members of the Institute for Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) standards board will be meeting today to possibly approve the 802.11i standard. The upgrade adds the AES (Advanced Encryption Standard) security protocol to the various 802.11 Wi-Fi flavors. AES supports 128-bit, 192-bit and 256-bit keys.

The path to 802.11i has been a long one, the industry pushing for WPA (Wi-Fi protected access) as an interim solution to the feeble security offered by WEP. WPA was a subset of 802.11i, and repaired many of the problems of WEP while the final standard was cooking in the oven.

With the security offered by AES, many companies who were slow to adopt Wi-Fi may now have a change of heart (likewise with paranoid residential shut-ins). The National Institute of Standards and Technology has designated AES as the security standard for wireless networks that carry government information.

Will users need to upgrade? While many outlets have reported otherwise, the majority of Wi-Fi chips shipped since roughly the middle of 2002 should be powerful enough to handle the new specification, and will simply need firmware upgrades from their respective vendors.

Many vendors like Broadcom and Atheros have essentially already integrated AES functionality, and are simply waiting for the green light. Intel says they're ready to offer the new security standard in their Centrino line of hardware.

A significant amount of older hardware will likely need to be replaced, however. Once the IEEE ratifies the standard, the group is expected to begin certifying products in September.

Related:
  1. FBI Gets DS3 Backdoor Into Verizon Wireless Network?
  2. Steal Wi-Fi In Maryland? Face 3 Year Prison Stretch
  3. Cell Phones and VoIP Calls Easy to Hack
  4. Tuesday Morning Links
  5. Friday Evening Links
  6. Using GPUs To Speed Up WPA Hacks
  7. WPA Wi-Fi Encryption Is Partially Cracked
  8. Japanese Computer Scientists Crack WPA
Forums » 802.11i Security Upgrade
view: topics flat text 
Post a:

Lumberjack
Premium
join:2003-01-18
Newport News, VA

Security good

This is good that the IEEE is working to get things accomplished at a good pace. But once its ratified I wonder how long it will take for the vendors to implement.
--
Dopeler effect: The tendency of stupid ideas to seem smarter when they come at you rapidly.
smp606

join:2002-01-16
PA

Re: Security good

Yes! hopefully vendors will implement this within a month or two...

BigARR
You Can Call Me Al
Premium
join:2004-01-16
MI, USA

said by Lumberjack See Profile:
This is good that the IEEE is working to get things accomplished at a good pace. But once its ratified I wonder how long it will take for the vendors to implement.

And...when they do will it require new hardware or just a firmware upgrade?

Karl Bode
News Guy
join:2000-03-02

Re: Security good

The majority of chips shipped by 2002 should have enough processing power to be able to handle it with just a firmware upgrade.
DSLrgm
Premium,MVM
join:2002-08-22
Oak Park, MI

I worked on the standard.

There are not a lot of differences between WPA and 802.11i.

Any hardware that works with WPA will work with 802.11i.

The spec has been stable for almost a year. Changes were cleaning up the text.

A lot of vendors should have code out quickly, as will MS (for XP and Win2000).
iffy

join:2004-02-07
Columbus, OH

Re: 802.11i times

WPA was never supported under W2K, without third party software. Hopefully this will change with 802.11i, but I wouldn't count on it.

wavguy2003
370's Forever
Premium
join:2004-03-18
Saint Charles, IL

Re: 802.11i times

Not completely true. Microsoft released WPA Pre-Shared key support for W2K last February.

Zomniak

join:2001-01-08
Frisco, TX
·Grande Communicati..

I've been using WPA-PSK with AES encryption for over a year with various hardware that all talk to each other:

Linksys WAP54G
Linksys WRT54G
Dell Truemobile 1450
D-Link A/B/G PCMCIA card
D-Link DWL-G120 (USB)
Linksys WPC54GS

Everything above uses broadcom chips except for the D-Links, which use Atheros and Prism chips.

So, what is going to be different if I upgrade to 802.11i drivers?
--
The visionary is always right.

Lumberjack
Premium
join:2003-01-18
Newport News, VA

Re: What will change?

Arg. Too bad Linksys/Broadcomm don't publish Linux drivers. Or at least the API specs.
ryjovern

join:2004-01-20
Cloquet, MN

More information

»wifinetnews.com/archives/002594.html

Go hear for more information on 802.11i.
Forums » 802.11i Security Upgrade


Sunday, 29-Nov 03:55:34 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.republican-creole