|
bah400Mbs is so slow where is 1Gbit | |
|
| |
Re: bah Be thankful you are allowed to have 400mbs in the first place. | |
|
| porkchops Premium Member join:2003-05-17 Saint Marys, WV |
to brianiscool
Yeah Hopefully they'll start putting more 10/100/1000 ports on consumer routers, since the wireless throughput will "theoretically" exceed that of wired hosts. | |
|
| yabos join:2003-02-16 London, ON |
to brianiscool
300Mbit wireless is pretty good. If you have channel bonding you can have 600Mbit. | |
|
|
Maybe.......I like the word "Should". It has such a nice ring to it... | |
|
Beans5 join:2005-07-16 united state |
Beans5
Member
2007-Jan-19 1:19 pm
faster?The 802.11n is suppose to be faster and have a better signal at farther distances right? | |
|
| Dude9What Happens When I Do This Premium Member join:2000-11-20 Chicago, IL |
Dude9
Premium Member
2007-Jan-19 2:16 pm
Re: faster?correct supposed to get great speed with a crappy signal | |
|
dadkinsCan you do Blu? MVM join:2003-09-26 Hercules, CA |
Tim AllenMORE POWER!!! | |
|
| koolman2 Premium Member join:2002-10-01 Anchorage, AK |
koolman2
Premium Member
2007-Jan-21 4:18 am
Re: Tim AllenOh, please! If Tim Allen got hold of one, he would put so much power into it that it would melt the entire block in a big poof of smoke. | |
|
axus join:2001-06-18 Washington, DC |
axus
Member
2007-Jan-19 2:20 pm
cool!Can't wait till the standard is finished, and get some reviews on routers so I can get one without any bugs ;p | |
|
| JeffConnoisseur of leisurely things Premium Member join:2002-12-24 GMT -5 |
Jeff
Premium Member
2007-Jan-19 2:47 pm
Re: cool!said by axus:Can't wait till the standard is finished, and get some reviews on routers so I can get one without any bugs ;p Don't hold your breath, everything has bugs, known or not. | |
|
ke4pym Premium Member join:2004-07-24 Charlotte, NC |
ke4pym
Premium Member
2007-Jan-19 2:38 pm
If it weren't for the pre-draft stuffthe IEEE would probably have taken a few more years to hammer this out. Good for the vendors putting a little pressure on IEEE. | |
|
| |
Re: If it weren't for the pre-draft stuffit's about time this got rolling....
Maybe we'll finally start seeing wireless networks with real-world throughputs above 100 meg (I know the currently draft-N can hit 70-90 meg, real world)...
So, when will the final "N" be approved? | |
|
|
Woot finallyWell I'll just look for routers with draft 2.0 chipsets, then I'll be fine. I'm not waiting a year for ratification.......because I don't want to invest in soon to be outdated inadequate a/b/g gear for my needs. So'll I'll buy 802.11n gear that uses draft 2.0 chipset. | |
|
|
They are going to need more...The routers would have to have gigabit ports because with the new DOCSIS 3.0 and FiOS, they will be well over 160Mbps, they will have to have gigabit ports. Even if the raw speed is 600Mbps, it'll only be maxed at around 300Mbps. Hopefully as our ISPs get faster, so will the wireless standard. They will have to upgrade the speeds like they did with 802.11g. Only time will tell, but even the new USB standard will be faster than this, and it'll be operating at 1Gbps! IEEE just takes too long. | |
|
|
differenceWhats all the fuss over a 802.11N standard? What are the differences between the draft and final N? | |
|
| 1 edit |
Re: differencesaid by patcat88:Whats all the fuss over a 802.11N standard? What are the differences between the draft and final N? Many interoperability issues have been resolved in v1.10 aka draft 2.0 of the specifications versus the buggy draft 1.0 specs. Draft 2.0 was unaminously approved in this month and will goto letter ballot in march and will be ratified and becom the final standard next year. | |
|
|
|