 RayWPremium
join:2001-09-01
Layton, UT
kudos:1 | No Telephone and DSL/HS internet. | |
|
 | jtel
join:2005-06-28
Bristol, RI | Re: No I don't care to bundle services just for the sake of having one larger bill.
I find it difficult to believe the cable co's just finished spending $2.4 billion on spectrum at the auction but have so little interest in having a wireless product. | |
|
| | RayWPremium
join:2001-09-01
Layton, UT
kudos:1 | Re: No said by jtel:I find it difficult to believe the cable co's just finished spending $2.4 billion on spectrum at the auction but have so little interest in having a wireless product. The Microsoft (and others) school of thought. Lock up anything that might let someone else make money in an area that you might want to someday.
--
I am not lost, I find myself every time. | |
|
| Reviews:
 ·Bright House
| said by RayW:Telephone and DSL/HS internet. The quadruple play won't be worth it for me until they give you one phone number for home and mobile. The I could see it being practical, but until then, this is just a waste of time.
--
SIPPhone/Gizmo # 17476200648 / PIMPNET Chatline / Ran by Asterisk & Slackware 10.1. | |
|
| | RayWPremium
join:2001-09-01
Layton, UT
kudos:1 | Re: No Since I do not have a cell phone, then it would REALLY be a waste.
Just want telephone and DSL, and I wish they would stop wasting my time with those mailed ads (wonder how much that adds to my bill) to get all the extra services, video, and other whizbangs.
--
I am not lost, I find myself every time. | |
|
amungusPremium
join:2004-11-26
America Reviews:
 ·AT&T DSL Service
| nope not one bit.
I'd care if cable companies would LOWER rates for once...
Who honestly cares about the majority of cable channels anyway?
...all I want out of 'em is television, and internet. and if it came down to it, I'd rather pay 'em for that 6Mhz of bandwidth for internet than all the rest of what's coming down that wire spewing out useless, unused video signals. | |
|
 intellerSociopaths always win.
join:2003-12-08
Tulsa, OK | sprints network is overpimped anyways. They pimp out their network to every MVNO that comes calling anyways. I'd actually run the other way if my cable co offers it.
--
"WHEN THE LAUGH TRACK STARTS THEN THE FUN STARTS!" | |
|
 MysticGogetaThe Robot DevilPremium
join:2005-03-14
League City, TX |  Depends
--
Team Discovery-Join the fight | |
|
 EUSKill cancerPremium
join:2002-09-10
canada | Do You Care About The 'Quadruple Play'? Nope. | |
|
| | | Re: Do You Care About The 'Quadruple Play'? I'm for it if it can be offered at a discount and is reliable. I'd think VZ could do a really kick-ass job if they offered the whole hog - HSI,TV,Phone and Voice/Data wireless. | |
|
| |
Reviews:
 ·Verizon FiOS
| no I don't even care about the double play. I could care less about a consolidated bill.
with the option these days to pay online or even automatic deductions, it's actually easier to see what the provider of each service is charging if you get the services separately.
how the hell are you going to tell if your "quadruple play" provider mis-charges without spending time poring over the consolidated bill and probably spending time on the phone? | |
|
|  morboComplete Your Transaction
join:2002-01-22
00000
·Charter
| Re: no said by nasadude:I could care less about a consolidated bill. agreed. why do they keep touting this as such a huge advantage? so it takes an extra 2 minutes to write a check, 30 seconds to use online bill pay, or 0 seconds for auto pay by credit card. a combined bill is not a miracle. | |
|
 gpidockPremium
join:2006-12-01
Columbus, OH
1 edit | quadruple play? No.
Not even with bundle discounts.
I don't even care about double play either. | |
|
 MattAll noise, no signal.Premium
join:2003-07-20
Jamestown, NC
kudos:12 | Nope Nor the triple play | |
|
|
| | only if it is cheaper that way if it would save me some money...Yes, I would be interested.
peace | |
|
 SOLdesignDid I drink a shot of Irrational Whore?Premium
join:2002-07-29
Woodland Hills, CA
1 edit | whatever-play not interested. we dont need a home phone. we have a contract with cell phone, can't break that, unless the cable co is willing to pay the penalty | |
|
patcat88
join:2002-04-05
Jamaica, NY
kudos:1 | quad plays Makes sense to gather in and contract up your customers as much as possible. People will fall for the Quadruple play, but there is one question, what kind of price are cell companies going to use to bring customers into quadplays, since if you think about it, the triple plays get consumers mainly by $$$, not single bill or other crap, and all the triple play services are unlimited, what happens when you put in a multi tier (of minutes) system of cell phone plans? Will be hard to pull people in unless there is a unlimited cell phone plan, and those are prohibited so far by the cell phone market.  | |
|
| | Nope Don't care about the triple plays - too expensive when I consider I pay Vonage $15/mo for service, the discount on cable is laughable, and so is the discount on the internet.
Could care less about triple/quad plays. | |
|
 viperpa33sWhy Me?Premium
join:2002-12-20
Bradenton, FL | Wouldn't care I don't care for triple play or even quadruple play. If they offered you a choice individually and wouldn't charge you extra for not getting it bundled, then I don't have a problem with it. | |
|
 IridiumPremium
join:2003-04-02
Los Angeles, CA | I won't even be looking at cable internet till they stop charging non cable tv subscribers more money to get online than if you subscribe to both.
--
Start the Revolution, download Opera, »www.opera.com | |
|
| MattAll noise, no signal.Premium
join:2003-07-20
Jamestown, NC
kudos:12 | Re: I won't even be looking at cable internet said by Iridium:till they stop charging non cable tv subscribers more money to get online than if you subscribe to both. At least you can get cable internet without cable TV.
I have no such option with DSL unless I purchase a POTS line.
--
Use the OS tool for the job. | |
|
| | | And how is that different from Telcos requiring a phone line to get DSL AND/OR charging more for naked DSL (if naked DSL is even available)??? | |
|
mitska
join:2001-12-25
Sarasota, FL | well Well, I think the price point needs to be around 100 bucks/month weather it is 3 or 4 bundled services. Then I believe people would hop on board... | |
|
 CylonRedPremium,MVM
join:2000-07-06
Bloom County | I certainly... Do not care inthe least... | |
|
 tc1uscg
join:2005-03-09
Saint Clair Shores, MI | eggs in one basket Even if they were the same price, they will have to offer something more (features) to get people to consider it. I.e., able to watch what your dvr records, etc.. now wouldn't that be a feature we all want..  .. I think one of the biggest mistakes wireless carriers did cater to mvno's. You either have a network or you don't. If you want a network that bad, buy it or sell used cars. | |
|
 dadkinsCan you do Blu?Premium,MVM
join:2003-09-26
Hercules, CA
kudos:18 | Sure! As long as... No 2-3 year contract, decent phones/services to choose from, and all on the same bill!
Just tack it on the bill (for at least a semi-reasonable price) with all the goodies!
Ya gots my address, send that cell now!
--
Think outside the Fox... Opera | |
|
| | Quad core, Quad Presidential Candiattes, Quad Wireless? who cares, really..
1. Internet, unlimited usage...
2. Phone, unlimited calling,
3. TV... well they're greedy, for content-- see #1.
4. Cell phone, Wireless? rip-off.. muni taxes, see #2 for the 'other porkchop' telcos throw at you' | |
|
|
|
