  MrMoody Beleaguered Middle Class
join:2002-09-03 Smithfield, NC | Apocalypse Now If this thing gets popular, it will cause the bandwidth/cap apocalypse. I can almost hear the ISPs screaming ... | |
|
 |   johndoe303
join:2003-01-01 Boca Raton, FL | Re: Apocalypse Now I agree, Comcrap is going to have a fit! -- WRTSL54GS v2 + WRT54G v2 | |
|
 |  |  |
 |  |  |  BosstonesOwn
join:2002-12-15 Everett, MA clubs:
·Comcast Formerly ..
| Re: Apocalypse Now Nah , they will charge a fee for not being a subscriber to their service. Oh wait they do.
Ok new idea , they will charge a fee for you because you use the directv on demand feature instead. Yeah thats more like it.
Damn I can't wait for FIOS. -- "It's always funny until someone gets hurt......and then it's absolutely friggin' hysterical!" | |
|
 |  |  |  |   MrMoody Beleaguered Middle Class
join:2002-09-03 Smithfield, NC | Re: Apocalypse Now Yeah, or cut off the download site until DirecTV pays them for carriage. | |
|
  McLovin I mean, you're not staff Premium join:2005-06-12 Fairbanks, AK
·GCI.net
·PTIAlaska.NET
| NFL The NFL is the greediest sports league out there besides basketball.
The MLB streams every game over their website free of charge (reg required, though), ESPN also helps them out too if I understand correctly.
I don't understand why the NFL requires such steep prices. Probably to pay their players $30 Million a year...... | |
|
 |   MuDvAyNe Premium join:2002-03-02 Brooklyn, NY | Re: NFL huh what are you talking about. It cost money to watch the baseball games from mlb.com | |
|
 |  |
 |  |   McLovin I mean, you're not staff Premium join:2005-06-12 Fairbanks, AK | Re: NFL OK Scratch that comment i guess. I remember people a few years back that always watched the games online before MLB.tv came out. Blackouts are pretty ridiculous as well. | |
|
 |   Big Pete
@qwest.net
| The MLB live streaming is most certainly not free... MLB.tv prices:
1 2007 MLB.TV Monthly Subscription Only 14.95
2 2007 MLB.TV Premium Monthly Subscription Only 19.95
3 2007 MLB.TV Yearly Subscription Only 29.95
4 2007 MLB.TV Premium Yearly Subscription Only 49.95
I think if you buy every game before the season its around $80 or so... | |
|
 |  |  |
 |  Awwc
join:2004-02-17 Vancouver, WA | Unlike MLB player contracts, NFL players do not receive guaranteed monies with exception to their signing bonus. Baseball players get the whole thing.
Nice attempt though. | |
|
 |  |   McLovin I mean, you're not staff Premium join:2005-06-12 Fairbanks, AK | Re: NFL Shut down.......  | |
|
  polosh
@optonline.net
| Directv only provider who you have to pay for DVR device dish network HD-DVR free to use just pay for service cable providers HD-DVR free to use just pay for service
directv HD-DVR $199 & they don't refund the money you paid for the device when u cancel or when contract ends or let you keep the device for that matter.
hope they change there policy by next year when there new Satellite comes online | |
|
 |   THUD300 Part Of A Complete Breakfast Premium join:2002-06-07 Decatur, IL | Re: Directv only provider who you have to pay for DVR device $199? Website says $299. 
I would already have one if it wasn't for that. -- Your actual mileage may vary. Operators are standing by. | |
|
 |  |  radougherty
join:1999-07-23 Austin, TX
·AT&T Southwest
| Re: Directv only provider who you have to pay for DVR device The list price is $299 but unlike buying a Saturn auto you can usually negotiate with DirecTV and pay much less. There's a thread, also at DBSTalk, where folks have said what they've done to get deals with DirecTV, some $199, some $99 and some $19.99 or free. And as for Dish, usually if you want a 2nd DVR you also have to pay to get one, the 1st is the only 'free' one. | |
|
 |  |  |   Frizzo
@sbcglobal.net | Re: Directv only provider who you have to pay for DVR device I got mine for free from DirecTV. I got mine last Dec. I doubt anyone will get one for less than $99 now. | |
|
 |  |  |  |  jjaromin
join:2004-09-30 Chesterfield, VA
·Verizon FIOS
| Re: Directv only provider who you have to pay for DVR device I don't know about now, but 2 months ago I recieved my 2nd and 3rd HR20 for shipping & handling ($19.9?). So in total, I have 3 HR20s which I paid a grand total of $60 for. I did not have to haggle to get this price, they were all offered to me this way. The monthly mirror fee of ~$12 for both recievers 2 and 3 are much less than I'd be charged with Comcast or FiosTv. | |
|
 |  |  |  |  |   tp0d yabbazooie Premium join:2001-02-13 Carnegie, PA clubs:
·Verizon FIOS
| Re: Directv only provider who you have to pay for DVR device Got my HR20 free with a 2yr agreement, which I was happy to do, I`ve had DTV for 5 years now, no problems.
I`m using the VOD features, they work quite well over my fios connection. Dont have to worry about getting capped either heh..
They have a pretty good selection on the VOD, theyre building some more HD content now. The HR20 uses a queue system, so I just queue up some programs at night and let it do its thing, then check em all out the next day.
Right now its free, but if they plan to charge for it, I will drop it. Dont need it that bad. Joost works well enuf for that.
-j | |
|
 |  |
 |  |  |
 |  |  |  dualsub2006
join:2007-07-18 Newport, KY | Re: Directv only provider who you have to pay for DVR device One run on sentence that makes no clear point. What is it that you are trying to say? | |
|
 Tim Premium join:2006-06-19
edit: August 28th, @07:19PM
| Yeah, right Okay... let me get this straight. DirecTV's "on demand" service is going to depend on the viewer paying for a broadband connection from another company... and that other company doing the heavy lifting for DTV?
That makes sense... on Planet Stupid.
(Just a quick edit: that would be like Comcast or TWC offering "free" on demand... but if only if you also had their internet service.) | |
|
 |  eco Premium join:2001-11-28 Wilmington, DE
| Re: Yeah, right I feel this is probably only a short term solution until they can offer a real triple play package by either more satellites to increase available bandwidth for voice/data or setting up a WiMAX type solution.
I really think that if they can't offer a real ondemand service, like the cable and phone companies are offering now, they'll be dead in 10 or 15 years tops. People are moving more and more to watching their content when they want to, and more and more via ondemand as opposed to DVR. I'd bet the cable/phone companies will be able to work out some deal to allow a 'head end DVR' to allow people to record content and it be stored in a central location. It's a lot cheaper for the cable/phone companies to do that than put a big expensive box in everyone's living room. | |
|
 |  |  |
 |  |  |   CapinPete Premium join:2002-12-23 Plano, IL | Re: Yeah, right Do away with all advertising on TV and charge for all viewing "a la carte". Shoot, if they did that, I might only have to pay DirecTV $2.67 every month for as much TV as I watch. | |
|
 |  CMoore2004 i r teh smarts Premium join:2003-02-06 Jonesville, MI
·Sprint Mobile Broa..
·HughesNet Satellit..
| The customer buying the equipment understands that they require a broadband connection for this to work. And it's nothing like TWC offering free ondemand but demanding you have their Internet service. That is buying another service from the same company, while DirecTV depends on you having service through another company. And no, DirecTV doesn't still own DirecWay. If a customer's willing to pay for a 6mbps connection, why is it that when they use it for DirecTV OnDemand it's suddenly the provider doing the heavy lifting? DirecTV still has to pay for the bandwidth the customers use. To me, that very simple comment makes you sound like you're against network neutrality. If someone wants to watch a YouTube video, is it the ISP doing all the "heavy lifting" for YouTube? -- Charter 5M | Windows XP MCE SP2 | Mobile AMD Athlon 64 4000+ | 1.5GB RAM | ATI Mobile Radeon X600 128MB | 120GB HDD | |
|
  batterup I Can Not Tell A Lie. Premium join:2003-02-06 Netcong, NJ clubs: | What no swimming pool? Why don't these leeches have to buy the mayor a swimming pool. Net-neutrality no problem, how many bits do you want to buy this month. | |
|
 |
 |  CMoore2004 i r teh smarts Premium join:2003-02-06 Jonesville, MI
·Sprint Mobile Broa..
·HughesNet Satellit..
| Re: sounds very much like IPTV I can see the cable companies doing it sooner, or throttling the traffic, and the telcos gaining a lot of customers. -- Charter 5M | Windows XP MCE SP2 | Mobile AMD Athlon 64 4000+ | 1.5GB RAM | ATI Mobile Radeon X600 128MB | 120GB HDD | |
|
 |  |   gaforces United We Stand, Divided We Fall
join:2002-04-07 Santa Cruz, CA
·Cruzio Internet
| Re: sounds very much like IPTV said by CMoore2004 :I can see the cable companies doing it sooner, or throttling the traffic, and the telcos gaining a lot of customers. It's AOL all over again, the service that doesnt cut it will hemmorage customers, and eventually go off into the sunset ... | |
|
 Awwc
join:2004-02-17 Vancouver, WA | At the least this will get some of you the idea to call your respective media pushers to cancel your service when the time comes.
Then you'll learn of the "retention" department. And that you could have had your service for cheaper allll this time. | |
|
 |  donjuan2002
join:2002-10-06 Kearny, NJ | Re: At the least they gave me a free hd-dvr, free hbo for six months, free cinemax for 3, I call last night | |
|
 biochemistry
join:2003-05-09 92361 | "On Demand" How is it "On Demand" when you have to wait a day to actually watch the video? | |
|
 |  gefflong
join:2003-02-18 Aledo, IL | Re: "On Demand" I don't know about anyone else, but I can start watching the On Demand shows in less than 60 seconds. | |
|
 |
|
 |