 
LiamJunket
Premium
join:2002-03-03
Ocean City, NJ
 ·Comcast
2 edits |  Restricting voice & prioritizing against long traffic
Gogo will not enable any voice-based functions. And the system will prioritize the flow of data so that passengers downloading movies or large documents won't prevent other passengers from getting their e-mail. Glad they are restricting voice traffic.
I'll bet their lowering priority of streaming video traffic will cause some complaints though.
And the 2 mbps figure per customer is VERY optimistic since the plane can only do 3 mbps total for all customers. If more than a couple people use the service, the claimed speed of 2 mbps per customer will not be possible(even with their claimed compression technology).
--
My BLOG .. .. Internet News .. .. My Web Page | |
|
 | nasadude
join:2001-10-05
Rockville, MD
·Comcast
| Re: Restricting voice & prioritizing against long traffic said by LiamJunket  :... I'll bet their lowering priority of streaming video traffic will cause some complaints though. ... darn. that's going to make it harder to watch the streaming porn  | |
|
AZ_OGM
join:2007-01-12
Phoenix, AZ
| Caps I wonder if it will have caps as well. All the airlines are nickel and dimeing us to death already. Imagine a $5 overage for each 10MB over a very small cap to begin with.
I know there are workaholics that are chomping at the bit for this but I would think most business travelers find the flight as a refuge from the boss and the rest of the world. | |
|
| flyingjoey
join:2005-11-07
Jersey City, NJ
 ·Sprint Mobile Broa..
 ·Verizon FIOS
| Re: Caps This service is geared towards Business customers. Not everyone will be willing to pay $12.95 to go online. I doubt Caps will be a consideration.
Also, Airlines are in business to make money, not loose money like any other company. They aren't nickel and dimeing anyone. Most airlines are just "breaking even" if you really think about it.
Picture this A320-200 Fuel capacity 6,300 Gallons / (JetA $8.22) with a capacity of 156 people on board (seat configuration can change this#)
Fully loaded 6300 X 8.22(JFK price) = 51,786 / 156 Pass = $331.96 a head... This is excluding Crew + Snacks + etc.
So don't be shocked when an airline cancels a flight because there are only 50 people onboard.
»www.youtube.com/watch?v=kySPoM6vf5s | |
|
| | expert007
join:2006-01-10
Buffalo, NY | Re: Caps Amen. The airline industry will likely never look the same. | |
|
expert007
join:2006-01-10
Buffalo, NY
| Isn't This Based On EVDO-A? If so, then isn't 3.0 per subscriber (which would really be the airplane) exceedingly optimistic??
Will be interesting to see how the handoffs between towers are handled.
Does anyone know if these are simply cell antennas mounted facing upward? | |
|
|
LiamJunket
Premium
join:2002-03-03
Ocean City, NJ
·Comcast
2 edits | Re: Isn't This Based On EVDO-A? said by expert007 :If so, then isn't 3.0 per subscriber (which would really be the airplane) exceedingly optimistic?? Will be interesting to see how the handoffs between towers are handled. Does anyone know if these are simply cell antennas mounted facing upward? They claim it is a specially modified form of Rev A that can get that 3 mbps speed.
»gigaom.com/2008/03/11/gogo-infli···oadband/
The technology being used for radio transmissions is a customized version of Qualcomm’s EV-DO Rev A technology. Blumenstein said that they can migrate to Rev B or LTE if and when those higher-speed technologies become available. The base stations for the system come from ZTE Corp., the Chinese telecom hardware vendor that is desperately trying to make a name for itself in the U.S. market. Aircell is using technology developed by Meru Networks to ensure that the on-board systems don’t run into capacity issues and all passengers can connect with the on-board 802.11 routers.
Aircell expects to deploy about 500 antennas, enough to cover the entire country and support as many as 250,000 broadband users. --
My BLOG .. .. Internet News .. .. My Web Page | |
|
| | 
Rodok
@sbcglobal.net
| Re: Isn't This Based On EVDO-A? Even if they got to 3 Mb/s per plane, that's just not enough. Sure, it'll do text email, but that's about it. You want to watch a video, even YouTube?: fuhgetaboutit.
I remember some news a while back about Harris working on a system with a California company to do about 30 Mb/s per plane. That sounds much cooler... | |
|
Windogg
join:2002-07-24
Cambridge, MA
| More ways to make money Let me predict things 6 months down the line:
NEW PRICING STRUCTURE:
Data service: $14.95
Laptop > 3lbs: $7.95 per flight
Laptop between 3 - 6lbs: $12.95 per flight
Laptop 6lbs: $19.95
Power: $3.95 per amp
Tray table use: $1.95 per hour | |
|
|
tmh
@qwest.net
| Re: More ways to make money said by Windogg :Let me predict things 6 months down the line: NEW PRICING STRUCTURE: Data service: $14.95 Laptop > 3lbs: $7.95 per flight Laptop between 3 - 6lbs: $12.95 per flight Laptop 6lbs: $19.95 Power: $3.95 per amp Tray table use: $1.95 per hour Wait, wait, you're forgetting the biggest money maker of all
Salty snacks: free
Beveranges: free
Restroom access: $10 per entry. | |
|
patcat88
join:2002-04-05
Jamaica, NY
| lets bring down planes And I bet the useless 10000 feet restriction exists. If a cellphone can bring down a plane, perhaps the terrorists need to stop buying SAM missles and simple take an cellphone with analog on it. That baby is like an EMP bomb. | |
|
| expert007
join:2006-01-10
Buffalo, NY
| Re: lets bring down planes Not the case. You don't want people making cell phone calls while the flight crew is shooting a Cat IIIB ILS approach. Not to confuse the issue, but technically speaking, there are soooo many variables that its a much more prudent decision to maintain an altitude restriction. Much more. I don't think people yapping on their phones is worth more than a safe approach/landing. | |
|
| | 
Toadman
How do you like these Apples
join:2001-11-28
Medina, OH
| Re: lets bring down planes said by expert007 : I don't think people yapping on their phones is worth more than a safe approach/landing. This is the primary reason. I saw a statistic somewhere that 40-50% of cell phones are still on (non-intentionally). I have yet to see a plane go down because of cell phone use. | |
|
| flyingjoey
join:2005-11-07
Jersey City, NJ
·Sprint Mobile Broa..
·Verizon FIOS
| so let's see here... the last thing I need is a 747 in the same air space I'm flying my little single engine cessna 172... oh wait better yet, flying VFR in the middle of now where with no flight following service, so I don't have someone saying skyhawk traffic at 270 2 miles out.
Not a good idea... Leave the big boys at 20k+ feet. | |
|
No_Code
join:2003-12-12 | Room to use laptops Nevermind the fact that unless you're flying in first class, it is practically impossible to use a laptop on an airplane these days and with more regional jets in the air every day, I predict that problem will get worse as time goes on. | |
|
| wierdo
join:2001-02-16
Tulsa, OK
 ·Future Nine Corpor..
·Teliax VOIP
| Re: Room to use laptops said by No_Code :Nevermind the fact that unless you're flying in first class, it is practically impossible to use a laptop on an airplane these days and with more regional jets in the air every day, I predict that problem will get worse as time goes on. And this is why I've been using PDAs and Internet Tablets rather than my laptop on planes now since the Zaurus SL-5500 was new. Not that there's any less room now than there was 10 years ago.
Well, except when I'm in first, when I'm too busy taking advantage of the free booze.
--
It's wierdo, not weirdo. Yes, I know that's not the 'proper' spelling of the similar english language word.  | |
|
|
|
|
American Airlines Broadband Trials This Week