 patcat88
join:2002-04-05 Jamaica, NY | map So wheres the coverage map? Or Tmobile hiding how shitty their network is? | |
|  |  gizmopt2002
join:2004-09-10 Fox River Grove, IL
| Re: map Someones a little bit of a pissy pete, aren't we?
I'll tell you that around here T-mobile is great, and I have been out of contract. My friends with Verizon seriously lack service, and often times text messages aren't received.
I'm looking forward to the launch and debating whether I should wait or not to get a new phone. | |
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  hottboiinnc ME
join:2003-10-15 Toledo, OH | Re: map the Cali and NY markets are actually a partnership of ATT and T-Mobile. Both state this all over the place. Especially when ATT and Cingular became one. | |
|  |  djeremy
join:2004-07-12 San Francisco, CA | My T-Mobile coverage here in SF is fantastic. I have no issues. You can always go to their website and see street level coverage as well.
»www.t-mobile.com/coverage/pcc.aspx | |
|  |  pabster
join:2001-12-09 Waterloo, IA | Yeah, because AT&T's 3G has such a tremendous footprint.
3G has been a laugh in the USA from the get-go. By the time these jokers get their 3G networks running coast-to-coast 4G will be widely deployed elsewhere. | |
|  |  |  EPS
join:2008-02-13 Hingham, MA | Re: map We have two 3G carriers with excellent coverage... shame they use CDMA2000 1xEV-DO rather than UMTS/HSDPA/HSUPA, though. | |
|  |   tiger72 SexaT duorP Premium join:2001-03-28 Saint Louis, MO clubs: | i'll also say that i've been extremely happy with t-mo's network.
Now if only we can get some 1700mhz 3g phones... | |
|  |  |   Jerm
join:2000-04-10 Richland, WA
| it took this long because... I have a friend who works for Tmob in Seattle, and he was telling me its taken them this long to launch because even though the won the spectrum last year, it's taken forever for the previous spectrum squatters (ie other goverment entities) to get off the sold spectrum. It's been a mess! | |
|   Ka0z
@bngmail.com
| WTF As a T-Mobile user myself, I honestly say...
WHO CARES? Why the hell are they using AWS? Seriously, why couldnt they use the SAME BANDS EVERYBODY ELSE USES? So we're forced to use their shitty low-end phones that they charge a ton for? I'll stick to my EDGE based iPhone on T-Mobile untill theres a phone thats worth paying full price for.
This is ridiculous. | |
|   SLD
join:2002-04-17 Los Angeles, CA | Nice backup I might plug a card into my router as a failover WAN when Comcast is down...depends on the monthly fee. | |
|   Cjaiceman Premium,MVM join:2004-10-12 Aurora, CO
·Comcast Workplace
·Comcast
| T-Mo sucks in Denver
Two of my friends were on T-Mo's network and for no reason it would drop a call. They went through several phones and lived in different parts of the metro area, but still had the same crappy service. My Sprint work phone is almost as bad, its not the phone as I have had it replaced a couple times, its just their network sucks. At least in the Denver metro area AT&T and Verizon are the ones to get. I like AT&T a little more as they now have 3G, which is fast, I can usually get about 1.9-2.1Mbits/sec down while on Verizon I can only get about 1Mbps down. I also like the idea of the SIM card so I can run my TyTN II, and not have to buy the AT&T Tilt.
The point is, T-Mo sucks around here and is a joke at best. As for my friends that had T-Mo, they got AT&T and they have never looked back. Dropped calls are a thing of the past, I can't actually remember the last time I dropped a call on AT&T or Verizon... -- Duct tape is like The Force it has a light side and a dark side, and it binds the Universe together | |
|  |   HotRodFoto Premium join:2003-04-19 Denver, CO
| Re: T-Mo sucks in Denver said by Cjaiceman :Two of my friends were on T-Mo's network and for no reason it would drop a call. They went through several phones and lived in different parts of the metro area, but still had the same crappy service. My Sprint work phone is almost as bad, its not the phone as I have had it replaced a couple times, its just their network sucks. At least in the Denver metro area AT&T and Verizon are the ones to get. I like AT&T a little more as they now have 3G, which is fast, I can usually get about 1.9-2.1Mbits/sec down while on Verizon I can only get about 1Mbps down. I also like the idea of the SIM card so I can run my TyTN II, and not have to buy the AT&T Tilt. The point is, T-Mo sucks around here and is a joke at best. As for my friends that had T-Mo, they got AT&T and they have never looked back. Dropped calls are a thing of the past, I can't actually remember the last time I dropped a call on AT&T or Verizon... I'll second that one, used to have T-Mobil here in Denver also, more dropped calls than a teen break up on the phone. Horrible service. Verizon has won me here. -- Capturing the images of Colorado »jdebordphoto.com | |
|   jfmezei Premium join:2007-01-03 Beaconsfield, QC
·ELECTRONICBOX
·TekSavvy Solutions..
| 1700 ????? Ok, let me get this straight:
GSM is at 900 and 1800 wordwide, 850 and 1900 north america
3G is 2100 worldwide, but 850/1900 in north america, and now they are adding 1700 in north america ?
How many handsets will be true "world" handsets with all that mismash of frequencies ? | |
|  |  kingofdsl
join:2002-12-11 Afton, OK | Re: 1700 ????? It's not that hard to mix frequencies anymore. | |
|  |  |  |  |  stufried Premium join:2003-10-13
·Verizon BroadbandA..
| Re: 1700 + 2100 I don't blame TMobile, but I'm not sure whether the network is worth investing in.
TMobile's EDGE network is a great bargain. I am afraid that with a little bit of 3g on an off frequency, they will start charging the same rates for their data as the other guys. | |
|  |  |  |   KA3SGM - -... ...- - Premium join:2006-01-17 West Chester, PA clubs:
·Cricket Broadband
·Verizon FIOS
| Re: 1700 + 2100 said by stufried :I don't blame TMobile, but I'm not sure whether the network is worth investing in. TMobile's EDGE network is a great bargain. I am afraid that with a little bit of 3g on an off frequency, they will start charging the same rates for their data as the other guys. I already have a T-Mobile Nokia 6263 phone that is UMTS/WCDMA capable on 1700-2100 UMTS, although we are still operating on GSM, but I dread to hear what they eventually charge for HSDPA.
At least they have ample competition, and being late to the game, they might initially offer some impressive deals to attract new customers, or draw them away from their competitors.
As deciding whether or not the network is investing in, I see Cricket(Leap Wireless) and MetroPCS now building out their new networks, and their target is FLAT RATE local voice plans.
There is still money to be made in Wireless Data, and I am still waiting to see where T-Mobile goes with it. -- "Lithium is no longer available on credit" | |
|   TowerTechVegas
@comcast.net
| AWS/GSM Spectrum Clearing Hey guys, one of the +'s with TMO's upgrade to AWS is that currently all the EDGE traffic occupies existing voice channels. Once AWS is operating (around Aug/Sept for So Cal and NV) it will free up all the previously used edge channels for voice; ie, fewer dropped voice calls. We have recently completed the install of 186 AWS sites in the Vegas market. TMO is drive testing and optimizing them now. | |
|  | |  |
|
|