republican-creole
site Search:


 
   
story category
Landline Use Continues Slow Death
20 million U.S. residents now cellphone only...
by Karl Bode Wednesday 17-Sep-2008 tags: wireless · stats · consumers
According to a new study (pdf) by Nielsen, 17.1 percent of Americans (about 20 million of us) have ditched their landline for wireless phone service only, a number that the stat farm says is rising at about three to four percent per year. The majority of users who've severed their landline are in lower income brackets (under $50k), tend to be younger (18-34), and have a smaller household size (1-2 people). Some assorted stats from the report:

Click for full size
•Wireless substitutors pay on average $6.69 more per month on wireless than those who retain wireless and landline service. Those users still save, on average, $33 per month per household, given that the average household spends around $40 per month on a landline (plus those notorious fees).

•10% of U.S. households with landline phone service used to be cell only, but switched back. 17% of those returning customers switched back because they had some device they believed needed a landline (DVR, security system). 11% switched back to get a bundle discount from a bell. 10% of them switched back because of poor voice quality.

•Cell only, users, on average, used about 1074 minutes per month, compared to the 742 minutes per month used by users who retained both a cell and landline.

•Cell only users are 16% less likely than the average person to have satellite TV, and 27% more likely to use over the air TV reception. They're also 62% more likely to have cable broadband, and 13% less likely to have DSL than the average household.

view: topics flat text 
Post a:
page: 1 · 2

Dogfather
Premium
join:2007-12-26
Laguna Hills, CA

Expected

When you charge $1.50 to keep people out of the telemarketing book, $7.50 for Caller ID and other bogus and overpriced fees, you lose subscribers.
ebubman

join:2002-01-17
Mechanicsburg, PA
Reviews:
·Verizon FiOS
·Comcast

we don't need no stinking landlines...

said by Dogfather:

When you charge $1.50 to keep people out of the telemarketing book, $7.50 for Caller ID and other bogus and overpriced fees, you lose subscribers.
>>PRECISELY why we booted our verizon landline out the front door circa 6 years ago. only regret is that we hadn't done it sooner. currently using gsm cell plan w/ vonage line for incidental use. landlines? we don't need no stinking landlines!

cork1958
Cork
Premium
join:2000-02-26

Re: we don't need no stinking landlines...

said by ebubman:

said by Dogfather:

When you charge $1.50 to keep people out of the telemarketing book, $7.50 for Caller ID and other bogus and overpriced fees, you lose subscribers.
>>PRECISELY why we booted our verizon landline out the front door circa 6 years ago. only regret is that we hadn't done it sooner. currently using gsm cell plan w/ vonage line for incidental use. landlines? we don't need no stinking landlines!
What? You don't think cell phone companies won't start including ridiculous fees like these in the future? Boy, are you gullible!!
--
The Firefox alternative.
»www.mozilla.org/projects/seamonkey/

Dogfather
Premium
join:2007-12-26
Laguna Hills, CA

Re: we don't need no stinking landlines...

Yeah and when they do you cancel and port for a better deal.
pandora
Premium
join:2001-06-01
Outland
kudos:1
Reviews:
·Google Voice
·Future Nine Corp..
·Comcast
·ooma
said by cork1958:

What? You don't think cell phone companies won't start including ridiculous fees like these in the future? Boy, are you gullible!!
There is more competition for wireless customers than for wired. If one vendor starts to make outrageous charges, porting is always possible.
--
"People demand freedom of speech as a compensation for the freedom of thought which they seldom use."
EPS

join:2008-02-13
Hingham, MA

Makes sense

This is why Verizon needs to buy out Vodafone- Wireless is the future of voice communications. Sound quality isn't as good, but the convenience more than makes up for it...

MrMaster
jetsetter
Premium
join:2000-12-16
St Thomas, VI
Reviews:
·Sprint Mobile Br..
·Virgin Mobile Br..

Re: Makes sense

said by EPS:

This is why Verizon needs to buy out Vodafone- Wireless is the future of voice communications. Sound quality isn't as good, but the convenience more than makes up for it...
you have that backwards. Vodafone might buy out VZW's share in Verizon wireless someday but it wouldn't be the other way around. Market cap should be much higher for Vodafone.
EPS

join:2008-02-13
Hingham, MA

Re: Makes sense

It's strange, yes, but I've seen several analysts claiming that VZ buying VOD is more likely than the other way around. I don't fully understand the arguments, though.

VZ's market cap is 91 billion, VOD is at 117 billion. Not too far apart, and if the dollar continues its gradual rebound against the pound a bit longer they'll be nearly equal.

yock
TFTC
Premium
join:2000-11-21
Miamisburg, OH
kudos:3

1 edit

No More

I'll never be without a landline anymore after the events of this week. Plain old telephone service with a plain old telephone was my only line to the outside for about a day and a half. My cell phone worked intermittently for receiving calls, but it could not make calls and I couldn't charge my battery without running my car engine to charge off the cigarette lighter.

IMO, for as long as I've lived without a landline, I now consider that decision to have been shortsighted and foolish.

[edit]Corrected a typo
--
Laughter is the closest distance between two people. --Victor Borge
Lynch All Liars
DMWCincy

join:2004-04-27
Fairfield, OH

Re: No More

Have to agree with yock. The realization of having an almost total blackout which does also effect cell towers has shown me that I will at least keep a landline at the house. It will not have the options I pay for on the cell service but it will be there in the slight chance that my area loses power like it did over the weekend.

DaveDude
No Fear

join:1999-09-01
New Jersey
kudos:1
The landline is still vital, When the storm hit a month ago, cellular was very busy, but i picked up the phone and everything was good. Verizon really isnt trying to keep customers though

S_engineer
Premium
join:2007-05-16
Chicago, IL

Re: No More

Absolutely, its also nice to get messeges when they were left, not 3 days later!
--
The "Lifetime" channel is responsible for 83% of all divorces...Robert Ginty

RARPSL

join:1999-12-08
Suffern, NY
said by yock:

I couldn't charge my battery without running my car engine to charge off the cigarette lighter
That is what having a spare battery (or two) is for. Just like having a spare for your laptop so you can use it without needing to be tied to a wall socket (such as on a trip/plane).

yock
TFTC
Premium
join:2000-11-21
Miamisburg, OH
kudos:3

Re: No More

said by RARPSL:

said by yock:

I couldn't charge my battery without running my car engine to charge off the cigarette lighter
That is what having a spare battery (or two) is for. Just like having a spare for your laptop so you can use it without needing to be tied to a wall socket (such as on a trip/plane).
Rechargeable cells discharge over time whether you use them or not. It's also an investment of some $50 - $100 per battery, plus the time and effort of charge cycling them regularly to keep them well conditioned. Then I'm still out of power once they die in the course of a week.

My girlfriend had a landline that we used extensively through our storm outtage. It costs her $15 a month and it never went out. It doesn't require any electricity that isn't already provided by the telephone company and their facilities have backup power generation. Did I mention that it never once went out? Never.

Uncle Paul

join:2003-02-04
USA
kudos:1

Re: No More

$15/month? Doubt it. Not with all the other fees added on.

But really, it just wouldn't hurt me to go without a phone for a week. My life simply doesn't evolve around it like that.

S_engineer
Premium
join:2007-05-16
Chicago, IL

Re: No More

said by Uncle Paul:

$15/month? Doubt it. Not with all the other fees added on.

But really, it just wouldn't hurt me to go without a phone for a week. My life simply doesn't evolve around it like that.
My ATT landline is $33 a month after taxes. It's not about having your life liesurely revolve around the phone, it's about having a basic maintenence free telecommunication line thats in service 99.99% of the time even without electricity. So for the price of 6 lattes at Starbucks (without tip), why wouldn't I want that type of insurance?

dsldude08
Premium,VIP
join:2008-01-03
La Crosse, WI
kudos:2

Re: No More

I agree with you. But most people don't get it.

David
I have a son- d3
Premium,VIP
join:2002-05-30
Granite City, IL
kudos:68
Reviews:
·AT&T Southwest
·DIRECTV
·AT&T Midwest
·Google Voice

Re: No More

said by dsldude08:

I agree with you. But most people don't get it.
Because they see savings... or they use the terms "screw the phone company... Vonage...." and that's all they see. They are not told what would happen if the power went out in that commercial. What they don't bother to mention is that as long as you can connect to Vonage's servers then you have a phone connection.
--
If you have a topic in the direct forum please reply to it or a post of mine, I get a notification when you do this.
Koetting Ford, Granite City, illinois... YOU'RE FIRED!!

UnKown
The Underground Network

join:2002-09-08
Orlando, FL

Re: No More

The savings are essential to me. i purchased the 29.99 unlimited calling with skype for a year in two months of landline. My cell phone is metro pcs which has unlimited calling nationwide, provided you are in the state. that service costs me 49.99. the little 15 dollar a month landline wouldnt do me any good as most of my friends all have cell phones with area codes that are all over the nation. If i really needed that so called life line ill just power up my ham radio!

There are ways around using a landline phone, and my life doesnt revolve around a telephone, so in the event i dont have telephone service for a few days it surely wont kill me, hell it might be relaxing.

I think i speak for about 94% of college students in florida (hurricane central) that cell phone only is way to go.

Might i also add that in the event of a hurricane it is very common for land lines to go out as well, so your theory of that always on safety and security is blown out of the woodwork

yock
TFTC
Premium
join:2000-11-21
Miamisburg, OH
kudos:3

Re: No More

said by UnKown:

Might i also add that in the event of a hurricane it is very common for land lines to go out as well, so your theory of that always on safety and security is blown out of the woodwork
It's all about diversifying your risk. If I have cellular and land service, that's two things that must fail instead of one. Your idea of breaking out the ham might not be bad either, though the density of ham users in your area might not be sufficient for you to reach capable help. Nonetheless, it's an option to which I've given some thought in the last few days.

Uncle Paul

join:2003-02-04
USA
kudos:1
Ohh if so much in life could just be rendered down to the price of a Starbucks latte. But then I see the price of a Starbucks latte as to much too.

With all that said, I still have a land line myself.

quetwo
That VoIP Guy
Premium
join:2004-09-04
East Lansing, MI
Many CLECs offer service for the $12 - $15 ($17 after taxes, unfees).

Many ILECS also offer 'lifeline' service for about $11 - 15 a month (depending on the region). Lifeline service is often regulated through your Public Service Commission.

yock
TFTC
Premium
join:2000-11-21
Miamisburg, OH
kudos:3
said by Uncle Paul:

$15/month? Doubt it. Not with all the other fees added on.

But really, it just wouldn't hurt me to go without a phone for a week. My life simply doesn't evolve around it like that.
Your life may very well rely on 911 service. This is exactly the shortsightedness I'm talking about.

Uncle Paul

join:2003-02-04
USA
kudos:1

Re: No More

You are absolutely correct, thank goodness my cellphone works and probably wouldn't turn it on except to make such a call.
wev567

join:2006-02-25
Pittsburgh, PA
Budget LUM service will run you about 12-15, depending on the area.

wifi4milez
Big Russ, 1918 to 2008. Rest in Peace

join:2004-08-07
New York, NY
said by yock:

said by RARPSL:

said by yock:

I couldn't charge my battery without running my car engine to charge off the cigarette lighter
That is what having a spare battery (or two) is for. Just like having a spare for your laptop so you can use it without needing to be tied to a wall socket (such as on a trip/plane).
Rechargeable cells discharge over time whether you use them or not. It's also an investment of some $50 - $100 per battery, plus the time and effort of charge cycling them regularly to keep them well conditioned. Then I'm still out of power once they die in the course of a week.

My girlfriend had a landline that we used extensively through our storm outtage. It costs her $15 a month and it never went out. It doesn't require any electricity that isn't already provided by the telephone company and their facilities have backup power generation. Did I mention that it never once went out? Never.
Totally agree. I was "that guy" without a landline for almost 10 years, and I used to even argue how pointless they were. It wasnt until an incident occurred that required dialing 911 did I realize the error of my ways. Now we have a handful of cell phones, one VoIP line for my wife, and of course a trusty landline for the sole purpose of (God forbid) dialing 911 again. The recent storms should only serve to convince people that they need a landline, regardless of how "techy" you are. Things (unfortunately) happen and when you need police/ambulance/fire department you want to pick up the phone and know they will answer.
--
If history teaches us anything, it teaches that simple-minded appeasement or wishful thinking about our adversaries is folly.
-Ronald Reagan-

dsldude08
Premium,VIP
join:2008-01-03
La Crosse, WI
kudos:2

Re: No More

I couldn't have said it better myself.

UnKown
The Underground Network

join:2002-09-08
Orlando, FL
couldnt u simply walk to the neighbors house and use theirs?

iLive4Fusion
Premium
join:2006-07-13
Reviews:
·AT&T U-Verse
·T-Mobile US
·AT&T Wireless Br..
·ViaTalk
·Verizon Broadban..

Re: No More

said by UnKown:

couldnt u simply walk to the neighbors house and use theirs?
Not if your internally bleeding and are a paraplegic and can't walk.

yock
TFTC
Premium
join:2000-11-21
Miamisburg, OH
kudos:3
said by UnKown:

couldnt u simply walk to the neighbors house and use theirs?
Why should they have a land line if you don't?

UnKown
The Underground Network

join:2002-09-08
Orlando, FL

Re: No More

cause they think like you

swhx7
Premium
join:2006-07-23
Elbonia
Reviews:
·RoadRunner Cable
Generally a landline is more reliable, but in my case it was less reliable. ATT just wouldn't maintain the lines well enough. Every few weeks, there would be no dial tone, and I'd have to call ATT and have them fix it.

Of course they threatened big charges if they decided the problem was in the customer's premises. But I checked that carefully first. So they'd come out and fix it, and then after 10-20 days, the same thing would happen again. And so on, over and over.

I was missing so many calls I had to cancel it. Another factor was repeatedly getting stuck in some place where I needed to make a call and there were no landlines.

BTW, this news is only about consumers. I don't envision businesses replacing all the desktop phones with cells.

David
I have a son- d3
Premium,VIP
join:2002-05-30
Granite City, IL
kudos:68
Reviews:
·AT&T Southwest
·DIRECTV
·AT&T Midwest
·Google Voice
said by yock:

I'll never be without a landline anymore after the events of this week. Plain old telephone service with a plain old telephone was my only line to the outside for about a day and a half. My cell phone worked intermittently for receiving calls, but it could not make calls and I couldn't charge my battery without running my car engine to charge off the cigarette lighter.

IMO, for as long as I've lived without a landline, I now consider that decision to have been shortsighted and foolish.
Ironically, there were many on my block as well that were just as foolish and shortsighted as well. They were all charter customers and ironically I happen to catch up with a few neighbors as they were complaining about not having service. That's when I became a really popular neighbor and told them "Really? Mine's working just fine." They asked who I had and I said "SBC/AT&T" at the time. I (or I should say my phone line) became rather popular for about a week.
--
If you have a topic in the direct forum please reply to it or a post of mine, I get a notification when you do this.
Koetting Ford, Granite City, illinois... YOU'RE FIRED!!

kruser
Premium
join:2002-06-01
Chesterfield, MO
said by yock:

I'll never be without a landline anymore after the events of this week. Plain old telephone service with a plain old telephone was my only line to the outside for about a day and a half. My cell phone worked intermittently for receiving calls, but it could not make calls and I couldn't charge my battery without running my car engine to charge off the cigarette lighter.

IMO, for as long as I've lived without a landline, I now consider that decision to have been shortsighted and foolish.

[edit]Corrected a typo
--
Laughter is the closest distance between two people. --Victor Borge
Lynch All Liars

We also had bad weather just before you did but this time cell service stayed up. A couple years back however we had a bad storm with high winds that came from the North/ NorthEast and it wiped out most power as well as cell service for many. My pots lines stayed up as well as my DSL until the UPS units died 20 hours later.
I can run my DSL stuff for 20+ hours but if I throw a machine in the mix then that time shortens to 6+ hours or so. I knew we were in for the long haul that time so I killed everything except the modem and router and used a laptop when needed. We were without power for 4 days.
So I also would never give up a good ole pots line that has power supplied from the CO in my case by huge racks of batteries as well as a couple large generators that keep those batteries charged!
Of course I'm lucky in that my phone is underground from home to the CO.

David
I have a son- d3
Premium,VIP
join:2002-05-30
Granite City, IL
kudos:68
Reviews:
·AT&T Southwest
·DIRECTV
·AT&T Midwest
·Google Voice
Well, All I can say is I had phone service when the power was out for 5 days here in STL. Which is the truth, I had it and DSL. Short of the power going out, that was about the only thing I missed. I added a generator to my small little network and even had DSL service. Which was more I could say for the 1/2 block I had. True phone service can go out, but what's going to get fixed faster, Cellular, Landline, or DSL?

if it's savings to you, then go for it. That doesn't mean it's savings to everyone.
--
If you have a topic in the direct forum please reply to it or a post of mine, I get a notification when you do this.
Koetting Ford, Granite City, illinois... YOU'RE FIRED!!

jchambers28

join:2007-05-12
Alma, AR

voip

I wonder if voip accounts for some of that loss also I have been on voip a year now and love it its better than giving it all to the greedy telcos

TuPaK

join:2002-07-21
San Gabriel, CA

Re: voip

ditched my landline for VOIP

swhitney2003
Premium
join:2003-06-13
NH

not for me

No land line for me. Extra money to pay on something I never use.

zoom314

join:2005-11-21
Yermo, CA
Reviews:
·DSL EXTREME

1 edit

82.9%

Then I must be one of the 82.9% that hasn't switched, Why?

Even though I could and Verizon would stick Me with a $10.00 charge for no landline, It would cost Me more than the landline and during a power outage when a storm rolls through I'd have no phone service at all.

odeonkreel
Searching for my lost shaker of salt
Premium
join:2000-10-31
Cape Coral, FL

Re: 82.9%

said by zoom314:

during a power outage when a storm rolls through I'd have no phone service at all.
Please explain? What do you mean you would have no service? Doesn't your cell phone have a battery? And you can always charge it in your car, if need be.
--
... --- ...

zoom314

join:2005-11-21
Yermo, CA
Reviews:
·DSL EXTREME

1 edit

Re: 82.9%

said by odeonkreel:

said by zoom314:

during a power outage when a storm rolls through I'd have no phone service at all.
Please explain? What do you mean you would have no service? Doesn't your cell phone have a battery? And you can always charge it in your car, if need be.
I don't have a cell phone and won't be getting one on $845.00 a month income from SSI, Thanks to a COLA next Year It could be as much as $888.00 a month that I receive.

After all a landline is not a Cell Phone and so My Phone service is a landline.

RandomAssault

@embarqhsd.net
If cell tower loses power: cell phones no workie. If home loses power, land line phones still work albeit it's not a fancy phone with that requires additional power. Phone company has local back up power to basic phone systems.

odeonkreel
Searching for my lost shaker of salt
Premium
join:2000-10-31
Cape Coral, FL

Re: 82.9%

Must have really poor cell towers in your area. When the power goes out around here (which is rare due to majority of electrical is underground), the cell towers still work.
--
... --- ...

UnKown
The Underground Network

join:2002-09-08
Orlando, FL
cell towers have backup generators just like phone companys, so when power goes out cell towers still workie

Ytsejamer1

join:2008-01-18
Somersworth, NH

On another subject related to landlines...

I wonder how the presidential campaigns are using their new polling data...if they're not getting people on their cell phones, are those polls accurate? With more peeps moving to cells only, something tells me that mostly older voters are getting polled. Just curious...

jmn1207
Premium
join:2000-07-19
Reston, VA

Re: On another subject related to landlines...

said by Ytsejamer1:

I wonder how the presidential campaigns are using their new polling data...if they're not getting people on their cell phones, are those polls accurate? With more peeps moving to cells only, something tells me that mostly older voters are getting polled. Just curious...
I'm 48% sure that 81% of those with only cell phone service vote less than 65% of the time.
ISurfTooMuch

join:2007-04-23
Tuscaloosa, AL
said by Ytsejamer1:

I wonder how the presidential campaigns are using their new polling data...if they're not getting people on their cell phones, are those polls accurate? With more peeps moving to cells only, something tells me that mostly older voters are getting polled. Just curious...
You're right. Polling firms don't call cell phones, so those without landlines don't make it into the polls. Since younger people are less likely to have landlines, they will be underrepresented in polls, and if they lean a certain way politically, then the polls will be off.

dslwanter
It's coming
Premium
join:2002-12-16
Niles, OH
Reviews:
·AT&T Midwest

Technology penetration

For a long time I was an advocate of keeping a good, reliable landline. However, with technology changing, I don't think it's valid to keep it with that idea anymore. You have to keep in mind that even major telcos will be switching to a digital form of phone. For instance, AT&T's Uverse or Verizon Fios. If regulations would be enforced on digital phone services as landlines, we would see an increase in reliability and scalbility of VOIP and digital phone.
--
Need a DJ within 60 miles of Youngstown, OH? Check out my service: »www.thebomb102djservice.com

maartena
Elmo
Premium
join:2002-05-10
Orange, CA
kudos:1
Reviews:
·AT&T U-Verse
·DIRECTV

1 edit

Earthquakes....

We had a 5.8 earthquake in the LA area about 2 months ago, and the FIRST thing that happened, was that all cell phone traffic was overloaded, because everyone was attempting to make the "are you OK" calls to their friends and family.

I had the same thing, could not get a hold of my wife. Picked up a LANDline at work, dialed the LANDline at home, and everything worked fine....

If people need to reach 911 in a time of need - such as right after an earthquake where you may have been wounded - cell phones only are useless. If you don't have a landline, your pretty much screwed for at least an hour or two until things calm down.

Now mind you, the earthquake could be bad enough that it also damages the land lines, but most landlines should continue to work anywhere up to a 7.0 quake or so, even IF it shuts down power. (At least, it has proven to do so in the past, most CO's have backup power for anywhere to three to six hours).

Also, if you make an international call - such as to Europe - you really don't want to do that on a cell phone. First off, most providers actually charge you something like $5 extra just to have the international calling feature on your phone, and then they charge you insane rates of up to a dollar a minute to call to Europe, where with a landline and a good LD provider, I get 3 or 4 cents a minute to europe right now, and I call The Netherlands and the UK a lot.
--
Obama 2008 - Because McCain is more of the same!

swhitney2003
Premium
join:2003-06-13
NH

Re: Earthquakes....

said by maartena:

Also, if you make an international call - such as to Europe - you really don't want to do that on a cell phone. First off, most providers actually charge you something like $5 extra just to have the international calling feature on your phone, and then they charge you insane rates of up to a dollar a minute to call to Europe, where with a landline and a good LD provider, I get 3 or 4 cents a minute to europe right now, and I call The Netherlands and the UK a lot.
This is an instance where Skype comes in very handy. Some of the best rates around... not to mention that if the other individual has Skype it is free.
ISurfTooMuch

join:2007-04-23
Tuscaloosa, AL
Two things:

1. I don't know about all carriers, but there's no fee to get international calling added to an AT&T cell. The rates are insane, but there are calling cards that help with that, or you can just use Skype.

2. I don't have a landline, but I have naked DSL, and, in my area, I have 911 service on the line into my house, even though I can't make or receive calls to any other numbers. So, even without a landline, I can still use the landline infrastructure to call for help if I need to.

wifi4milez
Big Russ, 1918 to 2008. Rest in Peace

join:2004-08-07
New York, NY

Re: Earthquakes....

said by ISurfTooMuch:

2. I don't have a landline, but I have naked DSL, and, in my area, I have 911 service on the line into my house, even though I can't make or receive calls to any other numbers. So, even without a landline, I can still use the landline infrastructure to call for help if I need to.
That means you do have a landline, which is good. I dont think anyone is arguing that you must have local dialtone (although you might as well), but at least being able to dial 911 puts you in a much better position if something were to go wrong.
--
If history teaches us anything, it teaches that simple-minded appeasement or wishful thinking about our adversaries is folly.
-Ronald Reagan-

funchords
Hello
Premium,MVM
join:2001-03-11
Yarmouth Port, MA
kudos:5
said by maartena:

If people need to reach 911 in a time of need - such as right after an earthquake where you may have been wounded - cell phones only are useless. If you don't have a landline, your pretty much screwed for at least an hour or two until things calm down.
And 9-1-1 is not any better. The public outnumbers operators 20,000 to 1. 9-1-1 is not your lifeline after an earthquake, which is what Emergency Planners have been telling you for years. Prepare to survive for 3 days without any help whatsoever. Learn first-aid. Keep supplied.
--
Robb Topolski -= funchords.com =- Hillsboro, Oregon
More features, more fun, Join BroadbandReports.com, it's free...

MrMoody
Free range slave
Premium
join:2002-09-03
Smithfield, NC

Landline Use Continues Slow Death

Telcos had better get serious about rolling out broadband to their entire footprint ...

pitroad01

join:2006-07-10
Raleigh, NC

arrogant ma bell's

I terminated my landline a number of years ago due to the arrogant mindset of then Southern Bell. They would not drop a $0.12 charge for calling a local business located in my city but routed through an adjacent city CO. It was the principle of the deal that really got me mad. How was I to know that I would be charged a toll for calling my own city ! Anyway I dropped them on the spot and have never looked back. I have been VOIP/cell and cell only. Today I have cell and a bundle package from Time-Warner (the VOIP is only $12 + taxes with unlimited local and long distance). I would use smoke signals before ever using a landline service again.
decifal

join:2007-03-10
Bon Aqua, TN
kudos:1
Reviews:
·Verizon Broadban..

well

drop all the extra fee's cept for 911, and of course your phone service plan of choice, and actually god forbid put more effort into expanding the dsl service along with it and you might have more landline loving going on.. Atm though,not so hot.. 55 a month for something i can take anywhere as opposed to 33 a month for something that only sits at home and allows me the alternative to talking there with it and thats it, just doesn't cutt it.. Give us lower price and more choice dang it!!
scooper

join:2000-07-11
Youngsville, NC
kudos:2

count me as a phoneline luddite

I'll never be without landline service - cell is not reliable enough in my house. Plus I really don't want to fight for a dry DSL line, plus I have DBS service that needs the landline (I haven't upgraded to use LAN only)...
ISurfTooMuch

join:2007-04-23
Tuscaloosa, AL

Re: count me as a phoneline luddite

I have naked DSL, ad getting it was no trouble at all. If you're in AT&T territory, look for their DSL Direct product. I called in, asked for it, and that was that.

Dropped the line

@crane.navy.mil

No Land line here

We lost our land line twice earlier this year when minor storms went through (still had power). We never lost our cell coverage, so we dropped our land line in July. Last weekend, we had no power for 5 hours, and many people still have no power after the remains of Ike went through. We have yet to loose our cell phone coverage. Called in our power outage, and surfed the web on my iPhone On top of that, I read a week or 2 ago that telephone companies no longer have to report up times for POTS (land line) to the FCC, so look for those numbers to plummet.
b10010011
Whats a Posting tag?

join:2004-09-07
Bellingham, WA
Reviews:
·Comcast Formerl..

I'll give up my POTS line...

When you pry it from my cold dead hands.

Seriously, I have Comcast so my internet service goes down every time the wind blows over 10 MPH. So VOIP and Comcast digital phone service is too unreliable.

The last time we had a major emergency the cellphone towers were jammed. The local radio stations were begging people to stay off their cellphones because the emergency services needed them.

Through out all this my POTS line was there and working.

See 61 replies to this post
kd6cae
P2p Shouldn't Be A Crime

join:2001-08-27
Palmdale, CA
Reviews:
·Vitelity VOIP
·AT&T U-Verse

Landlines have there place

I'm very much a computer and internet nut, and even have skype in and out. However, I can see where Landlines have their usefulness, and I'm likely to be getting one soon. for one thing, many cell phones, the sound quality just plain sucks when compared to a traditional POTS landline. Secondly, if my internet goes down, obviously my skype services won't work, so having a landline to call and find out what's going on is quite handy. The only thing holding me back from getting a landline, is that AT&T wants to charge over $150 if I read their site correctly, just to activate and wire a jack for use with the new line. The folks I reside with have their own line, but I want my own line billed in my name, but charging that much just to make sure a phone jack will work with the new line? Not exactly something I can afford right now!
Twegner
Premium
join:2000-05-27
Houston, TX

Hurricane IKE: thanks for Land Line!

Here in Houston, the electricity is out over most of the city, and the water was suspect for a few days. Thank goodness for the land line, we never lost it. Even used it for dialup internet from a dark house! We had cell phones but didn't dare turn them on because we had no idea when we would be able to recharge them. I don't want to lose the land line anytime soon.

Dude111
An Awesome Dude
Premium
join:2003-08-04
USA
kudos:9
Reviews:
·Time Warner VOIP

3 edits

Landlines are better!

said by b10010011 :
I'll give up my POTS line...

When you pry it from my cold dead hands.
I agree!!

After having VOIP for about 2 years now i can say w/o a doubt that LANDLINES are much better and more reliable!!

VOIP service is garbage,sounds like crap and is a cheap way to give people supposed PHONE SERVICE..

You can do the same thing with a landline (Unlimited USA and CANADA) and have MUCH BETTER service.......

These cable companies are just ripping people off with thier over priced garbage when 1/2 the time it doesnt work right!!

said by Skeedatl :
When you charge $1.50 to keep people out of the telemarketing book, $7.50 for Caller ID and other bogus and overpriced fees, you lose subscribers.
I think thats worth the much better quality dont you??
Mr Matt

join:2008-01-29
Eustis, FL
kudos:1
Reviews:
·CenturyLink
·Comcast
·Embarq Now Centu..
·Millenicom

Landlines connected on copper to the C.O. are most reliable.

I learned, after Hurricane Wilma struck, that all landlines are not created equal. I had Two landlines in my home. One was hard wired directly to the central office and the other was connected through the neighborhood Subscriber Line Carrier System. We lost power for about Five Days. The line connected directly to the Central Office continued to function through the entire power outage. The line connected to the neighborhood subscriber line carrier system stopped working about Eight Hours after the power failed. Subscriber Line Carrier Systems are powered by rechargeable batteries during power failures. The design criteria calls for Twelve Hours of power backup when batteries are new. As time passes the batteries degrade and backup time is reduced. Central Offices have battery backup and generators to provide emergency power. A line hardwired to the central office via copper is the most reliable landline connection you can get.
SilverSurfer1

join:2007-08-19

Good Luck with that...

Personally, I couldn't care less if the entire planet dropped landline service because I'd still have mine. Every single time there is some small blip in the status quo, the cell phone never works. Case in point. There was a teeny tiny little quake here in So Cal a couple months ago. Note: No deaths. No multibillion dollar damages. Just a little tectonic plate shifting that shook a few bldgs more than what we're used to. Result: No cell phone service for at least 3-4 hours afterwared.

Good luck during any sort of emergency after you drop your landline service.

Sunday, 12-Feb 07:46:51 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online! © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.