While all four major wireless carriers profess to have the nation's "largest 4G network," there remains some obvious differences in LTE deployment. Fierce Wireless has compiled a good breakdown of where things currently stand among the country's big four in terms of LTE coverage. Verizon continues their lead with 301 million potential customers (POPs) covered, followed by AT&T (225 million POPs), T-Mobile (167 million POPs), and Sprint (POPs not provided). Both Sprint and T-Mobile got late starts, but are rapidly gaining ground in their fight against AT&T and Verizon. Have you noticed improvements?
Haha that was great! Completely agree. Regardless of who you have, VZW and ATT grossly overcharge, T and Sprint are too unreliable at this point to be viable contenders.
YMMV. Sprint was great until they got the iPhone, then their network went from 'ok' to crap. T-Mobile has been great for me throughout. In fact, i've had quite a few friends who went from Verizon to T-Mobile who are getting better service because T-Mobile's coverage in this city is pretty dense for the most part. -- "What makes us omniscient? Have we a record of omniscience? ...If we can't persuade nations with comparable values of the merit of our cause, we'd better reexamine our reasoning." -United States Secretary of Defense (1961-1968) Robert S. McNamara
The US is in the top 3 in world in LTE coverage along with S.Korea & Japan. US is way ahead of the EU in this regard. The US carriers are spending 10's of billions of dollars in infrastructure upgrades to effect this LTE rollout. -- "If you want to anger a conservative lie to him. If you want to anger a liberal tell him the truth."
The US is in the top 3 in world in LTE coverage along with S.Korea & Japan. US is way ahead of the EU in this regard. The US carriers are spending 10's of billions of dollars in infrastructure upgrades to effect this LTE rollout.
US carriers have the greatest economies of scale (outside of China Unicom), and charge some of the highest prices in the world. No duh they have such great coverage.
Sprint needs to hurry the hell up and actually/officially launch LTE in DC.
What's the point of an LTE-capable phone without actual LTE coverage?
2013-Aug-23 8:37 am: ·
ropeguru Premium join:2001-01-25 Mechanicsville, VA
Re: Hurry the hell up Sprint
I said the same thing with Verizon when I purchased the original Droid but they only provided 1x coverage and no 3G. I was impressed when I went back to that location and thye now have LTE installed. Was in the area last weekend and was getting 50Mbps download speeds.
At this point, if you are on Cricket, I would look at switching to T-mobile/MetroPCS. They have LTE in Fresno and merced so it's only a matter of time before it gets to you, plus you get t-mobiles hspa+ 4G until then, all for probably less than you currently pay.
You can get something like the optimus L9, or F3 for pretty cheap.
Their towers are near the intersection of schmoor and sunset, by the Mormon church there. Another over by D and 7th, and also at the 6 food mart on Yosemite and Tozer, and by Farnesi's restaurant/hotel. There are other towers in town but they are 2G used to supplement voice coverage. If those locations work well for you I think you'll find it a better experience.
This would also keep you from getting absorbed into the death star (ATT) with their newly announced plans to purchase cricket. And it's unlikely Cricket will build any new LTE markets.
2013-Aug-23 3:48 pm: ·
IllIlIlllIll EliteData Premium join:2003-07-06 Hampton Bays, NY kudos:7
ive noticed "spotty" coverage for LTE on TMOBILE but as usual, if you have a poor LTE signal, expect speeds to be no greater than WCDMA (HEDGE) in which case, the WCDMA (HEDGE) signal is always much better. -- Suffolk County NY Police Feed - »www.scpdny.com PS3 Gaming Feed - »www.livestream.com/elitedata
ive noticed "spotty" coverage for LTE on TMOBILE but as usual, if you have a poor LTE signal, expect speeds to be no greater than WCDMA (HEDGE) in which case, the WCDMA (HEDGE) signal is always much better.
There is no such thing as "HEDGE." Its either LTE, HSDPA/WCDMA, EDGE, or GPRS. --
I am with Sprint and the coverage grows bigger and fast. The coverage density improved a lot, I can stay on LTE whole day in metro LA to OC area no problem now. Still some black holes with no coverage (roaming) inside metro area, for example: that's 0.3 miles away from the tower for some reason, but it's LTE in full next corner.
I have a combination of 12 lines of different devices for my business in Los Angeles and I am super happy I waited out the LTE growing pains while t-mobile was upgrading its towers. Our experience with LTE has not disappointed us one bit. It is super fast and my sales teams report point of sale transactions take mere seconds to authorize out in the field. Not long ago I was at a convention and shared my tmobile service via a Cradlepoint Wireless Router with nearby vendors who just happened to be on Sprint and what a misery for them trying to complete sales or send large PDF informational files to attendees via email. I had a total of 35 connections to my cradlepoint and Tmobile LTE did not fail any of us. I know the feeling being with a provider and being told the upgrades are coming time and time again. Tmobile has definitely earned my business for the long run in providing wireless service for my company.
I just spent a week down there in various places between San Bernardino and San Diego and I was also impressed with their LTE network. I had other LTE devices in tow from other carriers and while there still are many t-mobile towers that haven't received LTE yet, it's in most places, and where they do have it, it's fast and reliable. I have screenshots of a zero bar LTE connection reliably doing 50ms pings and 6mbit+ throughput.
So-cal is a 10x10 market for T-Mobile, so you get to play in the same league as the big boys (ATT/VZW) without any of the costs and hassle and many times less the customers to share that bandwidth with.
I switched to sprint about 4 months ago, and now have LTE in a town where prior to them doing about 8 days ago it was 1x, I'm probably one like 20 people with Sprint in my town but ATT still only has edge there.
I'm pretty impressed with the growth of LTE with sprint, hopefully they turn the 800 towers here on and it will be fantastic.
Seems to be working great up here in the Anchorage and Mat-Su areas. I had to turn on my personal hotspot to help a few merchants process my credit card purchase on thier AT&T and GCi wireless devices at the Alaska State Fair. Towers have historically been unable to handle the influx of devices during the fair. Looking forward to seeing how Verizon LTE holds up during the Fur Rondezvous and other major events.
T-Mobile is really coming together here in the Chicago area. My entire commute, half tollway, half local streets and highway, is now covered by LTE. For my 70 minutes on the road I can now stream music and podcasts without having to pre-download at home or the office and Gas Buddy loads so fast.