Search:  

 
 
   News
newer
story category AT&T Increases U-Verse Spending
While 1 million fewer customers will see service...
(old news - 05:36PM Monday May 07 2007)
tags: business · telco · stats
AT&T tells the Wall Street Journal (non reg version) they may spend $1.4 billion more on U-Verse VDSL IPTV deployment than previously reported, while decreasing their overall deployment target by one million customers. AT&T says they hope to pass (not serve) 18 million subscribers by 2008 at a cost of $6.5 billion. The service currently passes 2.8 million homes but only has slightly more than 20,000 subscribers. The WSJ explains the spending hike:
"AT&T blamed the price increase in the cost of adding more servers, which are needed as the company significantly increases the amount of high-definition channels it plans to offer. AT&T is also paying a premium to its equipment vendors to ensure gear is on hand when needed, the company said. The ballooning cost of U-verse comes at a time when AT&T is finally gaining a little traction in its efforts to launch the long-delayed service."
The company has launched U-Verse in 18 major markets (most recently the Los Angeles area). Some clunky Microsoft code and bug squashing was thought to be the cause of some deployment delays late last year. By comparison, Verizon is spending some $23 billion on their FTTH FiOS deployments.

Related:
  1. Wednesday Evening Links
  2. Friday Evening Links
  3. Backbone Analysis Puts Exaflood Myth To Bed
  4. Scott Cleland: Google Using 21x The Bandwidth They Pay For
  5. 17.5% of Households Wireless Only
  6. AT&T Brings 3,000 Support Jobs Back To U.S.
  7. Wednesday Evening Links
  8. U-Verse Invasion Of BellSouth Territory Continues
Forums » AT&T Increases U-Verse Spending
view: topics flat text 
Post a:

ColorBASIC
8-bit Fun
Premium
join:2006-12-29
Corona, CA

Where's the comparison

quote:
By comparison, Verizon is spending some $23 billion on their FTTH FiOS deployments.
AT&T is just spending $1.4B MORE, not total. I wonder how much AT&T is spending total to deploy U-Verse.

Boozer



Re: Where's the comparison

said by ColorBASIC See Profile :

I wonder how much AT&T is spending total to deploy U-Verse.
well according to the article they are spending $6.5B, so a little less than 1/3 what Verizon is spending. In the end they will probably wish they had just finished the job and gone all the way to the curb...

telcolackey
The Truth? You can't handle the truth

join:2007-04-06
Death Valley, CA


2 edits

Re: Where's the comparison

Verizon has spent 20 Biilllion dollars (pinky raised to mouth) for less than 7 million homes past (not customers)...

They have plans to get to 18M homes past. That additional spending is incremental on top of 20B.

Lot-o-$$ from those stock holders.

Onedollar

join:2001-08-27
Pomona, CA

Re: Where's the comparison

said by telcolackey See Profile :

Verizon has spent 20 Biilllion dollars (pinky raised to mouth) for less than 7 million homes past (not customers)...

They have plans to get to 18M homes past. That additional spending is incremental on top of 20B.

Lot-o-$$ from those stock holders.
Where exactly do you see this 20 B already spent? No where do I see already spent. 20B is for the entire rollout.

KrK
Heavy Artillery For The Little Guy
Premium
join:2000-01-17
Tulsa, OK
·AT&T Yahoo
·AT&T DSL Service
·Cox HSI
·AT&T Southwest

The difference is Verizon is spending their money wisely to invest long-term and in a future proof solution.

While at&t is IMHO wasting a lot of this money on a stop-gap measure that probably in the near future won't measure up to Cable and the likes of Verizon (and others) (If it even measures up now!) and in the end at&t will have to spend even more money to go back and finish the job.
--
"Regulatory capitalism is when companies invest in lawyers, lobbyists, and politicians, instead of plant, people, and customer service." - former FCC Chairman William Kennard (A real FCC Chairman, unlike the current Corporate Spokesperson in the job!)

ColorBASIC
8-bit Fun
Premium
join:2006-12-29
Corona, CA
The $6.5B is only through the end of next year. Certainly they will be deploying long past that.
guardfrog

join:2004-08-27
Dallas, TX

Southeast states

The article also says that AT&T will soon announce build plans for the Southeast (the former BellSouth territory)which will take it to MORE than 19 million homes by end of next year.

I see this as AT&T gaining more confidence in the U-verse service...and spending more as a result.

Mizzat
Will post for thumbs
Premium
join:2003-05-03
Atlanta, GA

Re: Southeast states

Just wish I could read the whole article.
--
What has two thumbs and likes to help?
Enlightener

join:2006-01-28
Cedar Park, TX

1 edit

Re: Southeast states

www.bugmenot.com ( unfortunatly the site is blocked...)
cwh

join:2006-05-14
San Antonio, TX

Re: Southeast states

said by Enlightener See Profile :

www.bugmenot.com ( unfortunatly the site is blocked...)
bugmenot only works with content sites that are free with signup and the WSJ not fall into this category.
Enlightener

join:2006-01-28
Cedar Park, TX

Re: Southeast states

You can't read can you? I said it's BLOCKED.
cwh

join:2006-05-14
San Antonio, TX

Re: Southeast states

I was stating the reason why wsj is blocked.

tc1uscg

join:2005-03-09
Saint Clair Shores, MI

1 edit
Obviously, the other guy can't.

Mizzat
Will post for thumbs
Premium
join:2003-05-03
Atlanta, GA
yea, I checked there, but it won't give logins for pay sites.
--
What has two thumbs and likes to help?

TKJunkMail
Enjoy the sun
Premium
join:2002-03-03
Avalon, NJ
·Sprint Mobile Broa..
·Comcast


3 edits
said by Mizzat See Profile :

Just wish I could read the whole article.
You can read the whole story here:
»www.moneyweb.co.za/mw/view/mw/en···n=Detail

--
--
Internet News
My BLOG
My Web Page

batterup
I Can Not Tell A Lie.
Premium
join:2003-02-06
Netcong, NJ
clubs:
·Verizon Online DSL

said by guardfrog See Profile :

The article also says that AT&T will soon announce build plans for the Southeast (the former BellSouth territory)which will take it to MORE than 19 million homes by end of next year.

If at&t had a hair they would blitz Connecticut, the only at&t area in the heart of FiOS country.


Do you think they are afraid?

aztecnology
O Rly?
Premium
join:2003-02-12
Murrieta, CA
·Verizon FIOS

Re: Southeast states

said by batterup See Profile :

said by guardfrog See Profile :

The article also says that AT&T will soon announce build plans for the Southeast (the former BellSouth territory)which will take it to MORE than 19 million homes by end of next year.

If at&t had a hair they would blitz Connecticut, the only at&t area in the heart of FiOS country.
Actually, that would be Southern California....

An employee friend of mine got u-verse this past week in SoCal.

Took 2 days and about 15 hours to set it up, with 4 techs and a manager, and many a call to tier 2 support...

End result, has been losing sync on his 2wire modem, can't unlock parental controls, all 5 of his set top boxes go black when a show is recording, setting up recordings online isn't working, and on and on.

A real winner...
--
"Independent thinkers tend to ALWAYS have someone not agreeing with them. It's The non-thinkers that always come in legions." John Callari .:|:. Say no to the IRS Yes to the Fair Tax

jamez818
please hold during the silence

join:2000-09-18
Sunland, CA

Re: Southeast states

Sounds like the Telco/Cable war has begun.
--
just whiners and complainers...
tmc8080

join:2004-04-24
Floral Park, NY

games and lowered expectations!!

Let the over-promises and price gouging begin!!

djrobx

join:2000-05-31
Valencia, CA
·PHONE POWER
·AT&T U-Verse
·AT&T CallVantage
·Time Warner VOIP
·RoadRunner Cable

Heh!

quote:
AT&T blamed the price increase in the cost of adding more servers, which are needed as the company significantly increases the amount of high-definition channels it plans to offer
But nobody cares about HD, right? Just wait till those HD customers start cancelling service during the trial period when they figure out they can't record two HD shows at once like they used to with their cable service.

They need to re-think their strategy very soon.
--
Laser eye surgery rocks! I love frickin' laser beams.

en102
Canadian, eh?

join:2001-01-26
Valencia, CA
·RoadRunner Cable
·DSL EXTREME

Re: Heh!

I see you've moved over to TW.... how are they working out? Also, were you in a former Comcast area, or TW area?

My DirecTv bill has been creeping up over the past year (2x $3/month hikes, and my service costs less than what a new customer would pay, but increases are increases.

Eventually, if they go high enough, I'll either go IPTV or TW.

I personally don't care about HD, as I don't have any HD TV's
--
Canada = Hollywood North

Mizzat
Will post for thumbs
Premium
join:2003-05-03
Atlanta, GA
·AT&T Southeast

I can barley record two HD channles on cable right now. The studder and packet loss is almost unbearable. I have to either watch a regular show while on in HD is recording or let the HD channel record and leave the room (and check DSL reports!). They are working on a way to record multiple HD channels at once.
--
What has two thumbs and likes to help?

en102
Canadian, eh?

join:2001-01-26
Valencia, CA
·RoadRunner Cable
·DSL EXTREME

Ummm... they need to actually deploy it... not just post it.

quote:
he company has launched U-Verse in 18 major markets (most recently the Los Angeles area).
at&t's uverse still doesn't show as available here in Santa Clarita, even though its one of their markets... and I even put in an address right beside a VRAD.
--
Canada = Hollywood North

jamez818
please hold during the silence

join:2000-09-18
Sunland, CA
·EarthLink

Re: Ummm... they need to actually deploy it... not just post it.

Have several friends in Santa Clarita that already have it. One lives off Arroyo Parkway on Salceda i believe and the others live in Saugus off Seco so it is available. I haven't heard any complaints so far.
--
just whiners and complainers...
axus

join:2001-06-18
Washington, DC

what's another billion

Hey, good to hear those $2 mystery charges are going to good use. Maybe they can ask the government for some tax breaks, then not share the subsidised network. Worked for Verizon!
Zoder

join:2002-04-16
Miami, FL

Re: what's another billion

Don't be silly. They'll invent another fee to cover the extra $1 billion.

en102
Canadian, eh?

join:2001-01-26
Valencia, CA

Re: what's another billion

Its times like this I think about getting an HD antenna for my house, and scrapping cable/satellite/iptv altogether.
--
Canada = Hollywood North

batterup
I Can Not Tell A Lie.
Premium
join:2003-02-06
Netcong, NJ
clubs:
·Verizon Online DSL

Letsssss get ready to rumble!!

In the Blue corner we have Kid at&t. He is so tough he cannibalized his own mother. In the Red Corner we have Fast-as-Light Verizon. He too has been known to cannibalize a once mighty MCI when they became weak and soft.

Once they were loving siblings of Ma Bell now they are fighting for the crown of undisputed heavy weight champion of information.

This is a fight on the streets and in the allies of Los Angeles, no holds barred. Weapons of choice, for at&t, an old well tested hunk of metal, copper. Verizon's weapon glass, lighter and quicker but it cost Fast-as a bundle.

Two siblings enter, one will leave.

cwh

join:2006-05-14
San Antonio, TX

Re: Letsssss get ready to rumble!!

The only problem with argument is they are boxing in different rings and those rings will rarely meet.

batterup
I Can Not Tell A Lie.
Premium
join:2003-02-06
Netcong, NJ
clubs:
·Verizon Online DSL

Re: Letsssss get ready to rumble!!

said by cwh See Profile :

The only problem with argument is they are boxing in different rings and those rings will rarely meet.
True it is more like competing movies opening on the same weekend but then I couldn't do my WWE build up.

verolom

join:2002-03-23
Eagleville, PA

Bummer

I smell layoffs...
alchav

join:2002-05-17
Palm Desert, CA
·Pacific Bell - SBC

I want to hear from some U-Verse Customers!

Everybody talks about the money both Verizon and AT&T are spending, but I have not heard from any U-Verse Customers. Can they deliver acceptable TV Service? People say AT&T can deliver one HDTV Channel at a time, so if someone has more than one HDTV, or wants to record a different channel than they are watching, it can't be done. If they can barely deliver Phone, High Speed, and TV right now with their FTTN. What will happen in the near future? I say Verizon FiOS, with their FTTH is the clear winner, and AT&T better wake up.

Rick
Premium,MVM
join:2001-02-06
Waterbury, CT
clubs:

Sorry but....

as I've been saying for a year now, I just don't think this service is going to make it.

And, AT&T is and was making a BIG mistake in pursuing this, and now spending a billion + more dollars on it.

Let me ask you this. How much money do you spend on an old car before you finally realize that when you add it all up, you should have just bought a new one instead?

I see Uverse as being like that. EXCEPT, when you finish spending it, you still just don't have anything even remotely close to what you could have had.

And, apparently a whole lot of people are now agreeing with me. It is hard to believe that they now pass 2.8 MILLION Homes, and only 20,000 people have signed up for the service.
If their goal is to pass 18 million homes, what will that leave them at that rate? 150,000 customers in the WHOLE country in the areas they serve?

What kind of a disaster is that waiting to happen?

My number one and two reasons for feeling the way I have is because of the last two addresses I lived at, prior to this one. Neither was rural, both very residential..and at neither one could I even get the lowest level of DSL service. Never mind anything else. At the last one, even the pots service I had left a lot to be desired.
This just suggests to me that the copper in the ground simply at times isn't even sufficient for these low level things like pots and low tier DSL. But NOW it's suddenly supposed to all be ok for HDTV..Voice..and HSI all in one?

Call me a skeptic, but I just don't believe it. Not on a widespread, large scale anyway.

Even just LOOKING at the wire they use and comparing it to the cable and fios networks suggests that it's flimsy for this kind of thing, and simply not enough.

We're all hopefully taught early on that when you want to power something with an extension cord, you buy and use a good solid, thick cord. Do you think that all these services coming over an old copper phone wire constitutes that? Not me.

I think it constitutes a company that realizes they're really far behind and is going to do anything to get something out there in the market.

Let me ask you this. We've all seen all the forums now around BBR. OOL..comcast with powerboost..COX 15MB service.
If AT&T showed up on YOUR doorstep and told you they could give you what essentially amounts to ONE THIRD the speeds we ALREADY get..and THAT is AT&T's NEXT generation service..

would you be buying it?

I didn't think so.

And, that's why only 20,000 people have so far.

Out of 2.8 Million homes that could.

WOW.
Is this perhaps the BIGGEST telco blunder you've EVER seen in your life in the making?
I think so.

In closing, let me reiterate again. I'm not anti AT&T. Not anti Telco. And certainly not a paid cable fanboy.
I'm a consumer, who lives in Comcast and AT&T land.
Comcast took over my old cable company, and has since raised prices quite a bit. In fact, the highest tier of tv service now seems to be over 30.00 per month HIGHER than Adelphia charged.
Cable companies have no fear to raise prices. And comcast and probably TW are doing it at will as they acquire these smaller rivals.

For us, the ONLY one who can fight the fight against them, is AT&T. Our areas need this competition. But, if that competition is going to have comcast laughing at them..there will be no price reductions. Because they don't fear AT&T and what they have to offer. It's really as simple as that.

On the other hand, look at Verizon and their fios service.
That is feared by the cable co's.
That is real competition.

And choice, for consumers.

While I'm sure what I have written has gone unheeded by AT&T, even though for a year or more I've been saying..i told you so..perhaps only 20,000 people signing up won't go unheeded by them.

Perhaps now they get to be the laughing stock of the telco and cable world.

And hopefully in doing so, they quickly reverse course.

FTTH..is the only answer AT&T.

You need to do it..now.
--
The Coyote captured the RR! Roadrunner Rick is now Comcastic!

See 6 replies to this post

T1 Rocky

join:2002-11-15
Dallas, TX
·Time Warner Cable

U-verse begins and Whitacre retires almost simultaneously

You think this U-Verse build out is the reason AT&T's CEO for the last 17 yrs sold $80 million of AT&T stock over the last 12 months and then abruptly announced his retirement 30 days ago? Is it coincidence that he retires at the same time the fiber to the curb starts getting implemented? Just to be safe, I dumped my AT&T stock last week. Whitacres $170 million retirement package didnt help to inspire confidence either.
Forums » AT&T Increases U-Verse Spending


Sunday, 29-Nov 20:59:25 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.republican-creole