dslreports logo
 story category
AT&T Promises Better Broadband...If it Gets Another Tax Cut

AT&T continues to promise that it will deploy broadband more broadly -- if it gets another giant tax cut. In a press release intended to show support for Trump's "tax reform" plans, the telecom giant promised to invest an additional $1 billion in US telecom infrastructure in 2018 if the corporate tax rate is further reduced. Granted, that's coming from a company with a long history of cutting corners on fixed-line network investment, and playing fast and loose when it comes to network deployment facts and data to currey favor from politicians and regulators.

Click for full size
"By immediately lowering the corporate tax rate to 20%, this bill will stimulate investment, job creation and economic growth in the United States," AT&T CEO Randall Stephenson said in a statement.

“With a rate of 20% combined with provisions for full expensing of capital expenditures for the next five years, we’re prepared to increase our investment in the United States. If the House bill is signed into law, we’d commit to increase our domestic investment by $1 billion in the first year in which the new rates are in place. And research tells us that every $1 billion in capital invested in telecom creates about 7,000 good jobs for the middle class."

While it's true that the United States technically has among the higher corporate tax rates among developed nations, corporations traditionally don't wind up paying anything close to that rate thanks to an ocean of accounting loopholes. Large telecom providers in particular have an ocean of tricks they use to defer or avoid taxes, and AT&T has consistently found itself under fire for paying a pittance in federal taxes more often than not.

Verizon has been particularly gifted on this front, using complicated financial tricks like Reverse Morris Trusts to offload massive swaths of its unwanted networks while avoiding nearly all tax penalties. And both AT&T and Verizon have spent the better part of a generation getting billions in tax cuts and subsidies for service upgrades only partially or never completed. And despite these billions in funds, both companies have let DSL lines in poorer areas rot on the vine.

More plainly, history says any additional tax cuts gleaned by companies like AT&T and Verizon will largely wind up in executive pockets, not the actual network.

Most recommended from 62 comments


neufuse
join:2006-12-06
James Creek, PA

43 recommendations

neufuse

Member

here's an idea...

Give them a tax cut... BUT

Only after you complete deployment of said investments to 100% of your served population, not a select few or cherry picked areas... after completion you get a cut for doing something... you know... a performance bonus in a way

TIGERON
join:2008-03-11
Boston, MA
Motorola MG7550

24 recommendations

TIGERON

Member

How much more tax breaks do you need Randall??

Large swaths of your company's aging copper network that you clearly do not want anymore is in dire need of massive upgrade / overhaul.
Many of the facilities are falling apart. Yet you rake in $15 billion every quarter.
You charge sky high prices for sub-par service along with low and very expensive data caps if your subscribers dare to cross past that artificially low threshold.
You charge an unrefundable fees if anyone buys a cellphone from your company along with additional fees ripping off said customers.
Speaking of your company's network :
It cannot handle cord cutting despite your best efforts to convince wall street douchenozzle investors that everything is fine and there's nothing to see here.
You constantly make "fiber to the press" announcements that your company is making fiber deployments to more areas even though there's very little evidence to convince the public the truth. Most of those deployments are going to new housing developments.

I lived in a very wealthy neighborhood in the San Francisco Bay Area for almost 10 years and no one ever saw fiber anywhere provided by your company. And these people could afford it.

So what exactly are doing with the breaks and CAF II funding you get on the taxpayer's dime Randall?

Anoneef5e
@mchsi.com

21 recommendations

Anoneef5e

Anon

I'd say....

I'd say to quadruple taxes on them and mandate that all promises they've made in the past 5 years be completed by end of year or their tax rate will go up 35X. I bet they'd actually get some things done then! AT&T is a horrible company and should not get any handouts.
Ostracus
join:2011-09-05
Henderson, KY

16 recommendations

Ostracus

Member

Rich get richer, poor stay the same.

Yeah, wish we could pull all those "tricks" come April 15.

CaptainRR
Premium Member
join:2006-04-21
Blue Rock, OH

15 recommendations

CaptainRR

Premium Member

Rural AT&T

I have a rural AT&T phone line and hell will freeze over before I will ever see broadband. Even the copper will be rotted away before it never happens.
ham3843
join:2015-01-15
USA

1 edit

8 recommendations

ham3843

Member

Here's the deal.....

When AT&T builds out FTTP to at least 90% of their footprint by 2022 which can actually be
ordered by each address (not just passing by, but functional) and can have a minimum of
100/100 Mbps at a reasonable price, then and ONLY then should AT&T be given a tax cut.
The remaining 10% must be able to get wired service over copper with speeds of at least
30/5 Mbps.
quisp65
join:2003-05-03
San Diego, CA

2 edits

7 recommendations

quisp65

Member

The cable companies have big advantages

Tax cuts can work but can also not do much. I do think cable has the advantage for a while and I hope people do put thought into ways to motivate the telcos to deploy faster. I fear our "duopolies" are going to effectively become monopolies if we don't put some thought into it just because the cable companies have the financial advantage offered by their technology.