republican-creole
site Search:


 
   
story category
AT&T: Reclassification Won't Help So You'd Better Not Try
As company continues to conflate prioritization deals with QOS
by Karl Bode Tuesday 05-Oct-2010 tags: legal · fcc · business · net-neutrality
AT&T started the modern network neutrality debate in 2005 by insisting they were going to charge companies who already pay for bandwidth an extra toll to reach their customers more quickly. Fast forward to 2010 and AT&T lobbyists have all but crushed any efforts to pass real customer protections preventing this, and the FCC is looking at partially reclassifying ISPs as common carriers to ensure they have the authority to police bad ISP behavior. AT&T for one says this won't stop prioritization:

AT&T executive Hank Hultquist said on Friday that reclassifying broadband from an information service to a public utility would not prohibit carriers from prioritizing some content over others. "Reclassification is not much of a threat to prioritization," Hultquist said "the FCC has decades of precedence of tariffs that were deemed lawful for the provision of prioritization."

As previously noted, AT&T likes to conflate normal network management and QOS with paid sweetheart prioritization deals. AT&T's real goal is to ensure the FCC doesn't get any additional authority to police broadband carriers (be they on issues of price, service quality or neutrality), so they're arguing that reclassification won't accomplish what the FCC and consumer advocates believe it will. AT&T last week supported a now scrapped neutrality bill in Congress that would have prevented the FCC from reclassifying carriers.

view: topics flat text 
Post a:
Mr Matt

join:2008-01-29
Eustis, FL
kudos:1
Reviews:
·CenturyLink
·Comcast
·Embarq Now Centu..
·Millenicom

The corporate bullies are in control!

Thank the Roberts Supreme Court for allowing corporate bullies to funnel unlimited funds to lawmakers to enhance their bias in corporates favor. This is the same disease that infects third world countries. The upper class controls the government through unlimited quid pro quo transactions between special interests and the government. Lawmakers kiss big business behinds and big business according to Roberts can make unlimited payoffs campaign contributions to lawmakers. There is no hope for fair treatment of average American Citizens if this continues.
kaila

join:2000-10-11
Lincolnshire, IL

Thanks AT&T, maybe you're right......

and perhaps the FCC should pursue unbundling instead. Maybe competition would have the 'desired' effect we're looking for.
--
Jeff Howe
Jeff's Blog - »www.ostjournal.net
hottboiinnc
ME

join:2003-10-15
Cleveland, OH
Reviews:
·WOW Internet and..

Re: Thanks AT&T, maybe you're right......

unbundling of what? the copper that is left during the last mile? okay! that will help speed up their network upgrade as they are NOT required to share that. So that doesn't solve anything but make more and more people locked to them and kicked off the indie DSL providers such as DSLX and Sonic where copper is still left.
--
www.twopugsbrand.com Kosher, Vegan, and Organic Certified Dog and Cat treats/foods and other products! www.etsy.com/shop/snakx4u/ Organic, Kosher, Gluten Free, Vegan Human Baked Goods
kaila

join:2000-10-11
Lincolnshire, IL

Re: Thanks AT&T, maybe you're right......

Good point. I know this stuff is messy and my response was half in jest. I do wish for a future where we have multiple provider choices for each type of service though.
--
Jeff Howe
Jeff's Blog - »www.ostjournal.net

Gbcue
Almost P.E.
Premium
join:2001-09-30
Santa Rosa, CA
kudos:8
I think some more regulation is in order.
bdon78
I didn't do it

join:2009-05-18
Decatur, GA

Not sure I agree with one statement....

Karl,

Not sure I agree on one point:

"AT&T lobbyists have all but crushed any efforts to pass real customer protections"

Here is why I disagree. We can spend all day blaming lobbyists, but at the end of the day, who is it that is really to blame? Answer? Congress. Not to say that lobbyist aren't bullies or in control of some certain amount of cash, but what happened to standing up for what you believe in? (I know the answer to that, the dollar is king now a days)

I guess my point is, there are just any many lobbyists (working for google) on the other side of this issue, but it comes down to the fact that our congressmen are more concerned with dollars and future votes then they care about taking care of their constituents. (or even truly representing them and not just a dem/repub party agenda)

morbo
Complete Your Transaction

join:2002-01-22
00000

Re: Not sure I agree with one statement....

Try to focus here.

What company is the top donor in political campaigns (since 1990)? AT&T
Sammer

join:2005-12-22
Canonsburg, PA

The more AT&T opposes reclassification

the more I know reclassification is the right thing to do!

Com6

@comcast.net

FCC

They should work on ways to allow for more competition. Instead of fighting a huge company like AT&T. AT&T is not gonna budge and either is any other large company.

dialup fiber

@netdoor.com

congress belongs to at&t

all the more reason for term limits... get this i have fiber and still have only dial-up...what a waste at&t

Monday, 04-Jun 21:23:00 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.