dslreports logo
site
spacer

spacer
 
   
spc
story category
AT&T Strikes Deal to Offer U-Verse FTTH to High End Apartments
by Karl Bode 08:30AM Friday Aug 16 2013
AT&T has announced a new deal with Camden Property Trust to deploy U-Verse fiber to the home to select "high-end" apartment developments in Atlanta, Austin and Orlando starting later this year. While the announcement cites fiber to the home (aka fiber to the premises), it doesn't mention any specific speeds -- and AT&T has a long history of capping fiber to the home customers at the same speeds offered to slower fiber to the node customers. For most of those customers, U-verse speeds top out at 24 Mbps, but AT&T did recently start offering 45 Mbps down, 5 Mbps up tiers in California and Nevada.

view:
topics flat nest 

dvd536
as Mr. Pink as they come
Premium
join:2001-04-27
Phoenix, AZ
kudos:4

$5000+/mo

shame they're saddled with T speeds and not fios.

--
Despises any post with strings.

Metatron2008
Premium
join:2008-09-02
Stockbridge, GA

2 edits

Wow! High end apartments get slower speeds then cable!

At a higher price too!

workablob

join:2004-06-09
Houston, TX
kudos:2
Reviews:
·Comcast

Re: Wow! High end apartments get slower speeds then cable!

said by Metatron2008:

At a higher price too!

So, are you saying that they will get fed up with the ATT speeds then switch to cable?

I would just skip ATT and go with cable.

Blob
--
I may have been born yesterday. But it wasn't at night.
Joe12345678

join:2003-07-22
Des Plaines, IL

Re: Wow! High end apartments get slower speeds then cable!

said by workablob:

said by Metatron2008:

At a higher price too!

So, are you saying that they will get fed up with the ATT speeds then switch to cable?

I would just skip ATT and go with cable.

Blob

To bad that Comcast cable TV sucks. Have DSL in area that is getting U-verse installed new ped in place and powered. But want to keep directv. U-verse tv still does not have NHL network back.

workablob

join:2004-06-09
Houston, TX
kudos:2
Reviews:
·Comcast

Re: Wow! High end apartments get slower speeds then cable!

said by Joe12345678:

said by workablob:

said by Metatron2008:

At a higher price too!

So, are you saying that they will get fed up with the ATT speeds then switch to cable?

I would just skip ATT and go with cable.

Blob

To bad that Comcast cable TV sucks. Have DSL in area that is getting U-verse installed new ped in place and powered. But want to keep directv. U-verse tv still does not have NHL network back.

I only watch H2 and Mil channel so I can't comment on the TV side as it is mainly for my Mother-in-Law.

The internet side is 30/6 for me and works well.

Blob
--
I may have been born yesterday. But it wasn't at night.

whamel
billhamel DOT net
Premium
join:2002-05-09
Hinsdale, IL
kudos:8
Reviews:
·AT&T U-Verse
·Comcast

Why not to the "HIGH-END" villages?

Shiz, I live in a town where the median home value tops 1.5 million and is densely populated. HELLO...profit?!?!
PS I don't live in one of those home, I live in a modest 250k condo/apt
--
Bill - Hinsdale, IL - »www.billhamel.net

Metatron2008
Premium
join:2008-09-02
Stockbridge, GA

Re: Why not to the "HIGH-END" villages?

Because you guys could probably get real speeds, not At&t, pretty easily.

whamel
billhamel DOT net
Premium
join:2002-05-09
Hinsdale, IL
kudos:8

Re: Why not to the "HIGH-END" villages?

I use U-Verse, get 24/3. Comcast is available but nodes are oversubscribed...
--
Bill - Hinsdale, IL - »www.billhamel.net
Joe12345678

join:2003-07-22
Des Plaines, IL
easier to install it in new apartment homes. and fiber to the home is a lot more work then running fiber in Apartments.

whamel
billhamel DOT net
Premium
join:2002-05-09
Hinsdale, IL
kudos:8
Reviews:
·AT&T U-Verse
·Comcast

Re: Why not to the "HIGH-END" villages?

True, not alot of line dropping. U can split a fiber line to individual subscribers, say for an entire building of say 3 buildings. Each building getting their own fiber trunk. Makes sense....buy if Google Fiber can do it, why not AT&T?
--
Bill - Hinsdale, IL - »www.billhamel.net
WhatNow
Premium
join:2009-05-06
Charlotte, NC
You and your neighbors should start and build a FTTH network.
TBBroadband

join:2012-10-26
Fremont, OH

AT&T

AT&T does not service Utah on their native footprint. It was Nevada - which was stated in the blog post you linked to.
radougherty

join:1999-07-23
Austin, TX

Thanks to Google

Ya think that Austin was picked because Google Fiber is coming? Bet if it wasn't for that Austin wouldn't be getting anything.

IowaCowboy
Want to go back to Iowa
Premium
join:2010-10-16
Springfield, MA
Reviews:
·Comcast
·Verizon Broadban..

What about working class apartments

They'll probably charge the same rates that they charge for DSL to run down apartments knowing AT&T's business practices.

I live near a public housing complex and I know some of the Comcast installers and the residents there order some pretty expensive packages. Maybe Verizon could wire those for FiOS and get a decent return on investment.

Whatever the service offered, they should price the services to reflect the quality of the services offered. DSL should be 19.95 per month at most. Cable internet could go for anywhere from $30-60 and FTTH could go from $80-100.
--
I've experienced ImOn (when they were McLeod USA), Mediacom, Comcast, and Time Warner and I currently have DirecTV. They are much better than broadcast TV.

I have not and will not cut the cord.
brookeKrige

join:2012-11-05
San Jose, CA
kudos:2

clauses for BW&caps increases, BW/$ control over time?

Would such "deals" routinely include measurable numeric conditions requiring the service (down and up) over time gets faster, more cost-effective, and higher caps by certain factors? (Given ATT FTTH emulates 50 year old copper, even asymmetry from cross-talk).
Rekrul

join:2007-04-21
Milford, CT
Reviews:
·AT&T U-Verse

Got a call from AT&T

I've been getting hangup calls from "Columbia House", so yesterday I answered the phone, just to find out what they wanted. It turned out to be AT&T, although I forgot to ask why the caller ID showed Columbia House.

Anyway, it was a salesman from AT&T trying to sell me phone/internet/TV service. When I asked about speeds, he told me about their 45 Mbps service. I told him that I currently have 100 Mbps with Cablevision. He went into the standard sales pitch about how since Cablevision uses a shared line I wasn't really getting all that speed and how with AT&T's fiber to the home I'd get much better speeds. When I told him that my speedtests registered around 104 Mbps he was surprised. I told him that I'd always had good luck with Internet speeds and that I must live in a good location. He then said that if that was the case, if I signed up for U-Verse fiber, I'd probably get even higher speeds because some AT&T fiber customers had gotten speeds as high as 200 Mbps. He also claimed that AT&T no longer has any official limit on internet usage.

He was pushing for me to sign up for a free trial, but I told him that I'd rather stick to Cablevision. BTW, I'm in CT.
tmc8080

join:2004-04-24
Brooklyn, NY
Reviews:
·ooma
·Optimum Online
·Verizon FiOS

Re: Got a call from AT&T

The sales guy is lying and deceptive. Would be quite fun for then to try and install the equipment and then tell them to take it all out and leave after they can't deliver.

For fiber to show it's real bandwidth it must be fed by Ethernet on short runs or Moca (capable of slightly longer runs). Not even Verizon is competing with 100 megabit service at $45 yet. Wait and see what 2014 brings.. maybe there will be something better that they can actually deliver on.

It's a foregone conclusion if you cancel the OOL at $45 and try to get it back, you probably can't since they haven't decided to lower the price for new and/or returning customers. This is primarily why Verizon's not obligated to respond or compete, because it's (an alleged) temporary retention gimmick. This remains to be seen what happens next in 2014 as promotions expire.
Rekrul

join:2007-04-21
Milford, CT
Reviews:
·AT&T U-Verse

Re: Got a call from AT&T

said by tmc8080:

The sales guy is lying and deceptive. Would be quite fun for then to try and install the equipment and then tell them to take it all out and leave after they can't deliver.

He made it sound like the highest speed tier was uncapped and you just get whatever speed you're capable of receiving. I should have asked him that, but I never think of these things at the proper time.
tmc8080

join:2004-04-24
Brooklyn, NY
Reviews:
·ooma
·Optimum Online
·Verizon FiOS

Re: Got a call from AT&T

Full disclosure of the number of line feet the DSL would run can give you a decent estimate of what speeds you could see from such a so-called uncapped service and the quality of that copper is almost as important. Assume any copper older than 10 years might have excessive noise on it.
jtorre69

join:2005-12-26
Hollywood, FL

Re: Got a call from AT&T

I don't know where you get your facts, but my home and the copper feeding my Uverse is over 30 years old. I get 30/5 profile on my service, and have yet to have any problems with my Uverse. I think your 10 year theory is nothing more than a random opinion. Let's stick to the facts.
Bengie25

join:2010-04-22
Wisconsin Rapids, WI
Reviews:
·Solarus
I would love to get one of those sales people on my phone.. My ISP is using fiber Ethernet and they even claim "dedicated bandwidth". Not just a dedicated fiber back to the CO, but your bandwidth is also dedicated within their network.

Anyway, DSL is shared at the DSLAM.

tigerpaw509

join:2011-01-19
Texans

TheToro
Premium
join:2003-06-05
N8B3L8
he lied to you, first of all, the 45Mb profile is only available in CA, this is only if you have FTTN-BP .

tigerpaw509

join:2011-01-19

Wireless is the answer

Guess who thinks wireless will deliver the needed speeds?