republican-creole
site Search:


 
   
story category
AT&T: Wireless Hot, Traditional Broadband Not
$4 billion net income, 1.6m new wireless, 347k fewer DSL
by Karl Bode Thursday 22-Jul-2010 tags: dsl · Fiber · competition · business · bandwidth · cable · telco · stats · consumers · Comcast · Verizon · AT&T U-Verse · AT&T Southeast · AT&T Midwest
AT&T's second quarter earnings are out, and despite "antennagate" and network coverage criticism -- the company still managed to activate a whopping 3.2 million iPhones during the quarter. Overall, the company added 1.6 million wireless subscribers (896,000 of those were not phones but embedded devices like e-Readers) for the quarter, to reach 90.1 million total wireless connections. AT&T saw a 27.2 percent growth in wireless data revenues, up $936 million from last year -- and their new data pricing only really just kicked in.

Click for full size
AT&T added a net 209,000 U-verse TV subscribers for the quarter, totaling 2.5 million. That said, AT&T overall lost about 92,000 total broadband customers, given they lost 347,000 traditional DSL customers, some to U-Verse upgrades, some to competitors. AT&T's broadband quarter wasn't a particularly great one, something AT&T attributes to "seasonal" slowdown, but also because competitors in non U-Verse markets are becoming "more aggressive with promotions."

In other words, users tired of slow and expensive DSL service are upgrading to cable. AT&T hopes to counter this with bonded VDSL, which will extend U-Verse's reach to 30 million potential users. But the fact that cable is kicking AT&T around in legacy DSL markets is kind of amusing -- given all the investor pressure on AT&T to skimp on network upgrades. By lamenting telco network upgrades (be they FTTH or FTTN), Wall Street stock jocks like Craig Moffett wind up helping cable companies.

"To be honest we had expected virtually all of those customers to migrate down to a lower price point."
-AT&T CFO on their new low wireless caps
On their earnings conference call, AT&T dribbled out a few interesting tidbits -- including the fact that their LTE trials will be starting in just a few months, with the service made available to AT&T customers sometime in 2011. The company also noted that they've been working hard to improve network performance in their trouble markets like New York City, where they claim dropped calls are down 23% in Manhattan while 3G speeds are up 31% the last six months. San Francisco upgrades are about 90 days behind NYC upgrades, says AT&T.

As for AT&T's decision to impose low 200 MB and 2 GB caps on wireless smartphone users during the quarter, AT&T's CFO Rick Lindner called the results "pretty encouraging." Interestingly, AT&T says fewer people than they expected downgraded from unlimited to 200MB and 2GB capped plans. "To be honest we had expected virtually all of those customers to migrate down to a lower price point." Perhaps because low caps and high overages (plus fees) isn't really a lower price point?

Regardless, AT&T acknowledged their new tiered pricing (which Verizon is expected to mimic later this month) "may reduce the growth rate in the next year." T-Mobile, Clearwire and Sprint certainly hope so.

Of course rumbling beneath all of this talk about wireless is AT&T's continued loss of traditional landline voice customers and associated revenues, which AT&T happily insists saw their "smallest year-over-year decline in five quarters." AT&T saw their wireline voice total (and they include U-Verse Voice in that total) drop to 44.3 million from 46.3 million on the quarter. Those continued losses mean continued layoffs at the company this year.

view: topics flat text 
Post a:

hdman
Flt Rider
Premium
join:2003-11-25
Appleton, WI
Reviews:
·exede by ViaSat

Hey ATT......

If you want to ADD DSL customers, stop petitioning states like Wisconsin to allow you to skirt the rules! Also, stop rebranding junk like WildBlue and trying to pass it off as "broadband" which further allows you to bloat your "broadband" coverage maps.

THEN....start adding DLS POPS in the rural communities that you already service with copper phone lines!!!

Sorry to rant....but AT&T needs to go down for they have done in Wisconsin.

HDMan
--
The proper way to break in a Harley: Grab a fist full of throttle, and ride it like you stole it!!!

AMDUSER
Premium
join:2003-05-28
Earth
kudos:1
Reviews:
·RoadRunner Cable

Re: Hey ATT......

AT&T should also note: Speed Sells [and the cable cos know it.]

How about setting up the adsl2 over ATM [line cards] that support it- that are already installed to offer faster service instead of just 6 Meg DSL / IP-DSL and offer 15 Meg like Speakeasy offers.
cahiatt
Premium
join:2001-03-21
Smyrna, GA

Re: Hey ATT......

said by AMDUSER:

AT&T should also note: Speed Sells [and the cable cos know it.]
Agreed. Why would I want to go back to DSL when my 25/3 cable service works pretty good at a competitive price. Even if they bring U-Verse why would I want to downgrade and be forced to use a set-top box again?

There is something about the simplicity of putting a coax into the back of a TV that I really enjoy.

trparky
Apple... YUM
Premium,MVM
join:2000-05-24
Cleveland, OH
kudos:1
Reviews:
·Time Warner Cable
·Time Warner VOIP
·AT&T U-Verse

Re: Hey ATT......

The cable companies want to switch all of their subscribers to what is known as Switched Digital Video. The idea is that all the programming will be held at the neighborhood cable node (or headend) until someone on the system actually wants that programming. The idea is that if you don't have to transmit all of the programming onto the cable you have more of the cable to transmit Internet data which will result in higher and higher Internet speeds.

This is of course going to require an STB for all cable company subscribers since the STB will be the only thing that can "request" the programming stream to be sent to you along the cable.
--
Tom
iansltx

join:2007-02-19
Golden, CO
kudos:2
Reviews:
·Verizon Online DSL
·Comcast

Re: Hey ATT......

Depends on which market you're in, and with which provider. Some cablecos are just upgrading plant to 1GHz, which provides enough capacity to comfortably offer plenty of TV channels and DOCSIS 3 HSI without a problem, assuming you're cutting back on analog channels as part of the process.
iansltx

join:2007-02-19
Golden, CO
kudos:2
Reviews:
·Verizon Online DSL
·Comcast
No kidding. I'm typing this from a market with AT&T DSL (no U-Verse AFAIK) and Suddenlink cable. Suddenlink's standard package is 10 Mbps down and 1 Mbps up...SIGNIFICANTLY faster than AT&T's top-of-the-line DSL, especially when you factor in ATM overhead!

Oh, and SL has a package that, for $5 LESS per month including taxes and fees, jumps you from 6M DSL + local phone service to 10M cable + unlimited local and LD.

AMDUSER
Premium
join:2003-05-28
Earth
kudos:1
Reviews:
·RoadRunner Cable

Re: Hey ATT......

Locally, AT&T does offer U-Verse; although build-out leaves something to be desired.
Time Warner Cable however offers 7 Meg as the standard here vs AT&T 6 Meg DSL [and after ATM network overhead] gives about 5 Meg. It is actually cheaper to sign up for Earthlink Cable internet [$41] 7 Meg - stand alone [resold TWC] than to sign up for 6 Meg AT&T DSL ~$45... for slower internet.

N3OGH
Yo Soy Col. "Bat" Guano
Premium
join:2003-11-11
Philly burbs
kudos:1
Landline voice is dead. DSL is yesterday's technology.

I remember the olden days when they were splitting area codes like crazy to make room for fax & modem lines. Talk about boom/bust!

Both AT&T and Verizon know that. Both are using their wireless divisions as cash cows.

AT&T is trying to compete with U-Verse, and Verizon with Fios. AT&T, IMHO made a mistake with FTTN. It's a half measure when full measures are in order.

If Verizon can survive the massive amount of money they poured into Fios, they will eventually do very well with it. Both companies realize they have to sell TV to compete with the likes of Comcast, and other large cable providers.

I would expect Verizon to become an even smaller company as they continue to sell of rural copper and focus on the higher population areas with their Fios offering.
--
Petty people are disproportionally corrupted by petty power
Sammer

join:2005-12-22
Canonsburg, PA

1 edit

Re: Hey ATT......

said by N3OGH:

AT&T is trying to compete with U-Verse, and Verizon with Fios. AT&T, IMHO made a mistake with FTTN. It's a half measure when full measures are in order.

If Verizon can survive the massive amount of money they poured into Fios, they will eventually do very well with it. Both companies realize they have to sell TV to compete with the likes of Comcast, and other large cable providers.

I would expect Verizon to become an even smaller company as they continue to sell of rural copper and focus on the higher population areas with their Fios offering.
I don't think Verizon can sell off any more rural areas without upsetting the very populous states where it remains a local (ILEC) phone company. It tried in both New York and Virginia and both states said no. Cincinnati Bell is about the only phone company of a large size whose overall territory has a higher population density than Verizon's so Verizon isn't very rural and I wouldn't worry about Verizon's survival.

Duramax08
A Challenger Appears
Premium
join:2008-08-03
San Antonio, TX
Reviews:
·Millenicom
·Cricket Broadband
·Juno Express
·Clearwire Wireless
Our system indicates that our DSL service, AT&T High Speed Internet, is not available at your location. However, let's see if we have another solution for you:

You may qualify for satellite broadband from AT&T. Learn More

If DSL becomes available at my location, Contact Me

--
In reviewing your account, I see that DSL Basic service should be available at your address. However, you are at the very edge of DSL availability. You must be within 15 Kft of our equipment in order to subscribe to DSL service. You are at 14.920 Kft.
Firefly2003

join:2010-02-14

Re: Hey ATT......

I get the same message everyday :/ and whats even worse AT&T is the only choice for phone service in the area so they own the lines and they have a franchise agreement with the village I live about 4 miles outside from, but even the village doesnt even have landline DSL service there, I even tried to get T-1 thru a 3rd party and AT&T would be the backbone the copper running to the house wasn't setup for internet AT&T wanted to charge me 15k to run new copper and repeater from 6 miles away to the house, thing is the house was built 3 yrs ago and all the utility lines were setup then as well, I told them to piss off needless to say...

Cole

@tds.net
What exactly did AT&T do in WI? As a Wisconsin resident as well, I'd really like to know.

hdman
Flt Rider
Premium
join:2003-11-25
Appleton, WI
Reviews:
·exede by ViaSat

Re: Hey ATT......

said by Cole :

What exactly did AT&T do in WI? As a Wisconsin resident as well, I'd really like to know.
They were the ones who petitioned the State Legislature to strip all municipalities of their ability to negotiate cable/data rates with local operators. Rural communities would sit down with the local operators and negotiate coverage rules (ie if there were x many homes in one mile, the operator would have to build out to them, etc.). AT&T made the State dopes believe that these negotiations hindered their build out which was the exact OPPOSITE. This allowed AT&T to do ONE thing and that was enter into already served markets and offer their U-Verse to compete with cable. In return, AT&T convinced the State dopes that they would focus on rural broadband as well.

So....what does AT&T do? They rebrand WildBlue and offer it as "broadband" to rural customer. This made certain that most rural dwellings unserved by cable or dsl will remain that way. Why? Take my situation: Charter would have HAD to build out to me and my neighbors under their contract with my town. AT&T has the copper lines for phone here, and nothing else. Their politicing relieved Charter of their responsibility, and AT&T was never obligated to service us with DSL because they offered us their shitty Sat based crap.

THAT is what they did in Wisconsin and it is well documented all over the web. I hope AT&T gets a blue water swirly ASAP....

HDMan
--
The proper way to break in a Harley: Grab a fist full of throttle, and ride it like you stole it!!!

Duramax08
A Challenger Appears
Premium
join:2008-08-03
San Antonio, TX
Reviews:
·Millenicom
·Cricket Broadband
·Juno Express
·Clearwire Wireless

How to stick it to ATT if youre a iPhone user w/ unlimited

For the people that dont know this.....

Screw the youtube app they give you, Use safari to go to the youtube website and watch HQ videos through the 3G network. Beats the shit out of that app.

We're still paying for unlimited. Use the crap out of it.
--
In reviewing your account, I see that DSL Basic service should be available at your address. However, you are at the very edge of DSL availability. You must be within 15 Kft of our equipment in order to subscribe to DSL service. You are at 14.920 Kft.

Z80A
Premium
join:2009-11-23

Re: How to stick it to ATT if youre a iPhone user w/ unlimited

Or JB and tether (if you didn't get the recent flashlight/tether app).

Pashune
Caps stifle innovation
Premium
join:2006-04-14
Gautier, MS
Reviews:
·Vonage
·CableOne

Always stuck at 1.5 mbit.

They wouldn't have lost me a few years ago either if they'd just upgrade my neighborhood already...

...which they finally did recently, sorta. There's still no power going to the new RT down my street. I give 'em 6 months-1 year before it's lit up.
--
ISP: CableOne 5 mbit/500 kbit
elray

join:2000-12-16
Santa Monica, CA
Reviews:
·SONIC.NET
·RoadRunner Cable

Re: Always stuck at 1.5 mbit.

said by Pashune:

They wouldn't have lost me a few years ago either if they'd just upgrade my neighborhood already...

...which they finally did recently, sorta. There's still no power going to the new RT down my street. I give 'em 6 months-1 year before it's lit up.
All of my ex-AT&T clients would have given their first-born for 1.5mbits ... over the past year, when they brought me in, I did my best to get their foolishly-ordered circuits repaired, but they never exceeded 140kbps.

AT&T's answer? Transfer you to sales, so they can put you on dialup service for a lower price.

You can't make this stuff up.

Pashune
Caps stifle innovation
Premium
join:2006-04-14
Gautier, MS
Reviews:
·Vonage
·CableOne

Re: Always stuck at 1.5 mbit.

I understand that a lot of people are still stuck on dial-up; God forbid the CMTS and central office exploding in my area.

AT&T had a problem where they were offering me 3 meg speeds and I went through 10 technicians or so trying to fix it. Their answer was just to downgrade to 1.5 meg.. but some of the same issues were still there (Sync loss during t'storms)

1.5 mbit doesn't feel like much anymore though when you've got 3 or more heavy internet users in the same house.
--
ISP: CableOne 5 mbit/500 kbit
Gflo

join:2009-06-25
Oxford, GA
Reviews:
·AT&T Southeast

At&t

Hey we need more stories like this. Maybe it will get at&t to get up off their asses and do somthing about it.

I'm stuck here at 3mbits(if i'm lucky) while people right down the street have cable and are downloading at 10x that. My part of the street is in an area where cable companies have not bid on and probably aren't going to.

Time
Premium
join:2003-07-05

1 edit

Re: At&t

Look on the bright side, you could live in a CenturyLink area and be stuck with 1.5 Mbps max.
--
"If it can't be done with brains, it can't be done with hours" - Clarence "Kelly" Johnson
fiberguy
My views are my own.
Premium
join:2005-05-20
kudos:3

Re: At&t

said by Time:

Look on the bright side, you could live in a CenturyLink area and be stuck with 1.5 Mbps max.
Hrmmm...

I'm in a century link area and the max here certainly isn't 1.5, max. Just curious where you're getting your information from?

Time
Premium
join:2003-07-05
Reviews:
·Cox HSI

Re: At&t

said by fiberguy:

said by Time:

Look on the bright side, you could live in a CenturyLink area and be stuck with 1.5 Mbps max.
Hrmmm...

I'm in a century link area and the max here certainly isn't 1.5, max. Just curious where you're getting your information from?
Being a past Embarq customer and CenturyLink's availability search, which hasn't changed since Sprint serviced this area.

I'm not stating that 1.5 is the highest package they offer, I'm just making mention that is the max they serve to my zip code.
--
"If it can't be done with brains, it can't be done with hours" - Clarence "Kelly" Johnson
fiberguy
My views are my own.
Premium
join:2005-05-20
kudos:3

Re: At&t

said by Time:

said by fiberguy:

said by Time:

Look on the bright side, you could live in a CenturyLink area and be stuck with 1.5 Mbps max.
Hrmmm...

I'm in a century link area and the max here certainly isn't 1.5, max. Just curious where you're getting your information from?
Being a past Embarq customer and CenturyLink's availability search, which hasn't changed since Sprint serviced this area.

I'm not stating that 1.5 is the highest package they offer, I'm just making mention that is the max they serve to my zip code.
You actually DID imply that it "was the max" offered... you didn't say "in your area".. but your reply does.

(I would have said "you could be stuck in an area OF century like where the max available is 1.5 - you said "a century link area AND BE STUCK with.. which reads that century link areas are 1.5.. but anyway)
nwmsbob

join:2007-07-15
Hernando, MS

1 edit
I'm stuck in an area that they not only don't offer broadband of any sort in, they have no intention of doing so in the short to medium turn future. Hence my decision to join the disgruntled masses and tell them that I no longer require their services.
Gflo

join:2009-06-25
Oxford, GA

3 edits

Re: At&t

Well technically they don't offer broadband where I'm at anymore, but my point is at&t needs to stop all this "Rethink Possible" crap and get to work.

Zulu

join:2008-03-17
Port Saint Lucie, FL

AT&T Got To Want To Help Their Selves First.

The FCC also released today defining "Broadband" speed as 4MB download services. As I've called at least once a week trying to buy improved services and always told they are not available. AT&T reps know nothing about "Pair Bonding" or VDSL, at least they are sharing with customers. So, the 3meg service, which I test at 2.5, is really not high speed by the FCC's standards.
MyDogHsFleas
Premium
join:2007-08-15
Austin, TX
kudos:4

new tiered data pricing is revenue neutral

according to AT&T's guidance to its investors. so I take issue with the implication of

quote:
and their new data pricing only really just kicked in.

Zoder

join:2002-04-16
Miami, FL

Re: new tiered data pricing is revenue neutral

Why would they make the change if it was revenue neutral?
MyDogHsFleas
Premium
join:2007-08-15
Austin, TX
kudos:4

Re: new tiered data pricing is revenue neutral

If you take them at their word, it is to better manage the growth of their network data usage, so that the "regular" user doesn't get choked out by the very heavy users.
bdon78
I didn't do it

join:2009-05-18
Decatur, GA

I have AT&T

And I don't hate them (which makes me a minority on this website).

I am one of the fortunate few that is within 1000ft of a VRAD, so I get the 24 tier. I also have wireless, but I'm in Atlanta, which has pretty solid coverage and speed.

Despite all the criticism on this forum, they must being doing something right.. why do I say this? Well, one.. I am happy, and I can't be alone. Two, look at their numbers... Q4 last year was the first time they beat out Verizon in most wireless categories (ARPU, Net Adds, etc..).

I can only assume they have the iPhone to thank for that, but that was a good strategic move on their part (VZW could've had it first and said "no".. wtf?). They also entered into connected devices such as eReaders (that really only need the EDGE network) long before Verizon.

Guess my point is, AT&T despite their network woes, seems to have made some pretty good strategic decisions that Verizon missed out on. Now Verizon is playing catch up.

I think it will all be interesting to watch once both have their LTE networks up... let the network battles begin!
dplantz

join:2000-08-02
Roslindale, MA
Reviews:
·Verizon Wireless..
·Clearwire Wireless
·RCN CABLE
·PHONE POWER

Re: I have AT&T

I have just checked and my parents can get DSL from At&T. It only took years for it to happen. Too bad it was 4 years since my parents dumped At&T for Comcast and 7 years too late for Broadband. When AT&T who at the time was SBC here in CT they did not offer unlimited LD and Comcast did, so Comcast got 75% of the home phone users in my home town. Strange thing is this town is just under 18,000 people and had only slight DSL availability. They had put in RT 10 years ago, but forgot to add the dsl line cards.
bdon78
I didn't do it

join:2009-05-18
Decatur, GA

Re: I have AT&T

That is unfortunate. I live in the SE region of the company (formerly BellSouth) and I tend to find that a lot of poor experiences with AT&T originate out of the SBC regions prior to the merger (not to say that BellSouth was perfect).

I also live within Atlanta city limits, so access to broadband is easy for me. (though I will never use a comcast service again...)

JasonOD

@comcast.net
Agreed. And instead of the cable companies racking up boatloads of debt, AT&T is laughing all the way to the bank. They've committed themselves to not wasting money on over the top FTTH upgrades, and will reap the benefits of not being the first mover should they decide otherwise down the road.
iansltx

join:2007-02-19
Golden, CO
kudos:2

Re: I have AT&T

Wait, have you used AT&T? Because you're typing this on a Comcast connection.
etaadmin

join:2002-01-17
Dallas, TX
kudos:1
As you said 'I am one of the fortunate few that is within 1000ft of a VRAD' how many of you are out there? 30%, 40%? the rest are just 25 and 19 Mbps gateway profiles and the immense majority just get ADSL.

That say a lot about the service right?
tmc8080

join:2004-04-24
Brooklyn, NY
Reviews:
·Optimum Online
·Verizon FiOS

technology vs subscription rates

vdsl isn't hot.. fttp is finally warming up (with verizon's new decision to offer digital voice instead of POTS). in the next few years the telcos will have to ramp up speeds due to consumer demand despite the lack of competition. where will at&t be in that brick wall of vdsl? spending twice to retrofit the last mile?

SLD
Premium
join:2002-04-17
San Francisco, CA

"Gate" again?

Please stop appending "gate" to every scandal - it was the name of a hotel for christ's sake!

heat84
Bit Torrent Apologist

join:2004-03-11
Fort Lauderdale, FL

2 edits

Re: "Gate" again?

said by SLD:

Please stop appending "gate" to every scandal - it was the name of a hotel for christ's sake!
Yeah that annoys the hell out of me too. So much so that one of the things I plan to do if someone invents a time machine is to wipe the name Watergate out of existence.
--
Bit Torrent is my DVR.
stridr69

join:2003-05-19
San Luis Obispo, CA

Re: "Gate" again?

No Watergate? That's not a good idea. Means we would have had to put up with "Trickie Dick" until 1976. But, we had "Jimmy" and his brother Billy at the family gas station, so it wasn't all bad.

heat84
Bit Torrent Apologist

join:2004-03-11
Fort Lauderdale, FL

Re: "Gate" again?

said by stridr69:

No Watergate? That's not a good idea. Means we would have had to put up with "Trickie Dick" until 1976. But, we had "Jimmy" and his brother Billy at the family gas station, so it wasn't all bad.

I could just fix it so the hotel has a different name. A one syllable name just to be on the safe side.
--
Bit Torrent is my DVR.

djrobx

join:2000-05-31
Valencia, CA
kudos:1
Blame Janet Jackson for boobygate. It's just such a short, convenient way to refer to something that's getting too much media attention.
--
AT&T U-Hearse
Your funeral. Delivered.

Rick
Premium,MVM
join:2001-02-06
Waterbury, CT

If I had 5 minutes with AT&T's CEO...here's what I'd say

Your landline business..is getting destroyed.
Your DSL business..is getting destroyed.
Your Uverse adoption rate..weak at best.

Your wireless results. Outstanding. Well..except for the fact that now you'll probably be losing the Iphone exclusive deal...Antennagate on top of that..and your "unlimited" plan going the way of the dinosaurs..driving some of those customers elsewhere.

Can I ask you a question? Could anyone SCREW UP MORE THAN YOU HAVE THE LAST FEW YEARS? Could anyone be doing a worse job for their customers AND shareholders alike?

And I say shareholders because you ARE doing them a disservice as well. You are NOT servicing them. You are leading them over a cliff. A real leader..LEADS...and doesn't let the pressure to make every last dime rule their every decision. Warren Buffet stands up yearly at his shareholder meeting and tells it like it is. And his shareholders...RESPECT HIM FOR IT. And what you need to do..as the leader of AT&T this formerly outstanding and great American company..is to do the same with yours.

Your customers do not want dsl speeds anymore. And they don't want their old landlines anymore either. And they certainly don't want Uverse...your pieced together..save every last dime you can to get something out there...kind of network. Mr CEO..you were told that here many times by many people including myself over the last couple of years.
And you still aren't listening.

As a company..you have the financial resources to wire your entire service area with FTTH. You can make that decision.
You can finally bring your network up to something that is a worthy competitor. Something that will serve your customers into the next generation. And something that will serve your shareholders as well..into their retirements.

Mr CEO..don't be afraid of your shareholders and Wall Street.

Show them what a real leader is instead.

~Rick
Gflo

join:2009-06-25
Oxford, GA
Reviews:
·AT&T Southeast

1 edit

Re: If I had 5 minutes with AT&T's CEO...here's what I'd say

Randall Stephenson, AT&T CEO
rs2982@att.com (direct)
randall.stephenson@att.com
phone: 210-351-5401 (direct to his secretary)
fax 210-351-3553
alternate phone: 210-821-4105 (headquarters, press 3, ask for Mr. Stephenson's office)
175 E. Houston
San Antonio, TX 78205

Fax, call and email him at all the same time
FredIsDead

join:2010-02-24
San Antonio, TX

Re: If I had 5 minutes with AT&T's CEO...here's what I'd say

said by Gflo:

Randall Stephenson, AT&T CEO
rs2982@att.com (direct)
randall.stephenson@att.com
phone: 210-351-5401 (direct to his secretary)
fax 210-351-3553
alternate phone: 210-821-4105 (headquarters, press 3, ask for Mr. Stephenson's office)
175 E. Houston
San Antonio, TX 78205

Fax, call and email him at all the same time
They move their headquarters to Dallas last year, so that isn't current address or phone.
bdon78
I didn't do it

join:2009-05-18
Decatur, GA
said by Rick:

Could anyone SCREW UP MORE THAN YOU HAVE THE LAST FEW YEARS?
I can answer your question and yes someone can. Verizon's CEO.. he said no to the iPhone and connected devices (eReaders, prescription bottles with connected tops, electric meters).

In a strategic blunder that could only be outdone by Blockbuster Videos board, Verizon's leaders put them behind AT&T.

And don't give me idealistic talk about vzw..... FOLLOW THE MONEY. Look at AT&T's financials versus Verizons since the iPhone... They are getting crushed!!! (also, the huge capital investment and low adoption rate of FIOS is coming back to bite them)

Your post was one of the least thought thru post's I've encountered here. Call it constructive criticism
Gflo

join:2009-06-25
Oxford, GA
Reviews:
·AT&T Southeast

Re: If I had 5 minutes with AT&T's CEO...here's what I'd say

said by bdon78:

said by Rick:

Could anyone SCREW UP MORE THAN YOU HAVE THE LAST FEW YEARS?
I can answer your question and yes someone can. Verizon's CEO.. he said no to the iPhone and connected devices (eReaders, prescription bottles with connected tops, electric meters).

In a strategic blunder that could only be outdone by Blockbuster Videos board, Verizon's leaders put them behind AT&T.

And don't give me idealistic talk about vzw..... FOLLOW THE MONEY. Look at AT&T's financials versus Verizons since the iPhone... They are getting crushed!!! (also, the huge capital investment and low adoption rate of FIOS is coming back to bite them)

Your post was one of the least thought thru post's I've encountered here. Call it constructive criticism
said by bdon78:

said by Rick:

Could anyone SCREW UP MORE THAN YOU HAVE THE LAST FEW YEARS?
I can answer your question and yes someone can. Verizon's CEO.. he said no to the iPhone and connected devices (eReaders, prescription bottles with connected tops, electric meters).

In a strategic blunder that could only be outdone by Blockbuster Videos board, Verizon's leaders put them behind AT&T.

And don't give me idealistic talk about vzw..... FOLLOW THE MONEY. Look at AT&T's financials versus Verizons since the iPhone... They are getting crushed!!! (also, the huge capital investment and low adoption rate of FIOS is coming back to bite them)

Your post was one of the least thought thru post's I've encountered here. Call it constructive criticism
Thats good and all but Verizon is working for the customer, not the money. While I agree that they could have done better with the iPhone and the connected devices. Verizon isn't trying to spoon money out of their customers, yet. It all depends on how their wireless data caps turn out.
CopperFiber

join:2009-12-08

Rethink Possible

AT&T needs to revamp their DSL customers cause the cable companies are way ahead of them.
Sammer

join:2005-12-22
Canonsburg, PA

Re: Rethink Possible

said by CopperFiber:

AT&T needs to revamp their DSL customers cause the cable companies are way ahead of them.
That's exactly why they are not gaining traditional broadband customers. They either can't or won't compete with cable.
void_of_Ligh

join:2005-12-27
Nacogdoches, TX

Money poorly spent

I want to know how much money they spend on advertising versus what it would cost to bring DSL outside the city limits.

Why spend all the money on an ad campaign when you can spend it to reach a captive audience.
decifal

join:2007-03-10
Bon Aqua, TN
kudos:1

Re: Money poorly spent

Need more dsl customers? Build out more dsl! Duh!

Sign me up!

Wireless with spotty coverage and rediculas fees? No thanks! I'll keep my bird and stone tablets!

Van
Premium
join:2009-07-08
New Orleans, LA

Awesome....so they are upgrading their systems

ridiculously slowly....all the while implementing a laughable cap across the board?

Great

Romney2012
Defeat Obama 2012-Chg we can believe in
Premium
join:2002-03-03
USA
kudos:4

$30.8 B revenue & $4 B profit still better than last year

The top line results got lost in all the stats about lost DSL customers and land lines, but AT&T still turned in better results than last year. They had $30.8 billion in qtrly revenues and $4 billion in profit. The stock holders are happy. Everybody else doesn't count. The stock finished up 2.37% at closing.
--
Are you happy with your rep in Washington, DC?

See 9 replies to this post
ackman

join:2000-10-04
Acworth, GA

They need to compete

Hard to get new customers when your 6MB service only gives 400k upload speed. Most any cable company beats that by far, on even a bad day. If AT&T wasn't such a huge oversized behemoth beast of a "too big to fail" corporation, they could compete more quickly and effectively in the free market with efficient free market solutions.

underlord2
Lolcat is Lol
Premium
join:2005-01-06
Belleville, MI

1 edit

Maybe if...

posted to wrong newspiece, mods please delete.

Monday, 04-Jun 21:31:27 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.