Search:  

 
 
   News
newer
story category Akamai: U.S. 33rd Fastest Broadband Country
Behind Slovakia, in terms of percentage of connections above 2Mbps...
05:05PM Thursday Jul 09 2009 by Karl Bode
tags: business · stats · world
Akamai today released their latest "State of the Internet Report," (registration annoyingly required) which covers a number of topics including broadband penetration, broadband speeds, security, and more. It's of particular interest to our readers, as the company gathers the data from clients that have hit their global content server network, offering at least a partial glimpse at useful broadband statistics. In a statement e-mailed to Broadband Reports, the company notes that Deleware leads the way in terms of the fastest state:
Click for full size
Continuing the trend established throughout 2008, the East Coast of the United States continued to lead the country in the greatest level of broadband connectivity, with 8 of the top 10 states on the list. Delaware maintained its top position, with 62% of connections to Akamai occurring at 5 Mbps or greater, and the highest average connection speed in the United States, at 7.2 Mbps.
Utah tops a list of the states with the highest number of connections above 25Mbps, thanks largely to the Utopia municipal fiber deployment. The District of Columbia, Alaska and Missouri rank as the top three slowest states in the country. Globally, the United States saw some growth in terms of the fastest overall nations, moving from thirty fifth to thirty third when ranked in terms of the percentage of connections above 2Mbps. In terms of connections above 5Mbps, Japan took the lead:
Click for full size
Japan unseated South Korea for the highest levels of "high broadband" (>5 Mbps) connectivity, though South Korea maintained the highest average connection speed, at 11 Mbps. For the first time since publishing the State of the Internet report in the first quarter of 2008, South Korea no longer had the largest percentage of connections to Akamai at speeds above 5 Mbps, with a significant 25% decline.
In the first quarter of 2009, the company says that one-fifth of the Internet connections around the world were at speeds faster than 5 Mbps. Akamai proclaims they see approximately 1 billion users per day on their network, observing a 5 percent increase in the overall number of IP addresses hitting their network.

On the security front, the group notes that the United States and China were the two largest attack traffic sources, accounting for nearly 50% of observed malicious traffic. Akamai also notes that the top 10 ports saw approximately 90% of the observed attack traffic, with more two-thirds of the traffic likely related to the Conficker worm.

Related:
  1. Backbone Analysis Puts Exaflood Myth To Bed
  2. Cable To Grab 75% Of New Subs In 2009
  3. Wednesday Evening Links
  4. The GPS Sky Is Falling
  5. Broadband Hardware Market To Shrink 36%
  6. 650 Million Broadband Households By 2013
  7. WiMax Is (And Will Remain) A Niche Player
  8. The "Death Of P2P" Is Relative, Possibly Wrong
Forums » Akamai: U.S. 33rd Fastest Broadband Country
view: topics flat text 
Post a:
page: 1 · 2

INT0CABLE
BANNED
Premium
join:2007-10-22
Bronx, NY

yesssss

we have reached the 33rd degree.
shoegazer
Premium
join:2009-06-22
Las Vegas, NV

Re: yesssss

off topic- how did you load up that avatar on dslreports,i use that site but cant get it to upload to dslr..
shoegazer
Premium
join:2009-06-22
Las Vegas, NV

1 edit

Re: yesssss

10 reasons not 2 see bruno, all 10 are , there are better ways to kiss 10 bucks goodbye..
Pv8man

join:2008-07-24
Hammond, IN
(Chants)

We're number 33 !!!

We're number 33 !!!

en102
Canadian, eh?

join:2001-01-26
Valencia, CA
·RoadRunner Cable
·DSL EXTREME

The 'real' question is:

Are these the percentages of people that _have_ those speeds, or the percentage where those speeds are available ?

Just because I can purchase +25Mbps (and pay and extra $25/month) doesn't mean that I will.

Eg. I have the 'standard' TWC package which is 10/1Mbps (was 6/512kbps) burstable to 15Mbps.

If (when?) I switch to AT&T, that 'standard' deal will be 3Mbps. I 'could' pay $20/month for 18Mbps, but I don't see any advantage.
--
Canada = Hollywood North

Eat Me

join:2002-09-25
Sussex, NJ

The average brings us down?

I think the average brings us down since most of America is rural.

tmh

@qwest.net


thumbs down from:
GOLFnSUN See Profile

Re: The average brings us down?

said by Eat Me See Profile :

I think the average brings us down since most of America is rural.
No, it's hiding our collective heads in the sand that brings us down.
Pv8man

join:2008-07-24
Hammond, IN

Re: The average brings us down?

Might I add to this to go against LiamJunket's thumbs down

Too much rural area???

Not profitable enough to install new lines throughout all the rural areas???

OK, understandable.....but then why not just invest in BPL (broadband over powerlines) for just the rural areas???

Think about it

Eat Me

join:2002-09-25
Sussex, NJ
·PenTeleData
·Future Nine Corpor..
·VOIPo
·Vonage

Re: The average brings us down?

said by Pv8man See Profile :

OK, understandable.....but then why not just invest in BPL (broadband over powerlines) for just the rural areas???

Think about it
Three reasons:

1. BPL causes a LOT of interference. Not just to ham radio but other uses of HF such as aviation, ships and broadcast.

2. Expensive repeaters are required pretty close together.

3. BPL really isn't that fast anyway.

Frankly, fiber would be a better choice as it is future proof. One investment and you're done.

Cjaiceman
Premium,MVM
join:2004-10-12
Parker, CO
·Comcast Workplace
·Comcast

Doesn't even have to be Rural, can be suburb and urban areas as well. Look at Qwest, they still offer their 1.5mbps DSL package, and that is their most popular package. I've even seen some people that still have the 256/256 package. I think Qwest needs to get rid of the 1.5mbps package and make their base package 7mbps.
--
Duct tape is like The Force – it has a light side and a dark side, and it binds the Universe together
stunod2002

join:2003-11-07
Carol Stream, IL

Re: The average brings us down?

said by Cjaiceman See Profile :

Doesn't even have to be Rural, can be suburb and urban areas as well. Look at Qwest, they still offer their 1.5mbps DSL package, and that is their most popular package. I've even seen some people that still have the 256/256 package. I think Qwest needs to get rid of the 1.5mbps package and make their base package 7mbps.
Why?? I'm on AT&T and I have 768/256 DSL.. It's not that higher isn't available but I don't need it.. I used to have the 6meg package but it was a waste of $$$..

And before you say it, yes I use it alot.. I work from home, do VPN access, photo sharing, etc.. I don;t do live video streaming and the large emails take longer but so what..

MSauk
MSauk
Premium
join:2002-01-17
Sandy, UT
·Qwest.net
·Vonage
·Verizon BroadbandA..
·surpasshosting
·Comcast

said by Cjaiceman See Profile :

Doesn't even have to be Rural, can be suburb and urban areas as well. Look at Qwest, they still offer their 1.5mbps DSL package, and that is their most popular package. I've even seen some people that still have the 256/256 package. I think Qwest needs to get rid of the 1.5mbps package and make their base package 7mbps.
lol to bad they can't even offer higher speeds than 1.5!

If I were to sign up with them it would cost over 30 dollars for 1.5 speeds! Qwest is a joke and having them around here is a joke (Utah).
--
801 Images

Omega
Displaced Ohioan
Premium
join:2002-07-30
Cheyenne, WY
clubs:
·Bresnan Online
·Verizon Wireless B..
·Comcast
·AT&T Midwest

said by Cjaiceman See Profile :

Doesn't even have to be Rural, can be suburb and urban areas as well. Look at Qwest, they still offer their 1.5mbps DSL package, and that is their most popular package. I've even seen some people that still have the 256/256 package. I think Qwest needs to get rid of the 1.5mbps package and make their base package 7mbps.
When I first moved here, I asked the Qwest people at the mall kiosk what they offered. They said 1.5mbps. I laughed at them.

Went to Bresnan and got 8mbit.
--
Whats smells like blue?

N O Y B
St. John 3.16

join:2005-12-15
Forest Grove, OR


said by Cjaiceman See Profile :

I've even seen some people that still have the 256/256 package.


That is all my Mom needs for email and checking news once in while.


BF69

join:2004-07-28
Camden, TN

said by Eat Me See Profile :

I think the average brings us down since most of America is rural.
Actually more Americans live in urban areas than rural.

Eat Me

join:2002-09-25
Sussex, NJ
·PenTeleData
·Future Nine Corpor..
·VOIPo
·Vonage

Re: The average brings us down?

said by BF69 See Profile :

said by Eat Me See Profile :

I think the average brings us down since most of America is rural.
Actually more Americans live in urban areas than rural.
More geographical area in the US is rural.
Lazlow

join:2006-08-07
Saint Louis, MO

Re: The average brings us down?

Eat Me

The point being that there are not enough people living in rural areas to bring our overall average down (significantly). When you understand that there are MANY counties that have only one person per square mile and that many cities have thousands (or more) per square mile, you will see how population density really drops out of the equation.

vzw emp

@qwest.net
I don't think being rural has anything to do with it. It's ranking the US amongst other countries in percentage of connections at 2mb or greater.

In other words, our speeds continue to suck.

jeffster1970
Whatta Ya Think About Dat?
Premium
join:2004-04-01
Kitchener, ON
clubs:
·magicjack.com
·Vonage
·Acanac
·Bell Sympatico

said by Eat Me See Profile :

I think the average brings us down since most of America is rural.
Most live in rural area's in United States;

Not according to the 2000 US census:

Population, 285230516, 100%.

Population living in Urban Area's, 225956060, 79.219%.

Population living in Rural Areas, 59274456, 20.781%



It has probably changed since 2000, but not in the Rural setting.
--
"I think there is a world market for maybe five computers."
Thomas Watson, chairman of IBM, 1943
nasadude

join:2001-10-05
Rockville, MD

don't worry

I'm sure that $7B broadband pot-o-honey will lift us to at least 32nd.

N O Y B
St. John 3.16

join:2005-12-15
Forest Grove, OR

Re: don't worry


By the time all the hands get washed with it, it will be a $7b deficit.

openbox9

join:2004-01-26
Alexandria, VA

Re: don't worry

It's already part of the $1 trillion deficit

Mellow
Premium
join:2001-11-16
Salisbury, MD
·HostGator
·Cavalier Telephone

Delaware?? Really?

They must be basing this on the Newark/Wilmington area, I know many parts of DE that still do not have broadband service cable or dsl.
--
SurfingOC.com / GsdPhotography.com

PhoenixDown
-- Wants FIOS
Premium
join:2003-06-08
Fresh Meadows, NY
clubs:

Business vs Residential

I think their is a huge difference between someone connection at work via their 45M DS3 connection and someone connecting at home on their residential DSL with symmetrical 236 kbps speeds.
--
~ Insert a Funny Sig Here ~

Alakar
Facts do not cease to exist when ignored

join:2001-03-23
Milwaukee, WI
·AT&T U-Verse

Total Numbers?

Hey Karl Bode See Profile, how about total numbers instead of percentages? Considering Slovakia's population is 5,463,046 (a third smaller then New York City at 8.3 million) these broadband percentages are meaningless. You can't compare broadband penetration in countries with populations smaller then our major cities. Oh, that's right! You can because you really prefer propaganda over facts.
--
"Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom; it is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves." William Pitt the Younger
cornelius785

join:2006-10-26
Worcester, MA

Re: Total Numbers?

To date, there has not been a method that can compare broadband penetration between countries that nearly all can agree upon. I agree percentages favor small countries. I don't think it is possible to come up with just one metric to rank all the countries. In my opinion, a bar graph of broadband penetration and speed vs population density would reflect reality better. As for rankings, base rankings on for broadband penetration over a given range of population densities for each country (each country will have a rank for density ranges of A to B, B to C, C to D, and so on along with what percentage of the people live in those ranges).

I still have a feeling America won't 'rank' high, but it sure would better show what some countries are up against to provide high speed internet to all in that country.
PapaMidnight

join:2009-01-13
Baltimore, MD
Yes, you can; and yes, you should as to say you cannot is nothing more than a cop-out (aka: Excuse).
sonicmerlin

join:2009-05-24
Cleveland, OH

Smaller countries have fewer resources with which to extend broadband to their citizens. The same goes for the ISPs, whose profits are hampered by limits on their economies of scale.

Density is also misleading, as in most industrialized countries, including the US, the majority of the population is concentrated in various dense urban centers.

New York has one of the highest population densities in the world, but its average broadband speed is still sorely lacking in comparison to high density cities in countries such as Sweden, Japan, and South Korea.

Matt
Gone playing Dragon Age Origins
Premium
join:2003-07-20
Jamestown, NC
·North State Commun..

said by Alakar See Profile :

Hey Karl Bode See Profile, how about total numbers instead of percentages? Considering Slovakia's population is 5,463,046 (a third smaller then New York City at 8.3 million) these broadband percentages are meaningless. You can't compare broadband penetration in countries with populations smaller then our major cities. Oh, that's right! You can because you really prefer propaganda over facts.
What is the GDP of Slovakia vs. the US? Surely we have 10,000x the resources to throw at the problem than Slovakia so we should have faster speeds, right?

Not to mention Slovakia has a population density of 287 people per square mile ... that's about as populous as rural middle America. So how do they manage to match us in broadband stats?

battleop

join:2005-09-28
00000
Negative stories = more traffic. More traffic = more money.

BF69

join:2004-07-28
Camden, TN

said by Alakar See Profile :

Hey Karl Bode See Profile, how about total numbers instead of percentages? Considering Slovakia's population is 5,463,046 (a third smaller then New York City at 8.3 million) these broadband percentages are meaningless. You can't compare broadband penetration in countries with populations smaller then our major cities. Oh, that's right! You can because you really prefer propaganda over facts.
You really need to learn how statistics works. Ok so if a country of 1 billion has 30% of their coutnry wired they are "more" wired than a country of 200 million that is 100% wired. Um no.
me1212

join:2008-11-20
Pleasant Hill, MO
·VOIPo

.....

" The District of Columbia, Alaska and Missouri rank as the top three slowest states in the country."


benc
Premium
join:2007-06-17
Glen Carbon, IL
·Charter Pipeline
·Future Nine Corpor..
·Callcentric
·AT&T Midwest

Re: .....

said by me1212 See Profile :

" The District of Columbia, Alaska and Missouri rank as the top three slowest states in the country."


Missouri really surprised me.

Why? If anything, apart from Alaska (much of which wouldn't even have local phone service without heavy subsidies), I expected it would be Montana, Idaho, or Wyoming. What all those states have in common is that they cover a very large land area, and population density is quite low. Wyoming in particular ranks at the bottom in terms of total population.
me1212

join:2008-11-20
Pleasant Hill, MO

Re: .....

Well we have a LOT of farm land, but I didn't think it was that much. I don't have access to a wired ISP, just a WISP works great though. But still in the bottom 3?

BF69

join:2004-07-28
Camden, TN

said by benc See Profile :

said by me1212 See Profile :

" The District of Columbia, Alaska and Missouri rank as the top three slowest states in the country."


Missouri really surprised me.

Why? If anything, apart from Alaska (much of which wouldn't even have local phone service without heavy subsidies), I expected it would be Montana, Idaho, or Wyoming. What all those states have in common is that they cover a very large land area, and population density is quite low. Wyoming in particular ranks at the bottom in terms of total population.
So? Those areas have low population so the fact those people don't have broadband doesn't actually bring the average down much.

asdfdfdfdfdfdf

@Level3.net

According to a wiki page on pop density, which uses 2000 census data

»en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_U.···_density

persons per sq mile

DofC 9,378
Missouri 81
Alaska 1

US Average 81

It would also seem to make the claim that this is a population density issue laughably absurd.

DustySilicon

join:2002-10-06
Oak Grove, MO

Slowest states?

DC surprises me, Alaska I can understand because of the wilderness and remote access, but Missouri? I knew it was bad here and this just backs it up. Show Me the Broadband $$$.
jjeffeory

join:2002-12-04
USA

Re: Slowest states?

said by DustySilicon See Profile :

DC surprises me, Alaska I can understand because of the wilderness and remote access, but Missouri? I knew it was bad here and this just backs it up. Show Me the Broadband $$$.
Greedy city gov't and greedy Verizon/Comcast are partly to blame. A lot of the city is poor, but A LOT of the city is rich. There's not much of a middle there.

wifi4milez
Big Russ, 1918 to 2008. Rest in Peace

join:2004-08-07
New York, NY
·Verizon FIOS
·Sprint Mobile Broa..
·RoadRunner Cable
·BroadVoice

Lame comparison taken out of context...

As the DSLR propaganda machine churns on, a key detail in the "statistic" mentioned in the headline (U.S. 33rd Fastest Broadband Country Behind Slovakia, in terms of percentage of connections above 2Mbps...) was omitted as usual.

The United States has a population of 306,861,000, and is the 3rd most populous nation in the world. Slovakia on the other hand, has a population of 5,379,455. Furthermore, the population density of Slovakia is 280 people per square mile, while the US is 80. Fair comparison? I will let you be the judge.........
--
"You're Welcome"
-The United States of America and our Armed Forces-

Keeping the world safe since 1776

See 35 replies to this post

Dagda1175

join:2001-06-17
Goleta, CA
·Cox HSI

Building across nearly ten million sq km isn't so easy

Switzerland 41285 sq km

Belgium 30,528 sq km

Japan 374,744 SQ KM

Hong Kong 1,108 sq km

Monaco 1.95 sq km

Denmark 43,098.31 sq km

Germany 349,223 sq km

Romania 238,391 sq km

South Korea 100,032 sq km

Slovakia 49,035 sq km
----------------------------

United States 9,826,630 sq km

See 9 replies to this post

Xizer

join:2004-02-05
New York, NY


1 edit

America in a nutshell

A consistently average country, never at the top when it comes to anything except military expenditures.

Good luck seeing America in the single digits on any list comparing quality of life, healthcare, etc. between all the countries.

Brainwashing is common among the American populace. It is rare to find an American that does not regurgitate the statement "best country in the world!!" whenever prompted to, ignoring reality. In this way, Americans bear a striking resemblance to the North Korean people. It is perhaps even sadder, however, as the North Koreans are forced by their government to worship their country. Americans are willfully ignorant.

See 11 replies to this post
jsloan

join:2005-05-11
Kearny, NJ

looks like we have a broadband gap ;-)

we can win this war, time for more americans to step up to the plate and put their money where mouths and take one for the team and get cable or fios broadband.

jmn1207
Premium
join:2000-07-19
Reston, VA

1 edit

Re: looks like we have a broadband gap ;-)

Can we blame the Amish for our middling performance?

Edit: Don't worry, no Amish were offended.
yt
Premium
join:2008-06-03


2 edits

Another view from Akamai + World Population

 
Click for full size
Click for full size
»www.akamai.com/html/technology/dataviz5.html.

Comparing highly dense, small sq mile geographies is a bit misleading. That said, there is a disparity, but there are with many things in this world.

JohnInSJ
Premium
join:2003-09-22
San Jose, CA
·Comcast

Re: Another view from Akamai + World Population

said by yt See Profile :

Comparing highly dense, small sq mile geographies is a bit misleading. That said, there is a disparity, but there are with many things in this world.
Yeah, we have too much open space.

At least in nice high density areas of the US speeds are in the double digits, availability-wise anyway.
--
My place : »www.schettino.us

battleop

join:2005-09-28
00000

This can't be flawed....

Their study is based on customer's speed that they subscribe to, not what is available to them.
tmc8080

join:2004-04-24
Floral Park, NY

scape goats du jour

Qwest, AT&T and Comcast take the cake on why large swaths of the country have pitiful broadband speeds today!
NormanS
Premium,MVM
join:2001-02-14
San Jose, CA
·Pacific Bell - SBC

Re: scape goats du jour

said by tmc8080 See Profile :

Qwest, AT&T and Comcast take the cake on why large swaths of the country have pitiful broadband speeds today!
Righto! Those greedy bastidges refuse to spend $6,000 per premises per year on an expected ROI of $600 per premises per year.
--
Norman
~Oh Lord, why have you come
~To Konnyu, with the Lion and the Drum

Anonymous
Premium
join:2004-06-01
IA
·Mediacom

Report included

Report.zip 6,691,350 bytes
4 files zipped

BF69

join:2004-07-28
Camden, TN

FACTS

2/3 of the US live in the top 125 METRO areas. METROS by it's very name means it's no rrual. So all the people claim we ar slow beacause we are a "rural" country are full of it.

the fact is that Alaska, Montana, New Mexico, Nevada Wyoming, Utah, Idaho, Kansas, Nebraska, N Dakota and S Dakota make up 42% of all the land mass in the US yet have 5.5% of the population. So if you look at the other 94.5% of the population that lives in the remaining 60% of the land the population per sqaure mile is 180 people vs 80 people that the haters here like to bring up. The bottom 5% drag down the average.

Captain456

@gci.com

Re: FACTS

said by BF69 See Profile :

2/3 of the US live in the top 125 METRO areas. METROS by it's very name means it's no rrual. So all the people claim we ar slow beacause we are a "rural" country are full of it.

the fact is that Alaska, Montana, New Mexico, Nevada Wyoming, Utah, Idaho, Kansas, Nebraska, N Dakota and S Dakota make up 42% of all the land mass in the US yet have 5.5% of the population. So if you look at the other 94.5% of the population that lives in the remaining 60% of the land the population per sqaure mile is 180 people vs 80 people that the haters here like to bring up. The bottom 5% drag down the average.
Alaska is 21% of the size of the lower 48. It is MORE than twice the size of Texas. People don't realize how bug Alaska is because maps and globes never show it at the correct scale.
jsloan

join:2005-05-11
Kearny, NJ

Re: FACTS

alaska part of us? i thought it belonged to russia. how/when did we get stuck with it. can we return it, that should greatly help our broadband numbers. I'm also for returning Texas to Mexico and apologizing for the terrrible mistake in judgement on our part. That too will help our broadband score. come on america we have to think outside the box with we are ever to solve our problems. :->

Captain456

@gci.net

Re: FACTS

said by jsloan See Profile :

alaska part of us? i thought it belonged to russia. how/when did we get stuck with it. can we return it, that should greatly help our broadband numbers. I'm also for returning Texas to Mexico and apologizing for the terrrible mistake in judgement on our part. That too will help our broadband score. come on america we have to think outside the box with we are ever to solve our problems. :->
LOL ok so you want to return the oil, natural gas, gold, the biggest clean coal reserves in the US, timber, and the great strategic location of Alaska militarily?

We bought Alaska for a bargain. Even adjusted for inflation, more $$$ worth of resources is pulled out of Alaska every single year than the purchase price of Alaska.
jsloan

join:2005-05-11
Kearny, NJ

Re: FACTS

not everything in life is about money.

anyway, every time sarah palin opens her mouth our collective iq drops by 2 points. soon we will be no smarter than sand slugs.

here is my plan

return Alaska to Russia

Montana, Wyoming, Idaho, Kansas, Nebraska, N Dakota and S Dakota can go to Canada

and New Mexico, Nevada, Utah we can give back to Mexico.

That will surely get our ratings up and it will make us feel better.

In the event that they are not interested, no problem, we can just give them back to the native peoples, apologize for breaking all those treaties and be done with it.

and just in case even they are not interested, we can raffle them off to help pay our enormous defecit and debt. I'm sure the Red Communisits Chinese would be a little bit happier and express a sign of relieve if we paid them back some of the monies that we owe them. We can surprise them.

just think of all the tax money we pay just to keep them in the union.
GenBlood

join:2005-04-14
Nashua, NH

New Hampshire ranges .... second place ...

I hate to say these charts are messed up.
They need to be redone,

I could believe these charts if Verzon was still
running the show, but now it's FairPoint Communications
owning all the lines now. They are on their way the a Chapter
11 or more likely a Chapter 7 ... filing ....

So, someone update your records.....

chlen
Ethically Challenged
Premium
join:2001-01-16
Albany, NY

Missing the point of rollout

You guys are missing one major fact.

When the US adopted AOL in the mid 90's those countries had limited internet access if any at all. US has been rolling out broadband for a much longer time and technology is different in different areas.

In my area the competition is between RR and FIOS, so between 10 and 50 mbit speeds, however many people still have 1500/384 dsl for $15 that they got ten years ago and dont plan on switching.

When countries like Slovakia or even DT (Germany) did rollouts they were already at over 2mbit. Since the adsl tech was much cheaper and they are heavily regulated by the government. Sweden has two major cities that they paid a lot of money to wire with fiber, that was on subsidy. BT (British) was far behind the US in price and service for years while we had northpoint, covad, and pacbell wiring up unprofitable neighborhoods.

So the study does not make too much sense in the grand scheme of things.
--

This is not the greatest post in the world, no, this is just a tribute!

Слесарь-гинеколог

jmn1207
Premium
join:2000-07-19
Reston, VA

#1 in Profits

So, what are the rankings for the most profitable ISP's in the world? Are we at least in the top 10 of that list? If so, what's the deal with the rest of the world's ISP's?
Forums » Akamai: U.S. 33rd Fastest Broadband Countrypage: 1 · 2


Tuesday, 10-Nov 12:21:12 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.republican-creole