 | | Too many polygons AMD is going to merge with nVidia after buying ATI? Seems a bit farfetched. | |
|
 |  | | Re: Too many polygons The AMD intel lawsuit have help AMD when they win.
Also Intel may be in line for some brake ups if amd goes down. | |
|
 |  |  CheesePremium join:2003-10-26 Naples, FL kudos:1 | Re: Too many polygons said by Joe12345678:The AMD intel lawsuit have help AMD when they win. Also Intel may be in line for some brake ups if amd goes down. Huh....
Also, AMD isn't going anywhere. | |
|
 |  |  |  KrKHeavy Artillery For The Little GuyPremium join:2000-01-17 Tulsa, OK Reviews:
·AT&T DSL Service
| Re: Too many polygons AMD is in deep trouble. They've had nothing but problems and trouble with making competitive CPU's, performance wise Intel has them, and they keep missing deadlines and having to delay, delay, delay, all the while losing money hand over fist and having to keep seeking help with their debt. I want them to stay in the market, but they really are in bad shape at the moment. I don't see why they'd merge with Nvidia, tho. That would be a bad deal for Nvidia. Maybe IBM will buy AMD up (cheap).... -- "Regulatory capitalism is when companies invest in lawyers, lobbyists, and politicians, instead of plant, people, and customer service." - former FCC Chairman William Kennard (A real FCC Chairman, unlike the current Corporate Spokesperson in the job!) | |
|
 |  |  |  |  Reviews:
·Charter
| Re: Too many polygons said by KrK:AMD is in deep trouble. They've had nothing but problems and trouble with making competitive CPU's, performance wise Intel has them, and they keep missing deadlines and having to delay, delay, delay, all the while losing money hand over fist and having to keep seeking help with their debt. I want them to stay in the market, but they really are in bad shape at the moment. I don't see why they'd merge with Nvidia, tho. That would be a bad deal for Nvidia. Maybe IBM will buy AMD up (cheap).... Why do people forget they make more than just CPUs. They makes tons of items like Intel does. | |
|
 |  |  |  |  |  KrKHeavy Artillery For The Little GuyPremium join:2000-01-17 Tulsa, OK | Re: Too many polygons No, they really don't. | |
|
 |  |  |  |  |  |  CheesePremium join:2003-10-26 Naples, FL kudos:1 | Re: Too many polygons said by KrK:No, they really don't. Yes, they really do... | |
|
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  KrKHeavy Artillery For The Little GuyPremium join:2000-01-17 Tulsa, OK | Re: Too many polygons Ok look it up. AMD's products are all semi-conductors and related, and most of them are actually made thru partners. | |
|
 |  |  |  |  CheesePremium join:2003-10-26 Naples, FL kudos:1 | said by KrK:AMD is in deep trouble. They've had nothing but problems and trouble with making competitive CPU's, performance wise Intel has them, and they keep missing deadlines and having to delay, delay, delay, all the while losing money hand over fist and having to keep seeking help with their debt. I want them to stay in the market, but they really are in bad shape at the moment. I don't see why they'd merge with Nvidia, tho. That would be a bad deal for Nvidia. Maybe IBM will buy AMD up (cheap).... The Core 2 is the first chip in many years that Intel has any lead over AMD, and that has just been in the last, year or 2, up until then AMD was the performance king for many years. | |
|
 |  |  |  |  |  KrKHeavy Artillery For The Little GuyPremium join:2000-01-17 Tulsa, OK Reviews:
·AT&T DSL Service
| Re: Too many polygons said by Cheese:The Core 2 is the first chip in many years that Intel has any lead over AMD, and that has just been in the last, year or 2, up until then AMD was the performance king for many years. Yes, but AMD still owned a small percentage of the market even in their leading years, and much of that was on the products with lower margin. The problem is now AMD is well behind and won't have anything competitive for AT LEAST 18 months if they can hang on that long, and so Intel can force them to price cheap while keeping all the high end buyers (and the fat profits) for themselves.
Yes, AMD is in trouble. The biggest problem is they are saddled with massive debt they cannot escape from. They are losing a large amount of money every quarter. The stock price is today is $6.32, it was $16.19 in Oct '07. Current market conditions are making it very difficult for them to finance their debt.
It's say it's 50/50 AMD goes under within the next year. -- "Regulatory capitalism is when companies invest in lawyers, lobbyists, and politicians, instead of plant, people, and customer service." - former FCC Chairman William Kennard (A real FCC Chairman, unlike the current Corporate Spokesperson in the job!) | |
|
 WeSRT4 join:2000-11-20 Mobile, AL | Sprint I believe that they could probably add Sprint to this list.
AMD isn't going anywhere just yet. | |
|
 |  | | Re: Sprint That's what I came here to say | |
|
 |  | | I highly doubt Sprint will merge with anyone. Even if they wanted to, I'm not sure that it would be approved. I know there's been a few rumors going around, but I just don't really see it happening since they already merged with Nextel and it was a disaster.
IF they do merge, hopefully its with another CDMA carrier and not a GSM carrier (like T-Mobile), it would be a nightmare to operate 3 (4 if you count WiMAX) networks. | |
|
 |  |  | | Re: Sprint The T-mobile rumors that surfaced really didn't make any sense and were the musings of a few analysts with nothing better to do I suppose.
A Sprint-Alltel merger would make sense. In fact, probably too much sense for it to actually happen unfortunately...  | |
|
 | | Comcast can't buy charter..... Thank god. i don't want caps or to be throttled. i love my freedom. Hopefully Charter will hang in there. And if they do sell out lets hope they sign agreement to keep there system the way it is. NO CAPS, NO THROTTLE'S | |
|
 |  RobIn Deo speramus, God Bless the USAPremium join:2001-08-25 Kendall, FL kudos:2 | Re: Comcast can't buy charter..... said by LowRider:Thank god. i don't want caps or to be throttled. i love my freedom. Hopefully Charter will hang in there. And if they do sell out lets hope they sign agreement to keep there system the way it is. NO CAPS, NO THROTTLE'S Too funny. The same way you don't want Comcast, us Comcast customers don't want you! -- www.rr.cx - My Blog YourIP.US - It's Your IP .. and more! MySite.cx - Free URL Redirection Service. | |
|
 |  |  zed260Premium join:2007-09-30 Cleveland, TN kudos:1 | Re: Comcast can't buy charter..... what i think will happen to charter is it will be bought up by companys are already buying pieces of charter and i suspect that will continue eventually charter will have less and less customers | |
|
 |  |  |  | | Re: Comcast can't buy charter..... AT&T is to Verizon as Comcast will be to who? Comcast may have a hard time getting approval to buy Charter, at least with the current administration in place. | |
|
 |  |  | | said by Rob:Too funny. The same way you don't want Comcast, us Comcast customers don't want you! And how does that make any sense? lol | |
|
 |  |  |  RobIn Deo speramus, God Bless the USAPremium join:2001-08-25 Kendall, FL kudos:2 | Re: Comcast can't buy charter..... said by Monster Rain:said by Rob:Too funny. The same way you don't want Comcast, us Comcast customers don't want you! And how does that make any sense? lol He's already bitching about Comcast and they haven't even made a single public announcement of their interest in acquiring Charter. -- www.rr.cx - My Blog YourIP.US - It's Your IP .. and more! MySite.cx - Free URL Redirection Service. | |
|
 |  |  |  |  zed260Premium join:2007-09-30 Cleveland, TN kudos:1 | Re: Comcast can't buy charter..... i have to agree with him anyone but comcast would be okey id prefer time warner
ill go to satellite and get a t1 if comcast buys charter | |
|
 |  |  |  |  |  RobIn Deo speramus, God Bless the USAPremium join:2001-08-25 Kendall, FL kudos:2 | Re: Comcast can't buy charter..... said by zed260:i have to agree with him anyone but comcast would be okey id prefer time warner ill go to satellite and get a t1 if comcast buys charter lol | |
|
 |  |  |  |  |  |  zed260Premium join:2007-09-30 Cleveland, TN kudos:1 | Re: Comcast can't buy charter..... besides if comcast bought charter they'd be the biggest phone and cable provider in the country | |
|
 |  |  | | well i could care less about customers that are on the network but since you said it first guess Comcast is having more problems than we expected. must suck that your on a network that can't handle the load. | |
|
 |  |  |  RobIn Deo speramus, God Bless the USAPremium join:2001-08-25 Kendall, FL kudos:2 | Re: Comcast can't buy charter..... said by LowRider:well i could care less about customers that are on the network but since you said it first guess Comcast is having more problems than we expected. must suck that your on a network that can't handle the load. LOL. Not only do I get my advertised speeds, 24/7, but factor in powerboost and I'm getting very nice speeds.
 | |
|
 |  |  |  |  | | Re: Comcast can't buy charter..... so your point is what?(rhetorical) i was just stating something and you obviously took offense to it . | |
|
 |  |  |  |  |  RobIn Deo speramus, God Bless the USAPremium join:2001-08-25 Kendall, FL kudos:2 | Re: Comcast can't buy charter..... said by LowRider:so your point is what?(rhetorical) i was just stating something and you obviously took offense to it  . Oh, I didn't take offense to. | |
|
 Mactronel Camino RealPremium join:2001-12-16 CM94sv | Hope not.. "Qwest, on the other hand, is predicted to be on its way out of the market with Verizon cited as the most likely buyer of the company."
Hope not. Then VZ will continue focusing on large return cities and never make Fios available here.  -- If only the Verizon CSRs worked this well.  | |
|
 |  DrModemPremium join:2006-10-19 USA kudos:1 | Re: Hope not.. Well with Qwest you'll never have FIOS anyway, so what are you losing? | |
|
 |  |  |
 |  |  |  Anonymous_AnonymousPremium join:2004-06-21 127.0.0.1 kudos:2 Reviews:
·RoadRunner Cable
·Comcast
·Time Warner VOIP
1 edit | Re: Hope not.. said by Mactron:said by DrModem:Well with Qwest you'll never have FIOS anyway, so what are you losing? Any hope of Fios in a small already VZ DSL served city. That's what I'll lose. there is FIOS in palmdale rich side
SHITTEY ATnT in the poor east side
and it's very small city also -- Underwater bogeyman continues secret mission... | |
|
 |  dvd536as Mr. Pink as they comePremium join:2001-04-27 Phoenix, AZ kudos:4 | said by Mactron:"Qwest, on the other hand, is predicted to be on its way out of the market with Verizon cited as the most likely buyer of the company."Hope not. Then VZ will continue focusing on large return cities and never make Fios available here. Phoenix NEEDS some competition for cox. I could welcome fios coming here  Qwest just needs to die already! -- You can never be too rich, too thin or have too much Bandwidth | |
|
 | | amd, qwest Verizon would've bought Qwest already, if they wanted to. Plus, they don't want rural areas. They're been selling off unprofitable areas (no fios areas). Qwest should go it alone. They have a chance. Moving fios to Qwest territory would likely increase their network upgrade from around $24 bln to over $30 bln.
AMD buying ATi, then getting bought by Nvidia... While Intel is in the graphics business, they're nowhere near Nvidia. Look at the integrated graphics. AMD should've partnered with ATi, instead of just buying them.
That list mentioned Level 3! | |
|
 | | Analysts? since when are the people at wall street 24x7 considered reputable?
People have been saying this about all these companies listed for YEARS. Nothing will happen. Watch and see. | |
|
 |  | | Re: Analysts? said by ssdd :
since when are the people at wall street 24x7 considered reputable?
People have been saying this about all these companies listed for YEARS. Nothing will happen. Watch and see. For the most part I agree with this. | |
|
 |  NOYBSt. John 3.16Premium join:2005-12-15 Forest Grove, OR kudos:1 | Re: Analysts? - How to be a Prophet How to be a Prophet
Repeatedly recite the inevitable, you'll eventually be right.
| |
|
 TransmasterDon't Blame Me I Voted For Bill and Opus join:2001-06-20 Cheyenne, WY | Bullsh*t....More Sh*t....piled Higher, and Deeper I have been reading about the intimate demise of AMD for more then 20 years now. I wonder how many of these rumors have been started by Intel, or stock manipulators so they can short sell shares in AMD. -- Send a prayer to Allah, eat Beans. | |
|
 | | Mergers mergers everywhere of course, AT&T could just buy Qwest, thus further increasing the amount of people that can be wire-tapped -- "True Patriotism is more closely linked with dissent than it is to conformity and a blind desire for safety and security...I accept the definition of patriotism as that effort to resist abusive state power." -Ron Paul | |
|
 Test99Premium join:2003-04-24 San Jose, CA kudos:1 | Level 3 Level 3, one of the largest Internet backbone providers, is also on that list. The article says they have debts of $6.8 billion. -- 50775@fwd.pulver.com | |
|
 |  Sammer join:2005-12-22 Canonsburg, PA | Re: Level 3 Interesting, Verizon would probably be much more interested in acquiring Level 3 than Qwest. | |
|
 |  |  | | Re: Level 3 said by Sammer:Interesting, Verizon would probably be much more interested in acquiring Level 3 than Qwest. And what would they do with it? If I could remember correctly, they said they would use most of MCI's backbone for Fios, opposed to using it for other companies to use.
Level 3 is used by many cable companies, wireless companies, etc. They compete with the other network backbone companies, such as AT&T, Qwest, Global Crossing, Sprint, etc. | |
|
 |  |  |  nixenRockin' the BoxenPremium join:2002-10-04 Alexandria, VA | Re: Level 3 said by pepperxn:said by Sammer:Interesting, Verizon would probably be much more interested in acquiring Level 3 than Qwest. And what would they do with it? If I could remember correctly, they said they would use most of MCI's backbone for Fios, opposed to using it for other companies to use. A lot of which came by way of UUNet, in the first place...
said by pepperxn:Level 3 is used by many cable companies, wireless companies, etc. They compete with the other network backbone companies, such as AT&T, Qwest, Global Crossing, Sprint, etc. Always good for putting the squeeze on your competitors... -- The trouble with the world is that the stupid are cocksure and the intelligent are full of doubt. -- Bertrand Russell | |
|
 QuiglagGod is LovePremium join:2004-09-19 Ontario, CA | What about IBM? IBM would be more likely to buy AMD then anyone. After all IBM and AMD have teamed up in the past. They would both work well together. -- My Website & Gallery - Tool Reviews | |
|
 |  SnickerdoPremium join:2001-02-28 Niagara Falls, ON | Re: What about IBM? said by Quiglag:IBM would be more likely to buy AMD then anyone. They've been saying that for the last 15 years. | |
|
 Reviews:
·Optimum Online
·Verizon FiOS
| The Great Kreskin Everybody has predictions of what will happen in the future..
Unfortunately.. most of these are off the mark.. Aside from at least ONE Cable or Telephone company merger, sale or acquisition, spin-off.. SOMETHING happening.. none of the other companies are going anywhere..
For example, how many customers is Qwest actually hemorraging to change it's fundamental financial stability?
If QWEST went belly-up.. I'm more than sure that it would be relatively even split between Verizon & AT&T--with Verizon getting the crown jewels. Sprint is a more likely company to go belly up with real tangible customer losses piling up. | |
|
 |  | | Re: The Great Kreskin Qwest isn't going under any time soon (read decades) if at all. They are currently making (net) ~1.2 billion a year, and is giving a bunch of it away in the form of a stock dividend. While their debt is high compared to other RBOCs, it's not compared to other S&P 500 companies, and is coming down.
As for a purchase, as stated above, if Verizon wanted them, they would have bought them already. And while Qwest's share price is rather low, it's level of debt is not attractive. While there are some growth prospects, they are barely enough to keep up with pots losses, so revenue is rather stagnant to slightly declining. With a great network but no wireless, they seem to be more likely to stay on their own as the 3rd RBOC than to be bought, and some mergers that make sense to me don't appear to be in the cards (while a Sprint/Qwest merger seems appropriate, Sprint just spun off all their land lines and seem to have no desire to reenter the pots business, and Alltel seems to have no interest in pots).
What Qwest DOES need to do, IMHO, is to work with the cities who want to get fiber to the prem, such as Seattle, and get it done. Their FTTN is a start on some decent speeds, but FTTP is the future. And figure out a good wireless solution! | |
|
 |  |  Reviews:
·Insight Communic..
| Re: The Great Kreskin Alltel used to be in the POTS business in rual Ohio and i think that got sold off to Sprint who was also in the area, who then spun off all pots to embarq. So in Ohio there is a mix of at&t(Realy Ohio Bell dba AT&T Ohio) Verizon North (ex GTE) and Embarq (former company's bought all the outher lil pots operations) . | |
|
 |  |  |  | | Re: The Great Kreskin Alltel Landline = Windstream Communications
Sprint Landline = Embarq Communications | |
|
 |  ifarrell join:2000-08-10 Willow Spring, NC | I can see Sprint merging with Alltel and maybe US Cellular. | |
|
 |  |  | | Re: The Great Kreskin said by ifarrell:I can see Sprint merging with Alltel and maybe US Cellular. Alltel and US Cellular? While I would love to see that happen, Verizon Wireless and AT&T Mobility would shit bricks and spend millions on lawyers to block it. | |
|
 |
 backfeedis giving feedback join:2002-12-16 Peru, IN Reviews:
·Comcast
| How About!!! I'm Thinking......."ComTimeWarnCharzion-Sprineztel, Partnered with "HughDirectDish"...Now you can have the Sextuplet Play! ...Grocery delivery not available in all areas. Subject to early termination fee...Oil change service requires enrollment in optional lawn and garden monthly! -- ERROR: Out of Memory... Should I forget Something (Y,y)? | |
|
 |  | | Re: How About!!! Boga, Boga-boga, boga... do you want [just a minute hun] any 'backbone' with that, sir? And, will you be long on th...? | |
|
 Reviews:
·Comcast
| ugh I hate analysts and predictions... there is no way nvidia would jump on that sinking ship especially since they are going after VIA to make their own processors instead... plus AMD is not going away... they make way more then just processors... everyone seems to always overlook that fact... | |
|
 The BeerI Love It When A Plan Comes TogetherPremium join:2001-07-24 Atlantic, IA | Verizon Buy Qwest? In Omaha that would be so killer, problem is it would take too long to show benefit.
Qwest does have some big metros where FIOS could go.
I would love to see it in Omaha to put Cox back in to place and finish the fight USWest picked with them in 94. | |
|
 Jwobot join:2002-08-14 Sterling Heights, MI 1 edit | Private equity Since the rest of the country is catching up with Michigan, they could call Cerberus to help them out.  | |
|
 | | Anschutz Anschutz raped the company. Next string of CEO completed the process. Now Ed gets a payoff to merge it or sell it. Great leaders. Pillage and plunder. | |
|
 | | Qwest... Instead of being bought out by Verizon (or AT&T) which I doubt will happen, wouldn't it be interesting if Qwest were to enter into a "merger of equals" with Embarq?! | |
|
 |  | | Re: Qwest... Verizon or AT&T would've bought Qwest already, if they wanted to. I'm not saying there's no chance of this happening, but chances are slim. If it was Verizon, they probably won't buy it as it is now. They would either buy some parts (large cities), and leave the rest, or buy then sell the rural areas. I think AT&T has a better chance at making a bid for them. Verizon is focusing on wireless, and Fios.
Embarq would give Qwest a lot more customers, but the company has too much debt. Embarq has about $6.4 bln debt. Qwest is trying to lower their debt. Any acquisition that Qwest may make would be for companies with low debt. | |
|
 Reviews:
·Verizon FiOS
| Speculation! I really am not impressed by some wallstreet hack speculating.
I mean, come on, Sears? Chop and shop, that is the nature first. AMD? No way. Just because Apple uses Intel, doesn't mean its a good thing. AMD 64bit cpus were far faster, smaller and cooler running than (cough) Itanium. AMD just took in ATI and needs to settle through that purchase before showing a good deal. Level3? Now's the time to buy shares.  -- Weeeeeeee! | |
|
 | | doubtful I highly doubt VZ would buy Q. Qwest has a lot of debt, and serves mostly rural states. The biggest markets are Denver, Phoenix, and Seattle. VZ only wants dense population and affluence. Most of Qwest's markets don't meet both those criteria. Look at their sale of Verizon New England. They weren't investing in Maine and New Hampshire hardly at all. Also, many customers in rural Massachusetts don't have DSL either.
In addition, Qwest has probably been doing better than Verizon on serving rural areas. If the purchase was made, you'd only see fiber in a few areas, and areas that are only moderately profitable right now but are scheduled to get broadband upgrades probably wouldn't get them at all. | |
|
 |
|