dslreports logo
 story category
Authors Guild Wants ISPs Forced to Monitor, Filter Content

The Authors Guild would like it very much if the nation's broadband providers began monitoring the Internet and filtering it of all pirated materials. In a letter (pdf) sent to the House Judiciary Committee as it considers changes to copyright law and the DMCA, the Guild proclaimed that current broadband ISPs have been profiting on the back of piracy for years, and they should lose their safe harbor protections as a result.

Click for full size
Although Google and other Internet services providers ("ISPs") clearly have the means to keep their sites free of most pirated content, the Section 512 safe harbor rules have been applied to allow these wealthy commercial enterprises to sit quietly and private from pirates who use their platforms to traffic in stolen content," the Guild said.

"In reverse Robin Hood fashion, the safe harbor rules allow rich companies to become richer at the expense of the poor, robbing creators of hard-earned income and the creative economy of hundreds of millions of dollars a year," it stated.

The solution? The Guild wants ISPs to implement technology that monitors the Internet and filters it of all pirated content. Since ISPs pass on all costs to consumers, you, the broadband customer, would of course be funding this expanded game of Whac-A-Mole.

"It only makes sense, then, that ISPs should bear the burden of limiting piracy on their sites, especially when they are profiting from the piracy and have the technology to conduct automates searches and takedowns," the Guild declares.

Most recommended from 48 comments


Kearnstd
Space Elf
Premium Member
join:2002-01-22
Mullica Hill, NJ
kudos:2

Kearnstd

Premium Member

The ISPs are not the Copyright Police

This idea if theirs is as dumb as someone stating that its up to EZ-Pass to monitor cars entering the NJ Turnpike for drug smuggling.
big_e
join:2011-03-05

big_e

Member

If ISPs are responsible for facilitating piracy...

Then logically the ISPs are also responsible for all e-book sales as well. The ISPs should sue the authors guild to get their cut of e-book royalties. because without ISPs, there would be no e-book sales.

The authors guild has been profiting on the back of hard working ISPs who invested countless billions of dollars into infrastructure to build the technology to deliver their e-book platform, yet they never see a dime of the profits payed out to authors who have unduly benefited from their technology.

The authors guild should be careful of what they wish for. Should network neutrality be revoked, they just might get it.
wispalord
join:2007-09-20
Farmington, MO

wispalord

Member

so lets sue the DOT ....

for all the drugs that go down the highway the road is there for everyone and the few who violate it should not affect everyone else.... same principle the roads and hiways are isp and top tier providers, cars are the connected device and what's inside is the data so in that aspect why would something in your car be so bad you have to stop and search EVERY car on the road at ever interconnection point for what they deem illegal. With no warrant or no reason .. its basically the same thing

sraz
join:2013-10-28
Tucson, AZ
·CenturyLink

sraz

Member

Where is the line?

Well we have seen how effective these filters have been in the past, especially when they filter out perfectly legitimate content. Not to mention the problem with the actual monitoring of internet traffic intruding into privacy anyway...

These groups never understand that there is that fine line between curtailing copyright infringement and violating consumer privacy and free speech.

So should we place monitors and filters on free speech just because the Author's Guild asked nicely? I'd pass, thanks.

How about ..