Average U.S. Broadband Speed: 3.8Mbps Delaware remains the country's fastest state at 7.6 Mbps Akamai just released their latest " State of the Internet Report," (registration required) which every quarter covers a number of topics including broadband penetration, broadband speeds, security, and more. It's of particular interest to our readers, as the company gathers the data from clients that have hit their 56,000-strong global content server network, tracking 465 million unique IP addresses from 234 countries. The data of course provides unique data on speed specifically. In the United States, Akamai says that the average connection is now 3.8 Mbps, which places us twenty second among all tracked countries behind countries like Latvia and the Czech Republic. Despite faster DOCSIS 3.0 and fiber deployments in some markets, that average speed dropped 0.9 percent for the quarter, and 2.5 percent for the year according to the report. Why the slowdown? "Overall, we do not believe that this data is necessarily indicative of significant problems with the broadband infrastructure in the United States, nor do we believe that it points to insufficient availability of broadband services," explains the report. "Rather, as mentioned previously, we believe that mobile usage at sub-broadband speeds has grown to the point where it is exerting some amount of influence over the average data." The study also tracks the fastest individual cities and states. According to Akamai, Delaware retained its position as the fastest U.S. state, with an average downstream speed of 7.6 Mbps. Alaska had the highest percentage of connections to Akamai at speeds below 256 Kbps, at 10%. On the city level, Akamai says that Berkeley, California has the fastest average connection speed at 18730 kbps, while New York has the fastest average connection speed (5139 kbps) when measured by unique IP count. In the fourth quarter of 2009, more than one-fifth of all global connections to Akamai were at speeds faster than 5 Mbps.
|
 BigVe join:2005-07-15 Gulliver, MI 1 edit | Why care about average? Just give me some more speed.My 1.5Mbps is not even half of the average.No higher speeds available here in the foreseeable(and unforeseeable) future | |
|  |  |  KearnstdElf WizardPremium join:2002-01-22 Mullica Hill, NJ | Re: A nice summary of report if you don't want to register this is why we need to get IPv6 going or do a quick patch and get some of these firms who whole entire blocks of thousands or millions of IPs and never use them and never plan to use them. but they got them because they where wired to the original network.(MIT i hear has a multiple IP blocks they will never use)
NAT is the big hole in IPv6 to push it out you need to make it NAT compatible because most home users have a NAT router.
you also have to get the ISPs to change their business model of one IP per household since v6 would allow a huge pile of IPs per user. -- [65 Arcanist]Filan(High Elf) Zone: Broadband Reports | |
|  |  |  Romney2012Defeat Obama 2012-Chg we can believe inPremium join:2002-03-03 USA kudos:4 | Re: A nice summary of report if you don't want to register said by Kearnstd:this is why we need to get IPv6 going or do a quick patch and get some of these firms who whole entire blocks of thousands or millions of IPs and never use them and never plan to use them. but they got them because they where wired to the original network.(MIT i hear has a multiple IP blocks they will never use) And the numbers above are just the IPs being USED, since Akamai is only counting IP addresses that were logged on their servers. -- Are you happy with your rep in Washington, DC? | |
|  |  |  RARPSL join:1999-12-08 Suffern, NY | said by Kearnstd:NAT is the big hole in IPv6 to push it out you need to make it NAT compatible because most home users have a NAT router. IPv6 supports IPv4 type addresses so those home NAT boxes can keep their IPv4 Internet facing address and have their private IPv4 LAN just like now. All that is needed is for there to be a IPv4IPv6 router at the ISP's Head End and the packets can be IPv6 on the Internet side (they flow as IPv4 like now between the customer and the Head End like now only becoming IPv6 Packets when leaving the ISP).
you also have to get the ISPs to change their business model of one IP per household since v6 would allow a huge pile of IPs per user.
With IPv6 you get assigned a /48 to a /56. If needed, anything up to a /64 can be assigned (BTW: A /56 is the same as the current /32 connected to a NAT router so far as the user is concerned so long since it gives the same 256 sub networks). Anything between a /48 and a /64 gives the user at least one LAN network. A /48 gives 16 bits of network address to the user so the (ie: The same as all the old Class B addressing in terms of networks).
Note: The Last 64 bits are your Host Address so the smallest allocation is a /64 (which gives the user ONE LAN SUB-Network). | |
|
 |  |
 KearnstdElf WizardPremium join:2002-01-22 Mullica Hill, NJ | a note about Delaware if i am not mistaken most of the population of Delaware is in North. that is New Castle County which is being served by Comcast and is fully DOCSIS 3.0 wired. and also has spots gaining Verizon FiOS so outside of DSL and Dialup users you have a small state with most population in an area with slow speed being 12mbit on cable, 15 on FiOS and i am guessing Verizon DSL at 7mbit. -- [65 Arcanist]Filan(High Elf) Zone: Broadband Reports | |
|  |  | | Re: a note about Delaware Correct... which also helps explains the US's constant poor showing in these reports. Countries like Denmark, Japan etc. have smaller populations and more people per square mile than the US. By tons. Not saying that ISP's sticking it to the smaller less profitable markets doesn't suck but anyone in a decent sized city gets some good speeds at this point. The average US mbps number is worthless. | |
|
 Romney2012Defeat Obama 2012-Chg we can believe inPremium join:2002-03-03 USA kudos:4 | Here is an interesting chart - Global Internet Penetration
I found this chart interesting: Global Internet Penetration as measured by IPs in use per capita:

How does the number of unique IP addresses seen by Akamai compare to the population of each of those countries? Asked another way, what is the level of Internet penetration in each of those countries? Using global population data2 from the United States Census Web site as a baseline, levels of Internet penetration for each country around the world were calculated based on Akamais view into Internet traffic. These per capita figures should be considered as an approximation, as the population figures used to calculate them are static estimates obviously, they will change over time, and it would be nearly impossible to obtain exact numbers on a quarterly basis. In addition, individual users can have multiple IP addresses (handheld, personal/home system, business laptop, etc.). -- Are you happy with your rep in Washington, DC? | |
|  n2ubp join:2007-07-13 Middletown, NY | I will trade speed for reliability
My ADSL speed was increased over the past year but reliability has decreased. unresponsive, lots of errors, unable to connect, most connect failures requiring 24 response and repair time with a fix of "central office problem". blah! | |
|  kaila join:2000-10-11 Lincolnshire, IL 2 edits | Forced linesharing is paying off.... in terms of the growing amount of broadband competition in Europe and other parts of the world that have adopted it. Despite DOCSIS 3 and an increasing number of fiber installs in the US, the US will continue to slide farther for a while. At least until the providers in the more competitive parts of the world run out of money or customers to push things as fast as they are. -- Jeff Howe Jeff's Blog - »www.ostjournal.net | |
|  Paul928 join:2000-05-06 Haverhill, MA | it's sad!! The sad part about this whole thing is that in the United States we are not only slow, but most likely pay the most for those sub par speeds! | |
|  | | Latvia Latvia population: 2 million US population 307 million
Of course it should be just as easy to wire the US as Latvia.  | |
|  |  Reviews:
·Comcast
| Re: Latvia said by Bobcat:Latvia population: 2 million US population 307 million Of course it should be just as easy to wire the US as Latvia. That part made me laugh too. What a comparison! lol | |
|  |  BF69Premium join:2004-07-28 Camden, TN | said by Bobcat:Latvia population: 2 million US population 307 million Of course it should be just as easy to wire the US as Latvia. How about we compare by state.
Latvia 25,000 sq miles 2 million people Rhode Island 1,500 sq miles 1 million people
So Rhode Island should have an average of 50 Mbps but doesn't. | |
|  |  |  Reviews:
·RoadRunner Cable
| Re: Latvia said by BF69:said by Bobcat:Latvia population: 2 million US population 307 million Of course it should be just as easy to wire the US as Latvia. How about we compare by state. Latvia 25,000 sq miles 2 million people Rhode Island 1,500 sq miles 1 million people So Rhode Island should have an average of 50 Mbps but doesn't. I....I....I can't believe it. I actually agree with you. | |
|  |  |  BF69Premium join:2004-07-28 Camden, TN | said by BF69:said by Bobcat:Latvia population: 2 million US population 307 million Of course it should be just as easy to wire the US as Latvia. How about we compare by state. Latvia 25,000 sq miles 2 million people Rhode Island 1,500 sq miles 1 million people So Rhode Island should have an average of 50 Mbps but doesn't. I'll take it a step further. These states are all smaller than Latvia. So what's the problem?
West Virginia 24,087 sq miles; pop 1,819,777 Maryland 9,775 sq miles; pop 5,699,478 Vermont 9,249 sq miles; pop 621,760 New Hampshire 8,969 sq miles; pop 1,324,575 Massachusetts 7,838 sq miles; pop 6,593,587 New Jersey 7,418 sq miles; pop 8,707,739 Hawaii 6,423 sq miles; pop 1,295,178 Connecticut 4,845 sq miles; pop 3,518,288 Delaware 1,955 sq miles; pop 885,122 Rhode Island 1,045 sq miles; pop 1,053,209
| |
|  |  |  | | Please... and the largest chunk of Rhode Islands population is where? Whats the average mbps in those cities? Sure as shit higher than 3 mbps. | |
|
 | | Who cares These "fastest countries" studies are getting a little old. The US remains slower than a lot of countries partly (and largely) due to the fact that it covers a lot of geography and a ton of people. Good for Japan and its 100mbps. What's its geography and population density compared to the US? Exactly.
Also you have rural parts of the country dragging down the average. I live in Fresno (Clovis) CA... I can get 50mbps from Comcast and 20+ Mbps from AT&T. Plus Clearwire and local ISP's offer service. I currently run 22/5 Mbps on Comcast. Fresno is far from a major metro and my offerings are plenty fast to date. | |
|  |  | | Re: Who cares Not to mention that some of use choose to have a lower-speed 3 Mbps DSL connection instead of paying Cablevision's inflated rates for their faster service. | |
|  |  kaila join:2000-10-11 Lincolnshire, IL | The geography argument goes only so far. The door was shut on open access here in 2000, and we have been losing any hope of free market broadband competition and sliding down the world rankings ever since.
The Economist sums it up nicely: »www.economist.com/world/united-s···15732610 -- Jeff Howe Jeff's Blog - »www.ostjournal.net | |
|
 jimhsu join:2001-06-26 Sugar Land, TX Reviews:
·Comcast
| Berkeley? "Berkeley, California has the fastest average connection speed at 18730 kbps"
I'm in Berkeley, and unfortunately I don't see anything close to that. AT&T DSL - lucky if I get the advertised 3 Mbps/512 Kbps.
Of course they are talking about the campus connection ... 60 Mbps of sweet broadband goodness. Unfortunately, the transfer cap is 8 GB/week (which was an improvement from 5 GB/week a few years ago), so 17 minutes of full speed downloading cuts you off. Heck, downloading one Steam game probably pushes you over that limit. Kind of puts Comcast's transfer cap into perspective. | |
|  |  |  |  |  | | Re: Berkeley? im getting 50mb down and 5mb up here in grand forks, nd | |
|  |  |  jimhsu join:2001-06-26 Sugar Land, TX Reviews:
·Comcast
| Really though, I don't mind paying by the byte for transfer, as long as the rates are a) competitive, and b) adjust based on actual market supply. I ran some calculations a year ago and came up with $0.20/GB as a reasonable price (»tinyurl.com/y37z2r5). Now, it should be even lower. The argument about bandwidth costs primarily in the last mile is not really valid, because those are essentially fixed costs (of infrastructure) - thus, they would be included in your already existing monthly bill. | |
|
 IgnitePremium,VIP join:2004-03-18 UK | Flawed Per-City Stats Oxford, UK, rates in the top 5 in the world. Berkeley, another university town.
Oxford University has 135,680 IP addresses, most of which will be connected through rapid academic connections.
The city of Oxford only has a population of around 154,000. It is safe to surmise that there are more academic IP addresses than non-academic in Oxford. Doesn't mean Oxford is a super well connected fibre city.
If they want this to be taken seriously they need to remove anything with .ac in its' DNS. | |
|
 | |
|
|