republican-creole
site Search:


 
   
story category
BT Scales Back 'Fiber To The Press Release' Plans
If scaling back largely non-existent plans was possible...
by Karl Bode Tuesday 18-Nov-2008 tags: Fiber · business · world
Last December, UK telco British Telecom called running fiber to the home "premature," instead opting to milk copper for a little longer (like a few baby bells we know here in the States). Then last July, the telco stated that barring "regulatory certainty" (industry code for government doing exactly what the phone company tells them to) they'd be spending $3 billion to offer a combination of both fiber to the node (FTTN) and fiber to the home (FTTH) technology at speeds up to 100Mbps. As is usually the case, the press release was a little less sexy when you looked closely:

We will deliver both though the exact split will be driven by the interest shown by government and regional and local authorities. FTTP deployment will be focused primarily on new build sites such as Ebbsfleet and the Olympic Village whilst FTTN will be more prevalent elsewhere. Recent tests show the majority of ADSL2+ customers should enjoy speeds of around 10Mb or above with many getting substantially higher speeds. The technology is also improving all the time.

Investors and analyst are almost always nervous nancies about investing significant amounts back into the network, as they lack patience and want immediate returns. Now with a recession looming, BT investors are getting cold(er) feet about the already fairly unambitious plan, and apparently have urged British Telecom CEO Ian Livingston to hoard the company's cash for a rainy day. From the UK's Guardian:

"I have to tell you there are some shareholders who say 'you know something, don't (invest in more fiber), don't do a whole lot of other things. That leaves you with a lot more cash and cash today is worth a lot more than cash in a few years' time'," said Livingston.

The Register notes that the future of communications in the UK "means nothing to BT shareholders if it means that they might get reduced dividends." Investors, of course, have the luxury of fighting upgrade plans now, then abandoning ship later -- when competitors are eating an ISP's lunch because they figured they could cheap out on future proofing your network in the age of DOCSIS 3.0 and HD video. Good luck with that, British Telecom.

view: topics flat text 
Post a:

ThrowDemsOut
If you can't convince 'em, confuse 'em
Premium
join:2002-03-03
Mullica Hill, NJ
kudos:4

Lack of capital money to borrow will be part of decision

The Inquirer web site always puts a sensationalist anti-corporate slant on the facts. Make sure to read the original more neutral news item in the Guardian to get a less biased view.
»www.guardian.co.uk/business/2008···elecoms1

And for all companies, the current economic environment makes borrowing money for capital expansion very difficult. I am not surprised that the investors have serious concerns about a company taking on more debt at this time.
--
My BLOG .. .. Internet News .. .. My Web Page
Ask yourself one question: 'Do I feel lucky?' Well, do ya punk?

wifi4milez
Big Russ, 1918 to 2008. Rest in Peace

join:2004-08-07
New York, NY

Re: Lack of capital money to borrow will be part of decision

said by ThrowDemsOut:

The Inquirer web site always puts a sensationalist anti-corporate slant on the facts. Make sure to read the original more neutral news item in the Guardian to get a less biased view.
»www.guardian.co.uk/business/2008···elecoms1

And for all companies, the current economic environment makes borrowing money for capital expansion very difficult. I am not surprised that the investors have serious concerns about a company taking on more debt at this time.
Come on now, you know that there is nothing more important than faster broadband! Why worry about a little thing like debt when all end users are demanding GigE bandwidth at home.
--
Комитет государственной безопасности
Gogo1

join:2004-05-27
Brooklyn, NY
said by ThrowDemsOut:

The Inquirer web site always puts a sensationalist anti-corporate slant on the facts. Make sure to read the original more neutral news item in the Guardian to get a less biased view.
»www.guardian.co.uk/business/2008···elecoms1
FYI The Guardian is at least as left wing as the NYT if not more so.

ThrowDemsOut
If you can't convince 'em, confuse 'em
Premium
join:2002-03-03
Mullica Hill, NJ
kudos:4

Re: Lack of capital money to borrow will be part of decision

said by Gogo1:

said by ThrowDemsOut:

The Inquirer web site always puts a sensationalist anti-corporate slant on the facts. Make sure to read the original more neutral news item in the Guardian to get a less biased view.
»www.guardian.co.uk/business/2008···elecoms1
FYI The Guardian is at least as left wing as the NYT if not more so.
I agree. But it at least is more professional and reasonable than the oft-quoted here at BBR "the Inquirer".
--
My BLOG .. .. Internet News .. .. My Web Page
Ask yourself one question: 'Do I feel lucky?' Well, do ya punk?

Saturday, 11-Feb 22:17:30 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online! © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.