republican-creole
Search:  

 
 
   News
newer
story category Broadband Stimulus A Big Verizon Pay Day
Could reap billions for doing nothing differently...
(old news - 03:25PM Friday Jan 30 2009)
tags: legal · coverage · business · Politics · Verizon FIOS
As we just got done saying, the Senate's version of the stimulus bill not only offers $9 billion in loans to companies who deliver broadband service to rural areas, but it also offers some very tasty tax credits -- something pushed for by incumbent lobbyists. Some of these credits, as the New York Times explores, will be doled out for doing virtually nothing differently. Verizon is the biggest potential benefactor of the bill's new language, standing to net $1.6 billion in tax cuts the next two years.

Click for full size
Unlike the House bill, the Senate stimulus plan would give carriers a 10% tax credit for building out high-speed Internet ("defined as 5Mbps/1Mbps) in rural and underserved areas, and a 20% credit for bringing "next gen" (defined as 100Mbps/20Mbps) speeds to both underserved and existing areas.

Given Verizon has said that their FiOS service will hit 100Mbps in a year or two (even if that metric is more marketing than necessity), they'll obviously be the first major carrier to reap the rewards. At least until cable operators upgrade to DOCSIS 3.0, which is supposedly what the bill's language is aimed at speeding up.

Comcast and Charter, who offer DOCSIS 3.0 speeds at 50/5Mbps and 60Mbps/5Mbps respectively, would obviously need to offer a 100Mbps/20Mbps tier to qualify, potentially testing upstream capacity. Meanwhile, the fastest speed AT&T offers to VDSL U-Verse customers is 18Mbps, though users with short loop lengths can technically achieve much faster speeds. Qwest's ADSL2+ service -- which tops out at 20Mbps/896kbps, would leave them litttle chance of benefiting -- which is probably why Qwest has been pouting about the plan publicly.

The Times also notes that while network neutrality language is tied to the $9 billion in grants, the billions in potential tax credits come with no such restrictions. That's not of much concern to Verizon, given they don't throttle or discriminate against protocols (yet). The differences in the House and Senate versions of the bill will be hashed out the next few weeks, with a final bill ready for passage by mid-February.

Related:
  1. Verizon Continues Proud History Of Denial
  2. FCC Launches New Broadband Plan Blog
  3. Verizon Union Workers Fight Layoffs
  4. Cable Operators Now Wary Of Connected Nation?
  5. Connected Nation Takes Inside Track On Minnesota Mapping, Too
  6. Verizon: We're Not Setting Broadband Definition Bar Low
  7. What Network Neutrality Is REALLY About
  8. Boston Wonders Where Its FiOS Is
Forums » Broadband Stimulus A Big Verizon Pay Day
view: topics flat text 
Post a:

major marco
Res Firma Mitescere Nescit
Premium
join:2003-02-13
Stepford, CA
clubs:

Told you so

The Times also notes that while network neutrality language is tied to the $9 billion in grants, the tax credits come with no such restrictions.
Ha.

GOLFnSUN
Enjoy the sun
Premium
join:2002-03-03
Avalon, NJ
·Sprint Mobile Broa..
·Comcast

Re: Told you so

said by major marco See Profile :

The Times also notes that while network neutrality language is tied to the $9 billion in grants, the tax credits come with no such restrictions.
Ha.
The Senate and House bills differ. When this goes to a House/Senate conference committee to hash out differences, who knows what will still remain in the final bill. It ain't over til the fat lady sings.
--
My BLOG .. .. Internet News .. .. My Web Page

SLD
Premium
join:2002-04-17
·Comcast


2 edits

Re: Told you so

Its been over for the past 6 years, and Obama isn't going to change anything. I wish I was wrong, but every law that gets signed leaves the people with their pants around their ankles regardless how much hemming and hawing the puffy faces do beforehand.
jc100

join:2002-04-10

Re: Told you so

Bush, Obama, etc are politicians. You actually put stock in what they say? Thats cute. Both suck. One side more so than the other with their ignorance and bigotry. However, both parties are absolutely useless. Obama could look me in the eye and promise me the sun, moon, and the starts. I wouldn't believe the first word out of his mouth. Maybe he does think he can make a difference. However, even if he was the best man in the world (which once again I doubt), he has lobbyists with big pockets to corrupt bills. Like any good politician, he will just tout the positives, and ignore the pork stuck into them. Legislation today is never clear cut. There are always tons of riders / addendums on ever bill these days. A bill that increases education might also:

Give money tot he NRA
Give money to faith based
Build 10 zoos
Pave roads
etc

With lobbyists hard at work buying our Democracy, few bills (if any) stay within their original intent. The U.S. is far from a democracy. We might "elect" our officials, but lobbyists are the ones who end up having the final say on the laws. The deeper their pockets, the more of them you get to write. Hence, we should be electing them, over the people who smile at us during campaigning season, and promise us everything and give nothing.

So will we see 100/20 universally any time soon? Doubtful. Matter of fact, we shouldn't be given PRIVATE COMPANIES a single penny. Hence the term private. I don't own them. I shouldn't be footing the bill for bad management. This 700 billion and 800 billion should be going STRAIGHT TO OUR POCKETS. IE ab out 10,000 dollars per person. 150 million working and 1.5 trillion total. You want to boost our economy. Give it to people who are going to pay bills and hoard the rest. IE there you go banks, here's an injection of money as people toss it into their savings.

Anyway, AS MUCH AS I WOULD LOVE US to be a wired nation (like sweden, japan, korea), our government is NOT SMART ENOUGH to see the money is used properly that it hands out. Rather than wasted on empty promises, just give it back to us.

/End Rant

Eat Me

join:2002-09-25
Sussex, NJ

FTTH

Hopefully it will encourage a lot of providers, both cable and telco to deploy FTTH.

I don't think it will be reality though, but we will see.

Hey, who knows it might just get Embarq off their butt here.
soothsayer15

join:2002-03-01
Irving, TX

Re: FTTH

Just because they "planned to do" upgrades doesn't mean they would have. Surprising from this site sine there is so much talk about cherry picking. In this economy, plans mean squat. Wasn't there a story just the other day about AT&T slowing down their U-Verse roll out.

The title was probably more to get the chickens clucking than anything else since Verizon is a regional provider and the stimulus is national. That's the whole point of a stimulus, to give companies the incentive to upgrade and/or expand. Given the number of people on this site who want their providers to upgrade service in their area, I don't see why this would be a negative. If cable companies upgrade their service , even better. Competition benefits the consumer.

Eat Me

join:2002-09-25
Sussex, NJ

Re: FTTH

huh? How does that relate to my post?
nasadude

join:2001-10-05
Rockville, MD
·Comcast


2 edits
money that goes to ANY of the large, incumbent providers will be wasted.

maybe not totally wasted, depends on what the penalties will be for noncompliance with requirements - if there are any.

quote:
Mr. Hodulik, however, said that the tax credits might well encourage the company to accelerate its plans and run FiOS past more homes over the next two years.
what if the credits don't encourage them? money WASTED

from gigaom:

»gigaom.com/2009/01/30/slowdown-h···rs-hard/

quote:
The current economic slowdown is beginning to hurt telecom equipment makers, and their prospects aren’t likely to change much in 2009, as indicated by the spending plans outlined by some of the major service providers.

For instance, AT&T said that it will cut its capex spend by 10-15 percent, or about $3 billion, and moderate its U-verse expansion plans. Verizon hasn’t been quite as blunt about its plans, but analysts expect the company to tighten its belt as well, and its suppliers are already starting to feel the hurt.
doesn't sound like providers are planning to accelerate anything except maybe layoffs.
PDXPLT

join:2003-12-04
Banks, OR

Fine with me...

If a 10% tax credit gooses Verizon into agreeing to sell DSL in my neighborhood, that's fine with me ...
blackriders

join:2005-01-16
Bronx, NY

High speed

Does this mean we'll finally be able to compete with South Korea and Japan.
I would love to have 50/50 or 100/100 for what i'm paying with cablevision right now. 30/5 So I can't really complain
iansltx

join:2007-02-19
Golden, CO
·Comcast
·Qwest.net
·magicjack.com
·BeeCreek Communica..
·Sprint Mobile Broa..

Re: High speed

100/20 would be awesome. Wouldn't need to host servers in a datacenter; could do all that stuff at home, albeit with more risk of power failure etc. I suppose. Then again, no colo costs

Eat Me

join:2002-09-25
Sussex, NJ
·PenTeleData
·Future Nine Corpor..
·VOIPo
·Vonage

Re: High speed

said by iansltx See Profile :

100/20 would be awesome. Wouldn't need to host servers in a datacenter; could do all that stuff at home, albeit with more risk of power failure etc. I suppose. Then again, no colo costs
Most residential ISPs forbid servers.

OOL allows it with boost but they also restrict its use. For example, you cannot host forums on an OOL boost connection.
iansltx

join:2007-02-19
Golden, CO

Re: High speed

No forums? That's rather odd...

As to the hosting ban, just get biz-class service. On FiOS it's 90 more for 50/20 but that includes a static IP. Price per megabit? Cheap, especially for downloads.

Eat Me

join:2002-09-25
Sussex, NJ

Re: High speed

Yeah, popular forums are typically bandwidth hogs.
iansltx

join:2007-02-19
Golden, CO
·Comcast
·Qwest.net
·magicjack.com
·BeeCreek Communica..
·Sprint Mobile Broa..

Re: High speed

And popular forums require decent hardware, which is easier to run out of your house than in a datacenter, cost-wise. OTOH the forum I run only has maybe ten people online at most, gets a few posts per day, and might use 5GB of bandwidth per month, if that.

Eat Me

join:2002-09-25
Sussex, NJ
·PenTeleData
·Future Nine Corpor..
·VOIPo
·Vonage

Re: High speed

Actually you can do it on a regular hosting plan which isn't that expensive, or virtual machines.

In fact you can use Amazon EC2 and do it pay as you go if you're concerned about cost.

That's how woot.com scale infinitely for minimal cost.

It's always better to host a website outside of your home unless it's a small website you don't really care about. They have multiple paths to the internet, power, cooling, redundancy and 24x7 support.

Most server cages also have >1GBps connectivity to the internet.
iansltx

join:2007-02-19
Golden, CO
·Comcast
·Qwest.net
·magicjack.com
·BeeCreek Communica..
·Sprint Mobile Broa..

Re: High speed

Most low-end servers only have a 10 Mbps port...still...100 Mbps is very average, particularly for web hosts. As to regular hosting and virtual private servers, I have both. The forum in question actually is on ZetaBoards, a free ad-supported (I have ad removal so I can put my own ads on there) service just for forums.

As to Woot, last I checked their servers aren't all via Amazon, though image serving was. May have changed since then though.

But for some people, having an unfettered broadband connection, and incredibly easy access to their server, if worth the heat, noise, etc. of hosting it in-house.

Eat Me

join:2002-09-25
Sussex, NJ

Re: High speed

Most servers come with gige ports standard now or at least the servers I've bought over the last year or so.

And yes woot is all on EC2. The images are on s3. They use Rightscale as well.
iansltx

join:2007-02-19
Golden, CO

DOCSIS and Fiber

Unfortunately for cable providers, they'll have to do upstream channel bonding and 4-channel downstream bonding to get to 100/20 speeds. Verizon on the other hand can use existing GPON infrastructure. Epic fiber win.

DrModem
Premium
join:2006-10-19
USA

Re: DOCSIS and Fiber

Well that's the CableCos fault for being slow, greedy and stupid isn't it?

DaveNJ
No Fear

join:1999-09-01
New Jersey
·Comcast
·Patriot Media

Re: DOCSIS and Fiber

said by DrModem See Profile :

Well that's the CableCos fault for being slow, greedy and stupid isn't it?
You have the argument backward. Cablecos (mostly) are years ahead of telcos. If cable wanted to go all fiber, it would just be home to node runs. Most if not all of the cablecos are entirely fiber, except to the residents. Notice how easily cables offered phone, and look how hard it is for telcos to offer tv.
--
Communism doesn't work because people like to own stuff - Frank Zappa


baineschile
2600
Premium
join:2008-05-10
Sterling Heights, MI
·Comcast
·magicjack.com
·Verizon Wireless B..

Re: DOCSIS and Fiber


"Utility" need for speeds above 50mb: 0
Marketing 50mb and above: cool for the next 2 years
Cost per customer for cable to upgrade: $50
Cost per customer for verizon to run ftth: $4000

Concerning resedential accounts, a very small population actually use enough bandwidth to warrant a 50mb connection.

espaeth
Digital Plumber
Premium,MVM
join:2001-04-21
Minneapolis, MN
·voip.ms
·Vitelity VOIP
·Callcentric
·VoiceStick
·ViaTalk
·Comcast
·Embarq

Re: DOCSIS and Fiber

said by baineschile See Profile :

Cost per customer for verizon to run ftth: $4000
Reportedly their costs are down around $750 per home passed + $700 in equipment for each home they hook up now. Things are looking a bit better for Verizon, but still not cheap.

Actually, if you consider their current adoption rate of 25% for FiOS, your numbers aren't too far off. If you assume 4 FiOS-available homes ($750 x 4) + $700 in equipment per user that signs up for FiOS, that's $3700.

said by baineschile See Profile :

Concerning resedential accounts, a very small population actually use enough bandwidth to warrant a 50mb connection.
Very true.

Of course, most wont agree because that small portion of broadband users is uniquely well represented in this forum.
Ahrenl

join:2004-10-26
North Andover, MA

Re: DOCSIS and Fiber

I'd imagine almost none of the population use enough bandwidth to warrant a 50mb connection, BECAUSE THEY DON'T HAVE THE BANDWIDTH.

Eat Me

join:2002-09-25
Sussex, NJ
Wow, I see the fibre fanboi's are quick on the draw.
iansltx

join:2007-02-19
Golden, CO
·Comcast
·Qwest.net
·magicjack.com
·BeeCreek Communica..
·Sprint Mobile Broa..

Re: DOCSIS and Fiber

2.4/1.2 Gbps shared with 32 users vs. 304/120 shared with many more people...as little as 50, as much as 500, usually around 250. And that's with eight channel downstream bonding and four channel upstream bonding. unfortunately coax just can't compete.

Eat Me

join:2002-09-25
Sussex, NJ
·PenTeleData
·Future Nine Corpor..
·VOIPo
·Vonage


1 edit

Re: DOCSIS and Fiber

You're comparing today's technology.

Coax is just a medium and is capable of far more than what is available at the headend today.

In fact, FTTH would be a relatively simple upgrade. I'm withing walking distance to my fiber node, as are many others.

aaronwt
Premium
join:2004-11-07
Woodbridge, VA
·Verizon FIOS
·Comcast

But I'm still on BPON.

said by iansltx See Profile :

2.4/1.2 Gbps shared with 32 users vs. 304/120 shared with many more people...as little as 50, as much as 500, usually around 250. And that's with eight channel downstream bonding and four channel upstream bonding. unfortunately coax just can't compete.
iansltx

join:2007-02-19
Golden, CO

Re: DOCSIS and Fiber

They'll upgrade you when they smell money. Plus, it's still better than 8/4 channel-bonded DOCSIS.
Oregonian2

join:2008-07-16
Beaverton, OR
·Verizon FIOS
·SpiritOne / Aracne..

BPON which is 622 Mbps download split among 16 or possibly 32 users still isn't bad (the full bandwidth is being delivered to each customer and theoretically could be used if allowed using statistical multiplexing). It's what I have now (only 20/5), but look forward to upgrades someday.

Matt
Gone playing Dragon Age Origins
Premium
join:2003-07-20
Jamestown, NC
·North State Commun..

said by Eat Me See Profile :

Wow, I see the fibre fanboi's are quick on the draw.
The funniest part is aside from the speed differences, fiber is just the same as cable from an end user perspective. Perhaps I'm in a good area for cable, but aside from the upstream speed advantage my fiber has, I doubt I could tell you which was which if you placed them side-by-side and let me browse the web.

Eat Me

join:2002-09-25
Sussex, NJ

Re: DOCSIS and Fiber

I can tell you for a fact that in some countries cable is marketed as a "fiber" connection.

At work I have a 100/100 connection and at home I have 30/2. I honestly can't really tell the difference when surfing either.
BosstonesOwn

join:2002-12-15
Everett, MA
clubs:
·Comcast
·Comcast Formerly ..

Re: DOCSIS and Fiber

Depends what your pipe to the net really is.

I have gig ethernet right to the internet and I can see a major difference in speeds. I can pull in iso's from most major companies even linux distros at over 20 MB a sec. nothing like clicking and within 30 seconds having the iso ready to burn.
--
"It's always funny until someone gets hurt......and then it's absolutely friggin' hysterical!"
cotm

join:2005-08-18
Winchester, VA
Yes you may see no difference when simply browsing but in my world, pings are different and there is no such thing as
having my connection throttled in fios when i upload a folder of photos to an off site webpage.

Eat Me

join:2002-09-25
Sussex, NJ

Re: DOCSIS and Fiber

PIng time is not a problem:



I'm also not throttled any time of day or night.
majortom1029

join:2006-10-19
Lindenhurst, NY

hmm

question would cablevision get any of this money? Are any parts of there service area considered rural?

i can see cablevision easily offering a say 100/20 tier for $100 once they complete their docsis 3 trials

Eat Me

join:2002-09-25
Sussex, NJ

Re: hmm

Good question. I have a friend who lives in Hewitt and it's out in the sticks and he has cablevision/OOL.

pende_tim
Premium
join:2004-01-04
Andover, NJ
·ProLog
·ViaTalk
·Verizon Online DSL

said by majortom1029 See Profile :

question would cablevision get any of this money? Are any parts of there service area considered rural?

i can see cablevision easily offering a say 100/20 tier for $100 once they complete their docsis 3 trials
That, my friend, will be the $9 Billion dollar question: "Who is Rural? and undeserved?"

Tim
--
The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits.
patcat88

join:2002-04-05
Jamaica, NY

Re: hmm

said by pende_tim See Profile :

That, my friend, will be the $9 Billion dollar question: "Who is Rural? and undeserved?"

Tim
It doesn't matter, no enforcement actions exist in law to determine whether it was spent on rural and underserved areas or not, courtesy of the OMB.

Swallx

@eerprogramming.com

I will be happy to get any Broadband what so ever.

I live in ohio, I live less than 3 miles from the center of a larger town, and cant even get decent telephone service from verizon, let alone broadband. I dont live in town, but I certainly dont live in the boondocks either..

I used to live 30 mins from the closest town with more than 5000 people, and in mountainous area and had broadband via AT&T..

as far as I am concerned Verizon is the Devil 0 Customer support.. crappy service, uneducated service techs, the list goes on and on ..


CaptainRR
Premium
join:2006-04-21
Blue Rock, OH

Re: I will be happy to get any Broadband what so ever.

Your not alone and you must have been in the right place to get AT&T broadband in the past out in the boondocks. I have AT&T out in the boondocks of Ohio and I pretty much only have a telephone. I wouldnt count Verizon as being a devil AT&T in most rural places isnt much better.
cooldude9919

join:2000-05-29
Cape Girardeau, MO
clubs:

Good for them

I hope verizon does get a lot of the tax credits. At least they are already spending the capital and getting fiber to the people. Everyone else is lagging behind.

Hopefully this will speed up docsis 3 deployment as suggested, because charters new 60mb is my only chance at anything really high speed around here.

See 8 replies to this post
cableman0327

join:2004-10-10
Westminster, MD

Fios Sucks

Wastful spending on a Hummer!!!!
cotm

join:2005-08-18
Winchester, VA

Re: Fios Sucks

Nice try cable boy. I live in your world work in the other.
I KNOW what I Can't have. And if this would encourage the company I work for to give me the service I see every day of my life, I'll drop you like a hot potato.

CylonRed
Premium,MVM
join:2000-07-06
Bloom County

Of course the stimulus is needed becuase of the extra cash..

broadband created for the economy.... or does it!?!?!?

»tech.yahoo.com/news/nm/20090130/···d_jobs_2

quote:
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A co-author of a widely cited forecast that nearly 300,000 U.S. jobs would be created for every percentage point rise in high-speed Internet use said on Friday these and similar estimates are "a gross overestimate."

"There is a great deal of overstatement in most of these studies," said Robert Crandall, a Brookings Institution economist and co-author of the frequently-cited paper with that estimate.

U.S. lawmakers are proposing grants between $6 billion to $9 billion and tax credits to encourage investment in high- speed Internet, as part of an economic stimulus plan winding its way through Congress costing up to $900 billion.

The 300,000 jobs estimate has been used in newspapers and cited by other publications advocating investment in high-speed Internet, or broadband.

The Brookings Institution study, published in July 2007, is not particularly relevant now because of differing employment and related migration trends at the time of the study, Crandall said.

Attempting to extrapolate it nationwide at this time is a "gross overstatement," he said.

Most the data on jobs and broadband is not relevant because it doesn't apply to underserved, mostly rural and high cost areas targeted in the stimulus package, said Shane Greenstein, a professor at Northwestern University's Kellogg School of Management.

"The experience of Manhattan in 2005 has no relationship to the experience in West Texas," Greenstein said.
--
Brian

"It drops into your stomach like a Abrams's tank.... driven by Rosanne Barr..." A. Bourdain
patcat88

join:2002-04-05
Jamaica, NY

wait till the lawyers get this

How long before Verizon sues that the requirements for the money are unconstitutional and they get the money for free?

meh37

@verizon.net

"...billions for doing nothing differently"

Is that a criticism of the Senate for another "ineffective" piece of legislation? or praise for Verizon for already doing "the right thing"? ...both?

...just curious.

See 6 replies to this post

Tandeddu

@comcast.net

Rural Areas...

Please help me understand:
$9B for broadband to rural areas and Verizon FIOS?
I think Verizon and the cable companies will all go thru multiple cost benefit analysis before deciding to whether run fiber out to "rural" areas. Let's face it alot of the areas that aren''t covered at this point are remote and can go quite a distance between homes. Enough of a distance that there may not be a return on investment even with a large government subsidy. It's not just the initial capital outlay to run the connection... it's the on-going support.

GOLFnSUN
Enjoy the sun
Premium
join:2002-03-03
Avalon, NJ
·Sprint Mobile Broa..
·Comcast

Re: Rural Areas...

All this gov't expenditure is supposed to create jobs thru broadband expansion. Guess what?? It won't create jobs.

The guy who wrote the study showing broadband creates a lot of jobs throws cold water on his own study and says people misinterpreted the results and are wrong.

I guess that shoots a big hole in the whole justification for gov't spending huge bucks to expand broadband.
»tech.yahoo.com/news/nm/20090130/···and_jobs
"We believe the current plans are unlikely to stimulate private sector investment in unserved areas," King said.

King, concurring with several Wall Street analysts, said tax credits for ultra-fast Internet speeds for underserved areas would likely only benefit Verizon Communications Inc and perhaps some cable companies.

A co-author of a widely cited forecast that nearly 300,000 U.S. jobs would be created for every percentage point rise in high-speed Internet use said on Friday these and similar estimates are "a gross overestimate."

Most the data on jobs and broadband is not relevant because it doesn't apply to underserved, mostly rural and high cost areas targeted in the stimulus package, said Shane Greenstein, a professor at Northwestern University's Kellogg School of Management.

--
My BLOG .. .. Internet News .. .. My Web Page
Sammer

join:2005-12-22
Canonsburg, PA


1 edit
said by Tandeddu :

Please help me understand:
$9B for broadband to rural areas and Verizon FIOS?
I think Verizon and the cable companies will all go thru multiple cost benefit analysis before deciding to whether run fiber out to "rural" areas. Let's face it alot of the areas that aren''t covered at this point are remote and can go quite a distance between homes. Enough of a distance that there may not be a return on investment even with a large government subsidy. It's not just the initial capital outlay to run the connection... it's the on-going support.
Yes there will be cost benefit analysis and this may very well tip some of the areas that Verizon was considering selling off into the FiOS column. Remember that Verizon's landlines are primarily in the Northeast and Mid-Atlantic regions and fiber actually reduces on-going support costs. $1.6 Billion in tax credits is money that Verizon could and probably would (why would the long-term shareholders complain?) use for FiOS expansion.
bobny1

join:2004-09-10
Bronx, NY


1 edit

Amazing!!

Woldn't be cheaper to move rural people to the city?. Who needs internet in a farm?. Give me a brake!. Take that freaking money an help people stay in their homes and feed their children. The idea is very noble but not in tough times. It is just another politics as usual BS.

farmboy

@pioneer.com

Who needs the internet on a farm??

I happen to live and work on a farm and we have always attempted to have the best internet connection, from dial-up, to Satellite and now to EVDO. You suggest that we dont "deserve" this connection because we live in a rural area. We rely on the internet for accurate and current weather information/radar, to monitor the ever-increasing volatile commodity markets, to place and sell farm produce and merchandise, and to stream information from remote pivot's and tractors to monitor their operation. I would say we "deserve" an internet connection more so than a suburban neighborhood where the vast majority of bandwidth is used to stream movies, download music and other forms of entertainment... And I realize that it isnt "fair" to subsidize the rural areas but what people fail to remember is that alot of metropolitan areas were once rural. The increase in services such as electricity, tv, roads, and yes even broadband can foster the growth of a rural area into an urban one.
Forums » Broadband Stimulus A Big Verizon Pay Day


Sunday, 08-Nov 19:03:56 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.