|
They been at it since 2007I left rogers in 2008 because of this crap they pulled. I think that's why I initially came here. I was a huge rogers supporter up until Feb 2007. Then they started pulling crap and lying to me.
I think it looks good on them, I hope they keep getting fined until they stop with the crap. | |
|
| Paul416 Premium Member join:2003-07-25 Brampton, ON |
Paul416
Premium Member
2012-Jan-25 9:52 am
Re: They been at it since 2007So why can't Rogers customers sue Rogers now for fraud . they list service which they obvious don't supply ? I would like to start a sue against Rogers if possible ? | |
|
| | MashikiBalking The Enemy's Plans join:2002-02-04 Woodstock, ON |
Mashiki
Member
2012-Jan-25 10:46 am
Re: They been at it since 2007A class action would probably be the best option. But the real question is, is it viable. Our CA have different requirements to be validated. | |
|
| | | resa1983 Premium Member join:2008-03-10 North York, ON |
resa1983
Premium Member
2012-Jan-25 11:11 am
Re: They been at it since 2007I was actually contacted in the summer regarding a class action against Rogers due to my CRTC complaint and research regarding the wow issue...
They were more interested in getting cash from Rogers, and didn't really care about the issue getting fixed, so Jason & I told him we weren't interested. | |
|
| Mr_Fix_It Premium Member join:2009-03-01 Orillia, ON |
to cpsycho
If their license to sell internet was on the line they would respond.
Short of that they will do nothing and tell the CRTC to stop interfering with their right to manage traffic anyway they see fit.
What really needs to happen is a class action suit for testing and using DPI on a public network against every ISP involved.
Customers didn't pay to have their internet throttled, they paid to use the internet at a "an up to" package speed which has be regarded as false and misleading advertising.
If I am paying for a 5mb package and my line is capable of 15mb. Why am I only getting 4mb if they can actually get 15mb ? Why is my profile not set to receive exactly 5mb ?
| |
|
| |
to cpsycho
This probably explains the Feb 1 price increase. | |
|
|
Mike416
Anon
2012-Jan-25 9:50 am
Sue Rogers for fraudSo why can't the customers sue Rogers now for fraud . they list service which they obvious don't supply ? I would like to start a sue against Rogers if possible ? | |
|
|
Do u still payFor ld calls on most plans?
I find it kinda awkward. There are no regional plans for most part in the us anymore, and in Europe u only pay for ld/roaming charges once u leave a country. | |
|
| J E F F4Whatta Ya Think About Dat? Premium Member join:2004-04-01 Kitchener, ON |
J E F F4
Premium Member
2012-Jan-26 10:47 am
Re: Do u still paysaid by chgo_man99:For ld calls on most plans?
I find it kinda awkward. There are no regional plans for most part in the us anymore, and in Europe u only pay for ld/roaming charges once u leave a country. There are plans you can get, like 500 minutes or you can choose a third party. | |
|
|
Chucks Truck
Anon
2012-Jan-25 11:13 am
Rogers doesn't careFebruary the 3rd will come and go and everyone will just forget about it and in another 5 years the issue of net neutrality will be brought up again. | |
|
| resa1983 Premium Member join:2008-03-10 North York, ON |
resa1983
Premium Member
2012-Jan-25 2:26 pm
Re: Rogers doesn't caresaid by Chucks Truck :February the 3rd will come and go and everyone will just forget about it and in another 5 years the issue of net neutrality will be brought up again. They won't let the Feb 3rd deadline come & go, otherwise they get hauled in front of a hearing, in which case.... CRTC really can do anything to Rogers. | |
|
| | |
Chucks Truck
Anon
2012-Jan-25 4:25 pm
Re: Rogers doesn't careRogers will do nothing and come February the 3rd the CRTC will also do nothing about it either. Remember this is Canada everything is rigged in favour of Rogers. | |
|
|
derekm
Member
2012-Jan-25 3:18 pm
laws?quote: after the nation imposed new neutrality laws
Umm... I think you're giving Canada too much credit. I think these were more "recommendations" than "laws". | |
|
| resa1983 Premium Member join:2008-03-10 North York, ON |
resa1983
Premium Member
2012-Jan-25 3:37 pm
Re: laws?said by derekm:quote: after the nation imposed new neutrality laws
Umm... I think you're giving Canada too much credit. I think these were more "recommendations" than "laws". Its not laws or recommendations. Its policy which must be followed. | |
|
| | Mr_Fix_It Premium Member join:2009-03-01 Orillia, ON |
Re: laws?Let me change that last statement to a small claims action instead of a class action because....
It will cost $100 bucks to file a claim against robbers in small claims. Being that they and hell Canada both inundated the CRTC with applications in the last 5 years than I say we as consumers reciprocate by filing thousands of small claims actions for the wrong doings.
Just think about it.... What would you get out of a class action ?...and the cost sharing ? The lawyers and courts get all the money.
What would a small claims action for 25,000 dollars net you ? If the CRTC has found the proof & evidence that their has been wrong doing than it should be used against them in a court of law. The burden of proof makes them reveal all to the courts. Not just a little report card to the CRTC.
They cost all of us time and money that we will never get back because of DPI and injecting commercial advertising. They made money while we had to wait.
Time is money...hence the max. small claim's $25,000. Now what do you think will happen when the legal department is swamped with cases ? First thing they will try and do is get a court to combine the cases. DON"T LET THEM COMBINE THE CASES.
They won't have time for the CRTC or to wipe up the mess.
Its time to prey on the big guys for a change instead of being kicked to the curb. | |
|
| | | |
Chucks Truck
Anon
2012-Jan-26 4:01 pm
Re: laws?Most of the problem is the CRTC itself. It's all made up of former members of Rogers and Bell. The whole thing is rigged so Rogers and Bell gets anything they please until it gets so bad either everyone in Canada gives up on the internet because it costs too much or they leave the country to go elsewhere where the internet works at a small fraction of the cost to the subscriber here. | |
|
|
|