Cavalier Launches IPTVRichmond, Virginia goes live (if you're in range) ( old news - 05:41PM Monday Jun 26 2006) tags: Video · coverage · clec · TVIPCLEC Cavalier Telephone has traditionally ranked rather poorly in our customer reviews, but the company claims to be the first telephone provider in the states to be offering MPEG-4 based IPTV. Cavalier's new "Triple Play" will offer local and long distance telephone service, 9Mbps DSL, and over 150 digital channels for $95 per month. The service went live today in the Richmond, Virginia area. Other markets expected to launch in the "coming months" are Norfolk, Baltimore, Philadelphia, and Metro Washington, DC. The catch is that the service is only available to customers within range of the CLEC's 9Mbps ADSL2+ service, according to a recent report in XChange Magazine. This initial launch area consists of about 150,000 homes - Cavalier passes around 300,000 homes in Richmond. Were calibrating the video streams at approximately 2mbps, which allows us to offer multiple streams of video and to provide a good broadband service as well, Evans notes. By operating the ADSL2+ ports from DSLAMs supplied by the Paradyne unit of Zhone Technologies Inc. at full throttle, Cavalier ensures that whatever bandwidth isnt being used for TV channels at any given time automatically defaults to the Internet access service." Obviously this means high-definition is out of the picture. Cavalier should have a brief window as the only TelcoTV provider before FiosTV emerges in Richmond. More detail at the Cavalier website. Related:- NY's First FiosTV Franchise
- Verizon's NJ FiosTV Push Stalls
- AT&T IPTV Launches In Fifteenth Market
- U-Verse Hits Northeastern Illinois
- House Passes Bill Delaying DTV Transition
- Despite Recession, People Still Paying For TV
- Mark Cuban: Still Terrified of TV Competition
- What Network Neutrality Is REALLY About
|
 |   jjgb10 Premium join:2004-11-24 Kasson, MN clubs: | Better than U-Verse At least this is a better deal than U-Verse. You get faster internet speeds, as fast as your connection will allow, and they use MPEG4 so TV uses less bandwidth. | |
|  |  |  |  |   kamm
join:2001-02-14 Brooklyn, NY
·T-Mobile US
| Re: Better than U-Verse said by GOLFnSUN :said by jjgb10 :At least this is a better deal than U-Verse. You get faster internet speeds, as fast as your connection will allow, and they use MPEG4 so TV uses less bandwidth. But no HDTV. BOO!! And I don't even think it's better, actually: just watch 3 streams in 3 rooms, that's already 6Mbit, so all you have is 2-3Mbit for your internet... | |
|   cavver
@comcast.net
| Cavtel
is known as the $300 T1 company here. Where as other still charge the typical $1200/mo.
They are also known as the $25/mo phone bill (with $18 in taxes)....which makes them the same price as Verizon. Go figure.
Atleast they built their voice network correctly: redundant ss7 switches instead of clustered. Still hard to get dialtone from Verizon on a friday afternoon or monday morning.
Verizon engineers take note. | |
|  bogey780
join:2004-03-19 Here | ADSL2+ 'Obviously this means high-definition is out of the picture.'
Not necessarily. ADSL2+ allows pair bonding. Provision another pair and port and you double the bandwidth. If they don't want to do HDTV bandwidth is just part of the issue. | |
|  jervin123
join:2005-04-14 Philadelphia, PA | they can't handle hdtv There network can't handle HDTV unless there gonna be upgrading it my school even switched away from them (charter) to SNIP | |
|  |  kdandaoc
join:2003-10-13 608052427 | Re: they can't handle hdtv What??? What school are you talking about, a middle school in urban Chicago? try english please! | |
|   kamm
join:2001-02-14 Brooklyn, NY | " video streams at approximately 2mbps" ??? Assuming MPEG4 that's still very borderline bitrate... anything below is shitty quality and even 2Mb is not even close to your average DVD...  | |
|   Tsume
join:2004-02-23 Johnson City, TN | Virginia... Virginia this, Virginia that...
Somewhere else for a change?
Oh wait, the rest of the US isn't as close to D.C. | |
|  |  |  |  |  |  digitalis99
join:2003-07-26 Bellevue, WA
| Rules out HD???? Say what?
Last time I checked, I own several WMVHD DVD's that contain 1080i content in a ~6Mbps data rate. It rules out MPEG2 HD streams, yes, but not MPEG4 HD streams.
Yes, I'm aware of the fact that one stream of HD would reduce you to 3Mbps worth of Internet connectivity. Also last I checked, that was still the MAX speed of a residential Verizon DSL circuit. It's nothing to snivel at. | |
|  |   kamm
join:2001-02-14 Brooklyn, NY
·T-Mobile US
1 edit | Re: Rules out HD???? Say what? said by digitalis99 :Last time I checked, I own several WMVHD DVD's that contain 1080i content in a ~6Mbps data rate. Well, those are pretty shitty quality movies...
It rules out MPEG2 HD streams, yes, but not MPEG4 HD streams.
If you like HD-Lite a'la DirecTV then you're right.
Otherwise no, it's not enough. Full 9Mbit is enough for one nice quality WMVHD stream but then you don't have internet at all.
Yes, I'm aware of the fact that one stream of HD would reduce you to 3Mbps worth of Internet connectivity.
No, it's just HD-Lite - real HD would reduce you to almost 0. 
Also last I checked, that was still the MAX speed of a residential Verizon DSL circuit. It's nothing to snivel at. Last time you misunderstood something - it's ADSL2+, pal, with 15-25Mb max.  | |
|  |  |  |  | |  |
|
|