republican-creole
site Search:


 
   
story category
CenturyLink To Buy Qwest
Landmark $22.4 billion deal announced
by Karl Bode Thursday 22-Apr-2010 tags: dsl · competition · coverage · business · consumers · Qwest.net · CenturyLink
Tipped by Bbrown49 See Profile
It looks like Qwest has finally found their suitor. CenturyLink and Qwest announced this morning that CenturyLink will acquire Qwest in a tax-free, stock-for-stock transaction worth about $10.5 billion. The deal also includes CenturyLink taking on $11.8 billion in Qwest debt -- which Qwest had been busily trying to reduce for several years now in order to attract a buyer. The new, larger CenturyLink will offer service in 37 states, and the new combined business will serve approximately 5 million broadband customers, 17 million access lines, 1,415,000 video subscribers and 850,000 wireless consumers.

Rumors of a CenturyLink or Windstream purchase had bubbled up earlier this year. Qwest had been making it pretty clear for several years that they were looking to be acquired, but the company's price tag had been considered too high by most suitors. While some speculated on a Verizon acquisition, Qwest serves a significant number of rural markets -- the exact kind of markets Verizon has been trying to get away from.

Recent estimates had pegged Qwest's value at around $20 billion -- though if you'll recall, Qwest bought much of their current infrastructure from U S West back in 2000 for $45 billion. For several years, Qwest has been focusing on lightening their debt load to make an acquisition more likely -- and as a result has made only modest investments in network upgrades.

According to the announcement, Qwest shareholders will receive 0.1664 CenturyLink shares for each share of Qwest common stock they own at closing. Upon deal completion, CenturyLink shareholders will own roughly 50.5% of the new company, with Qwest shareholders owning 49.5%. Of course CenturyLink was created only just last year with the merger of CenturyTel and Embarq.

It seems likely that the merger's primary goal is to create a bigger, rural super-telco with a better shot at grabbing USF and broadband stimulus funds. Still, this doesn't magically create a wireless division, and both companies have a lot of outdated last-mile copper that needs upgrading.

view: topics flat text 
Post a:
page: 1 · 2

Steve B
Premium
join:2004-08-02
Seattle, WA

So For Everyday Things....

Will Qwest remain Qwest in its territories and the same with CenturyLink?
openbox9

join:2004-01-26
Alexandria, VA
kudos:2

Re: So For Everyday Things....

Since CenturyLink will own ~50.5%, I would think a rebranding of Qwest is in order.
fiberguy
My views are my own.
Premium
join:2005-05-20
kudos:3

Re: So For Everyday Things....

Well.. as usual, I'm going to throw something into the stew here. I'm not 100% convinces that the name "CenturyLink" will be the dominating and surviving name. I have some small amount of belief that Qwest may be the name when everything is said and done.

When AT&T Broadband and Comcast were going to do a "true merger", the new company was supposed to be AT&T Comcast or something, at first.

When SBC purchased AT&T, they were supposed to originally, for a brief time, keep SBC as the name but decided the AT&T name was more recognized, even though the name was largely tarnished with consumers. AT&T still had a much larger global & business presence which is where the money was.

Now comes Qwest and really what is a no-name company, Century Link, which is made up after about 2 or 3 other swaps in names...

I'm still on the fence as to what name will ultimately dominate.

But, what's in a name? .. a lot actually. Century Link just sounds like one of those Jetson's futuristic cute names that were either in 1950's scifi movies, or in the 1990's dot.com bust era. I think a name says a lot and I just have a small feeling, even with the past history with Qwest, that the Qwest name MAY survive this one. Even with a somewhat tarnished name (at&t) Qwest is still more recognized as a name.

If all else fails, there's still SuperMegaGlobalCorp, or what ever Homer Simpson called his business.. that is, before Bill Gates "bought him out"..

fiddelm3742
I Hope You Learned Your Lesson

join:2003-02-19
Waterloo, IA

Re: So For Everyday Things....

CompuGlobalHyperMegaNet

I'm interested in upgrading my twenty eight point eight kilobaud internet connection to a fiber-optic one point five megabit T1 line. Can you provide an IP router compatible with my token-ring ethernet LAN configuration?

couldn't resist
--
Fiddelke.org
fiberguy
My views are my own.
Premium
join:2005-05-20
kudos:3

Re: So For Everyday Things....

lol.. THAT'S it!!!

yea.. that was a classic episode.

I also LOVE 'how' Bill Gates bought him out... after smashing up Homer's desk and not paying him, he says "you don't think I got rich by BUYING people out did you?"

Ring Trip
BP-Link

join:2009-03-17
La Crosse, WI
DISCLAIMER: I work for CenturyLink, corporate-infused bias may apply, but in no way are these official statements from the company.

Days before this buyout was announced, CenturyLink launched a shiny new Brand website »www.centurylinkbrandcenter.com. Corporate has been pushing this brand as hard as they can since the Embarq merger was announced, I believe they will continue using it.

I do agree though, the brand is weak. I'm not a fan of it, just look at my avatar

needforspeed59
Cruise Ship Just Passing Through

join:2001-05-02
Glendale, AZ
CenturyLink rebranded Embarq to CL after they bought them. I think the Qwest brand is so soiled they will do a service to rebrand.
--
Great success! High five!
fiberguy
My views are my own.
Premium
join:2005-05-20
kudos:3

1 edit

Re: So For Everyday Things....

Actually, I believer Century Telecom and Embarq merged to form CenturyLink.. there's been so many changes in the rural market that I forgot who Century was, exactly, before Embarq was done with, that is after Sprint.. and now Qwest who was formerly USWest who was part of the Bell system before that which was pretty much AT&T who is now simply SBC in disguise with a new name too busy rethinking possible after your world destroyed.

Can't we just make checks out to "The Telephone Company".. and "The Cable Company"..? Wouldn't that just be easier?

Remember, AT&T's name wasn't the greatest either, and that name survived for recognition purpose only.
NormanS
Premium,MVM
join:2001-02-14
San Jose, CA
kudos:4
Reviews:
·SONIC.NET
·Pacific Bell - SBC

Re: So For Everyday Things....

said by fiberguy:

... and now Qwest who was formerly USWest ...
Actually, Qwest was a direct competitor to the post breakup AT&T; long lines, dial-up POP centers, and backbone transit. They bought USWest.
... who was part of the Bell system before that ...
As were Ameritech, Atlantic Bell, Bellsouth, NYNEX, The Pacific Telesis Group, and Southwestern Bell Telephone (which rebranded to SBC).
... which was pretty much AT&T who is now simply SBC in disguise with a new name too busy rethinking possible after your world destroyed.

Can't we just make checks out to "The Telephone Company".. and "The Cable Company"..? Wouldn't that just be easier?

Remember, AT&T's name wasn't the greatest either, and that name survived for recognition purpose only.
"Indeed" to those last comments!
--
Norman
~Oh Lord, why have you come
~To Konnyu, with the Lion and the Drum
NormanS
Premium,MVM
join:2001-02-14
San Jose, CA
kudos:4
Reviews:
·SONIC.NET
·Pacific Bell - SBC
said by needforspeed59:

CenturyLink rebranded Embarq to CL after they bought them.
As fiberguy See Profile says, CenturyLInk is the result of the merger of CenturyTel (Century Telephone) and Embarq.
--
Norman
~Oh Lord, why have you come
~To Konnyu, with the Lion and the Drum

ewth8tr
Premium
join:2005-04-03
Salt Lake City, UT

Hopefully this will be a good thing for customers

Does anyone know if CenturyLink outsources their DSL support?

Hazy Arc

join:2006-04-10
Greenwood, SC

Re: Hopefully this will be a good thing for customers

They do not...as of right now.
zipcode97733

join:2005-01-01
Crescent, OR
I have centurytel or centurylink DSL and the last time i used them they were in the USA

pnh102
Reptiles Are Cuddly And Pretty
Premium
join:2002-05-02
Mount Airy, MD

Echoes of the Past

For some reason, this reminds me of the merger between NetZero and Juno.

dvd536
as Mr. Pink as they come
Premium
join:2001-04-27
Phoenix, AZ
kudos:4

Re: Echoes of the Past

said by pnh102:

For some reason, this reminds me of the merger between NetZero and Juno.
one bottomfeeder swallowing another bottomfeeder?
--
The shortest distance between 2 points adds 1.5 stars to T. want $50? solve »coord.info/GC20A37 for me

CLisAWFUL

@embarqhsd.net

To all Qwest user....

Welcome to Hell, enjoy your stay.

Topmounter
Sent By Grocery Clerks

join:2001-02-20
Evergreen, CO

Re: To all Qwest user....

CenturyTel is that bad?

Out of the pot and into the frying pan.

Glad I swore off Qworst years ago.

Hazy Arc

join:2006-04-10
Greenwood, SC

1 edit

Re: To all Qwest user....

YMMV.

I've been quite pleased with my Sprint AKA Embarq AKA CenturyLink connection.

en102
Canadian, eh?

join:2001-01-26
Valencia, CA

Re: To all Qwest user....

The only complaint that I know of (from coworkers in NC) on Sprint aka Embarq aka Century Link DSL is the cost (relative to AT&T/VZ). They were (are?) paying something like $50/month for ADSL

Hazy Arc

join:2006-04-10
Greenwood, SC
Reviews:
·Embarq Now Centu..
·CenturyLink
·Dish Network

1 edit

Re: To all Qwest user....

Click for full size
CenturyLink Pricing
I pay $54 a month for 10/768 dry loop DSL. See attached for the current pricing.
My line monitor can be found on »/testhistory?view=78 (page 2)
scooper

join:2000-07-11
Youngsville, NC
kudos:2
Shame on them to not see if there are cheaper rates available...

I'm paying about $65 /month for voiceline with some extras and 3M down, 640K up DSL

AlexNYC

join:2001-06-02
Edwards, CO
You think Qwest is bad ... CenturyHell aka Century Link is 10 times worse. In my area they sell the same 1.5/256 oversubscribed DSL for over 10 years. No improvements, 0, nilch, nada! I tried to be their customer 5 - 6 years ago and it was truly hell. Read my old review if you are interested.
Here's the funny part: A few weeks ago I get a sales call asking me to switch to Century Link, so I ask what speed can I get? He tells me 1.5/256 so I tell him that with Comcast powerboost I currently get up to 22/3 and the sales a-hole on the phone had the nerve to tell me: "Sir, you don't need all that bandwidth" Waahaaahaaa ... I told him to .... have a nice day and hung up.
Ammler
Premium
join:2005-04-19
Pittsburgh, PA

Re: To all Qwest user....

I would have told him, "You can't knock it until you try it!"

Seriously though, I would have been pissed as well if sales geek told me that. Un freaking believable!
fiberguy
My views are my own.
Premium
join:2005-05-20
kudos:3

Re: To all Qwest user....

... don't be mad at that Salesman.. really.. he's just in shock still. He probably came from AT&T's marketing department. I think he's with Century now still rethinking possible.

Tron4Net

join:2010-01-14
Corrales, NM
You have every right to bitch! If thy try to pass that B.S on me I'm going to give them hell too!
Markie

join:2003-07-26
Kalispell, MT
Yes, CenturyTel is *that* bad... I felt horrible for all the former Embarq customers who were devoured by the beast... now Qwest too.

I live in the one part of Montana that's CenturyTel/CenturyLink. Most of the rest of the state is Qwest. I also live in the only "major city" in Montana with no local numbers from most VoIP providers, and that in the dial-up days never had the national companies (AOL, EarthLink, etc)...

All CenturyTel's doing. NOBODY has lobbied harder again VoIP, acted more anti-competitively, etc.

Heck, Flathead County decided to go with some VoIP service out of UTAH rather than use CenturyLink for their new 911 center. CenturyLink cried foul to the press and the county bit them right back basically bringing how awful they were into the public light.
soccerguy

join:2004-06-28
Seattle, WA

Re: To all Qwest user....

There's too many people living in the Flathead to be stuck with that kind of terrible service. I'm so sorry...
Markie

join:2003-07-26
Kalispell, MT

Re: To all Qwest user....

Eh, it's getting better, slowly but surely. Bresnan is great, and a real option. Verizon Wireless, CellularOne, and Alltel (soon to be AT&T) are most people's real phone company nowdays anyway. Combine a cell phone with some Bresnan internet and a Brensnan VoIP line if you need a landline and it's possible to live a happy, CenturyLink-free life here now...

Hazy Arc

join:2006-04-10
Greenwood, SC

I Don't Get It

The gubment splits up the Bells in the 80s, then allows them to merge 20 years later. What exactly was the point?

powerhog
Stinkin' up the joint
Premium
join:2000-12-14
Owasso, OK

Re: I Don't Get It

said by Hazy Arc:

The gubment splits up the Bells in the 80s, then allows them to merge 20 years later. What exactly was the point?
Deregulation.

They couldn't just deregulate Ma Bell - the people would revolt. So the plan was developed to split her up then declare that "competition" between the baby bells will keep them in check without all those pesky Federal regulations.

en102
Canadian, eh?

join:2001-01-26
Valencia, CA

Re: I Don't Get It

Instead of many baby Bells, now, we're seeing 2 big Bells (AT&T and Verizon) and a couple of rural Bells (Century Link and Frontier)
iansltx

join:2007-02-19
Golden, CO
kudos:2

Re: I Don't Get It

You forgot WIndstream. They're pretty big as well.
NormanS
Premium,MVM
join:2001-02-14
San Jose, CA
kudos:4
Reviews:
·SONIC.NET
·Pacific Bell - SBC
said by en102:

Instead of many baby Bells, now, we're seeing 2 big Bells (AT&T and Verizon) and a couple of rural Bells (Century Link and Frontier)
Qwest was also a Baby Bell. CenturyLink and Frontier (and Windstream) were not.
--
Norman
~Oh Lord, why have you come
~To Konnyu, with the Lion and the Drum
fiberguy
My views are my own.
Premium
join:2005-05-20
kudos:3
Well, we also have this thing now called "the cable company" and "cellular phones" which have fostered options and competition.. something that didn't exist back with Ma'Bell.

Gbcue
Almost P.E.
Premium
join:2001-09-30
Santa Rosa, CA
kudos:8
Reviews:
·AT&T U-Verse

Re: I Don't Get It

said by fiberguy:

Well, we also have this thing now called "the cable company" and "cellular phones" which have fostered options and competition.. something that didn't exist back with Ma'Bell.
I'm sure Cable Television and Cellular Telephones existed in the 80s.

As a matter of fact, cell towers were invented by Bell Labs engineers @ AT&T in the 50s.
»en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cellular_telephones
--
My Blog 2.0
fiberguy
My views are my own.
Premium
join:2005-05-20
kudos:3

1 edit

Re: I Don't Get It

said by Gbcue:

said by fiberguy:

Well, we also have this thing now called "the cable company" and "cellular phones" which have fostered options and competition.. something that didn't exist back with Ma'Bell.
I'm sure Cable Television and Cellular Telephones existed in the 80s.

As a matter of fact, cell towers were invented by Bell Labs engineers @ AT&T in the 50s.
»en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cellular_telephones
Oi.. REEEEEAAADDD....

Cable did in fact exist in the 80's... but, in the CONTEXT of "TELEPHONE SERVICE" were they offering "phone service" as what the TOPIC at hand is we're talking about?

Also, again, in the CONTEXT of what WE are talking about, it doesn't matter WHO developed cellular towers, we're talking about COMPETITION - remember? .. that's one of the words you quoted me on..

So, put that all together... and tell me how CABLE TV service (video-only providers of the 80's) and a practically non-existent CELLULAR TOWER (cellular service which really didn't get into the hands of end users until the 90's) falls into the CONTEXT of lack of competing TELEPHONE service?

n2jtx

join:2001-01-13
Glen Head, NY
Reviews:
·Optimum Online
said by Hazy Arc:

The gubment splits up the Bells in the 80s, then allows them to merge 20 years later. What exactly was the point?
It paid the salaries of the regulators and made oodles of money for the lawyers.

At least with the current mega-telco's you do not have the restrictions you had before 1984. I remember when doing your own wiring or having an extra phone in your house that AT&T did not know about (you had to rent them all) could get your service terminated. And, prior to the Carterphone decision of 1968, attaching any non-AT&T equipment to your line could get your service turned off. So far, that nonsense has not come back.
--
I support the right to keep and arm bears.

See 11 replies to this post
EPS

join:2008-02-13
Hingham, MA
Correct me if I'm wrong, but technically, isn't CenturyLink formed mainly of non-Bell areas that weren't part of the Bell System to begin with?
iansltx

join:2007-02-19
Golden, CO
kudos:2

Re: I Don't Get It

You sir are correct. With the Qwest purchase this changes (yay Mountain Bell) but previous to that we were talking about all non-Bell companies.
NormanS
Premium,MVM
join:2001-02-14
San Jose, CA
kudos:4
Reviews:
·SONIC.NET
·Pacific Bell - SBC
said by Hazy Arc:

The gubment splits up the Bells in the 80s, then allows them to merge 20 years later. What exactly was the point?
They aren't exactly remerged. AT&T was split into:

• Ameritech
• Atlantic Bell
• Bellsouth
• NYNEX
• The Pacific Telesis Group
• Southwestern Bell Telephone
• USWest

But the remergers are:

AT&T (which is SBC renamed):

• Ameritech
• Bellsouth
• The Pacific Telesis Group
• Southwestern Bell Telephone (which rebranded as SBC)

Qwest: (which bought USWest, then dropped the brand)

Verizon:

• Bell Atlantic
• NYNEX

Of that list, two also incorporate non-bell companies:

AT&T (both were bought):

• Southern New England Telephone
• Prodigy

Verizon (also part of the merger):

• General Telephone & Electric (GTE)

Furthermore, other parts of AT&T which were split off were merged with other non-Bell companies, at least one of them foreign.

There is no reconstituting AT&T as it was through 1984.
--
Norman
~Oh Lord, why have you come
~To Konnyu, with the Lion and the Drum
caco
Premium
join:2005-03-10
Whittier, AK

No wireless division, no future

Waste of money. Wireless is the future, doubling down on wireline is not the way to go.

See 24 replies to this post

Romney2012
Defeat Obama 2012-Chg we can believe in
Premium
join:2002-03-03
USA
kudos:4

Where is the new company?

Current CenturyLink coverage:
»www.centurytelembarqmerger.com/s···dex.html



Qwest:
»news.qwest.com/company



Qwest's very extensive business network:
»www.qwest.com/largebusiness/ente···der.html


--
Are you happy with your rep in Washington, DC?

See 8 replies to this post
brianw1957

join:2006-01-24
West Jordan, UT

Combining Operations

This part has me worried for my brother who is employed by Qwest in their Denver offices. Yikes...
"The new company would also generate up to $625 million in annual savings by combining operations,CenturyTel said."
RichNice

join:2003-01-09
Columbia, MD

Re: Combining Operations

Goodbye HR and IT departments. NetOps should be okay until they start consolidating systems/operations.
hottboiinnc
ME

join:2003-10-15
Cleveland, OH
when 2 companies merge you always have people being let go. That's how it works, unfortunately.

Ted Sheckler
Monster Rain
Premium
join:2009-01-17
00000
kudos:3

Yay

Now they can take the god awful Qwest sign from the Denver skyline!

PhoenixAZ
Get A Mac
Premium
join:2004-01-04
Phoenix, AZ
kudos:1

Re: Yay

And put a CenturyLink one up instead.

Ted Sheckler
Monster Rain
Premium
join:2009-01-17
00000
kudos:3

Re: Yay

Anything would be better than that eyesore...
treichhart

join:2006-12-12

1 edit

if CL buys Qwest why not buy up Verizon.

If CL buys up Qwest why buy up Crappy Verizon/Frontier. If they do that CL would be the largest Telephone Company in the nation with there crappy services.
envision

join:2007-10-30

good buy services?

CT had acquired a large debt itself when it bought out (merger?) of Embarq. Since it has officially gone public, they have only converted 1 state to the new system. With the 2nd state coming shortly in a month or so.

The problem is see with both of these deals is, CT is an acquisition company. They don't spend anything so they have the money to buy. But it doesn't seem that they put any of the money back into the services.

They did however, from what i have read and understand, drop their tiered structure of pricing and went with what Embarq had. Who wants to pay $49.95 for 1.5mb service?

A good thing about CL though, is 99% of all their support is housed in the US.

But my question is, how is this new acquisition going to effect the service and support of CL, when they still have so much work to do since the acquisition of Embarq?

tstolze
Premium
join:2003-08-08
O Fallon, MO
kudos:1
Reviews:
·CenturyLink
·Charter

Re: good buy services?

said by envision:

A good thing about CL though, is 99% of all their support is housed in the US.

But my question is, how is this new acquisition going to effect the service and support of CL, when they still have so much work to do since the acquisition of Embarq?
I fully agree, I have noticed a big upturn in customers with throughput issues, very localized and usually takes months to get resolved. I even had issues as a legacy CTL customer for a couple weeks that is now resolved.

Let's hope they use lessons learned from the Embarq merger.
--
Ofallon, Mo Weather
St. Peters, Mo Weather

old_dawg
"I Know Noting..."

join:2001-09-22
Westminster, MD

Maybe

Just maybe they can take Dan Hesse back to do their commercials?
--
"Our network engineers are aware of the problem..."
talz13

join:2006-03-15
Avon, OH

Oh boy...

On my CenturyLink phone at home, I can't even call one city over without it being a long distance call ("expanded area", "super local", whatever the hell they want to dress it up as). Actually, there's not many places I can call outside of my city, and two of the 3 immediately bordering cities without paying some kind of usage fee.
fiberguy
My views are my own.
Premium
join:2005-05-20
kudos:3

Re: Oh boy...

I believe that has a lot to do with your PUC and the calling boundaries set up.

In the twin cities, you have an incredibly large calling area which includes 5 area codes, for the most part, and one which includes part of Wisconsin. When I lived in California, the city of Sacramento is split up into 2 major area.. Sacramento North and Sacramento Main. Then you have Roseville CA to the north of that in Placer County and you have Elk Grove in the south which is still Sacramento County. If you live in Sacramento Main, the south Sac area (south of the Rivers) Roseville is a local toll call. Basically, anything 8 miles out of your ZUM area. (Zone Usage - measured by your central office)

For the record, the twin cities is about a good 50 miles across if you include the immediate metro, and that's not even including the 13 county metro area. But, that's Minnesota.
jhaygood86

join:2005-03-01
Marietta, GA

Re: Oh boy...

MEtro Atlanta is very similar. You can call from pretty much anywhere to anywhere in the Atlanta area.
QLR

join:2009-06-23
Tallahassee, FL
Reviews:
·Comcast
·Verizon Wireless..

Re: Oh boy...

I miss that... ATL has the largest toll free calling area in the nation; one could even call 2 small towns across the Alabama line as well. The towns could be 90 miles apart and still be considered as local

Tallahassee is small, but at least Embarq killed the EAS fees for calling Madison and Chattahoochee (about 40-50 miles) from Tallahassee. But it's not like ATL where every city can call each other in the local area.
travelguy

join:1999-09-03
Santa Fe, NM
said by talz13:

On my CenturyLink phone at home, I can't even call one city over without it being a long distance call ("expanded area", "super local", whatever the hell they want to dress it up as). Actually, there's not many places I can call outside of my city, and two of the 3 immediately bordering cities without paying some kind of usage fee.
Unfortunately, those kinds of situations are the result of your local PSC. We have a situation in New Mexico where the PSC insisted on an expanded local calling area so that a big chunk of the state can call local into Albuquerque and Santa Fe, funded by a charge to all users in the metro area.
nutcr0cker

join:2003-04-02
Chandler, AZ
kudos:2

whatever will happen to the qwest price for life contracts?

whatever will happen to the qwest price for life contracts? they have a lot of that I hope they honor it.

toby
Troy Mcclure

join:2001-11-13
Seattle, WA
Reviews:
·OlyPen, Inc.
·CenturyLink

Re: whatever will happen to the qwest price for life contracts?

said by nutcr0cker:

whatever will happen to the qwest price for life contracts? they have a lot of that I hope they honor it.
Even with Qwest they end, and its a pain getting them back to that price.

Steve B
Premium
join:2004-08-02
Seattle, WA

Re: whatever will happen to the qwest price for life contracts?

are you sure they will not keep that? or at least honor existing customers?
pooker314

join:2005-04-12
Brush Prairie, WA

Re: whatever will happen to the qwest price for life contracts?

I think the point he was trying to make is that when Qwest itself sometimes breaks its price for life commitments, how can you expect the purchaser to honor them.

That having been said, this is a stock transaction. The purchaser is assuming all of the contracts held by the seller. So the price for life agreements should be honored (although who knows if they'll make them available for future subscribers).

Dezbend
Premium,MVM
join:2001-04-20

Re: whatever will happen to the qwest price for life contracts?

Embarq had price for life DSL offers, that are no longer being sold, but continue to be honored... I would assume CenturyLink would do the same with Qwest customers.
--
DSLr Mafia Member
Reveal Legislation
iansltx

join:2007-02-19
Golden, CO
kudos:2
Reviews:
·Verizon Online DSL
·Comcast

Could be a good thing...

CenLink is investing a good bit into their Las Vegas network to copete with Cox...I hear FTTH is coming to some areas with speeds that surpass Cox's DOCSIS 3 speeds.

That said, Qwest in Colorado is mainly competing against Comcast, so it will be an interesting battle as Comcast ramps up to 100 Mbps later this year or sometime next year.

This is a big win for recurring CenLink revenues no matter what, because they now own a Tier 1 backbone network and a LOT of cell tower T1s.

Also, it appears as though CenLink is pushing out bonded (25/2) ADSL2+ to folks (Annex M eventually?) which could mean very good things for Qwest FTTN customers...ad Qwest regular ADSL customers in cities. 25/2 would represent a five-fold increase in available DSL speed to my location, and 2 Mbps up is enough to actually consider getting DSL when cable is the other option.

Granted, CenLink could just sit on their infrastructure, but I'm betting that you'll see a LOT more FTTH from them than from Qwest, and that's a good thing when your only other option effectively starts at $60 per month.
djcrazy

join:2009-08-05
Minneapolis, MN
Reviews:
·Comcast

Re: Could be a good thing...

said by iansltx:

.........Also, it appears as though CenLink is pushing out bonded (25/2) ADSL2+ to folks (Annex M eventually?) which could mean very good things for Qwest FTTN customers...ad Qwest regular ADSL customers in cities. 25/2 would represent a five-fold increase in available DSL speed to my location, and 2 Mbps up is enough to actually consider getting DSL when cable is the other option.
I hope so because then Comcast will simply give us all more upload speed for free!

bigdiger

@mcleodusa.net
ftth is in play right now. the company i work for is a placing contractor for qwest we are completing some ftth jobs now.

WeSRT4

join:2000-11-20
Mobile, AL

1 edit

Sprint buyout next?

Wouldn't it be fitting for Sprint>Embarq>Centurylink>Quset/Embarq to buy Sprint? This would be a way to enter wireless in a quick manner. I bet they could acquire Sprint at a good price too!
hottboiinnc
ME

join:2003-10-15
Cleveland, OH

Re: Sprint buyout next?

Sprint won't sell. They're buying all their prepaid MSOs for a reason to help turn the bottom line into $$$.
--
www.twopugsbrand.com Kosher, Vegan, and Organic Certified Dog and Cat treats/foods and other products!
rahvin112

join:2002-05-24
Sandy, UT

Re: Sprint buyout next?

Sprint is for sale, Hesse has been marketing the company to the cable co's. Most of the cable companies are now re-selling Sprint service and I would expect that if the major CableCo's can negotiate a working agreement that they will buy sprint. The problem hasn't been that Sprint isn't willing to sell, it's that the major Cable Co's can't agree on how to purchase the company jointly. To make it work they all need to go in on it and they don't play well together, after all, how many years did it take for them to make Cable Labs a working group?
hottboiinnc
ME

join:2003-10-15
Cleveland, OH
Reviews:
·WOW Internet and..

Re: Sprint buyout next?

And how do you figure Sprint is for sale just because they partner with the MSOs? that does not mean they are for sale. That is called B2B sales.
--
www.twopugsbrand.com Kosher, Vegan, and Organic Certified Dog and Cat treats/foods and other products!
hrz

join:2007-12-01
Utica, MI

Post-Merger Name

Qwest Telephone & Telegraph a/k/a QTT

Don't ROFLMAO, it could happen!

caffeinator
Coming soon to a cup near you..
Premium
join:2005-01-16
WA, USA
kudos:3
Reviews:
·CenturyLink

Already in trouble..

Hmmm..

Qwest Communications International Inc. Board Under Investigation - Trevor Allen - Shareholders Foundation - 2 hours ago
»shareholdersfoundation.com/casei···tigation

It's funny too, since Qwest's stock has risen, and CL's has fallen since the announced merger this morning.
--

My 9/11 Tribute..online since 9/14/01
Need an Avatar? Check out Wafen's Avatar Pages
QLR

join:2009-06-23
Tallahassee, FL
Reviews:
·Comcast
·Verizon Wireless..

I had hope when CenturyTel bought Embarq...

... but no changes so far besides the branding. I liked their service for the most part, but I wanted more speed 3.0M is the best offered in my area.

It also sucks the whole county isn't wired for high speed internet (shame on CTL AND Comcast)...

nunya
Who is John Galt?
Premium,MVM
join:2000-12-23
O Fallon, MO
kudos:5
Reviews:
·Charter
·voip.ms

Not so bad

I'm no longer a CL customer, but their service isn't so bad. They are a solid ISP. My only problem with CL was their pricing - too high. When calling for support, I always got someone in the USA.

I doubt CL will re-brand to Qwest. CL just spent a fortune on re-branding it's entire area from CenturyTel and Embarq. I think Qwest can probably start scraping the signage off their trucks now.

One thing I'm curious about: Neither Qwest or Centurylink have serious IPTV offerings or a wireless offering. It would behoove them to get a pony in the show, quick-like.
--
Looks like Reverend Wright got his wish - God Damn America.
Nancy Pelosi - House Minority Leader 2010
Harry Reid - Senate Minority Leader 2010

Monday, 04-Jun 16:29:37 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.