site Search:


 
   
story category
CenturyLink is Imposing Usage Caps
150 GB for Slower than 1.5 Mbps, 250 GB Otherwise
by Karl Bode Monday 21-Nov-2011 tags: dsl · prices · business · bandwidth · consumers · caps · CenturyLink
Tipped by skj See Profile
An anonymous poster to our CenturyLink forums claims the company is preparing to impose usage caps on their DSL customers. According to a supposed memo posted by the user, the company is changing its terms of service to reflect the fact they will be putting a 150 GB cap on users with connections 1.5 Mbps or slower, and a 250 GB cap on users who have connections faster than 1.5 Mbps. While the user posted a memo claiming the TOS language is being changed this week, a page on the CenturyLink website (and this pdf FAQ) confirms the changes but states the actual caps won't be imposed until February.

Click for full size
According to the CenturyLink website, the caps won't be accompanied by the kind of per byte overages imposed by companies like AT&T -- at least for now. The company says that those who violate their cap will receive an e-mail, call or in-browser web message informing them they've crossed the cap, and advising them to upgrade to a faster residential or business-class tier.

"CenturyLink will weigh variables such as network health, congestion, availability of customer usage data, and the line speed purchased by the customer as factors when enforcing this policy," says the company -- adding that their EUP is "application neutral." "It only looks at the total usage (bytes transferred) over a defined period of time independent of protocols, applications, or the content that is generating the excessive usage," says CenturyLink.

General reaction in our forums is not particularly positive, with many users already paying a considerable amount of money for slow DSL -- now made even less attractive by usage limits. CenturyLink says they'll push users toward higher speeds if they cross the cap -- yet the company isn't capable of offering service any faster than 1.5 - 3 Mbps to many users. CenturyLink, which offers an IPTV platform that could benefit from such a heavy internet video deterrent, says that users that repeatedly cross the cap may have their service disconnected.

On the bright side -- if there is one -- this may be a slight improvement for Qwest users recently acquired by CenturyLink. As we've explored previously, Qwest had a history of kicking users off of the network for "excessive usage," without bothering to clearly tell customers precisely how much usage would bring down the hammer.

view: topics flat text 
Post a:
page: 1 · 2

jchambers28

join:2007-05-12
Alma, AR

OMFG this is BS.

I knew this was going to happen sooner than later.
firedrakes

join:2009-01-29
Arcadia, FL

1 edit

Re: money

well dam. this is bs.
FastLearner

join:2003-09-14
Arvada, CO

Re: money

Here is a link:
»qwest.centurylink.com/internethelp/eup.html

Effective February 2012

letmoneytalk

@qwest.net

I figured

Centurylink is just following suit, and I can't blame them, as they must see the profits that other ISP's are making with these caps?

They can't blame me when I cancel their service either, as I'm just doing what I see others doing...
rradina

join:2000-08-08
Chesterfield, MO

Re: I figured

I haven't read any numbers. How much are they making? Is this because folks upgrade to more expensive packages or because the provider's have overage charges?

For instance, Charter has 100GB cap but as I understand it, it's only used to warn excessive users and possibly take corrective action if they don't abide by the limits. I'm not aware of them stating what they would charge per unit over 100GB or if they would force a user into a higher priced package.

letmoneytalk

@qwest.net

Re: I figured

"How much are they making?"

I would say this move would help their bottom line overall, as it will scare users into wondering if it's ok to "click on that next Netflix/Youtube" video, or possibly face letters inquiring about usage and upgrade requests from their ISP(that alone would probably allow capacity upgrades to be postponed). I pay for 40/5mb service with CL, and for what I pay for and use each month, I don't want a "cap hanging over my head". Although I am not a "problem user", and may have hit 250Gb in a month once in a my time with this account(maybe), I just do not like the idea of throttling users or pushing users to upgrade accounts, when the ISP thinks* your using too much bandwidth - they are writing their own rules/speed limits. That being said, their will always be some users(losers) that leave bit torrents and other file shares open all month long and rack up crazy outgoing bandwidth, and I would appreciate it if those users were singled out by the ISP for this abuse and sent letters or "informed that excessive usage can lead to account termination", but leave the majority of us alone, and don't hold these caps over our heads. At the end of the day though, I feel that we are going backwards in our pursuit of technology, and think that limiting people to the amount of content, or their perception of the amount of content that can reach them monthly, is just wrong. In a world where we compete with each other on an intellectual basis, limiting a users access to rich content, is a sin.
Wilsdom

join:2009-08-06

Re: I figured

With most connections having such pitiful upload capacity in the US excessive torrenting isn't even possible.
talz13

join:2006-03-15
Avon, OH

Re: I figured

It's perfectly possible. You get 5 users who actually have decent upload bandwidth, and the rest of them sponge off of them and each other. Torrenting worked fine back when 5/384 was the best they had.

Just because you can't grab a finished torrent in under 10 minutes doesn't mean it's not possible... You just gotta have patience!
rradina

join:2000-08-08
Chesterfield, MO
I get the subjective reasons for why you don't like caps. I'm looking for some facts regarding how much these caps increase revenue or stall growth which thereby stretches capex upgrade cycles.

Right now my gut tells me wire line caps aren't as much about a revenue play as protecting other revenue streams. Granted, a definition is needed to gauge outliers but right now they don't seem to be monetizing like wireless. Maybe that's because they don't have good meters, yet, but rather than speculate, I was wondering if anyone has put this in numbers.
Fibre

join:2011-06-11
Reviews:
·CenturyLink
·NPG Cable
In the history of the Internet, there was no such thing for capping or throttling and enough with the 'growing users' as an excuse. Because as much as users grow, technology grows in order to support the load in their servers from users at full bandwidth. Browsing or Torrenting, ISP's need to mind their own business since it is just the service their giving and not regulating our usage, much less the neighbor ranting others habits and comparing their usages to others. If ISP's can't provide the support like they supposedly say which I doubt, then why not drop their speeds? Downgrade their service enough so that they could estimate a stable service if such amount of users connect at full load without problem. And now regular users are forced to upgrade to "business" accounts for true ethical unlimited service all because the family easily surpasses the 250GB cap from Netflixing, Youtubing and Gaming. Call this corrupt business practices for profit, control or greed.
timo1745

join:2012-01-26
Bloomsbury, NJ

Eh?

said by Fibre:

In the history of the Internet, there was no such thing for capping or throttling and enough with the 'growing users' as an excuse. Because as much as users grow, technology grows in order to support the load in their servers from users at full bandwidth.

A lot has happened since the advent of the Internet. How exactly to you think providers continue to provide as demand grows and grows? Magic? And how is expanding a network and infrastructure to meet demand an "excuse" exactly? Yes, providers are trying to keep pace with customer demand--which is skyrocketing, by the way--and maintaining an ever-growing infrastructure to meet that demand costs....wait for it.....lots of money. Megabucks. Providers also base their rates/plans/caps around the "average" usage by a typical family. So, if your usage is far above that average, guess what....you're going to be paying more. And how does downgrading your internet service help you exactly? You want slower throughput at home--just so that you don't have to pay for a higher data cap?

I don't like it much either, but the days of the "all you can eat buffet" of unlimited internet access plans will soon be a thing of the past, and customers are actually gonna' be faced with paying for what they use. Like a car rental. Like a hotel stay. Like your electric bill, monthly wireless plan minutes....and pretty much everything else.

said by Fibre:

Call this corrupt business practices for profit, control or greed.

That's actually a good summary of pretty much any capitalistic society. Capping usage to control costs and ensure equal service for all customers is not corrupt; it's called "doing business". If a company either imposes an unrealistic cap or raises their rates so that they are no longer competitive, then the market will adjust, they will lose customers and either go out of business or adjust their cap/rates again. And yes...it's ALL about greed; that's how companies makes money.
elray

join:2000-12-16
Santa Monica, CA
said by letmoneytalk :

Centurylink is just following suit, and I can't blame them, as they must see the profits that other ISP's are making with these caps?

They can't blame me when I cancel their service either, as I'm just doing what I see others doing...

Utter nonsense.

They are not profiting with caps. As you suggest, cap threats alone, not enforcement, causes customers like you to head for the exit door. As populists claim bandwidth/consumption costs them "nothing", they're sacrificing pure profit as you leave.

Wired caps are merely a defensive measure to protect the pay-tv product.
With the introduction of so-called "net neutrality", caps are one way to limit cable-tv defections to OTT/IPTV/streaming services without violating the rules.

BF69
Premium
join:2004-07-28
Camden, TN

On the other hand

the caps are better than what Charter has on it's lower tiers which is 100 GB. Also 1.5 Mbps can only download 475 GB a month. So 150 GB would be 31.5%. Not bad compared to other ISPs. Once again Charter's caps are less than 3%.
Technicholas

join:2010-11-11
Winterset, IA

I've been a Qwest/Centurylink customer for over 10 years.

I've been a Qwest customer for over 10 years..... they shouldn't be enforcing this cap because I get close to the 250GB limit every month.... we have a house of 4 everyone uses the internet on YouTube and Netflix streaming at 7mbps. I think they are out there to reduce congestion. Wonder what they will do? Make us go to a business account or just cut us off hmm?
Skippy25

join:2000-09-13
Hazelwood, MO

Re: I've been a Qwest/Centurylink customer for over 10 years.

They wont cut you off.

Many people here and throughout the world are not aware of this... but when you move up to a higher service or just simply begin paying more then "congestion" suddenly disappears and all is good on the ISP's network.

It has something to do with some network physics that scientist are still trying to wrap their heads around. It is believed once these scientist/economist figure this out we will have enough bandwidth in the world to do anything we want.

Linklist
Premium
join:2002-03-03
Longport, NJ
kudos:5
said by Technicholas:

. we have a house of 4 everyone uses the internet on YouTube and Netflix streaming at 7mbps.

Then backoff on the quality. Most of the time you won't be able to tell the difference:

»account.netflix.com/HdToggle

Manage video quality
We know that some of you have Internet data caps and we want to make it easier for you to manage how much data you use.
We offer 3 video quality settings to help you manage your data usage. No matter what level you choose, your Netflix membership price will remain the same.

Good quality (up to 0.3 GB per hour)
Better quality (up to 0.7 GB per hour)
Best quality (up to 1 GB per hour, or up to 2.3 GB per hour for HD)
Save Cancel


--
The nine most terrifying words in the English language are, I'm from the government and I'm here to help.
»www.politico.com/rss/2012-election-blog.xml

Wilsdom

join:2009-08-06

Re: I've been a Qwest/Centurylink customer for over 10 years.

There is no point in watching movies in sub-optimal quality. Certainly not worth paying for it--we aren't taking about pirated cam releases. And unless you have a severe eye disease you will notice. It's like reading CliffsNotes when you aren't in school (or dyslexic).

espaeth
Digital Plumber
Premium,MVM
join:2001-04-21
Minneapolis, MN
kudos:2
Reviews:
·Vitelity VOIP

Re: I've been a Qwest/Centurylink customer for over 10 years.

said by Wilsdom:

There is no point in watching movies in sub-optimal quality.

I agree to a point, but you're not watching multiple streams all on 42"+ TVs, are you?

Thaler
Premium
join:2004-02-02
Los Angeles, CA
kudos:3
said by Wilsdom:

There is no point in watching movies in sub-optimal quality.

Pretty sure I'm not missing anything when I watch a Twilight movie in "sub-optimal" quality.Also, I don't think seeing it in HD's going to fix the plot or actors.

Honestly, do you need HD to watch your "Crap movies I missed last year but want to say I saw them" list? An exception might be Michaelbaysplosion films, but that's because the only allure in those films is the visual eye candy.
Skippy25

join:2000-09-13
Hazelwood, MO
LOL, thanks TK.

Maybe next time you should just suggest they quit actually watching TV. No dont cancel the service, that would be bad for the company. Just stop watching through Netflix while you still pay them so that all the corporations benefit.

Thaler
Premium
join:2004-02-02
Los Angeles, CA
kudos:3

Re: I've been a Qwest/Centurylink customer for over 10 years.

Because Netflix is responsible for your crap internet service, clearly.

Now if you'll excuse me, I'm going to go yell at McDonalds as to why my Toyota Camry isn't as fast as a Ferrari.

dvd536
as Mr. Pink as they come
Premium
join:2001-04-27
Phoenix, AZ
kudos:4
said by Technicholas:

I think they are out there to reduce congestion.

easier and cheaper than actually beefing up your network.
--
Oh YES! let me drop everything i'm doing regardless of who it affects to deal with your petty little problem!
pooker314

join:2005-04-12
Brush Prairie, WA

I would LOVE to upgrade to a faster tier

but unfortunately, Centurylink's refusal to make any improvements to service in my area makes that impossible. Perhaps the only good thing about CL's craptacular service is that it is slow enough to keep most people from hitting the caps.

On my service level (nominally 1.5mpbs), I have managed to exceed 100GB a month twice in the past two years. Both times were in during Steam's annual Xmas sale, when I was downloading game files 24/7 for well over a week straight. But with video streaming not really being an option, I don't see how I could ever come close to hitting 150GB. Most months are well under 15GB.

Transmaster
Don't Blame Me I Voted For Bill and Opus

join:2001-06-20
Cheyenne, WY
Reviews:
·CenturyLink

Re: I would LOVE to upgrade to a faster tier

I have the fastest tier avialable in Cheyenne. I was looking at my usage figures and most I have done in one month in the last year was somewhere around 86 gig's.

Can anyone suggest a good useage meter. I have a D-link DIR-655 what can I get to work with it?
--
I am quite sure now that often, very often, in matters concerning religion and politics a man's reasoning powers are not above the monkey's.
- Mark Twain in Eruption
Mr Matt

join:2008-01-29
Eustis, FL
kudos:1
Reviews:
·CenturyLink
·Comcast
·Embarq Now Centu..

Now that CenturyLink has TV over internet (Prism)

Now that CenturyLink has TV over internet (Prism) they want to limit subscribers usage so that they cannot stream many movies from Netflix and others without consequences. Must make subscribers use prism if they want to watch television.

BF69
Premium
join:2004-07-28
Camden, TN

Re: Now that CenturyLink has TV over internet (Prism)

Streaming Netflix at 1.5 Mbps sucks anyways.

fifty nine

join:2002-09-25
Sussex, NJ
kudos:2

Re: Now that CenturyLink has TV over internet (Prism)

said by BF69:

Streaming Netflix at 1.5 Mbps sucks anyways.

CenturyLink DSL goes up to 10Mbps here.

BF69
Premium
join:2004-07-28
Camden, TN

Re: Now that CenturyLink has TV over internet (Prism)

said by fifty nine:

said by BF69:

Streaming Netflix at 1.5 Mbps sucks anyways.

CenturyLink DSL goes up to 10Mbps here.

Well your 250 GB cap is better than the 100 GB Charter has on it's 15 Mbps service.

fifty nine

join:2002-09-25
Sussex, NJ
kudos:2

Re: Now that CenturyLink has TV over internet (Prism)

said by BF69:

said by fifty nine:

said by BF69:

Streaming Netflix at 1.5 Mbps sucks anyways.

CenturyLink DSL goes up to 10Mbps here.

Well your 250 GB cap is better than the 100 GB Charter has on it's 15 Mbps service.

I don't have centurylink. I have the cable company's internet and for my tier their cap is 350GB peak hours (5P-1A) only.
jcremin

join:2009-12-22
Siren, WI
kudos:2

Re: Now that CenturyLink has TV over internet (Prism)

said by fifty nine:

for my tier their cap is 350GB peak hours (5P-1A) only.

And I think that is where caps should be enforced. Peak hours only. That way customers have the option to move their traffic to off-peak hours, much the way I can make a call after 9pm if I don't want to use my cell minutes.

dks7

join:2004-05-31
Omak, WA

monopoly

This is what happens when corps are allowed in America. There is zero competition, they make the decisions. Ma bell put herself back together and now she's mad as hell and has a french tickler, bend over.

KrK
Heavy Artillery For The Little Guy
Premium
join:2000-01-17
Tulsa, OK

Who still doesn't see the wrong way the US is heading...

... in practically every regard.

Ironic how reports about bandwidth costs dropping dramatically are equally matched by the latest ISP announcing caps and overages and moving towards UBB profiteering.

... and as for consumers voting with their wallets.... there's now not a single broadband ISP I can choose that isn't capping and charging more for usage. So much for the "free market."

Bring on Muni-Fi.
--
"Fascism should more properly be called corporatism because it is the merger of state and corporate power." -- Benito Mussolini

See 53 replies to this post
ArizonaSteve

join:2004-01-31
Apache Junction, AZ

How Much Data Is In A Packet?

Since the modem records packets sent and received I don't see how they could enforce a limit of 250Gb. How many packets is that?
mlcarson

join:2001-09-20
Los Alamos, NM

Re: How Much Data Is In A Packet?

Since the amount of data in a packet is variable and the type of packets vary -- it's not a set number.
Joe12345678

join:2003-07-22
Des Plaines, IL
all over head, network ack, arp, resends, etc are part of your cap.
scooper

join:2000-07-11
Youngsville, NC
kudos:2

Since I got a SamKnows router (with traffic meter)

We never exceeded the 100GB "softlimit " I put in the router.

This is 2 non- gameplay adults who don't do alot of You-Tube either.
Wilsdom

join:2009-08-06

Re: Since I got a SamKnows router (with traffic meter)

You should only have to pay like $10/month.
thedragonmas

join:2007-12-28
Albany, GA
kudos:1
yeah? i have the same router, it said i used 250GB's in one month, however the person i talked to with my isp said i used closer to 500GB's that month, so whos meter is right? and thus points out a flaw in any thing with a limit like this, who's setting the metrics the meters use.

edit: fat fingerd a 3 instead of 5

mdaddyrabbit
Premium
join:2004-02-05
Clinton, NC
kudos:2
Reviews:
·Embarq Now Centu..

Terrible Leadership to say the least

I can only speak for myself but how do you cap someone who has not gained any improvement in speeds for last 4 years. I mean come on people! Max we can get is 10M down and 768K up. Focus on bigger and better infrastructure and less on cutting your customer base back. The companies focus is heading in the wrong direction and customers can go away.
Skippy25

join:2000-09-13
Hazelwood, MO

Re: Terrible Leadership to say the least

Because they have not stopped overselling their network. Therefore they have added people that want to use bandwidth, but now need to try and create a scarcity to limit and monetize it.
ShooterX
Premium
join:2004-08-14
Bloomsbury, NJ
kudos:1

Contract

Does this mean I could leave my contract without an ETF?

Even since CL and Embarq merged, my service has gone to absolute crap.
shinji

join:2003-11-27
Newburg, PA

Re: Contract

Not likely as it is also in the terms and conditions that they may change the conditions at any time. Most providers do that now.
EAQOCaA

join:2010-03-22
Littlestown, PA

how much more is business class?

those who violate their cap will receive an e-mail, call or in-browser web message informing them they've crossed the cap, and advising them to upgrade to a faster residential or business-class tier.
Seems there is no upgrade if one crosses the 250GB cap unless one goes to 'business-class'.
I pay $50 for a 5M/768 naked dsl connection. How much would that cost me with business-class, or is that even possible? Would I need to pick up phone service?

I have stuck with sprint/embarq/centurylink dsl since I have never had to worry about caps. The speed has been fast enough.

CenturyLink is taking away the 1 reason why I have stayed with them.
So CenturyLink tell me, why should I stick with you when you will now have the same cap as Comcast and less then half the speed for the same price?

W7PSK
Just Me
Premium
join:2000-12-04
Everett, WA

More money for the Boards pockets

Just another money grab. We are going to see more and more companies putting on caps so they can charge ridiculous fees for going over. Until we consumers say STOP they wont.

WiseOldNerd
De gustibus non est disputandum
Premium
join:2001-11-25
Phoenix, AZ
Reviews:
·Cox HSI
·Charter

Who Cares-Still Sh***y Service

Since they are making no moves to upgrade their decades old copper in Phoenix or elsewhere, and their speeds are super sucko unless you are down the street from the CO, what difference if they cap. I used to love Qwest and DSL(still have my Cisco routers) but Cox and even Charter are better service providers.
--
My perception is REALITY
ArizonaSteve

join:2004-01-31
Apache Junction, AZ
Reviews:
·T-Mobile US
·voip.ms
·Sipgate VOIP
·CenturyLink

Re: Who Cares-Still Sh***y Service

Actually they are upgrading the service, maybe just not in your area yet. Just 2 months ago they put a new fiber cable down the street near my house so now I can get 20mb DSL service with VDSL2 where before I couldn't get anything cause the phone line was too long for even the old 1.5mb ADSL service.

toby
Troy Mcclure

join:2001-11-13
Seattle, WA
Reviews:
·OlyPen, Inc.
·CenturyLink

Re: Who Cares-Still Sh***y Service

said by ArizonaSteve:

Actually they are upgrading the service, maybe just not in your area yet. Just 2 months ago they put a new fiber cable down the street near my house so now I can get 20mb DSL service with VDSL2 where before I couldn't get anything cause the phone line was too long for even the old 1.5mb ADSL service.

Its unlikely that your phone line got shorter.

What they did is stop feeding your DSLAM with T1s, its fed with fibre now.

See here:

»whatis.techtarget.com/definition···dslsumry

You can 1.5 MBbs DSL if you are less than 3.5 miles from the DSLAM.

They are upgrading in very few areas. They are mostly upgrading densely populated cities from 7Mbps speeds and up, the cheapest way to bring the over all average up, while still not increasing the over all speed for most people.
ArizonaSteve

join:2004-01-31
Apache Junction, AZ

Re: Who Cares-Still Sh***y Service

No the phone line didn't get shorter, they connected me to a new network that's just 1000' away.

Saw it

@twtelecom.net

bad

Qwest is dead long live Century link??????????????????

It looks like a desperate move to pay back big debt. Qwest was only worth 10b when sold. Another 10b of debt was taken over by Centurylink. The way they are racking up debt I believe bankruptcy is in their future. Going the way of regular postal mail are we.

danawhitaker
Space...The Final Frontier
Premium
join:2002-03-02
Urbandale, IA

I was hoping CenturyLink would upgrade speeds in my area...

...and now I find that I don't even care. This is no better than the cable company I'm with now, which has a soft cap of around 250 gigs. I was looking to get away from even having a soft cap if they increased speeds beyond 1.5mbit in my neighborhood, but apparently that's just not going to be an option. It's not that I even come close to hitting the cap, I just dislike them on principle, and I don't want to give my money to a company that caps if I can avoid it.
--
You're watching Sports Night on CSC so stick around...
FastLearner

join:2003-09-14
Arvada, CO

This sucks

I am with Qwest/CenturyLink BECAUSE there are no caps. I have the 40meg down 5meg up and it works great! I avoided Comcast because my roommates and I will easily use up 250GB per month with just Netflix and Hulu alone.

NOCMan
MacChatter
Premium
join:2004-09-30
Colorado Springs, CO

Duopoly Caps

Comcast 250G
Century 250G

Wish they would of at least overshot Comcast in some attempt at competition. Neither company has any impetus to raise their caps.
--
www.MacChatter.com
www.FrontRangeHosting.com
catnapped

join:2010-11-22
Elizabethtown, PA

Re: Duopoly Caps

said by NOCMan:

Comcast 250G
Century 250G

Wish they would of at least overshot Comcast in some attempt at competition. Neither company has any impetus to raise their caps.

Of course not! If anything I'd expect many will lower those caps over time and charge (or push up) overage fees knowing many of their subscribers have no choice ("really, where you gonna go?")

herb77

join:2005-02-23
Fort Myers, FL

Time to Occupy Centurylink

Occupy Centurylink
--
Obama 2012
Rob_
Premium
join:2008-07-16
Mary Esther, FL

Re: Time to Occupy Centurylink

Come and check out the FB page here: »www.facebook.com/CenturyLink look at ALL the complaints! Seesh

Thursday, 23-May 19:03:48 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 13.5 years online © 1999-2013 dslreports.com.