 BF69Premium join:2004-07-28 Camden, TN | Price points Prices may vary based on regional competition, but Charter's website lists the tiers' introductury price points at $30, $40, and $55 respectively.
It should be noted these are not regular prices, but prices for new customers. Actual prices are $15 higher. $25 higher if you have internet only. | |
|
 |  wben772 join:2010-03-04 Charleston, WV | Re: Price points Just like suddenlink which is charter if you have internet alone it cost more it cost less if you have it in a package. | |
|
 1 edit | How to tell actual charter speeds? So how am i supposed to be able to tell what my actual speed is? With the "power boost" theyve got going I cant get a real value from the java tests and the flash just gave me a return of 20676Kbps down and 796Kbps up? And from Speedtest.net ? Im on the formerly 5Mb tier.
//edit: Just did the charter based speed test and came out @ 7.2 / 1. | |
|
 |  BF69Premium join:2004-07-28 Camden, TN | Re: How to tell actual charter speeds? Did you power cycle your modem? Personanly I can't trust speedtest.net results anymore and haven't in nearly 2 years.
try this
»speed.uberbandwidth.com/ | |
|
 |  |  | | Re: How to tell actual charter speeds? It's too bad you can't retest with a different server. Plus, it'd be nice if they had some sort of of ping test there. | |
|
 |  |  |  DaMaGeINCThe Lan ManPremium join:2002-06-08 Greenville, SC kudos:2 | Re: How to tell actual charter speeds? said by jarthur31:It's too bad you can't retest with a different server. Plus, it'd be nice if they had some sort of of ping test there. Its called CMD prompt > Ping google.com -t
Why would you need a ping test site like pingtest.net. What a retarded service. -- I hate idiots and stupid questions. If you dont know something, figure it out the best you can, if that fails, then ask someone | |
|
 |  |  | | uh... The applet on the uberbandwidth.com says Ookla, which basically is speedtest.net
It's the same application just different server. | |
|
 |  |  |  BF69Premium join:2004-07-28 Camden, TN | Re: How to tell actual charter speeds? said by pacojoebob:uh... The applet on the uberbandwidth.com says Ookla, which basically is speedtest.net It's the same application just different server. You know when I try the 3 closest servers to me I'm lucky if I get it to show 5 Mbps. Explain that.



and you wonder why I don't trust thier results?
from the link I posted
Download Speed: 15597 kbps (1949.6 KB/sec transfer rate) Upload Speed: 2125 kbps (265.6 KB/sec transfer rate) Monday, March 01, 2010 10:18:59 PM | |
|
 |  |  |  |  mbkownsGot Bandwidth? join:2003-07-01 Riverside, CA | Re: How to tell actual charter speeds? speedtests are lame anyway hope thats not your only benchmark... -- - MBK (AIM = IllMBKllI) | |
|
 |  John_WPremium join:2000-04-25 Worcester, MA | said by papeluv:So how am i supposed to be able to tell what my actual speed is? With the "power boost" theyve got going I cant get a real value from the java tests and the flash just gave me a return of 20676Kbps down and 796Kbps up? And from Speedtest.net  ? Im on the formerly 5Mb tier. //edit: Just did the charter based speed test and came out @ 7.2 / 1. Or you could use the java based speed tests on this site. It uses larger downloads and extends the test out beyond powerboost. -- Team Discovery--BBR Team Helix--Cuz I Care!! | |
|
 |  |  | | Re: How to tell actual charter speeds? This is what I get using the Java tests.  | |
|
 |  |  |  John_WPremium join:2000-04-25 Worcester, MA | Re: How to tell actual charter speeds? I think there is something up with the new jersey one. I used that one and got 947/1063.
I used the new york one right afterwords and got something more accurate, 9914/1049. -- Team Discovery--BBR Team Helix--Cuz I Care!! | |
|
 |  rradina join:2000-08-08 Chesterfield, MO | Make sure you reboot your cable modem and then download a BIG file (~500MB). After a while (I don't know, 20 or 30 seconds???), PowerBoost will end and you'll drop back to your configured maximum speed. As long as the file is big enough, the initial PowerBoost skew won't affect the average and you should get a reasonable idea of whether or not you are getting your rated speed.
Most browsers tell you the final download speed when the transfer finishes. Do the math. If you achieved 600KB/second throughput, multiply that by 8 and you get 4,800,000 bits/second. or 4.8Mbps. That's a misleading number because TCP/IP has overhead but the browser is only counting the bytes that make up the file. It might be more accurate to multiply it by 9 or even 10 to arrive at the raw throughput. The raw throughput (i.e. including overhead) is what your modem/CMTS considers when throttling your connection.
If this approach doesn't yield the speeds you think you should get, before getting irate with customer service, try a similar sized file from several different sites. The site's geographical proximity makes a big difference in terms of packet loss (which can stall the download until the TCP/IP stack recovers) and latency.
If you have Windows XP, consider increasing the RWIN with the tweak tools available here. I don't know if the same concern holds true for Vista, Win7, OSX or Linux. Check out the many forums here for further information. | |
|
 |  | | Same here in the Greenville/Spartanburg SC area. It has been 4 weeks now with a 20/1 speed. At first I thought it was a tease put out by Charter (I was on 5/512 for years) But now I must give it to them, it works well!  -- Some people should'nt | |
|
 | | 60mbps available in Reno, NV The 60Mbps tier is available here in Reno for $109 for 6/mo's. | |
|
 |  |
 morboComplete Your Transaction join:2002-01-22 00000 | Welcome speed upgrades This is great news for Charter customers! | |
|
 BF69Premium join:2004-07-28 Camden, TN | at&t just keeps getting further behind In my area you can get Charter or at&t DSL. At one point they used to be about the same. In fact about 4 years ago at&t had 6 mbps and all Charter had was a max of 3 Mbps. Now Charter's "slow" tier is 8 Mbps while at&t still only offers a max of 6 Mbps.
DSL with phone service 6 Mbps/512 kbps $43 a month naked DSL 6 Mbps/512 kbps $48 a month Charter HSI with cable TV 8 Mbps/1 Mbps $45 Charter HSI without cable TV 8 Mbps/1 Mbps $55
I don't know about you but at&t can't compete | |
|
 |  zed260Premium join:2007-09-30 Cleveland, TN kudos:1 | Re: at&t just keeps getting further behind @bf69 in my area at&t is luanching uverse in some aprts of town 18 meg internet so they are upgrading just not as fast as charter | |
|
 |  |  BF69Premium join:2004-07-28 Camden, TN | Re: at&t just keeps getting further behind said by zed260:@bf69 in my area at&t is luanching uverse in some aprts of town 18 meg internet so they are upgrading just not as fast as charter I can tell you they are not coming to Camden anytime soon. when at&t got that statewide franchising law passed they listed areas they were going to have built out within 3 years and Camden as not on that list. In fact as far as I know at&t didn't even bother to apply for a franchise agreement for neither Camden or Benton County
»tennessee.gov/tra/reports/FinalCCVSA.pdf | |
|
 |  |
 |  |  BF69Premium join:2004-07-28 Camden, TN | Re: at&t just keeps getting further behind Well I see Cleveland got their agreement in August of 08 and you state they are just now getting U-verse in PART of town. So going by that were talking at least 2012 or later for Camden to get U-verse. So that means for at least the next 2 years I'll be sticking with Charter for internet. | |
|
 |  |  |  Reviews:
·Charter
·Clearwire Wireless
| Re: at&t just keeps getting further behind Who honestly cares at this point? I wanted uverse several years now when charter had 10 mbps and uverse was going to have 18. Now I have 25/3 service.
Uverse is horribly butchered. 2 hd streams total, 18/2 that becomes 15/2 if you watch tv, etc. | |
|
 |  |  |  |  djrobx join:2000-05-31 Valencia, CA | Re: at&t just keeps getting further behind U-verse is a dream for some of us in poorly maintained Time Warner areas. -- AT&T U-Hearse Your funeral. Delivered.
| |
|
 |  |  |  |  ra8844 join:2003-03-29 Austin, TX | Hi,
That isnt true about uverse.
I have 24Mbps down and 3Mpbs up service with 3HD/2SD streams with no issues with speeds while watching uverse TV.
Also, the SD picture looks pretty damn good. | |
|
 |  |  |  |  |  CnC join:2009-02-03 Chesterfield, MO | Re: at&t just keeps getting further behind U-VERSE is heavily compressed for TV. If they raised it to say 15Mbps from the current 6-8Mbps it would be watchable. | |
|
 |  toddbs98 join:2000-07-08 North Little Rock, AR | Wow Charter is expensive in your area. I pay 29.95 for the now 8/1 package with a two year price guaranty. -- Patriots always speak of dying for their country never killing for it. Bertrand Russell
| |
|
 DoubleKDoublek join:2003-03-04 Beloit, WI Reviews:
·Charter
·AT&T Midwest
1 edit | Yes it is! I just emailed Senator Feingold hoping he can find a way to get Google to bring that super fast fiber network to Rock County  | |
|
 |  fiberguyMy views are my own.Premium join:2005-05-20 kudos:3 | Re: Yes it is! said by DoubleK:I just emailed Senator Feingold hoping he can find a way to get Google to bring that super fast fiber network to Rock County Ummmm... let us know how that works out for ya!!! | |
|
 | | FYI Cablevision's been able to offer 30/5mbit service under docsis 2.0 modems for quite a while... average real world usage brings it around 22/4 mbits, but well within 2.0 specs. Offering a real 50/20mbits would put you firmly in 3.0 specifications. | |
|
 |  tubbynetreminds me of the danse russePremium,MVM join:2008-01-16 Chandler, AZ | Re: FYI said by tmc8080:Cablevision's been able to offer 30/5mbit service under docsis 2.0 modems for quite a while... average real world usage brings it around 22/4 mbits, but well within 2.0 specs. Offering a real 50/20mbits would put you firmly in 3.0 specifications. yes. this is true. however, the docsis 2.0 spec gives you a raw speed of *almost* 43/31, which, when you subtract signalling, overhead, etc gives you a usable data rate of 38/27 *per carrier deployed*. because of the density that cablevision has deployed their cmts units and their taps/peds, they have more downstreams/upstreams deployed than other msos (in terms of numbers, not channel occupancy - i'm almost sure that there are only a handful of frequencies being used, but when you deploy gear you can use the same carrier frequencies in different neighborhoods), they can offer a higher utilisation per carrier because that carrier may serve a smaller geographic neighbourhood.
bottom line - can it be done in docsis2, yes. however, with channel bonding and such, its much more efficient to use docsis3 to offer higher speeds.
q. -- "...if I in my north room dance naked, grotesquely before my mirror waving my shirt round my head and singing softly to myself..." | |
|
 jarablueAlways be true to yourself join:2001-06-11 Boxborough, MA 1 edit | Charter is changing Charter is doing well. They have to make up a lot of bad history but good for them for wanting to change and taking steps.
I live in Worcester, MA and they have 60meg internet here. I subscribe to 60meg/5meg and I get that speed 24/7. I had to get a docsis 3 modem.
Keep up the good work Charter  | |
|
 | | No service in my area now! Hmm I wonder wtf happen to charter they use to offer basic cable in my area now this "Sorry, Charter does not provide service at this address. You can try a different address, or find services from other providers in your area" | |
|
 | | Since the upgrade... I've gotten impossibly good ping, heh.
| |
|
 Reviews:
·Charter
| Thanks Charter... starting to suck less! I'm impressed.. $39.99 (exact amount I pay) and I'm getting the following:
Download Speed: 23486 kbps (2935.8 KB/sec transfer rate) Upload Speed: 2113 kbps (264.1 KB/sec transfer rate)
It's not 100mbps but it's still a decent value compared to the other providers in my area (and I always get the advertised speed and it rarely cuts out.)
If they fixed their TV service and didn't charge rediculous prices per DVR and provide such CRAPPY dvr's I'd probably switch back to cable (maybe... I love direcTV)
It's something they need to think about! | |
|
 |  | | Re: Thanks Charter... starting to suck less! Oh yes! Well put!
said by BlakePaulson:I'm impressed.. $39.99 (exact amount I pay) and I'm getting the following: Download Speed: 23486 kbps (2935.8 KB/sec transfer rate) Upload Speed: 2113 kbps (264.1 KB/sec transfer rate) It's not 100mbps but it's still a decent value compared to the other providers in my area (and I always get the advertised speed and it rarely cuts out.) If they fixed their TV service and didn't charge rediculous prices per DVR and provide such CRAPPY dvr's I'd probably switch back to cable (maybe... I love direcTV) It's something they need to think about! -- Some people should'nt | |
|
 Killa200Premium join:2005-12-02 Southeast TN | Nice This is good news for me, as my new house i am moving into has a choice of charter or AT&T.... guess which I'll be choosing,  | |
|
 | | Explains the Maintence This explains my outages recently. They have be doing maintenance at 1-5AM over the last few weeks. Normally not an issue, however with a 16mo old teething I've been seeing 2AM too much. | |
|
 Synbios join:2002-05-18 Arlington, VA | Why is DOCSIS 3.0 necessary for 25/3? But finally..they're breaking the 2 Mbps upload barrier that they've had with all their DOCSIS 2.0 configs. If you can get 25/3 on a DOCSIS 2.0 modem, that would be clutch. I live in a DOCSIS 3.0, 60/5 area so there's no point in getting 25/3 if I were to get a 3.0 modem. | |
|
 |  KoRnGtL15Premium join:2007-01-04 Grants Pass, OR | Re: Why is DOCSIS 3.0 necessary for 25/3? Apparently the channel bonding is a huge plus. That would be why its worth getting a new modem.
said by Synbios:But finally..they're breaking the 2 Mbps upload barrier that they've had with all their DOCSIS 2.0 configs. If you can get 25/3 on a DOCSIS 2.0 modem, that would be clutch. I live in a DOCSIS 3.0, 60/5 area so there's no point in getting 25/3 if I were to get a 3.0 modem. | |
|
 | | Not where im at... Doesn't seem to effect Charter customers in Victorville, still have the 5/.5 service. Lucky if i get 2/.3
Oh well. | |
|
 |  BF69Premium join:2004-07-28 Camden, TN | Re: Not where im at... said by Mike760 :
Doesn't seem to effect Charter customers in Victorville, still have the 5/.5 service. Lucky if i get 2/.3
Oh well. Actually the upload on the 5 Mbps tier was upgraded to 1 Mbps months ago. Maybe you need to use the tweak test here | |
|
 | | Meh... I'm all for free, but quite frankly I'd trade my increased download speed to get the other .1 MB/s of my upload speed.
For that matter. 8/1, 16/2.5, 25/3 woulda been nice... | |
|
 mph300Two Thirds The Way There join:2000-11-09 Reviews:
·Charter
| Not Bad..... Last Result: Download Speed: 19921 kbps (2490.1 KB/sec transfer rate) Upload Speed: 2123 kbps (265.4 KB/sec transfer rate) Monday, March 01, 2010 8:44:39 PM
Previously on 10/1 and then 10/2 and now 16/2. No price change through the increases!
I will add that my service is rock solid!
Time to update my review.
Mike -- CH3NO2-Fuel me UP-Let's race! | |
|
 TuPaK join:2002-07-21 San Gabriel, CA | Great news I've been happy with Charter for the past several years.
I first signed up with them in late 1998 when my speed package was 768 KBPS, LOL. I canceled them a couple years later and went to AT&T DSL but because of my distance from the CO, I am limited to 1.5 MBPS (shh, don't tell Charter).
My connection is stable and fast. I can't complain. Well, I guess I could complain that it's not cheaper :P
So overall, I'm quite pleased with their service here in the San Gabriel Valley. | |
|
 |  TuPaK join:2002-07-21 San Gabriel, CA | Re: Great news oh btw, I do qualify for u-verse now but they can't compete with Charter's upload it seems so I'll stick with Charter  | |
|
 dvd536as Mr. Pink as they comePremium join:2001-04-27 Phoenix, AZ kudos:4 | Uhmmmmmm Shouldn't they focus on getting people what they CURRENTLY pay for before trying to boost speeds to something most will never see? -- When I gez aju zavateh na nalechoo more new yonooz tonigh molinigh - Ken Lee | |
|
 |  TuPaK join:2002-07-21 San Gabriel, CA | Re: Uhmmmmmm I loved Cox cable when I was in Phoenix... maybe you should try them?  | |
|
 |  |
 | | Okay, wow, they weren't lieing, this time. If you read my reviews of Charter, you'll see that I'm not fan.
I got an email earlier this week telling me that I should upgrade my modem to DOCSIS 3.0 compliant modem to take advantage of Charter's new speeds. I was highly skeptical, but at least the announcement also stated that I could use my own modem instead of paying them $5/month.
After a little research, I found that a DOCSIS 3.0 modem may be helpful for decreasing latency, which would be nice with my VoIP phone and Xbox LIVE! services, so I ordered one up.
Well, I haven't gotten my modem yet, but I just powercycled my modem and using uberbandwidth.com here are the before and after results:
Before: 16206/2050
After: 21424/2313
That's pretty good! -- Time... beckoning me. | |
|
 |
|