dslreports logo
Cincinnati Bell Details 1 Gbps Expansion Plans

1 Gbps has of course been the marketing buzzword du jour for the last year, companies offering a smattering of 1 Gbps connections to developments -- then heavily marketing them to give the impression of significantly larger upgrades. Cincinnati Bell is no exception, the company late last year launching their own "FiOptics" 1 Gbps offering for $90 a month.

Click for full size
Unlike many companies (who hide deployment totals to give the impression of greater rollouts) Cincinnati Bell is specific about how many homes the service reaches: around 335,000 (or roughly 40%) of homes and businesses in and around greater Cincinnati.

Speaking on the company's recent conference call, Cincinnati Bell CEO Ted Torbeck stated that the company's recent decision to sell their wireless assets to Verizon has given the company the necessary resources to expand their FiOptics service further this year:
quote:
"The completion of the wireless transaction and our strategy for monetizing Cyrus One has increased operational and capital flexibility and also provides us with the ability to focus on our fiber investments," Torbeck said. "Our Fioptics suite of products is currently available to 40 percent of greater Cincinnati and we plan to expand that coverage to 70-80 percent over the next few years."
In 2015, the company says it will spend between $80 million and $85 million to pass another 100,000 homes with the speedy service.
view:
topics flat nest 
xthepeoplesx
join:2013-10-21

xthepeoplesx

Member

Columbus?

Can Cinci Bell please come to Columbus?!?
TebTeb
join:2009-01-28
Reynoldsburg, OH

TebTeb

Member

Re: Columbus?

i would gladly pay up to $150 for this service in Columbus. Being stuck with TWC and their 50/5 stinks.
xthepeoplesx
join:2013-10-21

xthepeoplesx

Member

Re: Columbus?

For gigabit? Yea id pay that!
tyrant_
Wannabe Billionaire
join:2013-07-07

tyrant_ to TebTeb

Member

to TebTeb
It's better than CL's 40/5... And thats the best it gets ;P

KennyWest
@sbcglobal.net

-1 recommendation

KennyWest to xthepeoplesx

Anon

to xthepeoplesx
CBell will never expand out side of their area unless they purchase another failed Muni project like they did a few years ago. Purchased an HFC network from a city, and turned it into an FTTH network.
pittpete1
join:2009-06-12

pittpete1

Member

$850 per home passed

$850 per home passed, not too shabby of an investment for a product that's future proof for at least the next 10 years...

jreffner
Premium Member
join:2003-04-16
West Chester, OH

jreffner

Premium Member

West Chester Please

Please consider moving into West Chester next. The slower FiOptics isn't enough (I can only get 20 mbps down). If you are going to do it, please bring Gigabit speeds to as many homes as possible. Including those with underground cable. Thank you for considering.
duffman45200
join:2010-09-20

duffman45200

Member

Fiber

Difference between this and other 1 gig rollouts from ATT etc, is that they actually already have a decent fiber footprint.

KennyWest
@sbcglobal.net

KennyWest

Anon

Re: Fiber

CinciBell is also much smaller as well. They cover a very small area compared to AT&T and they don't have a national cellular network that they are pushing either. CinciBell had a small regional GSM network but as Karl said- sold that to VZW (surprised it didn't go to TMO or AT&T as they were partners).
Corporate
join:2014-10-04

1 recommendation

Corporate

Member

Cincinnati Bell should buy Verizon Wireline

Cincinnati Bell, use the money Verizon paid for your wireless service against Verizon to buy their remaining wireline footprint and deploy a 100% fiber optic network.

While you are at it, buy Frontier too.

KennyWest
@sbcglobal.net

-2 recommendations

KennyWest

Anon

CyrusOne

It was a smart move for them to spin off Cyrus One and let them be their own company but still colocate in them.

Although as far as companies not giving actual numbers- you shouldn't hit about other providers such as ATT, you should mention Google who doesn't since they're also hiding their numbers.

battleop
join:2005-09-28
00000

battleop

Member

$80-85M sounds cheap.

"In 2015, the company says it will spend between $80 million and $85 million to pass another 100,000 homes with the speedy service."

EPB spent almost $750 Million to pass a similar number of homes.

Is it $80-85 just pass 100k homes or $80-85 to pass and deliver to 100k homes?
Expand your moderator at work
sonicmerlin
join:2009-05-24
Cleveland, OH

sonicmerlin to battleop

Member

to battleop

Re: $80-85M sounds cheap.

EPB spent $7500/home passed?

battleop
join:2005-09-28
00000

battleop

Member

Re: $80-85M sounds cheap.

They have used $750 Million in Bonds and Grants to build their fiber network. I'm guessing they have somewhere around 100-120k power customers and the last I heard they have somewhere in the 60-70k fiber customers in the last few months.

It's hard to figure out exactly what goes where with the way the comingle money between the Fiber and Power sides of the house.

rebus9
join:2002-03-26
Tampa Bay

rebus9

Member

Redeeming Quality

Can you believe it.... there's actually a reason to move to Cincinnati.

(... with apologies to all the good people of that city for this somewhat back-handed compliment...)
BiggA
Premium Member
join:2005-11-23
Central CT

BiggA

Premium Member

Wish SNET stayed independent

We'd have fiber in CT too. Now Frontier is just screwing us.
Trogdor9000
join:2005-07-12
Cincinnati, OH

Trogdor9000

Member

Symmetric

Got the 1gbps last week. Talking to the tech (who seemed smart for once!) was talking about future expandability. They are working on upgrading their backhaul and should roll out symmetric 1gpbs (currently 1gig/250meg) sometime this year.