  S_engineer
join:2007-05-16 Chicago, IL | Good luck I wonder when the tin foil hats will claim that this is causing defects in Portlands children? | |
|
 |  RadioDoc 58ef2c0 Premium,ExMod 2000-03 join:2000-05-11 | Re: Good luck I thought that was already proven to be caused by the tin foil hat. -- Toolmaster of La Grange. | |
|
  Marylander
@umbc.edu | Weaker than Xohm If you compare the "Clear" plans to the current Xohm offerings "Clear" is a lot less competitive.
I don't understand why they'd eagerly "unveil" a weaker product in this kind of market. | |
|
 |   Smile__ Premium join:2008-10-10 New Freedom, PA | Re: Weaker than Xohm Marylander,
How's those 24MB/18MB speeds at the college? lol | |
|
 |   TKJunkMail Enjoy the sun Premium join:2002-03-03 Avalon, NJ | I thought Wimax was a 4G product. The upload speeds being offered are pretty anemic for 4G - they barely compete with the 3G wireless offerings from the telcos. | |
|
 |  |   Greyface
@or.us
| Re: Weaker than Xohm »en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WiMAX
It's a group of broadcasting technologies suitable for longer-range broadcasting than Wi-fi. It's usually cheaper to set up and run, although it can be used in close proximity for theoretically tremendous speeds. | |
|
 |
 |  travelguy
join:1999-09-03 Santa Fe, NM
| Re: Wrong Price said by iansltx :» www.clear.com/home_services.phpThe 6/512 tier is $40, not $50. Provides nice counterpoint to cable if you ask me, though Verizon DSL is a slightly better deal if available. Beats "dry" AT&T DSL though. And Qwest's "We really don't want to but the PUC made us" rural 1.5Mbps Dry DSL for $58/month... | |
|
 |  |  iansltx
join:2007-02-19 Golden, CO | Re: Wrong Price Better than $60/month for satellite 1 Mbps, or $69.95 for 1 Mbps fixed wireless that's rather unreliable to say theleast. Feel better now?  | |
|
 |  |  |  travelguy
join:1999-09-03 Santa Fe, NM
| Re: Wrong Price A little bit. Actually, considering where I live, I consider myself fortunate to get any kind of broadband service.
Clear was advertising for a local project engineer here a year or so ago, so I'm hoping they'll be offering Wimax service at some point. | |
|
 PDXPLT
join:2003-12-04 Banks, OR
| Home Plan Business model I don't see how they're going to succeed with the home plan. They appear to only be deploying in areas already served by Comcast, Verizon, and/or Qwest. Being the third entrant to a territory means they need to compete on price alone; not easy.
Of course, they did not deploy in my neighborhood, or anywhere near. If they did, they'd own the broadband market here. | |
|
  Smile__ Premium join:2008-10-10 New Freedom, PA | Go XOHM!  | |
|
 decifal
join:2007-03-10 Bon Aqua, TN
| yeah yeah, tell me about it.. Everyone deploys in already saturated markets First one to provide a reliable service (( i'm good with 95 percent up time )).. And i'm going to be a long term customer.... | |
|
  wesm tmb.org Premium join:1999-07-29 Lewisville, TX
| Delay?
Does anyone know what the actual delay is in getting the other prospective markets going? Dallas has been running great for a few months (XOHM is my only connection at home), as have Chicago and others. Why go to the trouble of getting an entire WiMAX network built for "testing" if it's taking so long to launch? -- Opinions expressed here are mine and not my employer's. This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights. | |
|
 |
  EIC
@norcalbroadband.net | hardly news yeah, it would be a lot less like a press release parroted up by a halfwit if you included . .. .gosh, I don't know: What state Portland is in? | |
|
 |
|
 |